How Trump's 'Midnight Hammer' blitz unfolded - what attack means for the UK

A surprise US attack on three key Iranian nuclear sites left a number of questions unanswered, including what the potential for a wider escalation in the situation means for the UK
Officials in the US have insisted America 'does not seek war' with Iran following a surprise US attack on three key Iranian nuclear sites. Overnight, the US carried out Operation Midnight Hammer, aimed at destroying nuke sites in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.
Seven B-2s - America's flagship aircraft - are said to have flown 37 hours non-stop from Missouri in the sortie. It was the longest B-2 mission since just after the September 11 attacks and officials say more than 75 precision guided missiles were fired.
‌
The US strike on Iran has fuelled fears that Israel 's war with Tehran could escalate to a wider regional conflict. US President Donald Trump had said on Thursday that he would decide within two weeks whether to get involved. In the end, it took just days, and Washington inserted itself into Israel's campaign with its early attack early on Sunday.
‌
'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said at a Pentagon news conference on Sunday. He and US Air Force General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the mission did not target Iranian troops or the Iranian people, a veiled effort to indicate to Tehran they do not want retaliation on American targets in the region.
It is not clear if the US will continue to attack Iranian sites along with its ally Israel which is locked in a nine-day war with Iran, but concern over potential escalation in the region remains. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi warned that while the 'door to diplomacy' should always be open, 'this is not the case right now'.
So just how was the attack carried out? What comes next? And what does this all mean for the UK?
Operation Midnight Hammer
Midnight Hammer was a daring raid designed to outwit Iran's air defence system, which includes older Russian-made surface-to-air missiles, the $2 billion (£1.5 million) B-2s repeatedly refuelled mid-air to avoid detection. Insiders had earlier suggested the aircraft had been sent to the US air base at Guam - but US officials say it was a ruse to throw the Islamic Republic off the scent.
‌
General Caine revealed more than 125 aircraft were used in the deception operation that saw bombers deployed over the Pacific as a "decoy". But once the chosen B-2s arrived in Iran, around midnight in the UK, they dropped 12 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) 30,000lb bombs on the Fordow enrichment plant.
It is the first ever use of the MOP explosives, designed to penetrate up to 200ft of earth or 60ft of reinforced concrete before detonating. It is one of the most powerful conventional bombs in the US arsenal.
‌
At the same time 30 long-range Tomahawk missiles - able to reach distances of up to 2,500 km - were fired from an Ohio-class nuclear powered submarine rained down on the Natanz and Isfahan facilities. Caine said all three Iranian nuclear infrastructure targets were hit between 11.40pm and 12.05am [GMT].
He said that the Tomahawk missiles were the last to strike at Isfahan to make sure the US kept "the element of surprise". "It appears that Iran's surface-to-air missile systems did not see us," he said, adding that during the mission, the US was not aware of any shots fired at the group as they left.
‌
Caine also noted that this was the "largest B2 operational strike in US history, and the second longest B2 mission ever flown, exceeded only by those in the days following 9/11."
No Iranian shots were fired at the bombers during the mission. Iran launched a ballistic missile barrage against Israel in retaliation to the US action.
Fordow has always been the main object of international concerns regarding Iran's progress on uranium enrichment. Meanwhile the Tomahawk missiles are equipped with high-tech GPS systems, making them capable of flying at low altitudes and navigating complex terrain to avoid detection and reach their target with high precision.
‌
