African gay men blame President Trump for their recent HIV diagnoses after he cut prevention funding
Gay men in Africa are blaming President Trump's decision to cut funding for HIV /AIDS prevention for their diagnoses of the virus.
The administration's sweeping cuts to foreign aid have reduced access to medications like Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis, or PrEP, which decreases the risk of contracting HIV by 99 percent.
Emmanuel Cherem, 25, a gay men in Nigeria, told Reuters that he tested positive for HIV two months after losing access to the US-supplied drug.
'I blame myself... Taking care of myself is my first duty as a person,' he said.
'I equally blame the Trump administration because, you know, these things were available, and then, without prior notice, these things were cut off.'
Echezona, 30, another gay man from Nigeria, told Reuters that he took PrEP pills daily for three years until he was told by a clinic worker that the drug was now only available to pregnant and lactating women.
'I just pray and wish that Trump actually changes his policy and everything comes back to normal so that the spread and transmission of the virus would be reduced,' he said.
Trump issued an executive order on his first day in office that paused foreign development assistance for 90 days, while Secretary of State Marco Rubio signed a 'stop work order' to employees of the State Department's Office of Foreign Assistance.
The department oversees the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which have seen drastic cuts since Trump took office.
The administration has defended its position, arguing that other countries need to shoulder the burden of providing aid.
During South African President Cyril Ramaphosa's White House visit, Trump acknowledged that the foreign aid cuts have been 'devastating.'
'Hopefully a lot of people are going to start spending a lot of money,' Trump added.
'I've talked to other nations. We want them to chip in and spend money too, and we've spent a lot,' he continued.
'And it's a big - it's a tremendous problem going on in many countries. A lot of problems going on. The United States always gets the request for money. Nobody else helps.'
Russell Vought, the director of the US Office of Management and Budget, echoed Trump's stance during a Congressional committee meeting in early June.
He argued that African countries should take on the responsibility of fighting HIV/AIDS, alleviating the financial burden on the US.
Vought added that some of the nonprofits facilitating HIV prevention programs 'are not geared toward the viewpoints of the administration.'
The director's comments are in line with a waiver issued to PEPFAR programs on February 1 allowing prevention programs to restart only for pregnant mothers.
Vulnerable populations, like members of the LGBTQIA+ community, sex workers, or injecting drug users, weren't included in the prevention measures.
PEPFAR grants often covered the cost of clinics supplying PrEP at public health centers for these populations, which have suffered closures due to decreased funding.
A spokesperson for the State Department told Reuters that PEPFAR-funded programs would continue to be reviewed for 'assessment of programmatic efficiencies and consistency with United States foreign policy.'
Public health officials and activists fear that if Trump's hardline policy toward foreign aid stays consistent, HIV infections will continue in the region.
Linda-Gail Bekker, an HIV expert at the University of Cape Town, said that African countries may not cover the expense of supplying the drug, leaving a gap for more diagnoses.
'It's as predictable as if you take your eye off a smoldering bushfire and the wind is blowing: a bushfire will come back,' she told Reuters.
Countries like Malawi, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique were almost entirely dependent on US funding for HIV prevention measures, according to UNAIDS.
Other countries, like Ethiopia, responded to the USAID funding cuts by introducing a new payroll tax to pay for HIV medication previously provided by US funding.
