Alcohol Lobbyists Given Input On Health Policies, Documents Reveal
Article – RNZ
Industry groups helped develop several initiatives about alcohol harm – including one on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder. Guyon Espiner, Investigative reporter, In Depth
Booze industry lobbyists have been granted input into the development of alcohol policies, including how to deal with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder.
Documents obtained by RNZ also show that references to a review of safe drinking guidelines were removed from an Health New Zealand website after an alcohol lobbyist complained to Ross Bell, a manager with the Ministry of Health's Public Health Agency.
The papers, released under the Official Information Act and sent anonymously to RNZ, show the booze industry has been given input into several government initiatives to tackle alcohol harm.
An October 2024 email from New Zealand Winegrowers to Bell, which copies in a lobbyist with the spirits industry, shows the extent to which alcohol lobbyists are involved in the Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) strategy.
'Appreciate the link to the speech and FASD initiatives,' the wine industry lobbyist says. 'We'd be interested in discussing the opportunity for industry engagement in the refresh of the action plan, as we were involved in the development of the initial plan.'
FASD affects about 1800 babies a year in New Zealand. The alcohol industry fought a 20 year battle against product labels warning pregnant women not to drink, before they finally became compulsory in 2023.
The documents also show that the alcohol industry has input into how the Ministry of Health spends the alcohol levy, a ring-fenced fund of $16.6 million, used to support alcohol harm reduction measures.
Bell emailed lobbyists with the wine and beer industries in November 2024, giving them information about the alcohol levy process and calling for their input.
'Following consultation and Ministerial approval we intend to have the framework finalised and published in the first part of next year to inform the next levy setting process. Let me know any questions, otherwise, thank you in advance for your input.'
The documents show lobbyists from the beer, wine and spirits industries also secured a meeting with health officials on 'the development of New Zealand's position' at a United Nations meeting.
'At the same time we would be happy to update you on the conversations our industry bodies are having at the international level,' a lobbyist for the wine industry wrote in an October 2024 email.
Health Coalition Aotearoa spokesman Steve Randerson said it was wrong to give the alcohol industry input on FASD, the alcohol levy framework and New Zealand's stance on UN strategies for reducing alcohol harm.
'There is a fundamental conflict of interest underlying alcohol industry input to the government on such issues, given most alcohol harm only reduces if we drink less, and alcohol sales drop,' Randerson said.
'When it comes to alcohol, our most harmful drug, we believe New Zealanders and policy officials dealing with alcohol harm should have real protection from alcohol industry lobbying.'
The papers also show that references to a review of safe drinking guidelines were removed from a Health New Zealand website after complaints from a booze lobbyist.
Safe drinking guidelines are a sensitive issue for the alcohol industry as evidence emerges that even moderate amounts of alcohol can lead to health issues.
The New Zealand safe drinking guidelines set the limit at 15 standard drinks a week for men and ten for women – much higher than Australia.
In 2020 Australia lowered its safe drinking guidelines from a maximum of 14 drinks a week to ten drinks a week for both men and women.
A lobbyist with the Brewers Association emailed Ross Bell in October 2024 asking why the alcohol.org.nz website, run by Health New Zealand, was reporting that the safe drinking guidelines were under review.
Bell investigated and then replied that he had told Health New Zealand it wasn't their responsibility and that it had now paused the review.
'They had thought that a refresh of the guidelines was in order. I've advised them that it's the Ministry's responsibility to lead on any technical/clinical public health guidelines, so they are pausing that specific piece of work on the guidelines,' Bell told the Brewers' Association.
'A refresh of the guidelines is not on our current alcohol levy-related work programme, which is something we would need to agree with relevant ministers anyway. I'll let you know at future meetings if this changes.'
A month later the Brewers Association lobbyist emailed Bell again, asking why references to a review of safe drinking guidelines were still on the website.
'It was raised with me by one of our stakeholders that the alcohol.org.nz website which hosts the NZ guidelines is still stating that they are under review. Given what you have noted below I was wondering why this was still stated as the case online.'
Bell responded the next day but much of the email has been redacted by the Ministry of Health, using a section of the OIA which protects 'the confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers of the Crown and officials'.
