Ron DeSantis Says Drivers Have Right to Hit Protesters—Is He Right?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has been accused of "overstating the protections that drivers have" if they hit individuals who surround their vehicles during a demonstration.
Tray Gober, the managing director of the law firm Lee, Gober & Reyna, told Newsweek that the governor appeared to "conflate civil protections with criminal immunity" and risked "sending a dangerous message."
Why It Matters
Since June 6, Los Angeles has been rocked by a series of protests against Immigration and Custom Enforcement raids. Some of the demonstrations have turned violent, with individuals burning vehicles and throwing rocks at the police. In response, President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of 4,000 National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines against the wishes of California Governor Gavin Newsom. Anti-ICE protests have since spread to other cities, and Texas Governor Greg Abbott has also deployed National Guard troops in his state.
On Saturday, the Trump administration is holding a military parade in Washington, D.C., to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. The "No Kings" movement has organized more than 1,500 demonstrations across the country to take place on the day, which is also Trump's 79th birthday. A large number of protests nationwide could mean increased interactions between drivers and people demonstrating on roads.
What To Know
During an appearance on The Rubin Report on Wednesday, DeSantis said drivers could legally hit demonstrators with their vehicles if fleeing for their safety.
"We also have a policy that if you're driving on one of those streets and a mob comes and surrounds your vehicle and threatens you, you have a right to flee for your safety," DeSantis said. "And so if you drive off and you hit one of these people, that's their fault for impinging on you."
Gober, who has worked as a criminal defense attorney and covered civil cases involving vehicle collisions, said the governor's comments were based on a misunderstanding of the law.
"Governor DeSantis' comments appear to conflate civil protections with criminal immunity, which are distinct in both intent and effect," Gober said. "Florida's HB 1 passed in 2021 provides an affirmative defense in civil lawsuits for injuries caused to someone 'acting in furtherance of a riot.' But that is not the same as granting drivers a carte blanche to hit protesters without consequence."
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis speaking during a news conference at an ICE Enforcement and Removal Operation office in Miramar, Florida, on May 1.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis speaking during a news conference at an ICE Enforcement and Removal Operation office in Miramar, Florida, on May 1.
Joe Raedle/GETTY
In 2021, DeSantis signed House Bill 1, nicknamed the "anti-riot" bill, into law. The legislation grants drivers some civil protection if they hit protesters with their vehicles while feeling threatened but not criminal immunity.
"In a civil context, the Florida statute (HB1) provides that if a person is injured while participating in a riot, and they then sue for damages, the defendant can raise the plaintiff's riot participation as an affirmative defense," Gober said, adding: "In a criminal context, HB 1 does not create blanket immunity for drivers who injure protesters. Florida criminal law still requires that use of force is justified only when it meets the legal standard for self-defense."
"So while DeSantis's rhetoric suggests a driver can simply 'drive off' and harm someone without legal risk, that's not what the law actually says," he continued.
Gober added, "DeSantis is overstating the protections drivers have. The law he's citing offers limited civil protection in very specific cases. It does not give blanket criminal immunity for injuring or killing protesters. It also risks sending a dangerous message that civil unrest justifies indiscriminate harm."
What People Are Saying
Bryan Griffin, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis' communications director, told Newsweek: "It's simple: don't protest in Florida by blocking traffic or threatening people in their cars, and you won't have a problem. Even you Newsweek activists and your Experts™ should be able to keep that straight."
Lorella Praeli, a co-president of Community Change Action, which is backing Saturday's protest, previously told Newsweek: "Look around—Trump and his allies are deploying the tools of authoritarianism: silencing dissent, targeting immigrants, punishing oversight, and even staging military displays for personal glorification. These aren't isolated incidents; they're part of a broader effort to delegitimize democratic norms.
"This isn't normal. It's manufactured chaos, designed to instill fear and consolidate power. When a sitting U.S. Senator is handcuffed for asking a question, it should be a five-alarm fire for anyone who believes in democracy. We have to name this moment for what it is—and organize with the clarity and courage it demands."
