Irish pro-Palestine activist set to be deported from Israel
An Irish woman is due to leave Israel on Wednesday after failing to lift an Israeli deportation order against her and spending ten days in detention, according to the pro-Palestinian activist group she was volunteering with in the occupied
West Bank
and her family.
According to the International Solidarity Movement (ISM), Máire ní Mhurchú, also known as 'D' Murphy (70), is to return to her home in Swansea, Wales. Ms Murphy has been detained in Givon Prison in the Israeli city of Ramla since 1st June, when she challenged a deportation order made against her following
her arrest in the West Bank
on 31st May.
[
Israeli strikes kill at least 35 people in Gaza, many near an aid site, medics say
Opens in new window
]
'As a family we are all very relieved to have my mother home,' said Dale Ryan, Ms Murphy's son, in a statement. 'The past 10 days has been intense and we have had to trust that the Israeli authorities would treat my mother fairly and ensure her basic needs were met. From their treatment of the Palestinians over the past several decades, this was not something we had the most confidence in.'
ISM said a hearing had been scheduled for July for Ms Murphy to challenge the deportation order against her. This followed an appearance Mr Murphy made before Israel's Detention Review Tribunal on June 4th where the Irish woman says she was not given legal representation or an opportunity to obtain legal advice and, on the basis, refused to participate in the proceedings.
READ MORE
ISM says Ms Murphy's lawyer, Noa Dagoni, has since managed to visit her once but did not receive a response from Israel's prison service regarding a request for the Irish pensioner's release.
The Israeli ambassador responsible for Ireland, Dana Erlich, did not respond to a request for comment.
The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade in Dublin said it is providing consular assistance and, as per protocol, does not comment on the details of individual cases.
Ms Murphy was detained by Israeli police on May 31st near Khalet al-Daba'a, a Palestinian village that has been largely demolished by Israeli forces, along with Swedish activist Susanne Björk (48). Ms Björk left Israel on June 2nd after a deportation order was also made against her. Both women deny that the grounds on which the orders were made against them and, in particular, deny failing to comply with an order to leave a military zone by Israeli soldiers.
'Israeli bulldozers have returned to Khalet Al-Daba'a, the West Bank village in the demolition-plagued region of Masafer Yatta where Murphy was arrested,' said ISM on Wednesday. 'It is a harrowing development that as she is deported, the Israeli forces are finishing to demolish what was left of the village of Khalet Al-Daba'a, where she and Björk were arrested. '
Ms Murphy, who is originally from Douglas, Cork but lives in Wales, is a founding member of Swansea Palestine Community Link and was previously detained in 2011, when she travelled to Israel with the group.
'I know after a day's rest my mother will be back gathering support for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and for the fair treatment of all Palestinians, after me and all her family give her a massive hug,' said Mr Ryan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump and Netanyahu should beware of the unintended consequences of their actions in Iran
Between escalation and de-escalation of the Israel-Iran war there is much room for unintended consequences and miscalculations. The choices made by Binyamin Netanyahu's Israel and Donald Trump's United States will have an impact, whether or not Israel's daring and highly risky attack on Iran succeeds in destroying or changing its Islamic regime. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi says Netanyahu successfully played Trump to scuttle the US-Iran negotiations on a nuclear enrichment agreement. Israel's attack pre-empted a US deal as it says – without proof – Iran is ready to produce nuclear weapons. But Israel's main strategic target is the Islamic State itself as its principal regional enemy, at a time when Iran's air defences and axis of proxies in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen have been decisively weakened by Israeli attacks. Netanyahu has been consistent that he wants to create a new regional order in which Israel is the most powerful military player. His aim is also to normalise relations with Arab states on that basis without a Palestinian state. Israel needs Trump's 'bunker buster' but will US enter the war? Listen | 31:22 If the US does enter the war, what will that mean for the region? He could not have missed this opportunity to strike since its timing avoids yet another crisis for his far-right coalition and once again boosts his domestic popularity. Its surprise execution involved extraordinary intelligence superiority using US assets and fierce lobbying through the pro-Israeli neoconservative interventionist wing of Trump's Maga coalition in Washington. READ MORE Netanyahu's long experience of US right-wing politics makes him exceptionally well qualified for such lobbying, despite the huge resistance this provokes from Maga's isolationist wing. Its leaders say US direct involvement will derail Trump's presidency in yet another forever war. Trump sacked his national security adviser Mike Waltz last month ostensibly over 'Signalgate' but also for getting too close to the Israeli camp. But he must heed the pro-Israeli wing of his movement. He now wants to force concessions from a much weakened Iran in renewed talks. Will he instead be sucked into Netanyahu's logic and use the US bunker-busting bombs against Iranian enrichment plants? Does he favour the regime change implied by Israeli attacks on leaders, civilians, energy assets and broadcasting stations? Trump's statement that he will decide on direct US involvement within two weeks creates space for diplomacy. Yesterday's talks between Abbas Araghchi and European leaders might open a path through which Trump could claim a win without a war. He could thereby avoid Netanyahu's trap. Iran experts warn that the state is more likely to intensify its approach to enrichment and withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty than capitulate to this Israeli attack in any talks. It would be sustained by a popular nationalist response against Israel. [ Could Israel's attacks on Iran create a nuclear contamination risk? Opens in new window ] As for regime change, Iranians are more likely to fragment into potential civil war than to topple the Islamic regime through a democratic revolution. Islamic State repression has ensured they lack an organised opposition and developed civil society. These unintended consequences would undermine the regional order Netanyahu seeks. A normalisation based on such instability and without Palestine would imperil the legitimacy of Saudi, Qatari and other Gulf rulers, as well as Egyptian, Jordanian and Moroccan regimes, which are also part of it. Trump would then discover this creates another US intervention quagmire like Iraq or Afghanistan rather than a peaceful transformation based on Iranian regime change. His hopes of drawing Iran into an alternative regional order based on Gulf money and expanded US trade with the region could not be delivered without a functioning regime in Tehran. Israel too would discover such a normalisation against Iran and Palestine is no guarantee that Israelis can live peacefully in the region, however militarily hegemonic they are. From a more radical perspective, the point can be made that democratic change and upheaval in the Middle East has usually come through regime crisis and war, as well as dysfunctional government – and that potential again. But many fear such change after the ill-prepared 2010-2013 popular Arab revolts in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Syria or Bahrain. The vicious aftermaths of authoritarian regimes and outside interventions were more Arab winter than spring. Trump faces critical choices as he steers a path between the domestic promise of no more foreign wars and being played into Netanyahu's serial gambles on US support in Gaza and Iran. His Maga movement is deeply split on Iran, however much it can cohere over Israel, trade wars or containing China. Events such as these force Trump's programmatic contradictions into the foreground of politics at home and abroad. His ability to ride and manage them without serious unintended consequences and grave miscalculations is increasingly in question. Popular resistance to his authoritarian assertiveness produced 2,100 demonstrations last weekend. Netanyahu will decisively – and consequentially – shift Trump's international position if the Iran war continues on Israel's terms.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
US enters Israel's war against Iran with strikes on three nuclear sites
The United States has entered Israel 's war against Iran , as US warplanes dropped bombs on three nuclear sites in Iran on Saturday – President Donald Trump announced – bringing the US military directly into the war after days of uncertainty about whether the US would intervene. 'All planes are now outside of Iran air space,' he said in a post on social media, adding that a 'full payload' of bombs had been dropped on Fordow, the heavily fortified underground facility in Iran that is critical to its nuclear programme. 'All planes are safely on their way home.' The three sites that Mr Trump said were hit on Saturday night included Iran's two major uranium enrichment centres: the mountain facility at Fordow and a larger enrichment plant at Natanz, which Israel struck several days ago with smaller weapons. The third site, near the ancient city of Isfahan, is where Iran is believed to keep its near-bomb-grade enriched uranium, which inspectors observed just two weeks ago. After a week of mixed signals, Mr Trump, who has long vowed to steer the US clear of overseas 'forever wars', authorised US forces to strike Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear installation, deep underground. The goal, US and Israeli officials have said, is to prevent Iran from building a nuclear bomb. READ MORE A US official, speaking on condition of anonymity given the sensitive nature of the information, said that multiple B-2 bombers had carried out the strikes. [ B-2 stealth bombers depart US as Trump weighs Iran strike Opens in new window ] Three senior Iranian officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly, said that they believed US forces had bombed Fordow and Natanz at about 2.30am local time in Iran. For days, Mr Trump had been weighing whether to provide Israel with the powerful munitions needed to destroy the facility at Fordow. Only US bombs known as bunker busters are believed to be capable of the destructive force required, and only US aircraft can deliver them. Israel and Iran, sworn enemies for decades, have been exchanging attacks since June 13th, when the Israelis launched a surprise assault that targeted Iranian infrastructure, including nuclear installations, and military leaders. Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu said his nation had no choice but to act if it wanted to stave off a nuclear 'holocaust'. Iran responded with missile barrages of its own, as well as offers to resume negotiations over its nuclear development programme. Just days ago, the Trump administration appeared intent on distancing itself from the conflict. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' US secretary of state Marco Rubio had declared. But Mr Trump, when he was not urging peace talks, began sounding increasingly belligerent. On Tuesday, he went so far as to make a direct threat against Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, saying that 'we know exactly where' he is and calling him 'an easy target'. He said, 'We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least for now.' But he warned, 'Our patience is growing thin.' Mr Trump also called for Iran's 'complete surrender'. In what was considered a sign that the US government was nearing a decision, Mr Trump cut short his attendance on Monday at the G7 summit in Alberta, Canada, and flew back to Washington – surprising US allies assembled for the meetings. [ If Netanyahu wants regime change in Iran, it is unlikely to end well Opens in new window ] 'Much was accomplished, but because of what's going on in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with heads of state,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. – This article originally appeared in The New York Times .
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
B-2 stealth bombers depart US as Trump weighs Iran strike
B-2 stealth bombers have taken off from the United States and are headed over the Pacific, multiple news outlets reported, as President Donald Trump weighs American involvement in the war between Israel and Iran . The moves, picked up by flight tracking services on Saturday, indicate that the administration is getting the air force bombers in position if needed for a strike on Iran , the Wall Street Journal reported. The aircraft, accompanied by refuelling tankers, may be on their way to a base in Guam, according to the report. Speculation about a potential US strike aimed at Iran's nuclear programme has focused on the B-2s, which would be needed to drop 30,000lb bombs — so-called bunker busters — if Mr Trump decided to target Iran's heavily fortified uranium enrichment site at Fordow. Israel , which is seeking to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities, does not have such weapons. [ Israel says it killed veteran Iran commander as both sides attack Opens in new window ] Multiple B-2s appeared to be airborne and heading across the Pacific from Whiteman air force base in Missouri, the New York Times reported. The newspaper cited flight trackers' posts on social media and air traffic control communications. READ MORE The Pentagon and the White House didn't immediately return messages seeking comment. Mr Trump was scheduled to return to the White House on Saturday and meet his national security team. The US president has sent mixed signals, discounting European efforts to secure a diplomatic solution between Israel and Iran while keeping possible US involvement in the conflict on the table. 'I'm giving them a period of time,' Trump told reporters on Friday. 'I would say two weeks would be the maximum.' – Bloomberg