It's not clear how this section of the OIA can be used to protect an exchange between an alcohol lobbyist and the Public Health Agency but the sections that are released show Bell is receptive to the industry's concerns.
'On the guidelines – I am hoping the HNZ website will be updated within the next day or so. I'll try to keep an eye on that,' he told the Brewers Association.
In a statement to RNZ, Bell confirmed that material was removed from the website.
'Reference to the drinking guidelines review was removed from the alcohol.org.nz website to avoid confusion about roles and responsibilities as the guidelines are now led by the Ministry of Health – rather than Health New Zealand who own the alcohol.org.nz site. This was an internal Ministry decision.'
He said work had been done on the review of safe drinking guidelines but was now on hold while the Ministry of Health considered its priorities.
Randerson said policies to reduce alcohol harm should be protected from 'commercial and other vested interests that can interfere with and undermine public health objectives'.
He said the alcohol industry 'paints itself as a legitimate partner while employing certain tactics in its policy advice' which focus on individual responsibility rather than regulating the marketing, price and supply.
Randerson said a poll commissioned by Health Coalition Aotearoa and the Cancer Society showed 71 percent of New Zealanders felt the alcohol industry should not be involved in developing policy on alcohol.
But Bell said the Public Health Agency needed to engage with the alcohol industry on issues such as the FASD action plan and how to spend the alcohol levy.
'The FASD action plan includes activities funded by the levy on the alcohol industry, and the framework sets out criteria for how the levy is spent,' Bell said. 'Development of the action plan and levy framework are intended to ensure levy funding is invested where it will have the biggest impact in addressing alcohol harms affecting the lives of New Zealanders.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
27 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Cancer charity Look Good Feel Better gets a wellbeing-focused makeover
For more than 30 years, Look Good Feel Better has been supporting New Zealanders who have cancer. With backing from the cosmetics industry, the charity is best known for its makeover skincare and make-up classes, and has mostly focused on helping women navigate the changes in their appearance caused by
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Hawke's Bay runner Nicole Pendreigh plans marathon for 115 women killed on runs
'Running has become a source of strength and healing for me. But for many women, it's also a source of fear,' she told the Herald. This race is a challenge she was once told she would never be able to do after a serious hip injury meant she could only run 30 seconds at a time. Nicole Pendreigh, a 23-year-old runner from Hawke's Bay, plans to finish a marathon in Taupō on August 2. Photo / Supplied From injury to marathon-ready In 2022, Pendreigh fractured her hip and suffered a labral tear, leading to years of pain after her injury was initially misdiagnosed as a groin strain. 'I didn't get any scans done. I was kind of doing the wrong sort of rehab for it, which led to an impingement,' she said. 'There was extra bone growth on my femur, which causes my bones to rub together on my hip.' Her hip capsule was inflamed and had become thickened. 'I tried to get cortisone injections for it because I couldn't sit for over an hour. 'I couldn't walk uphill or downhill. I couldn't sit on the ground without pain.' Pendreigh said she was told to give up running and look for another hobby because it was 'just something I'll have to deal with now'. At the beginning, she was only able to run for short distances and could only manage 30-second blocks. After years of rehab, Pendreigh has built up her body's tolerance for running. 'I think later on it might give me a bit of grief, but it's definitely worth it for the [marathon] day.' 'Constantly getting scared' Pendreigh said the run will be about more than just crossing the finish line. 'It's about honouring the lives of women lost and working toward a future where every woman can run freely and safely.' Pendreigh said because of her schedule and the winter season she is forced to run at night or early morning in the dark. 'I'm constantly getting scared from my own shadow ... and people or males coming towards me.' She told the Herald she was on a daytime beach run when an incident with a man occurred that sparked her desire for change. 'I was running, and he thought it was a fun time to just yell at me, and he started running after me, which was super scary,' she said. 'It got me thinking about how unsafe women feel when running and how normal it is for me to feel like that on a run. 'I wanted to make it not normal.' Women assaulted and killed on runs Pendreigh said she will be dedicating her marathon to 115 women killed on runs worldwide, including murdered Kiwi runners Jo Pert and Margaret-Lynne Baxter. The young athlete will be wearing a custom top with all 115 names. 'I'll bring all of them across the line. I've got all 115 names on the back of my top and two of them are New Zealanders as well.' Nicole Pendreigh plans to tackle a marathon event wearing a top bearing the names of 115 women killed on runs worldwide. Photo / Supplied Wellington resident Margaret-Lynne Baxter was run down, abducted, raped and murdered near the Hastings suburb of Flaxmere during a Sunday morning run in 2001. In 2016, mother-of-two Jo Pert died after being attacked while out jogging in Remuera, Auckland. 'I really want to have them along with me in the journey,' Pendreigh said. 'Just knowing that they were trying to do something for enjoyment and got their lives taken because of it.' Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Private use of publicly-funded cancer drugs will widen inequities, doctors warn