What Happens Next
Demonstrations are expected across the U.S. on Saturday. Organizers of the No Kings protests have said: "All No Kings events adhere to a shared commitment to nonviolent protest and community safety. Organizers are trained in de-escalation and are working closely with local partners to ensure peaceful and powerful actions nationwide."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
House Democrat: We should be let into ICE facilities
Rep. Greg Meeks (D-N.Y.) condemned new policies requiring pre-screening for lawmakers' visits to immigration detention facilities on Friday after a series of incidents where members of Congress seeking to conduct oversight were denied entry. 'This administration has continuously tried to go around Congress and block Congress from doing its constitutionally responsible duties,' Meek said during a Friday appearance on MSNBC. 'We are and have oversight and should be let into these facilities without notice,' he added. Meeks said when provided advanced notice Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials can misrepresent conditions. His comments come after DHS issued new guidance requesting 72-hour notice before members of Congress visit facilities. Several lawmakers in New Jersey, California, Illinois and New York have been barred from entering facilities to conduct legal oversight. Meeks said DHS' new policy is 'problematic.' 'The way that you find out what actually is taking place, and we've done this under several administrations, Democrat and Republican previously, you're able to walk in and make an assessment of what is and what is not taking place,' Meeks told MSNBC. 'When you are prevented from doing your job and prevented from, you know, doing what the Constitution says you should be doing, then it makes you feel that there is something going on that should not be going on.' Multiple detainees have complained of overcrowding and a lack of due process amid national protests regarding the Trump administration's new immigration policies. Rep. Bennie G. Thompson (D-Miss.) also said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is seeking to block lawmakers from visiting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) field offices, even during advance visits. DHS did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment on the allegations. 'No matter how much she and Trump want to force us to live under their authoritarian rule, ICE is not above oversight and the Department must follow the law. This unlawful policy is a smokescreen to deny Member visits to ICE offices across the country, which are holding migrants – and sometimes even U.S. citizens – for days at a time,' Thompson, ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee, said in a statement. 'They are therefore detention facilities and are subject to oversight and inspection at any time. DHS pretending otherwise is simply their latest lie. There is no valid or legal reason for denying Member access to ICE facilities and DHS's ever-changing justifications prove this,' he added.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Border patrol agents arrest US citizen standing up for detained maintenance worker
A US citizen has been arrested after a physical altercation with immigration agents after they detained a maintenance worker at a shopping center in Pico Rivera, California.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Los Angeles Dodgers ICE protests and boycott threats, explained
The Los Angeles Dodgers are facing a fan revolt in their hometown amid rising tensions due to the Department of Homeland Security's immigration raids and the team's recent actions — and inactions. After previous repeated refusals to comment on the situation in Los Angeles — despite the fact LAFC and Angel City FC soccer clubs have both backed the city's immigrant community — some fans have called for boycotting the Dodgers and plan on protesting the franchise beginning Saturday, June 21. Those calls grew louder following a recent attempt by federal agents to access the stadium. Considering the Dodgers say more than 40 percent of the fan base is Latino, the fallout from a boycott could be felt immediately. Here's how we got here. Federal agents attempt to access Dodger Stadium On Thursday, shortly after the Dodgers finally indicated they would announce plans to assist LA's immigrant community, fans woke up to rumors of federal agents using the parking lots at Dodger Stadium as a staging area. The team released a statement later in the day saying it had refused access to ICE agents and Thursday's game would go on as scheduled. ICE denied a presence at Dodger Stadium, claiming it wasn't there Thursday. Photos and videos show border control agents attempting to access stadium parking lots. As protesters quickly swarmed the area, calls for the Dodgers to speak up or face a protest continued to grow. Who is calling for a Dodgers boycott? The call for action is coming from multiple groups and supporters and is starting to gain steam around the area. Here's more from the Los Angeles Public Press: Buried Under The Blue, an organization that advocates for the Indigenous communities displaced to build Dodger Stadium, have also spoken out and are asking fans to boycott the team. The group, which routinely refers to the Dodgers as the Displacers and advocates for the memory of the original neighborhoods of Palo Verde, La Loma and Bishop (modern-day Chavez Ravine), are now referring to the team as the Deporters and are directing fans to partake in the ActionCali action. Lawyer Michael Alder of Alder Law took to Instagram to call for a boycott of the team, urging fans not to buy tickets, attend or watch games or buy merchandise. 