logo
Sisseton's Roberts County Farm Mutual marks 120 years serving South Dakota communities

Sisseton's Roberts County Farm Mutual marks 120 years serving South Dakota communities

Yahoo11-06-2025

Roberts County Farm Mutual Insurance Company (RCMI) marks 120 years of business this year. Having served South Dakotans since the early 20th century, the company is owned by its policyholders, and they are therefore considered a 'hometown' company by clients.
'It is quite an accomplishment for a small town to have an insurance company,' said Julie Stapleton, who has been a manager at RCMI since 2012.
As one of the oldest existing businesses in Sisseton, Stapleton says the business still has a few policies in effect from the first policy numbers.
More: Watertown opens new City Hall with help from Aberdeen construction co.
'RCMI supports their local clients and all of their clients statewide,' she told the Public Opinion. 'The current staff at Roberts Mutual strives to help the community and does many local community projects throughout the year and helps sponsor many local events. Roberts Mutual has helped two other Mutuals in the state by merging with them, and then they were able to take on their agents and clients.'
RCMI began offering its products statewide in 1984. The company merged with Kingsbury Farm Mutual just over three decades ago, then with Denver-Kingsbury Farm Mutual Insurance Company in 1998. Finally, in 2008, RCMI merged with Central Farm Mutual in Onida, expanding its business into the western part of South Dakota.
More: South Dakota records best pheasant hunting season in 13 years, state parks department says
Stapleton says her company also has been able to help the Dakota Farm Mutual Insurance Company and their clients through the years.
Currently, RCMI has roughly 60 agents across the state and have grown from a humble beginning to nearly 2,000 policyholders.
'In general, Roberts Mutual is able to provide a product that has small town appeal and affordable rates and excellent coverage,' Stapleton said.
The home office building — a rental that was formerly a bank — burned down in 1959. The company then rebuilt the current office building.
'So, Roberts Mutual built around the two bank vaults,' Stapleton said. 'RCMI has two bank vaults. Roberts Mutual was able to purchase the building next door to them and expanded the office in 2006-2007.'
In the end, the company returns to its reliable, local roots.
'RCMI has had many local faces serve on the Board of Directors over the years,' Stapleton said. 'Several local staff members and some local agents got their start in the Roberts Mutual Office Building. It has a long history of being on Main Street. Roberts is a fantastic place to work, and it shows with the longevity of the staff. There is over 85 years of combined insurance knowledge with the current staff. Roberts has always put family first, and the staff and directors are like family.'
This article originally appeared on Watertown Public Opinion: South Dakota's Roberts County Farm Mutual Insurance turns 120

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After House passes public broadcasting cuts, Lakeshore Public Media focuses on Senate
After House passes public broadcasting cuts, Lakeshore Public Media focuses on Senate

Chicago Tribune

time5 days ago

  • Chicago Tribune

After House passes public broadcasting cuts, Lakeshore Public Media focuses on Senate

