NHS staff protest against 'huge' jobs cuts in Cambridge amid warnings patient care could be damaged

Staff are protesting against hundreds of job cuts at a major hospital trust, amid warnings that patient care could be "damaged."
Members of the Unite union at the Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) demonstrated outside Addenbrooke's Hospital on Wednesday.
The trust has announced that over 500 jobs are at risk - approximately 4% of the total workforce - in a move described as a "difficult but necessary" decision.
The cuts come after a mandate from NHS England earlier this year, which said that spending on support functions in NHS trusts must return to April 2022 levels.
Five hundred roles at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH), which is Norfolk's largest hospital, have also been put at risk, although the exact number has yet to be decided.
Unite's lead representative at Addenbrooke's Craig Jamieson, said: "My role in clinical engineering is at risk and it is very worrying.
"Everybody you speak to at the hospital is very concerned and anxious about what will happen."Already, many of my colleagues work unpaid overtime, and stress and mental health problems are major reasons why staff go off sick. If these cuts are pushed through, I only see that getting worse."
Roles up for redundancy include those working in "support functions" such as porters, maintenance staff, plumbers, engineers and those in administrative and clerical roles.But according to Unite, staff are concerned that losing these support roles will leave workers having to take on more as well as impacting patient care.
Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: "These huge cuts across NHS trusts in Cambridgeshire are a blunt tool that risks damaging patient care, quality and waiting times."Unite stands firmly against these cuts."
A CUH spokesperson said: 'Like all NHS Trusts, we have been asked to reduce the cost of our support functions this year to April 2022 levels."For CUH, which has a total workforce of 13,000 staff, this means a reduction of around 500 posts not delivering direct clinical care."The statement continued: 'We are taking all possible steps to minimise redundancies, through natural turnover by not recruiting to posts when staff leave, holding vacancies empty and a mutually agreed resignation scheme.'We appreciate it is a worrying and uncertain time for many colleagues working in the NHS, and we have put in place a range of measures to support staff during this process.'Over the past three years we have invested in additional staff, and our focus on productivity and efficiency means we delivered more than £53m of savings in the last financial year.'Taking these difficult but necessary decisions will help us manage our budget in the coming year and in the long term, while continuing to meet the needs of our patients now and in the future.
"Throughout this process, we will ensure that patient safety remains our absolute priority.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Times

39 minutes ago

• Times

I know my public sector pension is great, but I can't afford it

M ohamed Habad has a workplace pension that millions of workers can only dream of. As a foundation doctor at the Princess Alexandra Hospital in Harlow, Essex, he was automatically enrolled in the NHS pension scheme. He was contributing 9.8 per cent of his salary and his employer was paying in an enormous 23.7 per cent. So why has he opted out of this generous savings scheme — along with many more of his NHS colleagues? Habad, 28, graduated from medical school last summer but it could be nine years until he completes his training to become an orthopaedic surgeon. He pays £800 a month to rent his room in hospital accommodation, £600 to help his family cover his empty room in their London council flat, about £300 a month on groceries and £200 on gas and electricity.

The Sun

an hour ago

• The Sun

Assisted dying puts price on my head, says disabled peer Lord Kevin Shinkwin as he speaks out against the bill

A DISABLED peer said he fears he would not be alive today if assisted dying was already legal. Lord Kevin Shinkwin said the Terminally Ill Adults Bill 'puts a price on my head' and he would have felt pressure to agree to having a lethal injection over fear of being a burden. 1 The Tory's warning comes as campaigners vow to fight the assisted dying bill in the Lords after MPs narrowly backed it by just 23 votes on Friday. Lord Shinkwin, 54, is a disability rights campaigner who has a severe form of brittle bone disease. He said: 'I am a disabled person. I cost the NHS, over the course of my lifetime, probably several million pounds to keep me alive. 'This Bill would put a price on my head — on the head of so many disabled people.' Asked if he feared he would not be alive today if the assisted dying law was in force, Lord Shinkwin said: 'I think you have hit the nail on the head. "Absolutely. I was in intensive care a few months ago, and had a doctor come over to me when I was extremely vulnerable and said, 'Have you considered assisted dying?', I would have felt under real pressure to do that.' Lord Shinkwin said he and other peers will now amend the Bill so it has greater safeguards. As it is a private member's Bill and not a government initiative, some peers are vowing to try to block it altogether. ASSISTED DYING VOTE What Happens Next? - With the Commons backing the Bill, it now moves to the House of Lords for detailed debate and scrutiny. - Peers can suggest amendments, which would send the Bill back to the Commons — a process known as 'ping pong'. - But because this is a major conscience issue, the unelected Lords are unlikely to block it outright after it passed the elected House. - Supporters hope it will win final approval and receive Royal Assent by October, officially becoming law. - A four-year implementation period will follow, allowing time to establish the new system, including expert panels and regulatory safeguards.

Scottish Sun

2 hours ago

• Scottish Sun

English region where men use most Viagra revealed – where does your town rank?

NHS stats show men in the North used the little blue pills much more often than in the South last year STIFF COMPETITION English region where men use most Viagra revealed – where does your town rank? Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) FELLAS from Yorkshire need most help rising to the occasion in the bedroom, according to new figures. Chaps in the county are given the most prescriptions for Viagra or similar drugs to aid performance. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 NHS stats show men in the North used the little blue pills much more often than in the South last year. The East Riding of Yorkshire, including the towns of Goole, Beverley and Bridlington, topped the table with 3.572 per cent needing them. But it faced stiff opposition from Northumberland with 3.359 per cent. Other Yorkshire towns where a high proportion of men needed a bedtime boost were Rotherham, Barnsley and Scarborough. Meanwhile, those in Dorset, including the coastal towns of Poole and Bournemouth which are popular with retired folk, also made the top five with 3.274 per cent. But fellas in large areas of London, Cambridgeshire and Berkshire were far less likely to get the prescription. Leicester had the lowest rate at 1.5 per cent. Consultant urologist Gordon Muir, of London Bridge Hospital, said: 'NHS provision of this treatment can vary from region to region, as can the ratio of underlying disease which probably explains some of the differences.' Inside UK's fake Viagra epidemic…agonising three-day effects, 50p hits and deadly drugs, drywall & ink used as 'fillers'