Election Day is this week. Here's what Issue 2 on Ohio's ballot means.
Construction work. (Photo by.)
Ohio voters will decide whether to renew a program that helps local governments support public infrastructure projects Tuesday on the May primary ballot.
Early voting is already underway. Depending on where you live, you may have city council seats, judges or a school levy. But every ballot across the state will have Issue 2.
It is a constitutional amendment meant to support local infrastructure projects, which many voters have said they want to see started expeditiously, since Ohio roads are no joke.
'You got to keep swerving around all these potholes, the second you take your eye off the road, you're setting yourself up for danger,' Akron resident Eric Makowski said.
Issue 2, on the ballot on May 6, is meant to fix the problem and make the roads safer.
Every 10 years, voters choose whether or not to renew the state's ability to issue billions in bonds for the State Capital Improvement Program (SCIP) and the Local Transportation Improvement Program (LTIP).
'We have lots of discussions about what we should spend money on, obviously, but almost all Ohioans agree on roads and bridges and infrastructure,' Huffman added.
This year, Issue 2 is the bond package paying for local infrastructure, roads, bridges and other things.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The amount would be $2.5 billion. This resolution will increase the annual amount for the program from $200 million to $250 million per year. This will be paid for through state general obligation debt.
These grants cover roads, bridges, water supply, wastewater treatment, stormwater collection and solid waste disposal. These bonds must be used for these projects.
Read the full ballot amendment here.
State Sen. Kent Smith (D-Euclid) explained that this money can only be used for general government infrastructure. The money would not be able to be used for other types of projects, like for entertainment.
'The Browns issue has percolated at the same time this issue has come up,' Smith said. 'The two issues are not related whatsoever, but there is some confusion because of that.'
To be very clear — this bond issue is unrelated to the Cleveland Browns' request for $600 million in bonds. This money would not be able to go to them.
Issue 2 has wide bipartisan support, from the Ohio Chamber of Commerce to each trade union. There seems to be no official, active campaign against it, but a couple of lawmakers are against it.
In a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, state Rep. Jennifer Gross (R-West Chester) argued that Issue 2 isn't helpful when Ohioans are already struggling with inflation.
'I encourage you to consider voting no on Issue 2… Did the state deliver income tax reform? Have we delivered property tax reform? Do we need more of your money? Vote accordingly,' she wrote.
Tim, a Cuyahoga County voter, saw and was convinced by Gross's tweets, saying he didn't think the state or cities deserved more.
'My taxes just go up every year and I think, 'You know what, we can allocate some of that money towards the infrastructure we need,'' he said.
Huffman said that Ohioans should have safe roads – ones where you don't need to swerve to avoid craters.
'Even if you're not driving a car, you benefit from safety services who use the roads; you benefit from things that are delivered to your house,' the speaker said.
In short — voting yes would renew the public works project. Voting no would stop the program.
Election Day is May 6. Polls are open from 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. If not returned by mail, absentee ballots must be received by your board of elections by 7:30 p.m.
If you do not know your county's website, click or tap here. This contains their addresses, emails and phone numbers.
Click here to check your registration status.
May 5: Mailed absentee ballots must be postmarked by this date.
May 6: Primary/Special Election: Polls are open from 6:30 a.m. – 7:30 p.m.
May 6: Absentee Ballots may be returned by mail or personally delivered to your county board of elections. If not returned by mail, absentee ballots must be received by your board of elections by 7:30 p.m.
May 10: Last day for boards of elections to receive non-UOCAVA absentee ballots (returned by U.S. mail) that have been postmarked on or before May 5. UOCAVA absentee ballots must be received (by mail) by boards of elections by this date to be counted.
Click here to find your polling location for May 6.
You need to bring a photo ID when voting in person. Acceptable forms are a valid Ohio driver's license, a U.S. passport or a military ID. You may no longer use bank statements or utility bills.
Other acceptable forms of ID are a state of Ohio ID card, an interim ID form issued by the Ohio BMV, a U.S. passport card, an Ohio National Guard ID card and a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs ID card.
