logo
High Court dismisses committal bid by former KL Tower operator against govt, individuals, orders RM25,000 payment

High Court dismisses committal bid by former KL Tower operator against govt, individuals, orders RM25,000 payment

Malay Mail09-06-2025

KUALA LUMPUR, June 9 — The High Court here today dismissed the former operator of Kuala Lumpur Tower's leave application to commence committal proceedings against seven individuals and the government.
The former operator, Menara Kuala Lumpur Sdn Bhd, and its parent, Hydroshoppe Sdn Bhd, are seeking contempt of court action against the eight for allegedly disrupting the administration of justice amid ongoing legal proceedings.
Judge Roz Mawar Rozain, who rejected the application, ordered the two companies to pay RM25,000 to the respondents, including Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil. — Bernama
MORE TO COME

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Costly click: Facebook investment scam drains Johor retiree of RM535,000 in three months
Costly click: Facebook investment scam drains Johor retiree of RM535,000 in three months

Malay Mail

timean hour ago

  • Malay Mail

Costly click: Facebook investment scam drains Johor retiree of RM535,000 in three months

JOHOR BARU, June 21 — A private sector retiree lost RM535,766 after allegedly falling victim to an online investment scam promoted via an advertisement on the Facebook application. Seri Alam District Police chief ACP Mohd Sohaimi Ishak said the police received a report from a 57-year-old local man on Tuesday, who claimed losses exceeding RM500,000. He said the victim had come across a share investment advertisement on Facebook on March 13 that promised lucrative returns within a short time, and clicked on the provided link out of interest. 'Subsequently, the victim made 26 payment transactions into five different bank accounts between March 13 and June 5, totalling RM535,766. The victim was also asked to make additional payments to withdraw the so-called 'investment profits', but those requests were never fulfilled,' he said in a statement today. Mohd Sohaimi said the victim only realised he had been duped after repeated attempts to recover the investment funds proved futile. 'Preliminary checks via the CCID's 'Semak Mule' platform found that all five accounts involved had a total of 22 police reports linked to investment scams,' he said. The case is being investigated under Section 420 of the Penal Code for cheating, and police are also looking into the possible involvement of mule account holders. — Bernama

Najib DNAA: Time for the attorney general to act and deliver reform — Dzulkifli Ahmad
Najib DNAA: Time for the attorney general to act and deliver reform — Dzulkifli Ahmad

Malay Mail

timean hour ago

  • Malay Mail

Najib DNAA: Time for the attorney general to act and deliver reform — Dzulkifli Ahmad

JUNE 21 — The recent decision by the High Court to grant a discharge not amounting to acquittal (DNAA) to Dato' Seri Najib Razak in the SRC International money laundering case has reignited urgent concerns over the integrity, professionalism and accountability of prosecutorial decisions in Malaysia. The charges, filed in 2019 under then attorney general Tan Sri Tommy Thomas, involved RM27 million under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA). Yet, as of 2025, the prosecution has acknowledged that it is still not ready to proceed. This is more than a delay — it is a failure of prosecutorial governance that demands immediate reform. Why this matters 1. Why charge if the case isn't ready?Prosecutions should only be brought forward when sufficient, admissible evidence is available and the prosecution is trial-ready. Anything less violates due process and undermines public trust in the legal system. 2. What happened under two successive attorneys general?Under the tenure of Tan Sri Idrus Harun and Tan Sri Ahmad Terriruddin Mohd Salleh, the case stalled with no meaningful review or resolution, pointing to a breakdown in internal accountability. 3. Does this violate constitutional rights?Yes. The prolonged delay infringes Article 5(1) — the right to a fair and expeditious trial — and Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law. Selective delays and prolonged inaction are constitutionally indefensible. 4. What does a DNAA mean?A DNAA is neither an acquittal nor a conviction — it suspends proceedings indefinitely, leaving both the accused and the public in legal and moral limbo, without resolution or closure. Lawyer,Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah speaks to reporters on his client Datuk Seri Najib Razak's DNAA at the Kuala Lumpur High Court Complex on June 20,2025. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa What must be done Under the leadership of Tan Sri Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar, the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) must take bold, decisive steps to restore institutional credibility and uphold the rule of law: Ensure all future charges are based on sufficient, admissible evidence and are trial-ready from the outset. Institutionalise internal review mechanisms to monitor and resolve long-pending or high-profile cases. Drive critical reform: separate the roles of attorney general and public prosecutor to eliminate conflicts of interest and strengthen prosecutorial independence. A justice system that works — not one that waits Justice cannot be charged today, delayed for years, and then justified later. For public confidence in the legal system to be sustained, justice must be transparent, efficient and independent. Malaysia cannot afford a justice system where high-profile cases are charged for headlines but never tried in court. This is not the time for institutional silence. This is the time for action. Reform must begin with a professional, principled and prepared prosecutorial authority — and the attorney general must lead that charge without fear or favour. * Tan Sri Dzulkifli Ahmad was a former Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief commissioner. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.

MACC backs new Government Procurement Bill to boost enforcement and tighten oversight
MACC backs new Government Procurement Bill to boost enforcement and tighten oversight

Malay Mail

timean hour ago

  • Malay Mail

MACC backs new Government Procurement Bill to boost enforcement and tighten oversight

PUTRAJAYA, June 21 — The Government Procurement Bill, scheduled to be tabled in Parliament this year, is expected to strengthen punitive legal action against parties found guilty of offences related to government procurement. The bill also aims to establish a specific legal framework to regulate the government procurement process, in addition to detailing the powers of stakeholders and enhancing check-and-balance mechanisms to ensure good governance in line with international best practices. The proposal and draft structure of the bill were presented by the Government Procurement Division of the Ministry of Finance, led by its secretary Datuk Norison Ramli, during an engagement session with Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki at the MACC headquarters here today. Norison said the MOF welcomes views and suggestions from the MACC, particularly on enforcement and the application of existing laws under the commission's jurisdiction. Azam expressed his support for the key points of the proposed bill, which he said align with the ongoing National Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS). 'NACS is the best platform for the MACC to address weaknesses in the government procurement system, and we fully support this initiative,' he said. — Bernama

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store