Natanz Nuclear Facility, located about 150 miles south of the nation's capital Tehran, is considered to be the country's largest uranium enrichment plant. Intelligence indicates the facility is used to build centrifuges for uranium enrichment, according to the non-profit Nuclear Threat Initiative.
The plant has six above-ground buildings and three underground facilities. Two of those underground buildings can hold 50,000 centrifuges.
‌
The Isfahan Nuclear Technology Center in central Iran is the nation's largest nuclear research complex. An estimated 3,000 researchers work at the center, which was built in 1984 with Chinese assistance, according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative.
Crisis in the Middle East
Sir Keir Starmer has warned of the Middle East spiralling further into a crisis. He said 'all necessary measures' had been taken to protect British interests in the region if the conflict escalates.
‌
Speaking at his Chequers country retreat, the PM said there was a 'risk of escalation' adding: 'That's a risk to the region. It's a risk beyond the region, and that's why all our focus has been on de-escalating, getting people back around to negotiate what is a very real threat in relation to the nuclear programme.'
US Vice-President JD Vance said there is US hope for a 'reset' and said the 'Iranians can go down the path of peace or they can go down the path of this ridiculous brinksmanship of funding terrorism, of trying to build a nuclear weapon, and that's just not something the United States can accept.'
‌
But there are a number of ways Iran may choose to respond. Mr Araghchi, warned in a post on X that the US attacks 'will have everlasting consequences' and that Tehran 'reserves all options' to retaliate.
One of the ways it could do this is by using the remaining stock of its missile arsenal. It is believed to have around half of its 3,000 capacity following its exchanges with Israel this month. The US has a number of bases in the Middle East that could be seen as a potential target.
It may also use its Revolutionary Guards Corps Navy to launch so-called 'swarm attacks' on US Navy warships. This would involve the use of fast torpedo boats and drones to overwhelm US defences and is something Iran has practiced.
‌
Perhaps a more likely form of response could be through its proxies. Both the Houthi rebels in Yemen and Hamas have condemned the US strikes. The Houthis vowed to support Iran in its fight against 'the Zionist and American aggression'.
In a statement on Sunday, the Houthi political bureau called on Muslim nations to join 'the Jihad and resistance option as one front against the Zionist-American arrogance'. Hamas and the Houthis are part of Iran's so-called Axis of Resistance, the collection of pro-Iranian proxies stretching from Yemen to Lebanon that for years gave Iran considerable power across the region.
‌
Iran may also wait to retaliate, or even choose to engage in further negotiations. Waiting or not retaliating might make the Iranian regime, known for its strict theocracy and repression of its citizens, look weak.
What does this mean for the UK?
A British defence source told the BBC that military personnel are now on high alert. The PM said Britain was not involved in the US attack on Iranian nuclear sites, but that the Government was informed.
‌
Despite this being a mission carried out by the US on its own, the UK remains a key ally in the West. Sir Keir sought to dodge questions about whether the UK could get dragged into the conflict if Iran targeted the bases of the US, a NATO ally.
'I'm not going to speculate about what may happen, because all of my focus is on de-escalation,' he said. Extra RAF Typhoon jets have already been moved to the region and Defence Secretary John Healey said 'force protection is at its highest level' following the US strikes.
MI5 counter terrorism officers might also see a boost in their workload as Iran's sympathisers in the Middle East and individuals in Europe look to retaliate.
The Mirror 's defence editor Chris Hughes suggested the West will 'inevitably suffer "terrorist repercussions from the joint Israeli-American attack on Iran' and that 'the risk of terrorism has now gone through the roof'.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Independent