Public broadcasting platforms, like Lakeshore Public Media, are looking to the Senate 'as the last hope' to save federal funding, said CEO Chuck Roberts. The U.S. House voted Thursday to cut about $9.4 billion in spending already approved by Congress targeting foreign aid programs and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides money for National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service. The vote was 214-212. Specifically, the bill includes cutting nearly $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which also provides funding for thousands of public radio and television stations around the country. If the Senate approves the cut, that would take away the full amount CPB was slated to receive during the next two budget years. The benefit for President Donald Trump's administration of a formal rescissions request is that the passage requires only a simple majority in the 100-member Senate instead of the 60 votes usually required to get spending bills through that chamber. So if they stay largely united, Republicans will be able to pass the measure without any Democratic votes. Leah Selk, a spokeswoman with Republican Senator Todd Young's office said the senator 'continues to have conversations with stakeholders' about the proposed cuts. 'It remains unclear if the Senate will take up the House-passed bill or go a different route,' Selk said. Senator Jim Banks did not respond to requests for comment. Roberts said the proposed budget cuts present 'very tenuous times' for Lakeshore Public Media. 'Not only for the organization that is Lakeshore Public Media, but also the many people that will lose the needed services and content across Northwest Indiana and our friends in Illinois, due to state and federal funding cuts,' Roberts said. In the final hours of the 2025 session, the Indiana legislature passed a biennial budget that cuts funding to all Indiana PBS and NPR stations, Roberts said. Lakeshore Public Media will lose approximately $380,000 per year of the biennial budget, he said, which represents nearly 30% of its annual budget. If the federal funds are cut, Roberts said Lakeshore Public Media will lose another approximately $560,000, or another 30% of its annual budget, Roberts said. Lakeshore Public Media has already laid off two-thirds of its staff amid the cuts, Roberts said. 'With the state funding cuts, you will see a reduction in the production of local content and the jobs of some awesome people telling the stories of Northwest Indiana. Federal cuts will have even further consequences for public media in our neighborhoods,' Roberts said. Indiana Public Broadcasting Stations, which represents the state's 17 PBS and NPR member stations, has been 'closely monitoring' the decisions made in Washington, said IPBS executive director Mark Newman. 'Our focus now shifts to the Senate, where we will continue to work with our partners and policymakers to emphasize the value of this essential public service,' Newman said. Indiana Public Broadcasting Stations offer news, classroom-ready education content, emergency alerts and cultural programming, Newman said. If the federal cuts are implemented, that would impact support to local station operations, especially in rural and underserved communities, he said. 'Federal support makes it possible for stations to extend their reach, deepen their journalism, and build programs that reflect the people and stories of Indiana,' Newman said. 'We will continue engaging with stakeholders at every level to ensure the critical role of public media is understood and preserved.'

Town hall tour centers on agriculture in Mitchell visit
Town hall tour centers on agriculture in Mitchell visit

Yahoo

time13-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Town hall tour centers on agriculture in Mitchell visit