Other unacceptable forms of ID are a driver's license or photo identification card issued by a state other than Ohio; a Social Security card, birth certificate, insurance card, government check, paycheck, or other government document; or any registration acknowledgment notice from the county board of elections.
The IDs must have an expiration date that has not passed, a photograph of the voter, and the voter's name, which must substantially conform to the voter's name as it appears in the Poll List or in the Poll Book.
If you do not have any of the approved forms of identification, you are allowed to cast a provisional ballot. To have your vote counted, you must return to the BOE within four days of the election to provide a photo ID.
If you have any questions or concerns about voting, a nonpartisan helpline has been created.
Call or text 1-866-OUR-VOTE (866-687-8683) to speak with a trained Election Protection volunteer in English.
The hotline also comes in different languages
Spanish: 888-VE-Y-VOTA (888-839-8682)
Asian languages: 888-API-VOTE (888-274-8683)
Arabic: 844-YALLA-US (844-925-5287)
Follow WEWS statehouse reporter Morgan Trau on Twitter and Facebook.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
What is the Prenatal Equal Protection Act? New bill would effectively ban abortion in Ohio
(WJW) — On Wednesday, Republican State Reps. Levi Dean and Johnathan Newman are set to introduce a controversial new bill at the Ohio Statehouse that would ban abortion in the Buckeye State. The legislation is called the Prenatal Equal Protection Act, and it aims to extend full legal rights to fetuses from the moment of fertilization. Bagworm outbreak threat growing in Ohio, OSU warns 'We are trying to create a constitutional debate in which we believe the state's constitution would be superseded by the U.S. Constitution,' said pro-life activist Austin Beigel, who helped craft the bill. Beigel, a member of End Abortion Ohio, said the legislation is about ensuring what he sees as equal protection for all life — born or unborn. 'To simply say this is a person in the womb, out of the womb — we know they are human. We believe all people deserve legal protection under the law,' he said. Supporters of the bill argue it is not about politics, but about morality. 'It is not going to permit the killing of innocent human beings, innocent people,' Beigel added. But opponents said the bill defies the will of Ohio voters, who passed a constitutional amendment in 2023 explicitly protecting access to abortion. 'I mean, we knew on Nov. 7, 2023, that there would be plans to undermine the will of the Ohio voter,' said Jordyn Close, deputy director of the Ohio Women's Alliance. Close said she first learned of the proposed legislation last week and was troubled by what she found. 'This bill does not account for any special circumstances. It does not account for any real-life realities for Ohioans who need abortion care,' she said. Baby delivered from brain-dead woman on life support in Georgia The bill argues that Ohio's constitutional amendment legalizing abortion should be considered invalid, claiming it violates the U.S. Constitution's equal-protection clause. But Close believes that argument won't hold up in court. 'Our fantastic legal team and legal scholars will be able to defeat this,' she said. Supporters of the legislation are expected to hold a rally inside the Statehouse from 2:30 to 4 p.m. on Wednesday as the bill is officially filed. Whether the bill gains traction in the legislature remains to be seen, but the fight over abortion rights in Ohio appears far from over. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
13 hours ago
- The Hill
Hawley challenges Democrats over bipartisan RECA language in ‘big, beautiful bill'
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who scored a big win by getting Senate GOP leaders to add language extending the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) to President Trump's budget package, is challenging Democrats not to contest the provision with the Senate parliamentarian. Hawley noted the bipartisan support behind RECA in urging Democrats to not challenge its presence in the Senate version of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'Democrats will soon have to decide whether to try to strop RECA out of the reconciliation bill (using the 'Byrd rules'). It stays in unless Democrats challenge. Don't do it! Survivors have waited too long. Let's get this done now!' Hawley posted on X. Hawley announced last week that GOP leaders agreed to include the largest expansion to date of the radiation exposure compensation program in President Trump's signature first-year legislation. It would expand the program to make residents affected from radioactive exposure in Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky and Alaska eligible for compensation and would fully cover people affected in 'downwind' areas such as Nevada, Utah and Arizona. 