SPT Q1 Earnings Call: Enterprise Pipeline and AI-Driven Product Enhancements Take Focus
Social media management software company Sprout (NASDAQ:SPT) reported Q1 CY2025 results topping the market's revenue expectations , with sales up 12.9% year on year to $109.3 million. Guidance for next quarter's revenue was better than expected at $110.8 million at the midpoint, 0.7% above analysts' estimates. Its non-GAAP profit of $0.22 per share was 48.4% above analysts' consensus estimates.
Is now the time to buy SPT? Find out in our full research report (it's free).
Revenue: $109.3 million vs analyst estimates of $107.6 million (12.9% year-on-year growth, 1.6% beat)
Adjusted EPS: $0.22 vs analyst estimates of $0.15 (48.4% beat)
Adjusted Operating Income: $12.54 million vs analyst estimates of $9.01 million (11.5% margin, 39.1% beat)
The company slightly lifted its revenue guidance for the full year to $451.4 million at the midpoint from $450.6 million
Management raised its full-year Adjusted EPS guidance to $0.73 at the midpoint, a 5% increase
Operating Margin: -10.2%, up from -13.7% in the same quarter last year
Customers: 9,381
Market Capitalization: $1.27 billion
Sprout Social's first quarter results reflected increased enterprise adoption and focused product development as key drivers. CEO Ryan Barretto emphasized the company's momentum with large-scale brands, citing new strategic wins in industries such as medical devices, food and beverage, and hospitality. Management attributed growth to robust execution in its go-to-market team, with particular strength in expanding relationships with high-value customers. Notably, Sprout Social's updated influencer marketing platform and integrations with Salesforce and LinkedIn were highlighted as meaningful product advances. The leadership team also discussed continued resilience in customer retention, crediting improvements in onboarding, support, and a newly implemented customer success platform aimed at proactively identifying renewal risks and expansion opportunities.
Looking ahead, Sprout Social's management outlined a measured but optimistic outlook, centered on continued enterprise expansion, multi-product adoption, and deeper integration with global partners. Barretto explained, "We're expanding our sales capacity this year and will continue to throughout the first half, which we believe will drive further momentum in our pipeline generation and enterprise coverage." The company expects elongated sales cycles and stable demand trends to persist through the year, but sees opportunities in cross-selling influencer marketing and customer care modules to both existing and new customers. CFO Joe Del Preto noted, 'We remain committed to growing operating leverage on a year-over-year basis, and will continue to evaluate our ability to drive greater profitability as the year progresses,' underscoring a focus on operational discipline as the company invests in its enterprise go-to-market strategy.
Management credited the quarter's performance to targeted enterprise wins, expansion of AI-powered solutions, and enhancements in customer care and partnerships, despite a stable but cautious demand environment.
Enterprise customer growth: Sprout Social secured several strategic deals with Fortune 500 companies across diverse sectors, leveraging its ability to consolidate social media management for large organizations. The expansion of $50,000+ annual recurring revenue (ARR) customers was driven by tailored solutions addressing complex enterprise needs.
Influencer marketing platform rebrand: The company relaunched its influencer marketing product, incorporating AI-powered natural language discovery and advanced creator vetting features. This update was positioned to help brands quickly identify and engage creators, reflecting the company's response to the shift in consumer discovery trends toward social platforms.
AI and automation enhancements: Recent releases included AI Assist for content generation, customer care features like Agentforce integration with Salesforce, and accessibility tools such as AI-driven alt text for images. These tools were designed to streamline workflows and improve inclusivity for both customers and end-users.
Go-to-market and sales investments: Management increased sales capacity and implemented a new customer success platform, aiming to proactively manage renewals and expansion opportunities. The sales organization's focus on multi-product selling was supported by new compensation plans and account intent signals.
Partnership and ecosystem expansion: The company made progress in global partnerships, particularly with Salesforce and AWS, and began building a network of international resellers to boost its presence in Europe and Asia-Pacific. These efforts were seen as long-term accelerators for pipeline growth and market access.
Sprout Social's outlook is shaped by enterprise sales momentum, multi-product expansion, and ongoing investment in strategic partnerships, all while navigating a cautious macro environment.
Enterprise pipeline expansion: Management anticipates that growing enterprise pipeline coverage, combined with increased sales capacity, will sustain revenue growth. The company is targeting higher-value customers and larger deals, with the expectation that enterprise adoption will drive average contract value upward.