Jun. 12—MITCHELL — On Wednesday evening, Dakota Wesleyan University hosted a town hall that brought together fewer than 50 local farmers and community members for a focused conversation on the challenges facing South Dakota's agriculture sector. The event was part of a statewide series organized by Nikki Gronli, former USDA Rural Development state director and former vice chairperson of the South Dakota Democratic Party, and Julian Beaudion, a Democratic Party candidate for U.S. Senate, aimed at giving South Dakotans a platform to share their concerns. Previous town halls in Rapid City, Aberdeen, Vermillion, and Sioux Falls attracted larger crowds and allowed participants to raise a wide range of issues, including cuts to Medicaid, the Department of Education, and the impact of trade tariffs. For the Mitchell meeting, however, organizers decided to narrow the discussion to focus solely on agriculture, a vital part of South Dakota's economy and culture. "We decided to switch things up for this town hall," said Gronli. "Instead of letting people bring up any topic like before, we wanted to try focusing on just one issue and see what the response would be." Joining Gronli and Beaudion on the panel were Marcia Bunger, a farmer and former administrator at the USDA's Risk Management Agency under President Joe Biden, and Al Merrill, a third-generation farmer from Parker. The discussion covered key agricultural concerns including economic pressures, federal policies, labor shortages, and funding for research and innovation. Bunger opened by outlining the tough financial outlook for farmers this year. According to Bunger, corn prices have fallen below $4 per bushel and soybeans are under $10, while costs for seeds, fertilizer, and equipment remain high. Many farmers face losses ranging from $50 to $100 per acre on corn, with even greater losses on soybeans. "Farmers are not going to make any money this year," Bunger said bluntly. This economic pressure was not new, she said, recalling the 2017 trade war with China that sent corn prices tumbling below $3 per bushel. "Tariffs get placed on the backs of farmers every time there's political tension," she said. Labor shortages were also a key topic, especially regarding the reliance on immigrant workers for harvesting fruits, vegetables, and dairy production. Bunger described how immigration enforcement actions have disrupted farming communities. "When ICE shows up and just drags people away, it hurts the farms, and it hurts families," Bunger said. Merrill added that many immigrant workers are eager to work and are essential to the farm economy. Beaudion emphasized the interconnectedness of these issues. He pointed out that South Dakota farmers export nearly a billion dollars in products through West Coast ports, which also rely on immigrant labor. The panelists agreed that immigration is both a human and economic issue that requires bipartisan attention. One audience member suggested reviewing immigration policy every five years to adjust to changing needs. The group then turned to federal policy, focusing on the farm bill — a comprehensive piece of legislation that governs agricultural and food programs nationwide, typically renewed every five years. Since the 2018 farm bill has been extended twice, its uncertain future is causing concern among farmers. Gronli noted that some parts of the bill may be folded into a reconciliation act with a 2031 deadline, potentially creating confusion and overlap. Broader federal budget cuts also sparked discussion, including reductions to SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) benefits and local food programs. Beaudion explained that a 10% cut to SNAP could increase monthly food expenses for South Dakota families by approximately $267. Joel Allen, director of the McGovern Center at DWU, raised questions about the McGovern-Dole Food for Education program, the largest school-based feeding initiative globally, which faces funding uncertainties. Gronli confirmed that many food assistance programs have seen reductions. "These cuts affect the children of the next generation," Beaudion said. Merrill suggested that farmers would likely support a universal school lunch program to help children and strengthen communities. Another concern raised was the potential loss of USDA staff, with up to 25% of the workforce expected to leave by September. Gronli warned this could mean a significant loss of institutional knowledge in rural areas. "That's institutional knowledge walking out the door, and many of these federal workers hold some of the best jobs in small rural communities," she said. Industry concentration in meat processing also came under scrutiny. Frank Kloucek, a farmer and former state legislator from Scotland, highlighted the growing foreign ownership of major companies like Smithfield and Tyson. He advocated for restoring country of origin labeling (COOL), which requires meat products to be labeled with their country of origin, helping consumers make informed choices and supporting local producers. Kloucek also called for stronger enforcement of the Packers and Stockyards Act, a law designed to promote fair competition and protect farmers from unfair practices in livestock and meat markets. Bunger shared an example from the poultry industry, where farmers who invested heavily in building barns lost contracts and insurance coverage after avian flu outbreaks forced companies to remove birds. Because the farmers did not own the birds, they faced substantial debt without compensation. "That sent shivers down my spine thinking about what could happen to our pork producers," she said. The panel also emphasized the importance of agricultural research and disease prevention. Merrill stressed ongoing investment in protecting livestock from diseases like avian flu and foot-and-mouth disease is essential to safeguarding the food supply. Kloucek lamented that short-term budget cuts threaten long-term research projects. "If you're not in it for decades, you're not really in it," he said. As the evening concluded, Beaudion encouraged attendees to stay engaged and communicate with elected officials. "Don't talk about nonsense. Talk about the things that matter to South Dakotans," he said.

Missouri prepares for sports betting rollout
Missouri prepares for sports betting rollout

Yahoo

time11-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Missouri prepares for sports betting rollout

JOPLIN, Mo. — Legal sports betting in Missouri is now just a few months away. If you want to place a bet on the big game, that's legal for half of the Four States. Sports betting is allowed in Kansas and Arkansas, and isn't far off for Missouri. 'For a number of years, people have tried to convince us that we are losing revenue to other states. It doesn't change the activity. People who live in Missouri still engage in the activity. It's just that we don't benefit in any way from it, and it was simply good for business,' said MO. Rep. Lane Roberts, R. The Show Me State switch is happening in 2025 with the 'Missouri Gaming Commission' taking applications for direct mobile licenses through next month. There are a couple more months to go for applicants for other retail and mobile licenses. 'I think we're pretty much on target – I believe the end of the year is what we'd like to accomplish,' said Roberts. Voters approved sports betting last fall, setting that timeline in motion. Much of the tax revenue from the change is earmarked for education. That comes from a state tax of ten percent, something that had been a longtime issues for state lawmakers. 'We normally try to attach that to something that benefits a certain area of our budget or a population,' said Roberts. The Gaming Commission expects to officially launch Missouri Sports betting on December 1. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store