Big opposition to joint water CCO
A sample of submissions for a joint local government water initiative suggests officials may have a fight on their hands.
The Clutha District Council meets in Balclutha today for hearings on its Southern Water Done Well proposals.
Thirty-three groups and individuals are scheduled to speak to their submissions regarding the proposals, under which Clutha would join forces with the Waitaki, Central Otago and Gore District Councils to manage water services infrastructure and delivery.
The council received 393 submissions during consultation, of which only the 33 from those speaking to their submissions have been made public.
Of those, 29 (88%) opposed Clutha forming a jointly council-controlled organisation (CCO), the preferred option put forward by all four councils in the group.
Only four favoured a joint or stand-alone CCO model, some with modifications.
During consultation, Clutha District Mayor Bryan Cadogan described the joint CCO as the "least bad" solution to the latest central government push for water reform.
Documents showed the four councils collectively accruing $598 million of water infrastructure debt by 2034, as they expected to spend $760m on providing improved water services in line with more stringent regulations.
At the time, Mr Cadogan said the joint CCO could lead to modest efficiencies and savings for ratepayers.
Other options included formation of a stand-alone CCO, or an in-house business unit.
Mr Cadogan warned these options could consign Clutha to insolvency during the next decade, due to mounting infrastructure debt.
Submissions against the joint council-controlled organisation cited "loss of local control" and "lack of transparency" as concerns.
Submitter Alex de Boer, of Owaka, said centralisation had been demonstrated not to work.
"The sums show very little advantage in rating by 2033-34.
"Combining with other areas will cause loss of focus on our unique issues.
"Centralisation did not work for the polytechs, hospital boards or the Auckland 'Super City'. Rates rose a lot."
Council deputy chief executive Jules Witt said yesterday the council could not comment on the overall split of submissions until the hearings had been completed.
"Council is still in the process of collating and analysing the submissions received. The submissions are part of the overall decision-making process of council," he said.
The Waitaki, Central Otago and Gore District Councils are also seeking feedback on the proposals at present.
The government will assess the council's resulting water services delivery plan and provide feedback from December.
If approved, a jointly owned CCO would begin operation in July 2027.
richard.davison@odt.co.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
4 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Big opposition to joint water CCO
A sample of submissions for a joint local government water initiative suggests officials may have a fight on their hands. The Clutha District Council meets in Balclutha today for hearings on its Southern Water Done Well proposals. Thirty-three groups and individuals are scheduled to speak to their submissions regarding the proposals, under which Clutha would join forces with the Waitaki, Central Otago and Gore District Councils to manage water services infrastructure and delivery. The council received 393 submissions during consultation, of which only the 33 from those speaking to their submissions have been made public. Of those, 29 (88%) opposed Clutha forming a jointly council-controlled organisation (CCO), the preferred option put forward by all four councils in the group. Only four favoured a joint or stand-alone CCO model, some with modifications. During consultation, Clutha District Mayor Bryan Cadogan described the joint CCO as the "least bad" solution to the latest central government push for water reform. Documents showed the four councils collectively accruing $598 million of water infrastructure debt by 2034, as they expected to spend $760m on providing improved water services in line with more stringent regulations. At the time, Mr Cadogan said the joint CCO could lead to modest efficiencies and savings for ratepayers. Other options included formation of a stand-alone CCO, or an in-house business unit. Mr Cadogan warned these options could consign Clutha to insolvency during the next decade, due to mounting infrastructure debt. Submissions against the joint council-controlled organisation cited "loss of local control" and "lack of transparency" as concerns. Submitter Alex de Boer, of Owaka, said centralisation had been demonstrated not to work. "The sums show very little advantage in rating by 2033-34. "Combining with other areas will cause loss of focus on our unique issues. "Centralisation did not work for the polytechs, hospital boards or the Auckland 'Super City'. Rates rose a lot." Council deputy chief executive Jules Witt said yesterday the council could not comment on the overall split of submissions until the hearings had been completed. "Council is still in the process of collating and analysing the submissions received. The submissions are part of the overall decision-making process of council," he said. The Waitaki, Central Otago and Gore District Councils are also seeking feedback on the proposals at present. The government will assess the council's resulting water services delivery plan and provide feedback from December. If approved, a jointly owned CCO would begin operation in July 2027.