Product cross-sell and adoption: The company's push for multi-product adoption, particularly influencer marketing and customer care modules, is expected to increase both customer retention and wallet share. Leadership sees significant room to deepen penetration within the existing customer base and to upsell new customers at the point of sale.
Macro stability and operational discipline: While Sprout Social does not expect the demand environment to improve in the near term, management is focused on maintaining operational flexibility and margin improvement through disciplined hiring and expense management. The company is also monitoring risks related to tariffs and federal spending cuts that could affect customer budgets.
In the coming quarters, our analysts will focus on (1) continued growth in enterprise pipeline and conversion rates, (2) adoption rates of new AI-powered influencer and customer care products, and (3) the expansion of global partnerships, especially through new reseller channels in Europe and Asia-Pacific. Execution on multi-product cross-sell and sustained operational discipline will also be important markers.
Sprout Social currently trades at a forward price-to-sales ratio of 2.7×. In the wake of earnings, is it a buy or sell? Find out in our full research report (it's free).
Market indices reached historic highs following Donald Trump's presidential victory in November 2024, but the outlook for 2025 is clouded by new trade policies that could impact business confidence and growth.
While this has caused many investors to adopt a "fearful" wait-and-see approach, we're leaning into our best ideas that can grow regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate. Take advantage of Mr. Market by checking out our Top 9 Market-Beating Stocks. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025).
Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Exlservice (+354% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Your AI use could have a hidden environmental cost
Sign up for CNN's Life, But Greener newsletter. Our limited newsletter series guides you on how to minimize your personal role in the climate crisis — and reduce your eco-anxiety. Whether it's answering work emails or drafting wedding vows, generative artificial intelligence tools have become a trusty copilot in many people's lives. But a growing body of research shows that for every problem AI solves, hidden environmental costs are racking up. Each word in an AI prompt is broken down into clusters of numbers called 'token IDs' and sent to massive data centers — some larger than football fields — powered by coal or natural gas plants. There, stacks of large computers generate responses through dozens of rapid calculations. The whole process can take up to 10 times more energy to complete than a regular Google search, according to a frequently cited estimation by the Electric Power Research Institute. So, for each prompt you give AI, what's the damage? To find out, researchers in Germany tested 14 large language model (LLM) AI systems by asking them both free-response and multiple-choice questions. Complex questions produced up to six times more carbon dioxide emissions than questions with concise answers. In addition, 'smarter' LLMs with more reasoning abilities produced up to 50 times more carbon emissions than simpler systems to answer the same question, the study reported. 'This shows us the tradeoff between energy consumption and the accuracy of model performance,' said Maximilian Dauner, a doctoral student at Hochschule München University of Applied Sciences and first author of the Frontiers in Communication study published Wednesday. Typically, these smarter, more energy intensive LLMs have tens of billions more parameters — the biases used for processing token IDs — than smaller, more concise models. 'You can think of it like a neural network in the brain. The more neuron connections, the more thinking you can do to answer a question,' Dauner said. Complex questions require more energy in part because of the lengthy explanations many AI models are trained to provide, Dauner said. If you ask an AI chatbot to solve an algebra question for you, it may take you through the steps it took to find the answer, he said. 'AI expends a lot of energy being polite, especially if the user is polite, saying 'please' and 'thank you,'' Dauner explained. 'But this just makes their responses even longer, expending more energy to generate each word.' For this reason, Dauner suggests users be more straightforward when communicating with AI models. Specify the length of the answer you want and limit it to one or two sentences, or say you don't need an explanation at all. Most important, Dauner's study highlights that not all AI models are created equally, said Sasha Luccioni, the climate lead at AI company Hugging Face, in an email. Users looking to reduce their carbon footprint can be more intentional about which model they chose for which task. 'Task-specific models are often much smaller and more efficient, and just as good at any context-specific task,' Luccioni explained. If you are a software engineer who solves complex coding problems every day, an AI model suited for coding may be necessary. But for the average high school student who wants help with homework, relying on powerful AI tools is like using a nuclear-powered digital calculator. Even within the same AI company, different model offerings can vary in their reasoning power, so research what capabilities best suit your needs, Dauner said. When possible, Luccioni recommends going back to basic sources — online encyclopedias and phone calculators — to accomplish simple tasks. Putting a number on the environmental impact of AI has proved challenging. The study noted that energy consumption can vary based on the user's proximity to local energy grids and the hardware used to run AI partly why the researchers chose to represent carbon emissions within a range, Dauner said. Furthermore, many AI companies don't share information about their energy consumption — or details like server size or optimization techniques that could help researchers estimate energy consumption, said Shaolei Ren, an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of California, Riverside who studies AI's water consumption. 