FCA appoints David Geale executive director, payments and digital finance
The FCA has appointed David Geale as permanent executive director for payments and digital finance, and managing director of the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR).
0
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
In his role David will be responsible for helping to deliver the National Payments Vision and driving the FCA's work on open banking and digital finance.
David will also play a key role in the work to consolidate the PSR into the FCA, as announced by the Government in March. He will also be responsible for supervising payments and cryptoasset firms under the recently announced regime.
Aidene Walsh, chair of the PSR said: 'David has played a key role in fostering greater alignment and strengthening the relationship between the FCA and the PSR. This will be increasingly important as we move towards consolidation while at the same time continuing to deliver the important work that the PSR does, including on APP fraud and card processing fees.'
Nikhil Rathi, Chief Executive of the FCA said: 'David brings a wealth of experience that will be vital as we deliver the National Payments Vision as well as unlocking the potential that open finance and open banking can bring.'
David Geale said: 'I'm delighted to be taking on this new role at such an important and exciting time for both organisations, and the payments sector as a whole. I look forward to working with colleagues, consumer groups and the wider industry as we take the next steps in our work.'
David was previously director of retail banking at the FCA. He has worked at the FCA and its predecessor, the FSA, for more than 20 years, carrying out a number of roles in policy and supervision. He was involved in leading and delivering policies such as the Retail Distribution Review and policy changes during the UK's exit from the European Union. More recently, David has led the FCA's work on developing a regime for cryptoassets as well as savings rates and reforming the mortgage market as set out in the FCA's letter to the Prime Minister on growth.
David has been acting as the managing director of the PSR since June 2024.
Following David's appointment, Emad Aladhal has been appointed permanent director of retail banking with Andrea Bowe becoming permanent director, specialist directorate. Both have been carrying out the roles on an interim basis.
Background
Details of the consolidation of the PSR can be found hereLink is external .
Prior to being interim director of retail banking, Emad was director of the FCA's specialist directorate, which included financial crime, Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision (OPBAS), financial resilience, client assets, resolution and insolvency, and technology, resilience and cyber. Emad previously co-led the FCA's strategy commitment on reducing and preventing financial crime, and is now part of the director team on helping consumers. Prior to re-joining the FCA in 2017, Emad was a compliance director at a top-tier investment bank, and has prior extensive experience as a regulatory consultant, where he has advised on various aspects of regulation, which included advising on the UK administration of a failed large investment bank during the last financial crisis.
Andrea has spent the last 18 years at the FCA, including 14 years in FCA enforcement and advancing to influential positions, including chief of staff to Nikhil Rathi, Chief Executive. Andrea led Nikhil's transition into the FCA and subsequently co-led the FCA's ambitious transformation programme. During this time, she was also interim director of FCA communications. In her current role as director of the specialist directorate in supervision, policy and competition, she has responsibility for prudential policy, standards and supervision, cyber and operational resilience, client assets, resolution and insolvency and financial crime, fraud and OPBAS. She co-leads the FCA's current 5-year strategy commitment to fighting financial crime, contributing to the UK's national Economic Crime Plan and Fraud Strategy. She is chair of the International Organisation of Securities Commission's (E)MMoU Monitoring Group and Monitoring Steering Committee, responsible for monitoring the operation of, and compliance with, the (E)MMoU, including decision making on disputes and matters of non-compliance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
11 hours ago
- Times
Are interest-only mortgages too risky for first-time buyers?
Interest-only mortgages are to become an option for most first-time buyers for the first time since the financial crisis. From Monday Gen H, which specialises in loans for first-time buyers, is offering interest-only deals for those with at least a 20 per cent deposit and a minimum income of £50,000. Buyers will need to demonstrate how they will repay the loan, for example by showing that they can save the difference between the monthly costs of a repayment mortgage and their interest-only payments. Gen H will also lend to first-time buyers with as little as 5 per cent deposit on a part interest-only, part repayment basis. Many lenders have started making it easier for first-time buyers to borrow, with some lending up to seven times salary, instead of the standard limit of 4.5 times. But, in an uncertain market, with house prices stagnant in many areas, could this all be too risky? A shove up the ladder Research by the Building Societies Association (BSA), a trade body, suggests that there are 2.2 million 'missing' first-time buyers who should have bought since the financial crisis but have been unable to, either because they have struggled to save a deposit or can't borrow enough. To fill this gap, the government, as part of its drive for economic growth and increased homeownership, has prompted the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the City regulator, to lean on banks and relax the lending rules. In the past three months, almost all high street banks have reduced the interest rate at which they 'stress test' borrowers, to see if they could afford payments if rates went up dramatically. Borrowers can now also find more loans at 100 per cent loan-to-value (LTV), where you borrow what the property is worth, without a deposit — another fixture of the pre-2008 mortgage Building Society offers five-year mortgage deals to those with less than a 5 per cent deposit who can prove they have been paying rent at the same level as mortgage repayments for two years. April Mortgages, which began lending in the UK last year, has a no-deposit deal for those with a household income of at least £24,000 who are happy to fix for ten or 15 years. And the ratio of debt to income