Otago Daily Times
07-06-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Economist backs new water services model
One of New Zealand's best-known economists is backing the maths behind a move to shift control of Waitaki's water services and assets to a new company, jointly-formed by four Otago district councils. With water charges due to come off rates bills from the 2027 financial year because of changes to government regulations, Infometrics chief economist Brad Olsen has voiced strong support for Southern Water Done Well's preferred water services delivery model, saying it offered the "best pathway" to safe, reliable water services and long-term financial benefits for the districts involved. SWDW's four partner councils — Waitaki, Gore, Central Otago, and Clutha district councils — are consulting on options for the future delivery of water services to meet the government's Local Water Done Well legislation. Their preferred delivery model is a jointly owned council-controlled organisation (CCO) covering all four districts. The other three options being consulted on are a standalone Waitaki CCO, an in-house business unit, and in the case of WDC only, a joint CCO with Mackenzie, Timaru and Waimate districts. At a recent meeting of Southern Water Done Well (SWDW) elected politicians and senior staff, Mr Olsen outlined what he felt were the positives of the joint CCO option. Mr Olsen said one of the "most compelling" advantages was the leap in bargaining power, a media statement issued by the SWDW group said. Individually, the four councils each represent just 1% to 2% of the South Island's population. However, by forming a jointly owned council controlled organisation, they collectively represent 6.6% of the South Island's population. "That shift in scale is transformative. "In a tight infrastructure market, scale gives you options and leverage." SWDW, through Wellington-based consultants Morrison Low, has modelled all of the options, for water charges in 2027-28 and 2033-34 years in the Waitaki district. Mr Olsen noted SWDW's deliberately conservative approach to financial modelling for the jointly owned CCO. While short-term financial gains might be modest, water assets were long-term (20 years+) and by year 20, modelling for other joint water services delivery entities showed potential savings of up to 20% compared with going it alone. "Even under these conservative assumptions, the numbers still stack up." The conservative modelling projects 15% to 16% operating and capital efficiencies being achieved over "roughly a decade, which is a similar timeframe to achieve efficiencies as seen in other spaces". WDC's public consultation on the four options ends today at 5pm. Water options Water options considered (prices per year) Joint ''Southern Water Done Well'' 2027-28 2033-34 Joint council CCO (SWDW) $2168 $2894 Stand-alone CCO $2466 $3754 In-house business unit $2269 $3093 The South Canterbury council's model 2027-28 2033-34 In-house business unit $2041 $2924 Joint council $2269 $3093
Otago Daily Times
03-06-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Joint CCO best water option: Infometrics
A leading economist has voiced strong support for Southern Water Done Well's preferred water services delivery model, saying it offers the best pathway to safe, reliable water services and long-term financial benefits for the southern region. At a recent meeting of Southern Water Done Well (SWDW), political leaders and senior staff heard from Infometrics chief executive Brad Olsen and his views on water reforms. Southern Water Done Well project leader Andrew Strahan said Infometrics was provided with documents to review. Those included the latest Morrison Low report, which included work last year for the group of eight Southland and Otago councils, a peer review of the benefits, briefings for elected members and consultation documents. SWDW's four partner councils — Waitaki, Gore, Central Otago and Clutha district councils — are consulting on three options for the future delivery of water services to meet the government's Local Water Done Well legislation. Their preferred delivery model is a jointly owned council-controlled organisation (CCO). The Infometrics chief executive and principal economist agreed, saying it provided a strategic, carefully considered approach to meeting future water services challenges. "Status quo is just not going to cut it any more. And if it does, it'll become so expensive that the community won't tolerate it ... the government clearly isn't tolerating it already. "So, effectively, things needs to change." One of the most compelling advantages of SWDW's preferred model was the leap in bargaining power it delivered. Individually, the four councils each represented just 1% to 2% of the South Island's population, placing them 13th to 18th out of 23 South Island councils, in terms of scale. By forming a jointly owned CCO, they collectively moved into the fourth-largest position, representing 6.6% of the South Island's population. "That shift in scale is transformative," said Mr Olsen. "It gives councils and their communities far greater influence when negotiating with contractors, accessing skilled staff and securing funding. In a tight infrastructure market, scale gives you options and leverage." Even greater efficiencies would be gained if other councils were accepted into a jointly owned CCO at some point in the future. Mr Olsen noted SWDW's deliberately conservative approach to financial modelling for the jointly owned CCO and emphasised the importance of looking long-term. While short-term financial gains might be modest, water assets were long-term (20 years+) and by year 20, modelling for other joint water services delivery entities had shown potential savings of up to 20% compared to going it alone, he said. Just as significantly, the joint approach improved resilience, attracted talent and helped councils meet more demanding compliance standards without overburdening local ratepayers. Mr Olsen believed there was potential for even greater gains beyond initial projections. "We've reviewed the assumptions, and they're conservative. That's appropriate, given the significant changes that have to happen, but even under these conservative assumptions, the numbers still stack up." The conservative modelling still projected 15%-16% operating and capital efficiencies being achieved over "roughly a decade", which was "a similar timeframe to achieve efficiencies as seen in other spaces". Morrison Low's modelling of the benefits of a jointly owned CCO shows SWDW consumers would save $44 million by 2033-34 compared to where costs would otherwise increase to. In its first 10 years, the jointly owned CCO would deliver $82 million in savings to consumers. Olsen also highlighted that the proposed model retained community ownership while delivering greater long-term benefits through scale and co-ordination. Southern Water Done Well's preferred delivery model gave councils the scale, flexibility and financial sustainability they simply could not get on their own while retaining community ownership and voice, Mr Olsen said. Southern Water Done Well consultation closes this Friday.