'You can't really say AI consumes this much energy or water on average — that's just not meaningful. We need to look at each individual model and then (examine what it uses) for each task,' Ren said. One way AI companies could be more transparent is by disclosing the amount of carbon emissions associated with each prompt, Dauner suggested. 'Generally, if people were more informed about the average (environmental) cost of generating a response, people would maybe start thinking, 'Is it really necessary to turn myself into an action figure just because I'm bored?' Or 'do I have to tell ChatGPT jokes because I have nothing to do?'' Dauner said. Additionally, as more companies push to add generative AI tools to their systems, people may not have much choice how or when they use the technology, Luccioni said. 'We don't need generative AI in web search. Nobody asked for AI chatbots in (messaging apps) or on social media,' Luccioni said. 'This race to stuff them into every single existing technology is truly infuriating, since it comes with real consequences to our planet.' With less available information about AI's resource usage, consumers have less choice, Ren said, adding that regulatory pressures for more transparency are unlikely to the United States anytime soon. Instead, the best hope for more energy-efficient AI may lie in the cost efficacy of using less energy. 'Overall, I'm still positive about (the future). There are many software engineers working hard to improve resource efficiency,' Ren said. 'Other industries consume a lot of energy too, but it's not a reason to suggest AI's environmental impact is not a problem. We should definitely pay attention.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI's Sam Altman Shocked ‘People Have a High Degree of Trust in ChatGPT' Because ‘It Should Be the Tech That You Don't Trust'
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman made remarks on the first episode of OpenAI's new podcast regarding the degree of trust people have in ChatGPT. Altman observed, 'People have a very high degree of trust in ChatGPT, which is interesting, because AI hallucinates. It should be the tech that you don't trust that much.' This candid admission comes at a time when AI's capabilities are still in their infancy. Billions of people around the world are now using artificial intelligence (AI), but as Altman says, it's not super reliable. Make Over a 2.4% One-Month Yield Shorting Nvidia Out-of-the-Money Puts Is Quantum Computing (QUBT) Stock a Buy on This Bold Technological Breakthrough? Is AMD Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold on Untether AI Acquisition? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! ChatGPT and similar large language models (LLMs) are known to 'hallucinate,' or generate plausible-sounding but incorrect or fabricated information. Despite this, millions of users rely on these tools for everything from research and work to personal advice and parenting guidance. Altman himself described using ChatGPT extensively for parenting questions during his son's early months, acknowledging both its utility and the risks inherent in trusting an AI that can be confidently wrong. Altman's observation points to a paradox at the heart of the AI revolution: while users are increasingly aware that AI can make mistakes, the convenience, speed, and conversational fluency of tools like ChatGPT have fostered a level of trust more commonly associated with human experts or close friends. This trust is amplified by the AI's ability to remember context, personalize responses, and provide help across a broad range of topics — features that Altman and others at OpenAI believe will only deepen as the technology improves. Yet, as Altman cautioned, this trust is not always well-placed. The risk of over-reliance on AI-generated content is particularly acute in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, legal advice, and education. While Altman praised ChatGPT's usefulness, he stressed the importance of user awareness and critical thinking, urging society to recognize that 'AI hallucinates' and should not be blindly trusted. The conversation also touched on broader issues of privacy, data retention, and monetization. As OpenAI explores new features — such as persistent memory and potential advertising products — Altman emphasized the need to maintain user trust by ensuring transparency and protecting privacy. The ongoing lawsuit with The New York Times over data retention and copyright has further highlighted the delicate balance between innovation, legal compliance, and user rights. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Media advisory - Minister Solomon to participate in Toronto Tech Week 2025
TORONTO, June 22, 2025 /CNW/ - The Honourable Evan Solomon, Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario, will participate in a series of events, meetings and visits with Canada's AI ecosystem and business leaders for Toronto Tech Week 2025. Minister Solomon to participate in a site visit at Xanadu Date: Monday, June 23, 2025 Time: 11:00 am (ET) Note: Members of the media are asked to contact ISED Media Relations at media@ to receive event location details and confirm their attendance. Stay connected Find more services and information on the Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada website. Follow Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada on social media.X (Twitter): @ISED_CA, Facebook: Canadian Innovation, Instagram: @cdninnovation, LinkedIn: Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada SOURCE Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada View original content: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