'The federal government dumped nuclear waste in the backyards of Missourians for decades—and then lied about it. These survivors sacrificed their health for our national security at the advent of the Manhattan Project, and their children and grandchildren have borne the burden of radioactive-linked illness for generations since,' Hawley said in a statement last week. Hawley is challenging Democrats who have supported the expansion of RECA to urge their leadership not to attempt to strip the language from the budget reconciliation package by litigating the issue with the Senate parliamentarian. Democrats are challenging an array of provisions in the massive package as violations of the Senate's Byrd Rule, which governs what legislation may be protected from filibusters under the budget reconciliation process. Democrats have already successfully knocked out several provisions, such as a funding cap that would have eliminated the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a key accomplishment of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act. The expansion of RECA has had strong bipartisan support in the Senate. Hawley joined Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) and Democratic Sens. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) and Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) in January to reintroduce the Radiation Exposure Compensation Reauthorization Act to compensate Americans exposed to radiation by government nuclear programs. Heinrich said at the time that 'it's long overdue for Congress to pass an extension and expansion of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act that includes Tularosa Basin Downwinders whose communities and families were harmed by the fallout of the 1945 Trinity Test.' The Trinity Test, which took place in July of 1945 at the Alamogordo Bombing Range in New Mexico, was the first detonation of a nuclear weapon as part of the Manhattan project. Luján, when he joined Hawley in reintroducing the legislation in January, said that 'individuals affected by nuclear weapons testing, downwind radiation exposure and uranium mining are still waiting to receive the just they are owed.' A Democratic aide on Friday declined to say whether Democrats would challenge specifically the RECA language championed by Hawley. The source said that Senate Democratic staff are conducting a comprehensive review of policy provisions in the package.
The Hill
15 hours ago
- The Hill
Clyburn endorses Cuomo in NYC mayor's race
Influential longtime Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) threw his support behind Andrew Cuomo ahead of Tuesday's Democratic primary for New York City mayor, adding another prominent name to his list of supporters. Clyburn said he's endorsing the former New York governor because of his experience in office and record of accomplishing his initiatives. He said Cuomo searches for answers and places to find common ground to build coalitions. 'If he says he will build more affordable housing, raise the minimum wage, make the city safer and create more opportunities for our youth, you can be confident that he will — because he's done it before,' Clyburn said in a statement. 'His record of accomplishments is extraordinary, and I am confident he will be a great mayor of New York.' Clyburn said he's known him since Cuomo served as secretary of housing and urban development during the Clinton administration, when they worked together to support those who were underserved, particularly people of color. He said the role of New York City mayor is 'uniquely positioned' to be important for the future of the Democratic Party, as it faces challenges addressing the Trump administration. He said the mayor must meet that challenge and defend the city. 'Andrew Cuomo has the experience, credentials, and character to not just serve New York, but also help save the nation,' Clyburn said. Backing from the longtime Congressional Black Caucus member, who has served in various leadership positions during his tenure, including House majority whip, is a notable get for Cuomo as he hopes to solidify his support among Black voters. Polls have shown them to be a key part of Cuomo's coalition. Clyburn flexed political muscle in the past, most memorably when he endorsed former President Biden during his 2020 run after Biden struggled in the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary. But Biden rose significantly after Clyburn's endorsement and went on to win the nomination and presidency. Cuomo said he's 'honored and humbled' to have Clyburn's support, calling him a 'man who has spent a lifetime prioritizing making headway over headlines, of actions over words and results over performative politics.' Clyburn is also taking part in robocalls going out to residents ahead of the Tuesday primary. In one call, he says Cuomo will stand up to President Trump and urges voters to vote early as a heat wave could bring temperatures up to 100 degrees on Tuesday. Cuomo has been the front-runner throughout the entire race so far but is hoping to hold off a rising challenge from state Assembly member Zohran Mamdani, who has consistently placed second in the polls and is closing the gap. But the latest independent polling still shows Cuomo ahead. Cuomo has notched other major endorsements from figures like Reps. Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.) and Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), former New York Gov. David Patterson (D) and former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