is being relaxed, with April Mortgages lending up to seven times a borrower's income on its ten or 15-year fixed-rate deals, provided they have at least a 15 per cent deposit. Skipton will lend 5.5 times a buyer's salary if they have an income of £50,000 — up from . £100,000. The downside While lenders have been praised for finding innovative ways to get more people onto the property ladder, concerns have been raised that making it easier to borrow will simply push house prices up, leaving first-time buyers having to find bigger deposits and take on even greater debt. The estate agency Savills estimated that a 1.25 percentage point reduction in stress rates by high street lenders could increase first-time buyer sales 24 per cent over the next five years, but could also push up prices between 5 and 7.5 per cent. That could be a problem when buyers are already stretching themselves. Some 7 per cent of new mortgages were at 90-95 per cent LTV in the first three months of the year, their highest share since 2008, according to the FCA. And while mortgage rates have fallen over the past year, first-time buyers are spending a bigger chunk of their cash on repayments. In March they spent an average of 22.6 per cent of income on their mortgage, the highest proportion since November 2008, according to UK Finance, a banking industry body. 'I'm nervous,' said Neal Hudson from the property data firm Residential Analysts. 'There are good reasons for a bit more flexibility but I fear that lenders and the government are going too far. Now that rates are falling, that saving is being used to push up house prices rather than reducing repayments. That's not good.' Paul Broadhead from the BSA said the return of part repayment and part interest-only loans could be popular because they 'provide a lower deposit threshold but also help affordability, which we know are the two important barriers for first-time buyers'. Critics, however, believe that interest-only loans should remain limited to those with more equity and assets. Martin Stewart from the mortgage broker London Money said: 'Let's not forget that interest-only was one of the significant contributors to the crash in 2008, along with pushes for higher loan-to-value lending and excessive income multiples. Throwing all these things together to limp the housing market forward feels like a dangerous game.' How the interest-only deal works The Gen H interest-only mortgage rates will start at 5.09 per cent for a two-year fix at up to a 60 per cent LTV, with a £1,499 fee, and 5.33 per cent for a five-year fix with the same maximum LTV and fee. For comparison, the best two-year fix for a standard repayment mortgage at 60 per cent LTV is 3.95 per cent and 3.99 per cent for a five-year deal. For those with only the minimum 20 per cent deposit (80 per cent LTV) the two-year fixed rate is 5.44 per cent. For a five-year fix it is 5.38 per cent. In time, Gen H plans to make interest-only deals available to those whose parents can support them by using their investments, buy-to-let property or pension pot as the initial repayment strategy for the loan, which could change if their child was later able switch to a repayment deal. Peter Dockar from Gen H said: 'Interest-only mortgages have long been pigeon-holed as a tool for the rich. But we believe they could fill important gaps for first-time buyers and households on average incomes too. In this landscape, buyers need all the help they can get. We all need to consider how familiar tools might be used in new ways to benefit more people.' Why interest-only became rare Interest-only mortgages were common before the financial crisis, when buyers could get larger loans with few questions about how they planned to repay them. At their peak in 2007 some 51 per cent of new mortgages were either fully or partially interest-only, according to the FCA. House prices fell about 20 per cent between 2007 and 2009 during the financial crisis. This led to mortgage rules being tightened in 2014, making it harder to get interest-only deals and forcing lenders to be much stricter about repayment methods. At the end of last year the total number of home loans on an interest-only basis was 541,000, down from 963,000 in 2012, according to the trade association UK Finance. Only 8.7 per cent of new mortgages in the first three months of 2025 were fully or partially interest-only. Interest-only loans have tended to be limited to wealthier borrowers with more equity. Applicants normally need to earn at least £75,000 a year (or a total of £100,000 on a joint application) and have a 25 per cent deposit and proof of how they will repay the loan. They can only use the sale of their main home as a repayment strategy if there will be enough equity afterwards to buy somewhere else. This has made them largely inaccessible for first-time buyers — lenders including Nationwide Building Society will not give them interest-only mortgages at all. Gen H said buyers would be able to list downsizing as a repayment strategy provided that the interest-only portion of their loan was capped at 60 per cent LTV, and that they would have at least £200,000 in equity (£300,000 in London) after repaying the interest-only mortgage. This would be based on their initial deposit and the capital repayment portion of their loan, and would not assume a future rise in house prices. Other options available Paul Barnes, 40, and James Hope, 36, expected to be saving for another five years to buy their first home in Cambridge — until they found out about an unusual scheme from Cambridge Building Society. Rent to Home offered buyers the chance to enter a ballot, where they could rent a property from the building society for up to three years, after which they could get back 70 per cent of what they had paid in rent to use as a house deposit, as long as they took out their mortgage with the building society. The couple won their chance in 2023: 'We were actually hesitant when we got the call because we thought there must be a catch,' said Barnes, who works for an exam board. 'Cambridge is its own little bubble and it is quite an expensive and competitive market.' They moved into a four-bedroom townhouse in Longstanton, near Cambridge, paying rent of £1,450 a month. It means that after three years they could get about £36,500 back as a deposit. The couple are now two years in and hope that they will own their home by next summer. 'I can't believe schemes like this aren't widely available. It's a massive opportunity for people like us, who might otherwise be struggling to get a foot on the housing ladder due to the cost of living and fierce rental market,' said Hope, who works for the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute.
