Whats A Black Box? How It Holds Clues To Air India AI171 Disaster
While rescue officials sift through the debris of Air India Flight AI171, which crashed into a physicians' hostel just outside Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport within minutes of taking off, investigators are relying on the plane's black box to reveal the reason behind the tragedy that claimed 241 lives. The Boeing 787-8, which was headed to London, dived from 625 feet, bursting into flames and filling the air with thick smoke.
What Is A Black Box?
The black box, ironically enough, is an orange-colored object consisting of two parts: the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) and the Flight Data Recorder (FDR). The CVR records radio communications, captain and crew member conversations, and noises such as engine sounds or stall alarms, allowing experts to study important audio signals. The FDR tracks a minimum of 88 variables, such as altitude, airspeed, and direction of travel, with contemporary aircraft monitoring as many as 1,000 features, like flap lever positions or smoke detector activation, reports the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).
Origins And Design
Initially developed in 1953 by Australian scientist David Warren, whose inspiration was his father's death in a 1934 plane crash and the 1953 Comet crash, the black box has become an essential instrument for aviation safety. Painted orange for visibility, they are constructed from titanium or stainless steel to survive high-impact crashes, fires, and 14,000-foot deep-sea pressure. The FDR is usually installed in the aircraft tail, and the CVR in the cockpit. On helicopters, a single combined recorder monitors 800–1,200 parameters, according to Airbus.
How It Survives And Functions
Designed to endure extreme conditions, black boxes can transmit signals from ocean depths and are treated to remove corrosive salt if submerged. Data retrieval, often conducted at facilities like Delhi's new Digital Flight Data Recorder and Cockpit Voice Recorder Laboratory, involves meticulous repairs and analysis, providing insights within 24 hours, though full investigations may take weeks.
Limitations And Challenges
Although critical, black boxes are not infallible. The NTSB commented that the Jeju Air plane crash in South Korea (December 2024) lost vital data from the last minutes of the flight. Likewise, Malaysia Airlines Flight 370's black box was never found (March 2014), and detection issues were exposed. The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) will be depending on the Delhi lab to inspect the recovered black box in the case of the Air India crash, hoping to explain the catastrophic failure.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
What's the biggest challenge in DNA analysis?
The story so far: At least 270 people, most of them passengers, were killed on June 12 when Air India flight 171, a London-bound Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, crashed less than a minute after taking off from Ahmedabad airport. Following the accident, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis is being used to identify the remains of those killed. In the past week, DNA samples from victims' family members have been collected and matched, and most remains have already been identified. How do DNA samples help? DNA fingerprinting identifies individuals by analysing unique regions of their DNA. While human DNA is 99.9% identical, the remaining 0.1% includes unique sequences called short tandem repeats (STRs), which are crucial for forensic investigations. DNA profiling focuses on specific regions called genetic markers, with STRs being the preferred markers due to their variability among individuals, except monozygotic twins (identical twins). 'Currently, STRs are the most widely used genetic markers for human identity determination and paternity testing. Their use makes it possible to clarify most legal and forensic cases with a generally very high degree of certainty. Identification of human remains is generally performed by comparing the genetic profile of the remains with that of first-degree relatives, usually the parents,' explained Dr. Rakesh Mishra, director, Tata Institute for Genetics and Society. DNA is the molecule that carries the genetic instructions of all living organisms. It's essentially the blueprint that determines an organism's characteristics and how it functions and is passed from parents to offspring. DNA profiling can be used in the identification of skeletonised or highly decomposed human remains. Identification is usually carried out by comparing the genetic profile from the remains with the genotypes of reference samples from relatives, most commonly the parents of the victim, according to an article titled, 'Identification of the Remains of an Adult Using DNA from Their Deciduous Teeth as a Reference Sample'. What is the process followed to collect, store and match samples during a disaster? In the case of accident victims, DNA samples may be degraded and contaminated which is the biggest challenge that forensic experts face even though DNA samples can be preserved for a long time. Samples are ideally frozen at minus 20°C, or, in the case of soft tissues (skin, muscles, etc.), they may be stored in 95% ethanol. 