Small-cap stock below ₹200 hits 52-week high upper circuit after THIS overseas business update

Small-cap stock below ₹ 200: Aayush Wellness share price hit 52-week high by surging 2 per cent upper circuit in Tuesday's trading session to ₹ 154.05 apiece after the board approved the formation of wholly owned subsidiary in Singapore with an initial capital investment of SGD 10,000.
The small-cap stock has gained over 51 per cent in last one month. In last one year, Aayush Wellness stock has given multibagger returns to its investors by ascending over 782 per cent.
In a release dated June 9, the company said that this strategic expansion marks a significant step in the company's global growth strategy and will serve as a launchpad for its nutraceutical and healthcare products across the rapidly expanding Southeast Asian markets.
'Our new Singapore-based subsidiary will enable us to tap into one of the world's most dynamic wellness markets, offering greater agility in operations, regulatory efficiency, and direct access to high-growth ASEAN economies. This is a critical step toward building a global wellness brand," Naveena Kumar, Managing Director of Aayush Wellness said.
The company further said that the expansion would focus on the following areas - Localizing product offerings to align with regulatory and cultural preferences, forging strategic partnerships and e-commerce distribution channels across ASEAN, driving export growth from India while expanding the company's international brand presence, establishing a regional R&D and innovation hub to adapt to market-specific wellness trends.
' This development is in line with Aayush Wellness Limited's broader mission to deliver science-backed, sustainable, and natural healthcare solutions globally. The company aims to use its new presence in Singapore to not only access markets in Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam, but also to establish a foundation for future global partnerships and innovation,' the company said.
Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, not Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

22 minutes ago

• Time of India

Nuvoco Vistas completes Rs 1800 cr Vadraj cement acquistion

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Nirma Group's Nuvoco Vistas Corp has made the Rs 1800 crore payment to lenders led by Punjab National Bank (PNB) and Union Bank of India completing its acquisition of the debt-ridden Vadraj Cement . The money was paid to lenders on Saturday, allowing them to write back their provisions this quarter, two people aware of the details said."The money came to lenders on Saturday and has been distributed. There were some delays due to some litigation but now that everything is settled, the company transferred the money well ahead of the June 24 deadline," said one of the persons cited with 25% of the more than Rs 8000 crore debt stands to gain Rs 431 crore, while Union Bank will get Rs 345 crore, calculations by ET acquisition will help Nuvoco Vistas boost its installed cement capacity by over 20% reaching around 31 MTPA and is the company's third acquisition after Lafarge Cement and Emami Cement. A Mumbai bench of the NCLT had approved the acquisition in Vadraj Cement, formerly owned by ABG Shipyard, has a 6 million tonne grinding unit in Surat and will add to Nuvoco Vistas' existing production capacity of 25 million tonne by more than 20%.The acquisition was undertaken through Vanya Corp , a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuvoco Vistas. Subsequently, Vanya will be merged with Vadraj Cement, according to the resolution plan. Vadraj Cement will ultimately become the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Rs 1,800 crore offer outbid Adani Group at an auction under the court-monitored corporate insolvency, ET had reported in January this year. Adani group-backed Ambuja Cement had partnered with Prudent ARC-backed RKG Fund to acquire the Gujarat-based cement the Rs 1,800 crore offered by Nuvoco Vistas, Rs 1,725 crore will be used for repaying financial creditors' dues, and the balance is set aside for operational credit, dues to employees, an insolvency resolution process costs.

Indian Express

27 minutes ago

• Indian Express

Developments since June 6 decision show why we need to be cautious: MPC's Nagesh Kumar

The Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) decision earlier this month to tighten its stance to 'netrual' from 'accommodative' even as it cut the policy repo rate by a larger-than-expected 50 basis points (bps) to 5.50 per cent caught markets off-guard. However, according to Nagesh Kumar, one of the three external members on the central bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), developments since the June 6 rate cut show why policymakers need to be cautious. 'Although the inflation numbers up to May are looking very good, with oil prices shooting up due to the Israel-Iran conflict, you never know what is in store. So, a neutral stance allows you freedom to adjust your actions. Since the MPC's decision on June 6, a lot has changed. We live in a very dynamic world, and that is why we need to be cautious,' Kumar said. Global crude oil prices rose to around $75 per barrel after Israel attacked Iran on June 13. Investors are now anticipating another sharp increase in oil prices after the US said on June 21 it had bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities. Speculation is rife if Iran – which has called the US attack outrageous and said it reserves all options to defend its sovereignty – will look to retaliate by blocking the Strait of Hormuz, a key waterway which handles almost a quarter of the global oil trade. In an interview with Siddharth Upasani, Kumar – Director and Chief Executive of New Delhi-based think-tank Institute for Studies in Industrial Development – also discussed how a consensus was finally achieved on his calls for a 50 bps rate cut and why growth numbers are not showing a broad-based revival, among other subjects. Edited excerpts: In the last meeting (in April) itself I had started making a case for a 50 bps cut. But at that time, trends were not very clear. There was uncertainty about the inflation number – it had begun to come down, but the drop was not significant enough. However, in June, we had numbers before us like 3.2 per cent in April. It has gone down even further in May. Looking ahead, the outlook seemed to be quite comfortable and benign because of the expectation of a better-than-normal monsoon, the declining prices of crude oil, and the softening of the US dollar. It was in that context and keeping in mind the continued concern about tariff-related uncertainties –the external economic environment had become very uncertain and volatile, with International Monetary Funds and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development downgrading the outlook very significantly, and World Trade Organization (WTO) projecting -1.5 per cent growth in world trade – and the need to support growth and the continued concerns about urban consumption and private investment not picking up that we cut the repo rate by 50 bps. In my view – and I articulated this in the April meeting – compared to two cuts of 25 bps each, one larger cut of 50 bps would be more effective. My reason was very common-sensical: if it is a quarter percentage point reduction, the banker might absorb a part of it as it is such a small change. But if it is 50 bps, the banker will have to pass it on with lower lending and deposit rates. We have seen the transmission of the 25 bps cuts being a bit slow. Of course, there will be a lag. But the stickiness of the deposit and lending rates was there. But 50 bps would be large enough to push the banks to take it into account. And if we feel confident that we will need another cut of 25 bps two months down the line, why not frontload it? That's why I made a case for a 50 bps cut. And this time, compared to April, the reason and policy space were much more solid. Seeing that, the consensus between us was easier to achieve. Well, at that time, inflation was high. And inflation targeting requires action when inflation is high. Even till October 2024, when the MPC was reconstituted, inflation was quite high around 6 per cent. The RBI's action also needs to be seen in the context of growth. We ended 2023-24 with a very robust 9.2 per cent growth. Growth was much less of a worry at that time. Yes, 7.4 per cent was a pleasant surprise and showed some kind of revival. However, it was not a broad-based revival; it was driven by rural consumption and government capex towards the end of the financial year. Because it was not broad-based and the external environment is becoming more challenging and uncertain – Liberation Day was in April – this is the time when you need to build policy actions which will protect the growth sentiment and build momentum. The change in the stance to neutral caught everyone off-guard, with the MPC saying there is very limited space to support growth going forward. Should we rule out rate cuts now? The way inflation outlook is shaping will determine the future course of action. The RBI Governor, in a recent interview, has clarified that. It depends upon what kind of inflation you have because you need to have a certain real rate of interest. If that becomes negative, then savings will not be incentivised. Assuming that 1.5 per cent is the real rate of interest you want to preserve, then the floor (for repo rate) with inflation rate would be 5.5 per cent. However, if inflation goes to 3 per cent, then you have additional room to manoeuvre. Therefore, it really depends on the dynamics of the inflation and growth numbers. I wouldn't say that. Strictly speaking, the stance is not within the purview of the MPC. But we, of course, make some observations. I think it was purely the fact that with the 50 bps rate cut, the room (to cut further) going forward is limited. In view of that, it was a step to manage expectations. The uncertainty surrounding us is another factor to keep the stance neutral, which gives you more freedom to go either way. Although the inflation numbers up to May are looking very good, with oil prices shooting up due to the Israel-Iran conflict, you never know what is in store. So, a neutral stance allows you freedom to adjust your actions. Since the MPC's decision on June 6, a lot has changed. We live in a very dynamic world, and that is why we need to be cautious. When circumstances are uncertain and you want to promote growth, you try to reduce the cost of capital to make it easier for the entrepreneur who is sitting on the fence on whether to invest or not. That is what it does at the margin. Ultimately, investment decisions are a very complex process. But the cost of capital is one of the factors which is weighed by the entrepreneur, and policymakers try to assist the process. By lowering the cost of capital and trying to push demand, you are creating more favourable conditions for an investment decision than before. As I said, making an investment decision is a very complex process and cost of capital is only one of the factors. You can only exercise the levers which are within your control. You can't really do much about global uncertainty. What Mr Trump does on a day-to-day basis is something you have no control over. But holding other things constant, these (such as lowering the cost of capital) are some of the things which we can do something about. The other could be a fiscal stimulus which may be helpful to revive demand. The government has budgeted for a very substantial capex. So, frontloading the capex to keep the momentum up while things settle down in the international market could be another thing that could be done. Well, they are reacting to the changed times. We are now in a situation where the multilateral framework for trade has been completely put aside. MFN (Most Favoured Nation) – which has been the bedrock of multilateralism – has also been thrown out the window because Mr. Trump has X rate for China, Y rate for India, Z rate for Europe. The dispute settlement mechanism of WTO has been abandoned for some time because the Appellate Body was not renewed. In normal times, you don't have that urgency and you negotiate in a very relaxed manner. But when you need to, you find ways to expedite the process. That is what is happening. There is a realisation that we need to seize the moment and close these deals quickly before the damage is done, to protect and preserve our economic interests in the best possible manner. Sooner we do that, the better it is. Then the uncertainty that is prevailing is cleared. Yes, some of these are the early harvest type of arrangements, and they will continue to be negotiated. But normally in trade negotiations, you know what you can do for a large part of the agenda and only a small part, maybe 10-20 per cent, holds up progress. So, the best way forward is to move ahead with the part of the agenda on which you have no issues and find ways to address the red lines. Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy. ... Read More

