
Trump and Netanyahu should beware of the unintended consequences of their actions in Iran
Between escalation and de-escalation of the
Israel-Iran war
there is much room for unintended consequences and miscalculations.
The choices made by Binyamin Netanyahu's Israel and Donald Trump's United States will have an impact, whether or not Israel's daring and highly risky attack on Iran succeeds in destroying or changing its Islamic regime.
Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi
says
Netanyahu successfully played Trump to scuttle the US-Iran negotiations on a nuclear enrichment agreement. Israel's attack pre-empted a US deal as it says –
without proof
– Iran is ready to produce nuclear weapons. But Israel's main strategic target is the Islamic State itself as its principal regional enemy, at a time when Iran's air defences and axis of proxies in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen have been decisively weakened by Israeli attacks. Netanyahu has been consistent that he wants to create a new regional order in which Israel is the most powerful military player. His aim is also to normalise relations with Arab states on that basis without a Palestinian state.
Israel needs Trump's 'bunker buster' but will US enter the war?
Listen |
31:22
If the US does enter the war, what will that mean for the region?
He could not have missed this opportunity to strike since its timing avoids yet another crisis for his far-right coalition and once again boosts his domestic popularity. Its surprise execution involved extraordinary intelligence superiority using US assets and fierce lobbying through the pro-Israeli neoconservative interventionist wing of Trump's Maga coalition in Washington.
READ MORE
Netanyahu's long experience of US right-wing politics makes him exceptionally well qualified for such lobbying, despite the
huge resistance
this provokes from Maga's isolationist wing. Its leaders say US direct involvement will derail Trump's presidency in yet another forever war.
Trump
sacked his national security adviser Mike Waltz
last month ostensibly over 'Signalgate' but also for getting too close to the Israeli camp. But he must heed the pro-Israeli wing of his movement. He now wants to force concessions from a much weakened Iran in renewed talks. Will he instead be sucked into Netanyahu's logic and use the US bunker-busting bombs against Iranian enrichment plants? Does he favour the regime change implied by Israeli attacks on leaders, civilians, energy assets and broadcasting stations?
Trump's statement that he will decide on direct US involvement within two weeks creates space for diplomacy. Yesterday's talks between Abbas Araghchi and European leaders might open a path through which Trump could claim a win without a war. He could thereby avoid Netanyahu's trap.
Iran experts
warn
that the state is more likely to intensify its approach to enrichment and withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty than capitulate to this Israeli attack in any talks. It would be sustained by a popular nationalist response against Israel.
[
Could Israel's attacks on Iran create a nuclear contamination risk?
Opens in new window
]
As for regime change, Iranians are
more likely
to fragment into potential civil war than to topple the Islamic regime through a democratic revolution. Islamic State repression has ensured they lack an organised opposition and developed civil society.
These unintended consequences would undermine the regional order Netanyahu seeks. A normalisation based on such instability and without Palestine would imperil the legitimacy of Saudi, Qatari and other Gulf rulers, as well as Egyptian, Jordanian and Moroccan regimes, which are also part of it. Trump would then discover this creates another US intervention quagmire like Iraq or Afghanistan rather than a peaceful transformation based on Iranian regime change. His hopes of drawing Iran into an alternative regional order based on Gulf money and expanded US trade with the region could not be delivered without a functioning regime in Tehran.
Israel too would discover such a normalisation against Iran and Palestine is no guarantee that Israelis can live peacefully in the region, however militarily hegemonic they are.
From a more radical perspective, the point can be made that democratic change and upheaval in the Middle East has usually come through regime crisis and war, as well as dysfunctional government – and that potential again. But many fear such change after the ill-prepared 2010-2013 popular Arab revolts in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Syria or Bahrain. The vicious aftermaths of authoritarian regimes and outside interventions were more Arab winter than spring.
Trump faces critical choices as he steers a path between the domestic promise of no more foreign wars and being played into Netanyahu's serial gambles on US support in Gaza and Iran. His Maga movement is deeply split on Iran, however much it can cohere over Israel, trade wars or containing China. Events such as these force Trump's programmatic
contradictions
into the foreground of politics at home and abroad. His ability to ride and manage them without serious unintended consequences and grave miscalculations is increasingly in question. Popular resistance to his authoritarian assertiveness produced 2,100 demonstrations last weekend.