'In an accident of this magnitude samples of tissue, nails, bone, body fluid and blood etc. can be used to identify and establish family relation. Technology available today is powerful and sensitive which aids in easy identification,' said Dr. Mishra. He added that only trained forensic experts are made to collect samples to ensure that there is no contamination. These samples are then stored in temperature regulated, sterile conditions and matched swiftly. 'In this case, establishing family pattern is enough. The STR process is used in this case to establish family relationship. Through this family pattern is established and based on this identity is ascertained,' he said. Experts noted that after sample collection, using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) the extracted DNA is amplified with specific primers targeting the STR regions of interest. The amplified DNA fragments are separated based on size using gel electrophoresis. The size and number of repeats in each band are analysed to generate the distinctive DNA profile with advanced computerised systems. The generated profile is then compared to other DNA profiles in a database to find any matches. What are the difficulties in the process? An article titled, 'Challenges and solutions in DNA fingerprinting: Sample quality, data analysis, and interpretation', noted that DNA fingerprinting, which is a pivotal tool in forensic science, paternity testing, and genetic research, faces significant challenges in sample quality, data analysis, and interpretation. It states that the sample quality is the bedrock of DNA fingerprinting. 'The integrity of the DNA sample dictates the accuracy of the result. Challenges arise from various sources, such as environmental degradation, contamination, and the complexity of handling mixed or limited DNA samples. These issues can lead to ambiguous or erroneous results, posing significant obstacles in forensic investigations,' it states. It adds that continued training and education of those in the field is vital. Contamination, interpretation challenges, including ethical concerns, privacy issues, and the potential for misinterpretation of results is acknowledged in this paper. It recommends the use of advanced techniques for DNA collection and recovery, developments in software for more precise data analysis, and the implementation of standardised protocols for interpretation. It also highlights the role of automation in enhancing accuracy and the importance of professional training. When has DNA fingerprinting been crucial? Several mass fatality events, including natural disasters and terrorist attacks, have forced authorities to use DNA analysis to establish identity. Most recent include the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, the 2009 Victorian Bushfires (Australia) where severely burned or fragmented bodies had to be identified, and the 2014 MH17 crash (Ukraine) which resulted in the loss of all 298 people on board. DNA fingerprinting was also used to identify victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Beside this, it is also a standard tool for identifying individuals in various criminal cases.
News18
2 days ago
- News18
‘Pathetic State': What A Pilot Told YouTuber Gaurav Taneja About Airlines Ignoring Safety Measures
Last Updated: Gaurav Taneja, aka Flying Beast, opened up about the real reasons behind the Air India Flight 171 crash in Ahmedabad. YouTuber Gaurav Taneja, also known as Flying Beast, lauded the Air India pilots for refusing to fly unsafe aircraft after the unfortunate crash in Ahmedabad on June 12. Contrary to this, the ex-pilot revealed that airlines habitually overlooked the safety measures, resulting in such tragic incidents. He ruled out bad weather as one of the significant reasons behind the incident and went on to explain the loopholes of the airlines. In a well-informed video on his YouTube channel, Taneja highlighted the safety standards in the Indian aviation industry while addressing various theories about the tragic Air India Flight 171 crash. He said the dual-engine failure was possibly the only reason the Air India flight crashed. 'In the event of bad weather, the aircraft warns the pilots to either delay takeoff or abort takeoff… A 787 has two radars, one on the left and one on the right. For dispatch, it is necessary for at least one to be functional," he said. He continued, 'If the aircraft has 100 pieces of equipment, the rulebook says that it can function even if 30 of them have failed. For instance, an aircraft can fly safely with even one functional weather radar. This is made to operationally assist the airline," further mentioning, 'Let's go with the theory that one engine failed on the ground and the other failed after takeoff… This theory makes a little sense. But this is extremely rare. I've been researching for so many days, and it still doesn't make full sense." The former commercial pilot also threw light on Boeing's close battle with Airbus and revealed how the duo have been constantly taking ahead the entire fleet. 