Business Standard

an hour ago

• Business Standard

India pursuing FTAs with mature, rule-bound markets: S Jaishankar

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has termed India's bilateral trade agreements as the 'space to watch', and said New Delhi has, over the past 11 years, pursued trade pacts with countries that have 'more mature markets' and are more 'transparent and rule bound' compared to East Asian countries. Jaishankar said India is now more interested in key free trade agreements. He said the one with the United Kingdom is more or less finalised, the one with the European Union is in advanced stages of negotiation, and there have been several rounds of discussions between Indian and American officials for a bilateral trade agreement. In an interview to public broadcaster DD India, a link to which the minister posted on X on Saturday, Jaishankar said that in the years following economic reforms, most of India's trade agreements were with Southeast Asian nations, which 'skewed the balance' as several of these economies competed with India and did not provide market access. It was important to make the correction and reach an understanding with more mature markets, which are more transparent and rule bound. Jaishankar said India's trade pacts with the United Arab Emirates and Australia are significant achievements, describing New Delhi's push for FTAs as the 'space to watch'. In 2019, India did not join the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) trading bloc that comprises the 10-member ASEAN grouping and other Asia-Pacific economies, including China, Australia and Japan. He said India has, in the past 11 years, systematically tried to 'deepen our posture, our strategic posture, to have good relations with all major countries, but also other regions, so that we get into the optimal position'. In the past 11 years, the EAM said, the consistent theme underpinning India's foreign policy has been planning for a multipolar world, which India not only desires as it gives it a higher profile and more influence. 'But it is not just the question of our wishes, that is the direction in which the world is moving,' he said, which is why New Delhi, despite enormous pressure on it, maintained its relationship with Russia, he added. About India's ties with the US, he said, 'Where the US is concerned, yes, there is unpredictability, therefore at a systemic level, you stabilise it with as many linkages and relationships as possible.' On India's relations with China, Jaishankar said, 'With China, if you have to stand up to that country and we have had some very difficult periods, (and) so it is important to prepare the capabilities.' The minister said a 'really perplexing' aspect of India's China policy before 2014 was the 'complete neglect of our border infrastructure in the previous decades'. 'To have a China policy and neglect your border infrastructure was absurd,' he said. 'And that is one of the things which has changed. We have today that standing up, in defence of our national interests, along the LAC. It is because we have built the border infrastructure to make that possible,' Jaishankar said. On India's ties with its immediate neighbours, Jaishankar said that India 'should not expect smooth sailing' all the time. He said New Delhi has attempted to shape a 'collective interest' to build an inherent stability in relationships, irrespective of changes in regimes. At the end of the day, 'the logic every one of our neighbours must realise' is that working with India will 'give you benefits', and not working with India 'has a cost', he said. 'Some take longer to realise, some understand it better. One exception of course is Pakistan, because it has defined its identity under the army, in a way it has an in-built hostility in it. So if you put Pakistan aside, the logic will apply everywhere else,' the EAM said.