Netanyahu will decisively – and consequentially – shift Trump's international position if the Iran war continues on Israel's terms.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
4 hours ago
- The Journal
Ireland's reaction to the US bombing Iran: 'There is an urgent need for de-escalation'
LAST UPDATE | 32 mins ago IRELAND HAS CALLED for an urgent de-escalation of tension and the use of diplomacy after the US bombed nuclear sites in Iran. Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris has warned that the risk of an 'extremely dangerous spiral of escalation' in the Middle East is now 'more real', following US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites . Harris said there is an 'urgent need for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy' to resolve the conflict. He added that he will discuss the issue tomorrow with his European counterparts in Brussels. His comments were echoed by Taoiseach Micheál Martin. Both Harris and Martin said that Iran needs to step away from any possible development of nuclear weapons. 'A negotiated solution is the way forward,' Martin said in a statement. The government remains in contact with embassies in Israel and Iran. Staff in Tehran left the country on Friday and have since been working remotely. Roughly 200 and 30 Irish citizen are currently in Israel and Iran, respectively. Support for those who wish to leave remains in place, Harris said. US President Donald Trump announced 'successful' strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities overnight, in a shock decision and major escalation in the war between Israel and Iran. Advertisement Israel launched its campaign against Iran two weeks ago over claims that the government there were developing nuclear weapons. Harris said while Ireland is 'united in the clear view' that Iran should not possess such weapons, the issue should be settled through diplomacy. 'Any alternative to that is simply too dangerous for civilians, for the Middle East region and for global security,' he said this morning. Labour TD and party spokesperson for foreign affairs Duncan Smith said tomorrow's Foreign Affairs Council of the EU meeting should maintain its focus on calling for a diplomatic solution, as well as debating the EU-Israel trade agreement. Iran, in response, has launched up to 30 missiles towards Israel this morning , targeting sites such as the Ben Gurion International Airport and military hubs. Three bombs made impact at residential sites in Israel, it has been reported. The Fine Gael leader welcomed initial reports that suggest there has not been an increase in off-site radiation levels as a result of the strikes on the facilities in Iran by the US last night. He added that US or other interventions in the future should use the reports as a 'warning as to how easily that could change should further escalation occur, and the disaster that could pose.' Radiation leaks from Iran's facilities, the Fordow site in particular, could pollute a radius of up to 50km, it has been estimated, and cause severe and reactive dust storms right across the Middle East. Global nuclear watchdog IAEA confirmed today that has been no increases in off-site radiation. An emergency meeting has been convened with the board of governors tomorrow. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

The Journal
4 hours ago
- The Journal
'There are many targets left': How Trump announced to the world that the US had bombed Iran
JUST BEFORE 1AM Irish-time, President Donald Trump took to his TruthSocial platform and made a stunning announcement. 'We have completed our very successful attack on three nuclear sites in Iran,' his post said. 'Congratulations to our great American warriors. There is not another military in the world that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!'. The move was widely unexpected. On Thursday, he had given Iran a two-week deadline – which, as a number of US newspapers noted, is his favourite unit of time which can mean 'something or nothing at all'. In this case, it meant two days. Just over an hour after that first post, Trump made a televised address from the White House, flanked by vice president JD Vance, US defence secretary Pete Hegseth and US secretary of state Marco Rubio. The address was brief by Trump standards, at just under 4 minutes, and he stuck almost entirely to the script. After describing how the US had 'totally obliterated' Iran's main nuclear sites, Trump warned that the United States would go after more targets if Iran did not make peace quickly. Advertisement The reaction was immediate: Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu congratulated Trump on the strikes, saying that 'the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history'. Iran's foreign minister condemned the US attacks as 'lawless and criminal', saying his country has a right to defend its sovereignty. 'The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences,' Abbas Araghchi wrote on X. The intervention by the US president, who had vowed to avoid another 'forever war' in the region and who had faced pushback from one wing of the Republican party which had asked him to avoid getting involved in the Middle East, is significant. It threatens to dramatically worsen the conflict between Iran and Israel. Trump's full televised address on the bombing Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo 'Thank you very, very much. A short time ago, the US military carried out massive precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. 