'Airbus took the lead after the launch of the A320. To compete with them, Boeing unveiled the 737 Max, and decided that pilots can safely fly the aircraft with just a two-hour iPad training," he stated. However, according to Taneja, the airlines often neglect to inform pilots about the MCAS system (Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System), a flight control system developed by Boeing, specifically for the 737 MAX aircraft, which was designed to enhance the aircraft's stability and wondered what if a different software issue could have caused the Air India crash. Further, highlighting the safety standards of the airlines, he said, 'A pilot told me that aircraft are in a pathetic state. Remember I told you about the MELs (Minimum Equipment Lists), and that a plane can fly with even one working radar? These snags are quite common. Every flight has snags. But they have a habit of overlooking these snags." Watch the video here: He went on narrating, 'The on-ground engineer will tell you that they are giving a temporary okay, they know, and the airline knows that the snag will appear during the flight. For every snag that happens, a live report goes to the company. The company knows everything. The company is okaying these snags despite knowing about them, and leaving it to the pilot to deal with these snags during the flight," and puts direct blame on the internal conflicts between the internal departments, which ultimately results in such a situation. At least 274 people, including 241 of the 242 onboard the London-bound Air India flight, died when the Dreamliner 787-8 crashed moments after take-off in Ahmedabad. First Published: June 21, 2025, 18:12 IST
News18
2 days ago
- News18
How Israel's Sea Shield ‘Barak-Magan' With 360° Radar Is Taking Down Iranian Drones
Last Updated: Military analysts say Barak-Magan may become key to Israel's naval defence as cheap but deadly drone threats continue to grow across the region In a significant defensive manoeuvre, Israel has demonstrated its advanced naval capabilities by intercepting and destroying eight drones launched from Iran. The drones were brought down using Israel's cutting-edge naval defence system, 'Barak Magan' or 'Electric Shield', from the Sa'ar 6 class corvette on the night of June 15. This marked the system's inaugural use in combat. What Is Black Magan? Barak Magan, developed by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) based on Barak MX technology, is an advanced air defence system designed for maritime deployment. Here are some of it's key features: It offers 360-degree radar coverage It can intercept drones, cruise missiles, shore-to-sea rockets, and certain ballistic weapons. The system features three types of interceptors: MRAD for up to 35 km, LRAD for up to 70 km, and ER for engaging threats up to 150 km away. How Does It Work? The system operates using the EL/M-2248 MF-STAR radar and electro-optical sensors installed on the Sa'ar 6 warship. Within seconds, it can identify enemy drones or missiles and launch a vertical missile from a smart launch module to neutralise the threat from any direction. Israel has deployed the system to safeguard its Navy's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), which includes critical gas platforms and maritime routes—highlighting its reliability and combat readiness. Why This System Matters To India The Barak Magan technology holds significance for India as well, with its land and sea-based variant Barak-8 co-developed by India's DRDO and IAI. The Barak-8, boasting a range of up to 100 km, is already in use by the Indian Navy and Air Force. Why It's A Strategic Breakthrough The introduction of Barak Magan is considered a game-changer in maritime defence, particularly against the rising threat of drones and low-altitude weapons. Ground-based systems like Iron Dome or David's Sling may not always suffice against such threats, making flexible and high-range systems like Barak Magan crucial for pre-emptive defence. Success Rate Till Now The Israeli Navy claims that Barak Magan has successfully intercepted approximately 25 drones or aerial threats during the ongoing conflict. Eight drones were recently intercepted in a single night by the Sa'ar 6 corvette, marking a significant milestone for the new defence system. Military analysts say the system's rapid and precise activation demonstrates its reliability and combat effectiveness. According to them, it is likely to become central to Israel's sea-based security strategy, particularly as threats from inexpensive yet lethal technologies like drones continue to rise. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! Location : Israel First Published:
