
Barry McGuigan's night of glory and bringing Northern Ireland together
As you might imagine, it's been a busy week. That people are still willing to mark the greatest night of my career 40 years after I beat Eusebio Pedroza to lift the WBA featherweight title is incredible.
Thursday night in Bristol followed fantastic receptions in Monaghan in Ireland and Cannock. I have also contributed to a raft of TV and radio programmes commemorating the occasion.
It is clearly very nostalgic for people as much as it is for me with so many having stories to share. It was a moment in time that saw almost 19 million watching live on telly.
One woman called Valerie asked me to send her dad a note. He is 90. She was 11 when they travelled together on a bus from Bangor in Northern Ireland. When the celebrations were over, they got back on the bus and drove the whole way home. He said it was one of greatest nights of his life.
It was a terrifying time in Northern Ireland and I did something that none believed possible, bringing people together. Leave the fighting to McGuigan was the slogan of the day. I'm as proud of that as I was of winning the title, giving people a sense of relief and joy in the middle of all that turmoil.
Anthony Joshua warned to avoid one opponent for comeback - 'He'd be flattened'
Paddy Pimblett told only way to earn £20million is to quit UFC
I had supporters from the Falls (Catholics) and the Shankill (Protestants) travelling together at the height of the Troubles. The killings, the deaths, the hatred were all set aside for one amazing night. It showed the kind of support I had, and that is what I remember above all.
Of course I recall the details. The BBC had never done a live outside broadcast of that kind before. That's why it was at QPR. It was only 200 metres to run back to the studio if anything went wrong.
We had a weigh-in on the Tuesday at the Lonsdale shop in the middle of Soho on Beak Street. Pedroza shouted into the camera 'I kill you'.
The whole week was incredible. And fight night was amazing with 14,000 people over from Ireland.
A guy sent me a mock-up of the original poster. It featured the likes of Dave McAuley, Simon Eubank, Roy Webb, Gary Muir and David Irvine, now a WBC referee.
I'm still friendly with him. I have not seen Webb or Muir since. Eubank died a couple of years ago and I'm still here and in good health.
Honestly, I have had so much loss in my life, the overwhelming thought when I look back is sadness at losing my dad, my daughter, my brother and sister. But hopefully I'll still be around to celebrate the 50th, please God.
Follow Barry on X at @ClonesCyclone @mcguigan's_Gym.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
2 days ago
- Spectator
Letters: How lads' mags spawned OnlyFans
Bad lads Sir: The articles on Britain's relationship with porn were fascinating and frustrating in equal measure. Fascinating in that Louise Perry and Michael Simmons's contributions ('Devices and desires' and 'Dirty money', 14 June) provided a thought-provoking analysis of the extraordinary growth of the industry. Frustrating in the juxtaposition of these pieces with Sean Thomas's delusional thoughts about 'lads' mags' ('Age of innocence'). Mr Thomas seems to recall these publications with the same dewy-eyed fondness that folk of my generation reserve for Spangles and Bagpuss. He is unable to see the direct line that joins them to the worst excesses of OnlyFans. It's all there in both – the same objectification of women, the betrayal of sex, the sad loneliness and repressed shame of the consumer, the denial of the negative effect on society and the castigation of those who wince or demur as dinosaurs or prudes. The only difference between FHM and OnlyFans, apart from the magazine's inability to grow its figures, is that the internet has enabled the production of and access to this sort of content on a much greater scale. Michael Harrison Belfast Derby match Sir: In her admirable exposé of the dirty deeds on OnlyFans, Louise Perry notes that two of its most depraved performers are 'oddly' both from Derbyshire. Perhaps it is more predictable than odd for some. Brought up in prim Peterborough in the 1950s, I was used to hearing that girls who turned to prostitution had 'gone to Derby' – which very often they had. Christopher Gray Oxford Mass appeal Sir: It is a pity that Damian Thompson ('Critical mass', 14 June) trivialises the issues vexing Pope Leo XIV as regards the treatment of the Tridentine form of the Mass. The current debate about the liturgy is not just about Latin. Indeed, the reformed liturgy (the Novus Ordo Mass) can be said anywhere, and in Latin, by any Catholic priest. And yet, as Damian rightly says, there is an increasingly vocal campaign, especially among Generation Z Catholics, for the tolerance and even the full legalisation of the Tridentine Mass. But this is not simply an argument about 'bells'n'smells' or even trying to preserve a beautiful and ancient liturgy. It is a war between the old pre-Vatican II Church and the post-conciliar movement which has been imposed on Catholics since 1965. The Tridentine Mass expresses the traditional theology taught by the Church since the death of St John the Apostle and it cannot be allowed to coexist alongside the new theology (some would call it ideology) which the bishops are trying to enforce. Countless pronouncements by Pope Francis and Cardinal Roche have confirmed that we now have a theology which runs in direct opposition to that taught for almost 2,000 years until the Second Vatican Council. This is why there can be no tolerance of the Tridentine rite, which represents a flagship of opposition to the conciliar reforms. Latin Mass lovers are accused of opposing Vatican II and the New Mass, something they hotly deny. I would say that those who campaign for the Tridentine Mass and ignore the underlying doctrinal contradictions it represents are no more than romantics. It is for this reason that the Church authorities will sweep them aside. Joseph Bevan Dover, Kent Pros and cons Sir: Prue Leith makes many good points about prisons and charities ('Jail break', 14 June), but she doesn't make the key one: that two-thirds of prisoners shouldn't be in the sort of prisons they are. Of Britain's 90,000 inmates, about 30,000 are extremely dangerous and should be kept away from the public. About 30,000 are mentally inadequate and should probably be under lock and key – but don't need to be in Category A, B or C prisons where they are bullied and learn nothing, not least because most of them can't read. The remaining third are addicts, and should be in rehabilitation centres where they might be cured. Instead of building more high-security prisons at vast expense, we should build lock-up centres and rehab centres, both of which would cost less. I visited about 20 prisons when I helped Action For Prisoners' Families, and they all told the same tale. David Astor Milton-under-Wychwood, Oxfordshire Good hare day Sir: Charles Moore's thoughts about hares (Notes, 14 June) reminds me of the day I went to the local post office to obtain a licence to sell game. I needed this as I was proposing to sell hares, which were then plentiful on the Kent marshes. The woman behind the counter said she needed to ask me three questions. 1) Was I an innkeeper? No, just a farmer. 2) Was I the driver of a stagecoach? Definitely not. 3) Was I a higgler? Stumped by this question, I asked what one was. She said 'someone who higgles for trade outside a cattle market': in other words, picks up return loads of livestock after an auction. Again, no. She then asked for a very small sum and gave me my licence. These requirements are set out in the 1831 Game Act and as far as I know are still in force. The three professions mentioned would all be capable of handling game illegally killed by poachers. Stephen Skelton London SW6 Animal instinct Sir: Anthony Whitehead's piece on lonely-hearts ads ('Notes on…', 14 June) reminds me of the glorious misprint I found in one posh Sunday paper: 'Looking for a significant otter.' Larry Spence Girvan, South Ayrshire Write to us letters@


Time Out
3 days ago
- Time Out
This Miami chef took home a James Beard Award last night, just a year after his sister won
If you needed extra proof that culinary bonafides run in the Chang family, last night you got it. At the 35th annual James Beard Foundation awards—which were held on Monday, June 16 at the Lyric Opera in Chicago—Nando Chang of Itamae AO took home the coveted medal in the Best Chef: South category, following closely in the footsteps of his sister Valerie, who won the exact same award a year earlier for her own acclaimed kitchen work over at Maty's. The Chang siblings, as well as their father Fernando, opened the first iteration of Itamae in 2018, when it was a mere food counter at the then-St. Roch Market (now known as MIA Market) in the Design District. The original counter—which served Nikkei cuisine, a delicious fusion of Peruvian and Japanese food—eventually grew into a standalone restaurant across the Palm Court, before it closed in 2023 so both Nando and Valerie could work on their own solo concepts. For Valerie, that was Maty's, a Peruvian charmer named for their grandmother and for Nando, Itamae AO, a 10-seat omakase counter directly connected to its sister restaurant (literally) that turns out a beautiful and beguiling tasting menu of Japanese-Peruvian bites. Nando's refined reimaginings earned the Miami restaurant its first-ever Michelin star earlier this year, so the James Beard sparkler is simply another glorious garnish on top of one tasty year. Itamae AO was one of two Miami-based finalists among this year's James Beard nominees, with ViceVersa—the aperitivo bar off the lobby of the Elser Hotel in downtown Miami—being recognized in the Best New Bar category. Alas, that local haunt was ultimately beat out by Identidad Cocktail Bar in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Prior to Valerie Chang's 2024 victory in the Best Chef: South category, and her bro's subsequent win a year after, a Miami-based chef hadn't taken home a James Beard Award since all the way back in 2010. Along with the Miami nods, Florida also saw two other finalists this year: Sue Chin and Jason Chin of Orlando's Good Salt Restaurant Group (Seito Sushi, Reyes Mezcaleria, The Osprey, and others) in the Outstanding Restaurateur category, and Winter Park's Ômo by Jônt in the Best New Restaurant category. Congrats to all of our Florida winners and finalists!


Daily Mirror
4 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Jake Paul told to start 'planning his funeral' after calling out world champion
The 'Problem Child' returns to the ring later this month - but is hoping to earn a few high profile fights with a win over Julio Cesar Chavez Jr Cruiserweight champion Gilberto Ramirez has warned Jake Paul to start planning for a 'funeral' amid talks of a potential fight between the pair. The 'Problem Child' returns to the ring later this month and will take on former world champion Julio Cesar Chavez Jr in Anaheim in a cruiserweight showdown. Chavez Jr comes into the blockbuster showdown off the back of a win over former UFC middleweight contender Uriah Hall. Since making his professional debut back in 2020, Paul has taken the sport of boxing by storm. With a professional record of 11-1, the American holds wins over the likes of Tyron Woodley, Anderson Silva, Nate Diaz and Mike Perry. Paul comes into the clash against Chavez Jr off the back of a win over Mike Tyson last November. Paul is eager to one day compete for a world title, but - amid talks of a potential clash with Ramirez - the American would have to jump into the top 15 of the WBA or WBO to be eligible to fight the Mexican what would amount to a voluntary title defence. According to Nick Walshaw, Paul's team claim that they are in negotiations to face the WBC and WBO cruiserweight champions, Badou Jack and Ramirez. Following those claims, Ramirez - who fights Yuniel Dorticos on the Paul vs Chavez Jr undercard - has sent a chilling warning to the 'Problem Child.' In an interview with World Boxing News, he said: 'I was scheduled for this date since early February or March and was contacted by my team to see if I was interested in being on the same card. 'I know Jake mentioned that he's ready to fight me today during the press conference, but I'm not sure if he really meant it. If he does follow through on his words, I'll be open to giving him a shot at the title. All the respect to him for actually putting in the work and making noise in the sport, but he's a YouTuber at the end of the day. There are levels to this game, and if he really means it, we can make it the next fight.' Ramirez believes he could inflict significant damage on the social media sensation. ' Jake Paul is a hard worker and has generated more success for himself than most professional fighters," he continued. 'It's been impressive to watch, but I do believe he knows best for himself to stay away from a real fighter like myself. All talk is cheap. But Jake Paul knows he should plan a funeral if he commits to a fight against me." With just a few weeks to go until the clash, Paul is confident that he will "embarrass" Chavez Jr. "I'm gonna shock the world once again and prove how good I am, how powerful I am," the 28-year-old said at the launch press conference. "This is his toughest fight to date, and I'm going to embarrass him and make him quit like he always does." He added: "I don't want any excuses, and when I beat this man all the boxing media, like you guys always do, are going to discredit it. But I'm gonna expose him and I'm gonna embarrass him. He's the embarrassment of Mexico. Mexico doesn't claim him. He's going to get exposed on June 28, and then the boxing media will have all these excuses but I don't want them to be having these excuses. They say he's training hard, they say this is the most focused he's ever been, good. As he should be, because people don't realise how good I actually am, and when he feels those first few punches he's going to want to quit and go back to his stool."