27 minutes ago

• The Independent

‘Morning Joe' stands up for Trump on Iran strikes and says even Hillary Clinton would have bombed nuke sites

MSNBC star Joe Scarborough came to the defense of his one-time pal Donald Trump on Monday morning, insisting that the president's decision to drop over a dozen bunker-busting bombs on Iran's fortified nuclear facilities would have been made by his predecessors — and Trump's 2016 opponent Hillary Clinton. On Saturday, the United States joined Israel's military campaign against Iran that is aimed at destroying the Middle Eastern adversary's nuclear program, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claiming Tehran was just weeks away from developing a nuclear bomb — an assertion he's made for decades now. 'Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term!' Trump boasted on Truth Social about 'Operation Midnight Hammer,' though experts say satellite imagery reveals the nation's nuclear program is 'far from destroyed.' Meanwhile, after Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth both insisted on Sunday that America wasn't looking for a protracted war that would include toppling Iran's government, the president sang a different tune just hours later. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' Trump posted on his social media platform on Sunday afternoon. While a new poll shows Americans overwhelmingly disapprove of Trump's decision to bomb Iran and worry that it will make the US less safe, Scarborough – an early and vocal cheerleader of the Iraq War – said on Monday's broadcast of Morning Joe that any other president would have handled the situation the same as Trump. 'The president had no good options,' Scarborough declared. 'What would Monday look like if he hadn't have moved, if Iran wasn't already at 60 percent, and an ability to create nuclear weapons in a short matter of time, right? … I'm not championing either side of this.' Turning to Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, the Morning Joe host asserted that the president had enough buy-in from the international community to take military action against Iran, adding that other Republican and Democratic commanders-in-chief would have felt obliged to do the same thing. 'I ask you, how difficult would it have been for any president to not take that shot if they knew that Iran was even being attacked by the United Nations?' Scarborough wondered. 'I find it hard to believe that Bush 41, Bush 43, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, you know, go down the list, any president wouldn't have felt compelled to take that strike.' Agreeing with the host, Ignatius said that Trump 'inherited' the war plans with Iran from his predecessors, adding that this would have been what they considered if they found 'diplomacy wasn't working.' At the same time, he said Trump's 'choices were debased at the moment' and the president 'had to make a decision.'Elsewhere in the show, Scarborough also invoked former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger to observe that the president had only 'difficult choices' in front of him when it came to Iran. 'Henry Kissinger famously said that when you're sitting in the White House and trying to make a decision on foreign policy, the possibility of war, you're never handed a good decision and a bad decision. You're handed two very difficult choices,' he stated. 'And the president made that choice.' While Scarborough and his wife/co-host Mika Brzezinski have been loud critics of the president for years now, that wasn't always the case. Considering him a longtime personal friend, the couple provided Trump a hefty boost in the nascent days of his 2016 presidential campaign, giving the then-reality TV star free rein of their program while promoting his candidacy. Though there would be a bitter split between the Morning Joe hosts and Trump prior to his winning the 2016 election, which would include the president peddling wild conspiracy theories about Scarborough killing an intern, the icy relationship may have begun to thaw in recent months. The couple traveled to Mar-a-Lago for an off-the-record huddle with Trump after his electoral victory in November, prompting viewers to briefly boycott Morning Joe over the perceived 'kissing the ring' trip. As for Scarborough's own foreign policy views, the former GOP congressman was a fervent supporter of invading Iraq over the George W. Bush administration's claims that the country was developing weapons of mass destruction. Though he has tried over the years to selectively criticize other cheerleaders of that war without pointing that finger at himself, Scarborough spent the early months of the Iraq War raging at news outlets, media figures and politicians he felt were too negative and critical about the US-led invasion. 'These leftist stooges for anti-American causes are always given a free pass,' he ranted in April 2003 to then-MSNBC colleague Michael Savage. 'Isn't it time to make them stand up and be counted for their views?!'

The Guardian

34 minutes ago

• The Guardian

Zohran Mamdani appears to pull ahead of Andrew Cuomo, according to new poll

Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic candidate for mayor of New York City, has drawn level with Andrew Cuomo in the city's primary, according to a new poll, as voters brave record-breaking temperatures to cast their ballots. Mamdani, a 33-year-old New York assemblyman, may even be leading Cuomo, the 67-year-old former governor and scion of a prominent New York political family, if the poll's simulation of the system of ranked-choice voting is correct. A survey by Emerson College Polling/PIX11/The Hill, found that Cuomo led Mamdani 35% to 32% – within the margin of error – for first-choice votes but when calculated by voters' final round choices, with six other candidates eliminated, Mamdani came out on top at 52% to Cuomo's 48%. Under the new 'ranked choice' system, voters select their top five candidates in order of preference. If no candidate surpasses 50% in the first round of voting, the candidate who's last is eliminated and their votes are redistributed. That could, in theory, favor candidates that have not until now featured strongly in the polls, including comptroller Brad Lander, who was last week detained by Ice agents, or Adrienne Adams, the city council speaker, or Scott Stringer, the former comptroller. But the mayoral primary does not include Eric Adams, the current Democratic mayor who has decided to run in November's election as an independent after becoming embroiled in a fundraising scandal. Cuomo, too, is still tarred by the sexual harassment claims that forced him to resign as governor in 2021. The down-ticket race also features another New Yorker, or 'boomerang candidate', with a clouded reputation. Anthony Weiner, subject of multiple sexting scandals, is running for the city council. Cuomo has led the polls until now, but Mamdani has surged in recent weeks, setting up a contest between a centrist and a progressive that may, or may not, indicate the direction of travel for Democrats nationally. Both factions of the party will welcome a win as significantly indicative. Cuomo, whose campaign is lavishly backed by some of New York's richest people, is endorsed by Mike Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York City, as well as Bill Clinton and Jim Clyburn, the influential South Carolina congressman. Meanwhile Mamdani scored endorsements from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders, but not the New York Times editorial board, which called him 'uniquely unsuited' for the city's challenges. The race between the leading candidates has been colored by international politics, with some accusing Mamdani of being antisemitic after he defended the phrase 'globalize the intifada'. Mamdani says the phrase has been deliberately misinterpreted to smear him and others who stand up for Palestinian rights. After the US strike on Iranian nuclear facilities at the weekend, Mamdani slammed the military action as heralding a 'dark new chapter' for America. 'Donald Trump ran for president promising to end wars, not start new ones,' he said on X, and said the 'unconstitutional military action represents a dark, new chapter in his endless betrayals that now threaten to plunge the world deeper into chaos.' Cuomo later addressed the subject: 'Iran cannot have nuclear capability. That's number one,' he said. 'It's dangerous, not only for the region, it's dangerous internationally. It's dangerous for the United States.'

The Guardian

34 minutes ago

• The Guardian

Zelenskyy calls Russia, Iran and North Korea a ‘coalition of murderers'

Volodymyr Zelenskyy has described Russia, Iran and North Korea as a 'coalition of murderers' during a visit to London in which he held talks with Keir Starmer on defence cooperation and how to put further pressure on Moscow. Ukraine's president arrived in the UK on Monday, hours after the Kremlin launched another big air raid on Kyiv. It involved 352 drones – half of them were Iranian-designed Shaheds - and North Korean ballistic missiles in what Zelenskyy called 'a completely cynical strike'. At least 10 people were killed and five civilian apartment blocks badly damaged. 'A large number of drones and missiles were shot down by our air defenders — but not all,' Zelenskyy posted on social media. 'Everyone in countries neighbouring Russia, Iran, and North Korea should be thinking carefully about whether they could protect lives if this coalition of murderers persists and continues spreading their terror.' Zelenskyy has supported Donald Trump's missile strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and has accused Tehran of complicity in Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, now in its fourth year. Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons arsenal in the 1990s in exchange for US, British and Russian security guarantees. These failed, however, to prevent Vladimir Putin's 2022 attack. Zelenskyy's latest trip to the UK was to discuss how to compel Russia to stop its war, Ukrainian officials said. His previous visit in March followed a disastrous meeting in the Oval Office in which Trump accused him of 'gambling with world war three' and the US vice-president, JD Vance, berated him for supposed ingratitude. Monday's discussions encompassed sanctions and the Trump administration, which has so far refused to punish Russia and has practically ended US weapons deliveries to Kyiv. Ukraine has been attempting to keep Washington onside diplomatically, despite its apparent pivot to Moscow. 'We will be negotiating new and powerful steps to increase pressure on Russia for this war and to put an end to the strikes,' Zelenskyy said of his London trip. As well as talks with Starmer, he met King Charles at Windsor castle and visited Ukrainian soldiers receiving military training in the UK. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Zelenskyy is likely to travel to this week's two-day Nato summit in The Hague and is scheduled to meet the alliance's secretary general, Mark Rutte. It is unclear if he will have a face-to-face meeting with Trump, who is expected to arrive on Tuesday and push for greater defence spending from Nato member states. Since Trump's return to the White House in January, Russia has dramatically stepped up its aerial attacks on Ukraine. It has refused Zelenskyy's offer of a 30-day ceasefire and continues to target civilians. Monday's strikes hit a residential area, hospitals and sports infrastructure. The most severe damage was in Shevchenkivskyi district, where a section of a five-storey apartment building collapsed. Kyiv's mayor, Vitali Klitschko, said six people had been killed in the district. Ten others, including a pregnant woman, were rescued from a nearby high-rise that also sustained heavy damage. Oleksii Pozychaniuk, 29, who lives in the building next to the one struck, said he heard the whistle of a rocket approaching and 'froze in terror' before feeling the impact. 'Windows blew out, glass was flying everywhere,' he told the Associated Press. 'We barely made it downstairs with my child. Everything here was on fire.'