'Everybody heard those names for years as they built this horribly destructive enterprise. 'Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror. 'Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier. 'For 40 years, Iran has been saying, Death to America, Death to Israel. They have been killing our people, blowing off their arms, blowing off their legs, with roadside bombs. That was their specialty. 'We lost over a thousand people and hundreds of thousands throughout the Middle East and around the world have died have a direct result of their hate. In particular, so many were killed by their general Qasem Soleimani. Related Reads Ireland's reaction to the US bombing Iran: 'There is an urgent need for de-escalation' US bombs three nuclear sites in Iran, a major escalation in the war between Israel and Iran 'I decided a long time ago that I would not let this happen, it will not continue. I want to thank and congratulate Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before, and we've gone a long way to erasing this horrible threat to Israel. 'I want to thank the Israeli military for the wonderful job they've done, and most importantly, I want to congratulate the great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines tonight and all of the United States military on an operation the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades. 'Hopefully we will no longer need their services at this capacity. I hope that so. 'I also want to congratulate the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan 'Razin' Caine, spectacular general, and all of the brilliant military minds involved in this attack. 'With all of that being said, this cannot continue, there will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days. 'Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight's was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal, but if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill. Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes. 'There's no military in the world that could have done what we did tonight, not even close. There has never been a military that could do what took place just a little while ago. 'Tomorrow, General Cain [and] Secretary of Defence, Pete Hegseth, will have a press conference at 8am [1pm Irish-time] at the Pentagon. 'And I want to just thank everybody, and in particular, God. I want to just say we love you, God, and we love our great military. Protect them. God bless the Middle East, God bless Israel and God bless America. Thank you very much.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

The Journal
4 hours ago
- The Journal
No signs of radioactive contamination after US attack on Iran, says nuclear watchdog
THE UN'S NUCLEAR watchdog has said there has been no increase in radiation levels in Iran after the US bombed the country's nuclear sites overnight. The International Atomic Energy Agency said it had not detected any change in radiation levels 'as of this time'. Nearby countries also reported no change in radiation levels. Both Saudi Arabia and Kuwait said that they had been monitoring the situation and the situation is 'normal'. The full extent of the attack on Iran's nuclear capabilities is not yet known; however Israel's president told the BBC this morning that 'it's quite clear… that the Iranian nuclear program has been hit substantially'. Advertisement Iran has maintained its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only, and US intelligence agencies have found that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. The US and Israel have controversially argued that Iran could quickly assemble a nuclear weapon, making it an imminent threat. 'Following attacks on three nuclear sites in Iran… the IAEA can confirm that no increase in off-site radiation levels has been reported as of this time,' the nuclear watchdog posted on X, just hours after Donald Trump said the US strikes had 'totally obliterated' Iran's main nuclear sites at Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow. Saudi Arabia said 'no radioactive effects were detected' in the Gulf region. 'No radioactive effects were detected on the environment of the Kingdom and the Arab Gulf states as a result of the American military targeting of Iran's nuclear facilities,' the kingdom's Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Commission wrote in a post on X. Kuwait's National Guard also posted on X that 'radiation levels in Kuwait's airspace and waters are stable, and the situation is normal'. Iran has said its nuclear programme will not be stopped. Related Reads Ireland's reaction to the US bombing Iran: 'There is an urgent need for de-escalation' 'There are many targets left': How Trump announced to the world that the US had bombed Iran International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons labelled the US attack as 'senseless and wreckless' this morning, adding that military action against Iran is 'not the way to resolve concerns over Tehran's nuclear programme'. The Nobel Peace Prize-winning organisation said the American strikes could 'undermine international efforts to prevent further proliferation of nuclear weapons'. It is not clear whether the US will continue attacking Iran alongside its ally Israel, which has been engaged in a nine-day war with Iran. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal