PCA teacher running for seat on Poudre School District Board of Education
Mike Thomas, a teacher at Poudre Community Academy and former member of the Colorado Education Association's Board of Directors, is running for seat on the Poudre School District Board of Education in the November 2025 election.
Thomas, 41, is running for the District D seat, representing northwest Fort Collins. Jim Brokish, who currently holds that seat, does not plan to run for reelection. Tom Griggs, who spent most of his professional career teaching teachers, and Coronda Ziegler, a student success manager at Colorado State University, have also announced their candidacy for the District D seat.
Board of Education members must reside within the district they represent but are elected by all voters within the school district's boundaries.
Thomas taught for 13 years at schools in Boulder, Denver and Fort Collins after getting started on his career in education in a Head Start program in the Seattle area, Thomas told the Coloradoan on May 30. His experience ranges from preschool through high school, primarily in science, mathematics, construction and welding.
Thomas took a break from teaching for several years to be a stay-at-home father — he and his wife, Kristen Rasmussen, have two children — and renovate their Fort Collins home before accepting a job two years ago at Poudre Community Academy, one of two alternative high schools in Poudre School District.
Concerns over the poor condition of the building that houses PCA prompted him to run for the school board, he said. Thomas waited until the school year was over to announce his candidacy, fully aware of a PSD Board of Education policy that automatically puts district employees running for seats on the school board on an unpaid extended leave of absence until the election. Were he to win the District D seat, that policy reads, Thomas would deem him 'automatically and voluntarily resigned as a District employee' upon taking the oath of office.
'I really love PCA; I don't want to leave it,' Thomas said. 'I made the decision to think about running in January, when we had to walk across the street with all of our students to use the bathroom, because our bathrooms had stopped working for the third time this year.'
More: Poudre School District raising pay for teachers, classified employees
One of Thomas' primary concerns, he told the Coloradoan, is ensuring the district uses money from the 2024 debt-free schools mill levy to properly maintain, repair and improve its school buildings and other facilities. He would like to help the school district explore the use of solar and geothermal energy in its facilities.
Thomas would also like to see the district speed up the implementation of its new elementary school literacy curriculum through professional development opportunities for teachers and expand its use into middle and high schools.
'I'm really happy with what the district is doing at the elementary school level, which is a big change,' Thomas said. 'It has not been implemented as fully as it needs to be; professional development has not been provided as extensively as it needs to be. We need to make it happen a lot faster than what's going on right now.'
In addition to serving on the Colorado Education Association's Board of Directors, Thomas said he worked on multiple political-action campaigns and helped two candidates with their races for seats on the Boulder Valley School District Board of Education while living there while his wife, now a climate scientist at CSU, completed post-doctoral work at the National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Two candidates in other districts have also announced their candidacy for Board of Education seats in the November 2025 election — Sabrina Herrick in District C (northeast Fort Collins) and Andrew Spain in District E (northern and western Larimer County, including Wellington, Red Feather Lakes and Poudre Canyon).
Reporter Kelly Lyell covers education, breaking news, some sports and other topics of interest for the Coloradoan. Contact him at kellylyell@coloradoan.com, x.com/KellyLyell, threads.net/KellyLyell and facebook.com/KellyLyell.news.
This article originally appeared on Fort Collins Coloradoan: Mike Thomas running for seat on PSD Board of Education
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
2 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
Business news: Congressional art competition winner named
The Northwest Indiana Partners for Clean Air honored high school senior scholarship recipients and regional air quality leaders recently at the organization's annual scholarship and awards luncheon at the Hammond Marina, according to a release. The PCA received a record number of applications for its high school scholarship program with very competitive submissions. The PCA Scholarship Committee selected four scholarship winners. Each winner will receive a $2,500 scholarship, totaling $10,000, the release said. This year's scholarship winners are: Paige Hein, Washington Township High School; Brooke Lakin, Michigan City High School; Cavin McNulty, Munster High School; and Kaitlin Shideler, Valparaiso High School. In addition to the scholarship winners, six recipients received awards for voluntary actions to improve air quality in 2024: K&C Trucking Co., Homewood Disposal Services, Metro Ports; Porter County Parks & Recreation and La Porte County each received the Municipal Award and Trailblazers Bike Barn of Hobart received the Mark Siminski Bicycle Award. U.S. Rep. Frank J. Mrvan, D-Highland, recently announced that Adam Tenbarge II of Chesterton High School is the winner of the Dist. 1 2025 Congressional Art Competition, a release said. Tenbarge used paint and colored pencils to create his winning artwork, 'Journey Through Indiana,' which captures the varied landscapes of Northwest Indiana. 'The dunes, Lake Michigan and the steel mills define our surroundings,' Janet Bloch, Executive Director of the Lubeznik Center for the Arts and judge of the Congressional Art Competition, said. 'This landscape impacts the way people in our region think, what we value, what we do recreationally, and how we define beauty. The winning submission depicts these various settings under one unified sky.' In partnership with the Northwest Indiana District 1 Firefighter Training Council, the MAAC Foundation recently graduated its newest class of 40 volunteer firefighters representing departments across Northwest Indiana, a release said. The graduation marks the culmination of intensive hands-on and classroom training designed to prepare recruits for service in their local fire departments. The graduates are: Brittany Llanes, Allied Universal; Noah Engelhardt, Michael Gutierrez and Kodi Nowacki; Kyle Caves and Brandon Zimmerman, Cedar Lake; Teagen Janson, Crown Point; Riley Waterman, Dyer; Joshua Bertossi and Patrick Thompson, Griffith; Clayton Buchanan, Julian Childress, Peter Gladstone and Shawn Glenn, Hebron; Matthew Michael, Highland; Jacob Rush and Christopher Stone, Lake Dalecarlia; Terrell Farmer, Kenya Jordan, Brayden Seaton, Kameron Stojakovich and Timothy Whitmore, Lake Ridge; Chris Bynum and Emma Parker, Isabella Fuentes and Sara Sweney, Lowell; Jayden Harvey, Jacob Simpson, Emmanuel Soto and Gavin Tienstra, Munster; Ryan Cogdill and Jason Skeesick, Ogden Dunes; Cameron Tancos, Rensselaer; Lucas Adams, Jermiah Brown and Ravi Fuentes, South Haven; Carmela Gallardo and Crystal Rivera, St. John; and Raymond Gorz and Ho Jonathan Nguyen, Washington Township. The City of Hammond has been awarded funding through the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program for new electric vehicle charging stations, according to a release. The grant will fund charging station infrastructure at the Hammond Sportsplex at 167th Street and Indianapolis Boulevard, and City Hall, 5925 Calumet Ave. Both were chosen for their visibility and frequent use, the release said. The project is part of Hammond's commitment to environmental responsibility, clean energy infrastructure and community well-being. Installation is expected to be finished by the end of 2025, the release said.
The Hill
3 days ago
- The Hill
Justice Thomas delights conservatives in shunning gender-affirming care ‘experts'
Justice Clarence Thomas's shunning of 'experts' defending gender-affirming care is delighting conservatives in their assault on liberal influence in academics and medicine, a mission now reaching the courts. The conservative justice argued in a solo opinion concurring with the court's 6-3 decision to uphold Tennessee's transgender youth care ban that so-called experts have jumped on the bandwagon to embrace such treatment while evidence to the contrary mounts. 'This case carries a simple lesson: In politically contentious debates over matters shrouded in scientific uncertainty, courts should not assume that self-described experts are correct,' Thomas wrote. Thomas's opinion quickly garnered the attention of prominent Republicans, including Vice President Vance, who made his debut on liberal social media platform Bluesky by complimenting the opinion as 'quite illuminating.' 'I might add that many of those scientists are receiving substantial resources from big pharma to push these medicines on kids. What do you think?' Vance wrote Thursday, quickly sparking thousands of replies dripping with snark. Since Trump has taken office, his administration has abandoned President Biden's defense of gender-affirming care. Trump's Justice Department dropped the legal challenge to Tennessee's ban, and in May, his Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) declared there is a 'lack of robust evidence' for the treatments. In a New York Times opinion piece following the Supreme Court ruling, the mother of the transgender teen who challenged Tennessee's law mourned the decision to block care for her daughter. 'I am deeply afraid for what this decision will unleash — politically and socially,' Samantha Williams wrote. 'Now that the Supreme Court has denied the rights of young people like my daughter and families like ours, what's next?' Major American medical groups have said gender-affirming care for transgender youth and adults is medically necessary. But Thomas in his opinion wrote that it's legally irrelevant, saying trusting those groups would otherwise allow 'elite sentiment' to 'distort and stifle democratic debate.' 'There are particularly good reasons to question the expert class here, as recent revelations suggest that leading voices in this area have relied on questionable evidence, and have allowed ideology to influence their medical guidance,' Thomas wrote. The Supreme Court's decision instead looks to Europe, citing health authorities in Finland, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The justices particularly emphasized the Cass Review, an influential 2024 report from England questioning the treatments. 'Health authorities in a number of European countries have raised significant concerns regarding the potential harms associated with using puberty blockers and hormones to treat transgender minors,' Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority. The increased prominence of conservatives' attacks come as public trust in health officials and agencies continues to plummet more broadly, a decline that began during the COVID-19 pandemic. Trust in state and local public health officials dropped by 10 percentage points to 54 percent, while the share of those who say they trust the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has also slipped five percentage points, according to January polling from KFF, formerly known as the Kaiser Family Foundation. 'Justice Thomas soundly put to rest the persistent sham that we should quiet down and 'trust the science' when it comes to life-altering experimentation on minors,' Katherine Green Robertson, chief counsel of Alabama's attorney general's office, said in a statement following the decision. The state filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case that urged the justices not to decide it on 'euphemisms about 'affirming care' and unsupported appeals to 'expert' organizations.' 'Alabama is proud to have armed the Court with a full rundown of the medical community's shameless political collusion on this matter, which should permanently discredit every organization involved,' she said. The justices' reliance on outside research has come into question before. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson caught heat after a study she cited in her 2023 dissent in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, which sharply limited the use of race as a factor in college admissions, was disputed. In an impassioned dissent expounding on the benefits of diversity in education, Jackson pointed to a friend-of-the-court brief by the Association of American Medical Colleges, which referenced the 2020 study. 'It saves lives,' she wrote, pointing to the research which showed that having a Black physician more than doubles the likelihood that a high-risk Black baby will live. In the following months, critics began to debunk the claim, suggesting at first that the justice misrepresented the statistic, and later, that the research itself was inaccurate. 'Even Supreme Court justices are known to be gullible,' lawyer Ted Frank wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed at the time. It's not just studies that support left-leaning views that have come under scrutiny, either. A month before the Supreme Court weighed a challenge to mifepristone access, one of the two common drugs used in medication abortion, a medical journal retracted two studies claiming to show the harms of the pill. The studies, published in the Sage journal Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology and backed by an anti-abortion group, were retracted after a reader raised concerns about the study's accuracy and a review found the conclusions 'invalidated in whole or in part.' U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk had pointed to the studies in his decision siding with the conservative medical group Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, which invalidated the Federal Drug Administration's (FDA) approval of mifepristone because it overlooked safety concerns. The justices ultimately ruled unanimously last year that the anti-abortion doctors did not have standing to challenge access to mifepristone, declining to address the underlying regulatory or safety issues. In the gender-affirming care case, the Supreme Court's decision aligned with the conservative voices that have called on the court to give credence to political forces over educational ones — and the shift did not go unnoticed. 'The vibe shift is real,' Roger Severino, a vice president at the Heritage Foundation who ran HHS's civil rights office during Trump's first term, told supporters after the decision. 'Not only was it political in the last election, President Trump's closing argument is that 'she is for they/them, and he is for you,'' he continued. 'And here, the court — not that they're political animals — at least they're consistent with where the American people are.'
New York Post
3 days ago
- New York Post
JD Vance is right — don't trust the left's 'experts'
The 'experts' holding sway over our public policy have failed America for what may be the last time — and they're not happy about it. Boundless trust has been placed in the hands of people who have leaned into their biases, ignored rigorous study and scientific inquiry and led trusting Americans straight off cliffs of financial, medical and social ruin. But in recent years, we've seen again and again that the 'experts' in everything from climate change to COVID are not as adept as they make themselves out to be — and on Wednesday, the Supreme Court expressly rejected expert claims in a landmark case. Advertisement In a 6-3 ruling, the court found that Tennessee has the right to ban the barbaric practice of child sex changes, as can 26 other states that have passed similarly sensible restrictions. Justice Clarence Thomas, in a concurrence to Chief Justice John Roberts' majority opinion, called out the attorneys who wanted the court to 'defer to the so-called expert consensus' regarding these inhumane procedures. Advertisement 'There are particularly good reasons to question the expert class here,' Thomas wrote. 'Leading voices in this area have relied on questionable evidence, and have allowed ideology to influence their medical guidance.' Indeed, experts in mental health, medical science and LGBTQ advocacy, led by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, peddled non-science-backed lies that medical sex changes for children are both reversible and life-saving, neither of which has turned out to be true. 'This case,' Thomas noted, 'serves as useful reminder that the American people and their representatives are entitled to disagree with those who hold themselves out as experts.' Advertisement Yet the left is refusing to accept that their experts can be argued with. Vice President JD Vance proved that when he launched a Bluesky account to have a 'common sense' conversation on the high court's ruling — only to be first banned, then shouted at by leftists who couldn't deal with the notion of respectful dissent. 'Hello Bluesky,' the veep posted, 'I found Justice Thomas' concurrence on medical care for transgender youth quite illuminating.' 'He argues that many of our so-called 'experts' have used bad arguments and substandard science to push experimental therapies on our youth,' Vance continued. 'Many of those scientists are receiving substantial resources from big pharma to push these medicines on kids . . . What do you think?' Advertisement 'I think you're an a–hole, and I think you don't actually give a f–k what actual scientists say about actual research,' responded one unhinged pro-butchery Bluesky user. 'I think you're a disingenuous bigot and I think you lack basic human empathy and anything resembling a soul.' 'There's certainly more scientific evidence to support transgender care than supports your belief in sky fairies,' another responded. The 'experts' themselves, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, got their panties in a bunch over the court's ruling — which simply upheld the right of states to determine if sex-change drugs and surgeries should be legal for minors within their borders. 'The Supreme Court's decision today does not change the science,' the AAP railed. 'Gender-affirming care remains evidence-based, medically necessary care that improves the health and well-being of transgender youth.' The group refused to back down from its position that permanently preventing children from growing up healthy and whole is the right thing to do. And it didn't admit that these kids are doomed to become lifelong medical patients, or that boys given puberty blockers and hormones can never experience normal sexual function, or that the denial of sex-change procedures does not in fact lead to suicide. These are all facts that attorney Chase Strangio, who argued the case for the American Civil Liberties Union, was forced to admit before the court. Advertisement 'This is a heartbreaking ruling, making it more difficult for transgender youth to escape the danger and trauma of being denied their ability to live and thrive,' wept Lambda Legal. The ACLU, which brings endless cases to defend such offenses as men in women's prisons and males in women's sports, slammed the ruling for telling 'transgender youth and their families that they cannot access healthcare that is vitally important for a successful life.' Talk about cope. Advertisement Thomas and Vance are right: Too much power and trust has been given to people who claim to have expertise, but are really just making things up as they go along. The left refuses to realize its own folly, which has cost the health of thousands of American children in service to lies. With 'experts' like theirs, we're all better off relying on people who lean into common sense and decency. Libby Emmons is the editor-in-chief at the Post Millennial.