Medical advancements for HIV prevention and treatment have progressed significantly in recent years. However, UNAIDS projects that gaps created by a lack of funding could see steps backward.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
35 minutes ago
- Metro
I was the only out lesbian MP for 13 years - here's how Parliament has changed
When Dame Angela Eagle decided it was time to come out publicly as gay, there were two people she knew she needed to tell first. That wasn't simply out of courtesy. It was because the year was 1997, and the reaction to the news from the media had the potential to be explosive. A general election had just resulted in a landslide victory for Tony Blair. Eagle – a Labour MP since 1992, covering the final stretch of Conservative power that lasted 18 years – became a junior environment minister. The landscape for LGBTQ+ Brits was tough, typified by the Section 28 law against 'promoting homosexuality' and the devastation of the Aids epidemic. Caustic homophobia was common in the media and broader culture. Making things harder still, there wasn't much precedent for a gay politician. There had been only two openly gay MPs before, Maureen Colquhoun and Chris Smith – and only the latter had come out publicly by choice. Smith, who became the new Culture Secretary under Blair, was the first of the two people Eagle decided to tell. She needed advice. 'It took me ages to get a cabinet minister to go out for a meal with me in the evening, where I could talk to him about how he did it and what I should be doing,' she told Metro. 'We knew each other well, and we were having a nice time in this restaurant, and we got all the way through to past the sweet, and I'm thinking, 'How do I, how do I just…' 'In the end, I was thinking, 'Angela, it's taken months for you to get this bloody meeting to ask him his advice, and now here we are, we're nearly at the end of the meal, and you still haven't.' With thousands of members from all over the world, our vibrant LGBTQ+ WhatsApp channel is a hub for all the latest news and important issues that face the LGBTQ+ community. Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications! 'So in the end, I just said it, and he was gobsmacked and pleased and happy to help and talk and things like that.' It took less time for Eagle to tell the second person: her boss, Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott. 'I got 15 minutes, and I told him, and he said, 'Tell me something I didn't know already, love.' 'And he said, 'Can I give you a hug?' And I said, 'Yes,' and he gave me a hug.' After a final chat with New Labour supremo Peter Mandelson, she gave an exclusive interview to Suzanne Moore of the Independent ('I didn't want to do it in the Guardian, because I thought they were all a load of public school blokes', she said) and that was that. Eagle returned to her Wallasey constituency in Merseyside for publication day, so she handle things with her local party. After all the anxiety, their reaction was 'very positive'. 'They did a vox pop [series of interviews with the general public], the local media, and they couldn't find anyone that criticised me. So when they said that, that's when I burst into tears,' she said. Astonishingly, Eagle spent the next 13 years – Labour's entire period in power – as the only 'out' lesbian in the House of Commons. Over that time, she picks out her role in proceedings for the civil partnership bill, her support for gay adoption, and her opposition to the watering-down of anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination laws in Northern Ireland as proud moments in Parliament. It's now thankfully hard to imagine a gay MP having to seek the advice of Deputy PM Angela Rayner before coming out, for fear of backlash. In fact, Labour's 59 openly LGBTQ+ MPs make up 'by far the largest party cohort of any parliament, anywhere in the world', according to PinkNews. Her current role, as minister for border security and asylum, puts her in touch with some of the most vulnerable LGBTQ+ people on the planet, asylum seekers fleeing persecution for their sexuality. Eagle said: 'I just think it's much better that everybody feels that they can be out now. And so that is part of a change that I'm glad to played a part in.' She added: 'I think people are well aware, given some backtracking particularly on trans rights in a lot of democracies, that there is a backlash going on about equality issues and LGBT rights, and we've got to make sure that we are there to carry on the fight.' Metro's interview with Eagle took place before the Supreme Court's ruling on the application of the Equality Act for trans men and women. She declined to comment when contacted afterwards, due to her role as a government minister. Last year, Metro revealed a gay man from Bangladesh had his UK asylum application refused after a judge told him he was only 'trying to pass' himself as gay. Asked about that story, Eagle said: 'It's very, very difficult to assert something that often you've had to hide. More Trending 'We just have to hope that caseworkers know the right way to approach these sensitive issues, and there isn't a cliched view and that they can make a sophisticated decision that everybody wants to support. 'I can't involve myself in individual cases, because we can't as ministers, but we've got to make certain that there's an understanding of what the issues are in some places where you really can't be gay acting, because you'd be killed.' For the last three years of the previous Parliament, Eagle sat as co-chair on the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Global LGBT+ Rights. Her experience there meant she knows 'very well' the struggles people face around the world, she said, adding: 'So I don't ever take progress for granted. We have to keep winning the arguments.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: I told my date my sexual preferences and was immediately ghosted MORE: Last 'LGBT free zones' in Poland are finally scrapped – what happens next? MORE: I'm allowed to date other women – my partner isn't