By Ruth Hill of RNZ A move to allow private patients to access publicly-funded cancer drugs threatens to increase wait times for those in the public system, warn senior doctors. Under "transitional access", which comes into effect on July 1, private patients who are already receiving treatment - or about to start treatment - with a newly funded medicine will not have to shift to the public system for 12 months. Associate Health Minister David Seymour, who has championed the rule change, said it would lessen stress on private patients by enabling continuity of care, and pressure on the public system which would no longer have to deal with a sudden influx of patients. However, the move has been criticised by opposition politicians as "a subsidy for private insurers", which already cover the cost of medicines newly funded by Pharmac, and of little benefit to patients. The Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, which represents 6500 senior hospital doctors and dentists, said its members working in oncology and haematology had "significant concerns" the change would widen inequities for patients. Change will create 'two-tier' waiting list In a letter on June 13 to Pharmac's acting chief executive Brendan Boyle, the union's director of policy and research, Harriet Wild, quoted a briefing to the minister saying the policy change "would not increase volumes of cancer medicines provided in New Zealand, as only the location of treatments will change". "It will simply shift some of the existing capacity to the private system, where patients will need to fund infusion costs out-of-pocket," Wild wrote. "There will be pressure on the public system to ensure a smooth transition in treatment regime, which may mean delaying treatment for other people already waiting on the public list and unable to self-fund to start in private. "This potentially creates a two-tier waiting list and a system where those with more financial resources, will be prioritised for treatment." Furthermore, the shift of resources and inevitable increase in demand was likely to speed up the exodus of staff to the private sector, making public waiting lists even longer. Minister signals broadening access further A "back-pocket Q&A" provided to Seymour ahead of a Cabinet meeting on April 7 noted that the current eligibility criteria in the Pharmaceutical Schedule (excluding patients in private settings) was "designed to ensure public funding for medicines was prioritised for those managed in the public health system for cancer treatment, assessed by need, rather than public funding supporting those who chose to access treatment in private facilities. "Often the private treatment is funded from private health insurance that people have paid premiums into." In the same document, the minister said there was no plan to expand the policy to include other types of medicines or treatments "at this stage". "With that said, I've asked the Ministry [of Health] to do further work in this area to explore the possibility of broadening access to all publicly-funded medicines in private facilities - not just newly funded cancer medicines. "I encourage the private health providers and insurance companies to work closely with the ministry to support their understanding of how this might work in practice." Wild said opening access to publicly-funded drugs even wider would pull more staff away from the public system, reducing access for the majority who relied on it. "That would establish a system where a patient's ability to receive timely cancer care would depend on whether they could afford the out-of-pocket infusion costs." Pharmac's Budget boost needs 'back up' The government's 2024 Budget boost to Pharmac to widen access to medicines for patients had not been accompanied by extra resources for Te Whatu Ora to deliver the treatments, when public oncology services were already swamped with demand, Wild said. "Our members are increasingly needing to manage deteriorating patients, who are unable to access chemotherapy infusions in clinically acceptable timeframes. "This is unacceptable and represents a significant failure to invest in a planned and co-ordinated way to enable the public system to meet the needs of cancer patients, including those eligible for newly funded cancer medicines. "Whenever a new cancer drug is funded, it must be accompanied by an increase in the full package of care (staffing, infusion space, pharmacy) so that patients can actually receive the medicines within clinically acceptable timeframes." The Health Minister and David Seymour's office have been approached for comment.