Finextra
15 hours ago
- Finextra
DLocal scores UAE, Turkey and Philippines licenses
DLocal, the leader cross-border payment platform specializing in emerging markets, proudly announces the obtaining of three pivotal licenses and authorizations. 0 This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author. These strategic approvals from regulatory bodies in the United Arab Emirates, Turkey, and the Philippines ignite a new chapter in dLocal's global expansion, reaffirming our steadfast commitment to navigating and upholding the highest standards of regulatory compliance in diverse markets worldwide. In the United Arab Emirates, dLocal has been granted a Payment Services License. This license enables dLocal to directly operate cross-border flows for both payins and payouts, our two main services, within the country. In Turkey, dLocal has received authorization from the Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye to operate cross-border payments via Lidio Payment Services Inc (Lidio). We consider Lidio a key player in the local market, and this authorized partnership will help us to ramp up the volume and operations in the Turkish market. In the Philippines, a key market for the inflow of remittances, dLocal has obtained a Money Services Business License, allowing the direct operation of remittance flows in the country. These new licenses join dLocal's growing portfolio of over 30 licenses and registrations worldwide, notably including the FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) license obtained earlier this year in the UK. Operating with this portfolio of licenses provides a compliant framework within local regulatory landscapes, offering a material advantage over competitors and the potential for more efficient direct integrations. "Expanding our licensed footprint in key high-growth markets like the UAE, Turkey, and the Philippines is essential to our mission of unlocking the power of emerging markets and connecting financial underserved populations to the global digital economy. It demonstrates our commitment to operating under the highest standards of trust and compliance, providing our global merchants with the secure and reliable access they need to reach billions of consumers." said Pedro Arnt, CEO. dLocal specializes in solving the unique payment challenges in regions where traditional cards represent only a fraction of transactions, connecting global companies to over 900 local payment methods across 40+ countries through a single integration. By enabling merchants to accept payments via methods like digital wallets, instant payment networks, and bank transfers, dLocal empowers populations who rely on these alternative methods and fosters economic growth.
The Independent
21 hours ago
- The Independent
Brother and sister guilty of £1m insider trading over Jet2 and Daimler shares
A former research analyst at the investment firm Janus Henderson has been found guilty of insider trading after making around £1m during the Covid lockdown, along with his sister. Redinel Korfuzi and his sibling Oerta Korfuzi were charged by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) with conspiracy to commit insider dealing and money laundering, between January 2019 and March 2021, and were found guilty at Southwark Crown Court after pleading not guilty. Mr Korfuzi was accused of using confidential information gathered during his work to place a particular type of complex trade, called Contracts for Difference (CFDs), through accounts owned by his sister and two other co-defendants. In this manner, Mr Korfuzi made £963,000 in around six months and was 'was at the absolute centre' of matters, said the prosecutor, benefitting from share price changes of at least 13 companies including Jet2, Daimler and THG. Their trading was detected by FCA market monitoring systems, despite Mr Korfuzi's apparent efforts to hide his involvement. The brother and sister were also convicted of money laundering, with the FCA saying they received money from the proceeds of crime, with more than 176 cash deposits totalling over £198,000. The source of that money was unrelated to charges of insider dealing. Insider trading is punishable by up to ten years in prison, but these charges predate a rule change increasing that time, meaning the pair face a maximum of seven years and/or a fine. For money laundering, a fine and/or up to 14 years imprisonment is the maximum. His Honour Judge Milne told the pair on Thursday: 'These are serious matters of which you've been convicted and the sentences will reflect that.' Steve Smart, joint executive director of Enforcement and Market Oversight at the FCA, said: 'We are committed to fighting financial crime and protecting the integrity of our markets. Those who use inside information to unlawfully make profits should be aware that we will identify them and bring them to justice.' Mr and Ms Korfuzi are set to be sentenced on 4 July and the FCA are also to apply for confiscation orders to recover the proceeds of crime. The jury cleared their two co-defendants, Rogerio de Aquino - Mr Korfuzi's personal trainer - and Dema Almeziad - Mr Korfuzi's partner - of both charges. Their accounts were also used to place trades but they said in statements they had been 'hoodwinked' and 'duped'. Ms Almeziad's lawyer Roger Sahota said in a statement: 'This case should never have been brought. There was no evidence that Ms Almeziad knew anything about insider dealing and it is wrong to expect ordinary people to understand or spot complex financial conduct that even professionals struggle with.' Janus Henderson was not involved in the case or accused of wrongdoing.
