US bombing of Iran started with a fake-out
As Operation "Midnight Hammer" got underway on Saturday, a group of B-2 bombers took off from their base in Missouri and were noticed heading out toward the Pacific island of Guam, in what experts saw as possible pre-positioning for any US decision to strike Iran.
But they were a decoy. The real group of seven bat-winged, B-2 stealth bombers flew east undetected for 18 hours, keeping communications to a minimum, refueling in mid-air, the US military revealed on Sunday.
As the bombers neared Iranian airspace, a US submarine launched more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles. US fighter jets flew as decoys in front of the bombers to sweep for any Iranian fighter jets and missiles.
The attack on Iran's three main nuclear sites was the largest operational strike ever by B-2 stealth bombers, and the second-longest B-2 operation ever flown, surpassed only by those following the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States by al Qaeda.
The B-2 bombers dropped 14 bunker-busting GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, each weighing 13,600 kg. The operation involved over 125 US military aircraft, according to the Pentagon.
From the US military's perspective, the operation was a resounding tactical success. The Iranians were unable to get off a single round at the American aircraft and were caught completely flat-footed, General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters at the Pentagon on Sunday.
"Iran's fighters did not fly, and it appears that Iran's surface to air missile systems did not see us throughout the mission," Caine said. "We retained the element of surprise."
Caine said initial battle damage assessments indicated that all three sites targeted sustained extremely severe damage and destruction, but he declined to speculate whether any Iranian nuclear capabilities might still be intact.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was more confident.
"It was clear we devastated the Iranian nuclear program," he said, standing alongside Caine in the Pentagon briefing room.
Midnight Hammer was highly classified, Caine said, "with very few people in Washington knowing the timing or nature of the plan." Many senior officials in the United States only learned of it on Saturday night from President Donald Trump's first post on social media.
Hegseth said it took months of preparations to ensure the US military would be ready if Trump ordered the strikes. Caine said the mission itself, however, came together in just a matter of weeks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
39 minutes ago
- The Age
Master stroke or mistake? Trump defies his base in seizing the moment to strike Iran
Washington: Five months after the starter's gun fired on Donald Trump's second presidency, he has made his most consequential decision. Perhaps not just the most consequential decision of just his presidency, but of several, given the decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities had been one faced by many of his predecessors, who ultimately opted against the idea. The merits of this cannot and will not be known today, not until the damage to the three Iranian sites has been assessed and the regime's retaliation, whatever that may be, has taken place. But politically, this move fundamentally changes the shape of the Trump presidency. The accusation of timidity and indecision – Trump Always Chickens Out (TACO) – that has so irritated him in recent months can no longer be credibly levelled against him. Did that irksome critique contribute to his resolve? We don't know. But it is becoming clearer that Trump has followed a predetermined path, or at the very least, seized on an opportunity with relish – and along the way, he has obscured his intentions to America and the world. Loading It was not true on Thursday, when Trump told Iran he would decide within two weeks whether to intervene. It is looking increasingly untrue that Israel, when it kicked off this offensive nine days ago, acted unilaterally and without US involvement, as we were told at the time. 'We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before,' Trump said on Sunday (AEST) of the US and Israel. Of Iran's state-sponsored terrorism, he said: 'I decided a long time ago that I would not let this happen.'
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
‘Inflection point in history': The world must consider what happens next in Israel-Iran conflict
Sky News host Chris Kenny discusses the 'pathetic' approach of the Albanese Labor government to America's bombing of Iranian nuclear sites. 'This is an inflection point in history,' Mr Kenny said. 'We need to consider what might happen next.'
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Diplomacy can't deliver the quick wins Trump craves. But neither can war
The tumultuous '20s get ever more tumultuous. After the pandemic in 2020, the storming of the US Capitol in 2021, Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Hamas's attacks on Israel in 2023 and the re-election of Donald Trump in 2024, now, at the midpoint of 2025, comes the US entry into the war against Iran. Wearing a crimson 'Make America Great Again' cap in the Situation Room of the White House, the US commander-in-chief oversaw his country's most significant military intervention in more than 20 years. Not since George W. Bush gave the go-ahead in 2003 for US forces to invade Iraq has a president made such a potentially consequential decision. The chaos of what happened after the fall of Saddam Hussein – which the brutal theocracy in Tehran revelled in fomenting – now hangs over America's latest Middle East adventure. But there is also the possibility that Trump could achieve a feat that eluded his predecessors: elimination of Iran's nuclear threat without heavy American loss of life. With so many unknown unknowns, it is too early to say. Already, the crisis has put on display so many hallmarks of Trump's leadership. The utter unpredictability of a president who signalled last week that a window had opened up for diplomacy. His readiness to gamble. His impatience with the slow pace of negotiated solutions – it took the Obama administration and its European Union, Chinese and Russian partners two years to conclude the 2015 Iranian nuclear deal which Trump withdrew from in his first term. There was the ritualistic trashing of European allies, who conducted talks with the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, in Geneva on Friday. 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us,' he said as those talks came to an inconclusive end, even though the UK foreign secretary David Lammy had flown direct from Washington to Geneva carrying a message from the Trump administration to Iran's leadership. Lengthy diplomacy seems to bore this fabled dealmaker who boasted of ending the Ukraine war in a single day. Loading The crisis has demonstrated Trump's penchant for the dramatisation of world affairs. Always, he is centre stage. Each unfolding day is vested with the suspense of an episodic cliffhanger. Even when blood is about to be shed, a factor in his decision-making seems to be the sheer entertainment value of his actions. The flourishes he used in his speech to the nation following the B2 stealth bomber mission was classic Trump. 'We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before,' he boasted of his collaboration with the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The 'great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines' had carried out 'an operation the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades', he added, using the patois of a carnival barker rather than a statesman. Ahead of the US strikes, we were also reminded of his fixation with winning a Nobel Peace Prize, something his nemesis, Barack Obama, achieved, rather undeservedly, early on in his first term. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan,' he moaned on Truth Social, as he cited five conflicts in which his administration had purportedly played a mediating role. In full victim mode, Trump complained he would be overlooked for the prize 'no matter what' he accomplished. Hours after this self-pitying diatribe, he took America to war. Winning is so central to his thinking. Israel, after days of strikes on Tehran and the nuclear sites, clearly had the upper hand. In joining Netanyahu – who stroked Trump's ego afterwards by praising him for 'courageously leading the free world' – he felt he was joining the winning side.