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Takeaways from AP report on accusation that Wagner commits war crimes by promoting atrocities
Editor's Note: This story contains graphic images and descriptions of atrocities. The International Criminal Court has been asked to review a confidential legal brief asserting that the Russia-linked Wagner Group has committed war crimes by spreading images of apparent atrocities in West Africa on social media, including ones alluding to cannibalism. The brief was seen exclusively by The Associated Press. Violence in the Sahel, an arid belt of land south of the Sahara Desert, has reached record levels as military governments battle extremist groups linked to al-Qaida and the Islamic State group. Last year, it became the deadliest place on earth for extremism, with half of the world's nearly 8,000 victims killed across the territory, according to yearly data compiled by the Institute for Economics and Peace. While the United States and other Western powers withdraw from the region, Russia has taken advantage, expanding military cooperation with several African nations via Wagner, the private security company closely linked to Russia's intelligence and military. Observers say the new approach has led to the kind of atrocities and dehumanization not seen in the region for decades. Social media offers a window into the alleged horrors that often occur in remote areas with little or no oversight from governments or outside observers. Experts say the images, while difficult to verify, could serve as evidence of war crimes. The confidential brief to the ICC goes further, arguing that the act of circulating the images on social media could constitute a war crime, too. It is the first such argument made to the international court. Here are some takeaways from AP's report on the issue. Videos which humiliate and dehumanize The brief, along with AP reporting, shows that a network of social media channels, likely administrated by current or former Wagner members, has reposted content that the channels say are from Wagner fighters. They promote videos and photos appearing to show abuses by armed, uniformed men, often accompanied by mocking or dehumanizing language. In the videos, men in military uniform are shown butchering corpses of what appear to be civilians with machetes, hacking out organs and posing with severed limbs. One fighter says he is about to eat someone's liver. Another says he is trying to remove their heart. While administrators of the channels are anonymous, open source analysts believe they are current or former Wagner fighters based on the content as well as graphics used, including in some cases Wagner's logo. AP analysis of the videos confirms the body parts shown are genuine, as well as the military uniforms. The videos and photos, in a mix of French and local languages, aim to humiliate and threaten those considered the enemies of Wagner and its local military allies, along with civilian populations whose youth face pressure to join extremist groups. But experts say it often has the opposite effect, prompting reprisal attacks and recruitment into the ranks of jihadis. The governments of Mali and Burkina Faso earlier condemned the graphic videos and said they would look into them, but it is not clear whether anyone in them has been identified. Russia's presence continues The U.S. State Department has described Wagner, a network of mercenaries and businesses, as 'a transnational criminal organization.' Wagner did not respond to AP questions about the videos. Since Wagner leader Yevgeny Prigozhin was killed in a plane crash in 2023, Moscow has been developing a new organization, the Africa Corps, as a rival force under direct command of Russian authorities. Earlier this month, Wagner announced its withdrawal from Mali, declaring 'mission accomplished' in a Telegram post. In a separate Telegram post, Africa Corps said it is staying. In Mali, about 2,000 Russian mercenaries are fighting alongside the country's armed forces, according to U.S. officials. It is unclear how many have been with Wagner or are with the Africa Corps. Outrages on personal dignity Under the Rome Statute that created the ICC, the violation of personal dignity, mainly through humiliating and degrading treatment, constitutes a war crime. Legal experts from UC Berkeley, who submitted the brief to the ICC last year, argue that such treatment could include Wagner's alleged weaponization of social media. The brief asks the ICC to investigate individuals with Wagner and the governments of Mali and Russia for alleged abuses in northern and central Mali between December 2021 and July 2024, including extrajudicial killings, torture, mutilation and cannibalism. It also asks the court to investigate crimes 'committed through the internet, which are inextricably linked to the physical crimes and add a new dimension of harm to an extended group of victims.' The ICC told the AP it could not comment on the brief but said it was aware of 'various reports of alleged massive human rights violations in other parts of Mali,' adding that it 'follows closely the situation.' Its Office of the Prosecutor said investigations have focused on alleged war crimes committed since January 2012, when insurgents seized communities in Mali's northern regions of Gao, Kidal and Timbuktu. Lack of accountability Human Rights Watch has documented atrocities committed in Mali by Wagner and other armed groups. It says accountability for alleged abuses has been minimal, with the military government reluctant to investigate its armed forces and Russian mercenaries. It has become difficult to obtain detailed information on alleged abuses because of the Malian government's 'relentless assault against the political opposition, civil society groups, the media and peaceful dissent,' said Ilaria Allegrozzi, the group's Sahel researcher. That has worsened after a U.N. peacekeeping mission withdrew from Mali in December 2023 at the government's request. That void, she said, 'has eased the way for further atrocities.'