'I know it might seem small,' Alder said, 'but if we stand together we will undoubtedly make a real impact. Fans have also been urged by groups like ActionCali to reach out to the Dodgers to voice their concerns. Is this all because of the ICE raids in Los Angeles? Yes and no. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids across the city have escalated concerns from fans, but the disconnect with the franchise actually began months ago. The Dodgers were noticeably silent back in March when the Department of Defense wiped a webpage dedicated to Jackie Robinson's military service and bravery in breaking MLB's color barrier — then the team celebrated Jackie Robinson Day a few weeks later as if nothing happened. In between those events, the Dodgers chose to visit the White House to celebrate their 2024 World Series title, despite manager Dave Roberts previously saying he would decline such an invite because of President Donald Trump. Most recently, the team asked Nezza not to sing the national anthem in Spanish during the 'No Kings' day protests. She did not comply. Meanwhile, the team allegedly removed a fan holding an anti-ICE sign from a recent game and made another fan remove a sarape scarf before he was allowed to enter Dodger Stadium. The actions here speak much louder than words, though the Dodgers haven't had too many things to say lately. Wait. The Los Angeles Dodgers didn't comment on ICE raids? Well, until Wednesday night — when talks of a boycott began growing louder — the official team position seemingly was to remain silent about what was happening to the city's immigrant community. Per the Los Angeles Times Dylan Hernandez: Don't expect this to change. 'We're not going to comment,' Dodgers executive vice president and chief marketing officer Lon Rosen said. Considering what's happened in the last week, do the Dodgers regret visiting President Trump at the White House earlier this season? 'We're not going to comment on anything,' Rosen said. When the Dodgers announced they accepted Trump's White House invitation, team president Stan Kasten claimed the decision had 'nothing to do with politics.' Kasten sounded as if he was counting on the fans to give the team a pass for visiting an aspiring tyrant, either because their love of the Dodgers overwhelmed their disgust for Trump or because they lacked the intellectual faculties to connect Trump's racist rhetoric to real-life consequences. That sentiment was clearly not shared in the clubhouse. What about the Dodgers players? Kiké Hernández has been one of the lone outspoken voices standing up for immigrants, posting a tribute to his adopted city on Instagram and asking for people to be treated with dignity and respect. "I may not be Born & Raised, but this city adopted me as one of their own," Hernandez wrote. "I am saddened and infuriated by what's happening in our country and our city. Los Angeles and Dodger fans have welcomed me, supported me and shown me nothing but kindness and love. This is my second home. And I cannot stand to see our community being violated, profiled, abused and ripped apart. ALL people deserve to be treated with respect, dignity and human rights." Pitcher Brusdar Graterol previously took a stand on Instagram the same day his teammates visited the White House without him. More players will certainly be forced to answer about the situation after Thursday. Dodgers delay immigrant assistance announcement If anyone thought the presence of federal agents at Dodger Stadium would encourage the team to finally speak out, they were mistaken. In fact, the team delayed their announcement indefinitely following the incident Thursday morning. "Because of the events earlier today, we continue to work with groups that were involved with our programs," team president Stan Kasten said in a Thursday statement. "But we are going to have to delay today's announcement while we firm up some more details. We'll get back to you soon with the timing." Which brings us back to the calls to protest and boycott the Dodgers. The franchise has a long, tenuous relationship with the neighborhood of Chavez Ravine, which is home to Dodger Stadium. When the Brooklyn Dodgers bolted for the West Coast, the area was predominately inhabited by Mexican-American communities, who had to flee their homes, or be forcibly removed, after the city seized the land via eminent domain in the 1950s. The team's relationship with the Latino community only began to repair when Mexican star pitcher Fernando Valenzuela became a must-see sensation for the Dodgers in the 1980s. This is not ancient history by any means. The Dodgers are only a few generations removed from displacing the local immigrant community, which explains why the silence from a franchise that worked for years to restore trust in the neighborhood it took over is suddenly fracturing.