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Mahmoud Khalil gets incredible news three months after ICE threw Columbia activist in jail
A pro-Palestine activist and Columbia University graduate student was ordered freed by a judge three months after ICE took him into custody over claims he is a Hamas supporter. Mahmoud Khalil, 30, must be freed on bail, a New Jersey federal judge ruled on Friday in a major victory for the protestor. A lawful resident in the US, Khalil was taken into custody on March 8, 2025, as the Trump administration cracked down on pro-Palestine demonstrations on college campuses. Khalil was one of the primary organizers of protests that took over Columbia as the Israel - Hamas conflict was ignited. In the ruling Friday, Judge Michael E. Farbiaz that none of the Trump administration's allegations against Khalil justified his continued detention, and sided with Khalil's argument that he was locked up as an unlawful retaliation for his activism. In his ruling on Friday, Farbiarz said: 'There is at least something to the underlying claim that there is an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish Mr. Khalil - And of course that would be unconstitutional.' Khalil has not been charged with a crime, but the judge's order to free him comes as the Trump White House continues efforts to deport him back to Algeria, where he is a citizen. When he was detained earlier this year, Khalil's case gained national attention as he was the first pro-Palestinian protester to be arrested by the Trump administration in its crackdown on college campuses. Several protests he organized and led at Columbia turned violent, with one seeing 112 students arrested when they stormed a campus building and occupied it as NYPD officers tried to shut their demonstration down. His arrest sparked protests across the country as critics accused the Trump administration of unlawfully arresting a legal resident without charging him with a crime in violation of his free speech. He was detained under the Cold War–era Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which states that non-US citizens can be deported if they are antagonistic against US foreign policy. Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Khalil of spreading anti-Semitism, and White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said he was 'siding with terrorists.' But in the three months that Khalil has been detained, the Justice Department hasn't disclosed any substantive connection between Khalil and Hamas, which attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, and killed around 1,200 civilians. In their successful filing to free Khalil this week, the graduate student's attorneys argued that he was not spreading anti-Semitism when he campaigned for Palestine in its war with Israel. They cited past quotes from him such as comments he made to CNN during a campus protest, where he said that 'he liberation of the Palestinian people and the Jewish people are intertwined and go hand by hand, and you cannot achieve one without the other.' Judge Farbiarz had previously ruled that the foreign policy law was not enough to justify Khalil's detention, and his ruling on Friday shot down further allegations from the Trump administration that Khalil made paperwork errors when applying for citizenship last year. A number of other pro-Palestine protestors have been arrested and freed in the time that Khalil was detained. Following Friday's ruling, Khalil's attorneys say he will be able to return to New York to be with his wife and baby son, both of whom are US citizens. 'Today's ruling underscores a vital First Amendment principle: The government cannot abuse immigration law to punish speech it disavows,' Noor Zafar, one of Khalil's attorneys, said.
