The US commemorates 250th anniversary of the 'great American battle,' the Battle of Bunker Hill

As the U.S. marks the 250th anniversary of the Battle of Bunker Hill, it might take a moment — or more — to remember why.
Start with the very name.
'There's something percussive about it: Battle of Bunker Hill,' says prize-winning historian Nathaniel Philbrick, whose 'Bunker Hill: A City, A Siege, A Revolution' was published in 2013. 'What actually happened probably gets hazy for people outside of the Boston area, but it's part of our collective memory and imagination.'
'Few 'ordinary' Americans could tell you that Freeman's Farm, or Germantown, or Guilford Court House were battles,' says Paul Lockhart, a professor of history at Wright University and author of a Bunker Hill book, 'The Whites of Their Eyes," which came out in 2011. "But they can say that Gettysburg,D-Day, and Bunker Hill were battles.'
Bunker Hill, Lockhart adds, 'is the great American battle, if there is such a thing.'
Much of the world looks to the Battles of Lexington and Concord, fought in Massachusetts on April 19, 1775, as the start of the American Revolution. But Philbrick, Lockhart and others cite Bunker Hill and June 17 as the real beginning, the first time British and rebel forces faced off in sustained conflict over a specific piece of territory.
A day-long reenactment of the battle got underway Saturday morning with the seaside city of Gloucester standing in for Charlestown. Organizers chose a state park some 35 miles (56 kilometers) from Boston to stage the battle because such activity is prohibited at the actual site.
Hundreds of onlookers watched as sharpshooters positioned on a rocky outcropping fired upon red-coated British sailors landing in the harbor. During the actual battle, British soldiers responded by setting a fire to drive them off and used the smoke to mask their movements.
Bunker Hill was an early showcase for two long-running themes in American history — improvisation and how an inspired band of militias could hold their own against an army of professionals.
'It was a horrific bloodletting, and provided the British high command with proof that the Americans were going to be a lot more difficult to subdue than had been hoped,' says the Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Rick Atkinson, whose second volume of a planned trilogy on the Revolution, 'The Fate of the Day,' was published in April.
The battle was born in part out of error; rebels were seeking to hold off a possible British attack by fortifying Bunker Hill, a 110-foot-high (34-meter-high) peak in Charlestown across the Charles River from British-occupied Boston. But for reasons still unclear, they instead armed a smaller and more vulnerable ridge known as Breed's Hill, 'within cannon shot of Boston,' Philbrick says. "The British felt they had no choice but to attack and seize the American fort.'
Abigail Adams, wife of future President John Adams, and son John Quincy Adams, also a future president, were among thousands in the Boston area who looked on from rooftops, steeples and trees as the two sides fought with primal rage. A British officer would write home about the 'shocking carnage' left behind, a sight 'that never will be erased out of my mind 'till the day of my death.'
The rebels were often undisciplined and disorganized and they were running out of gunpowder. The battle ended with them in retreat, but not before the British had lost more than 200 soldiers and sustained more than 1,000 casualties, compared to some 450 colonial casualties and the destruction of hundreds of homes, businesses and other buildings in Charlestown. Bunker Hill would become characteristic of so much of the Revolutionary War: a technical defeat that was a victory because the British needed to win decisively and the rebels needed only not to lose decisively.
'Nobody now entertains a doubt but that we are able to cope with the whole force of Great Britain, if we are but willing to exert ourselves,' Thomas Jefferson wrote to a friend in early July. 'As our enemies have found we can reason like men, now let us show them we can fight like men also.'
___

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

28 minutes ago

• Daily Mail​

Mahmoud Khalil sparks outrage days after being released from ICE detention amid calls for him to be deported

Pro-Palestine activist Mahmoud Khalil has sparked fury by returning to the frontlines of a protest just two days after he was released from Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention. The Columbia University student, who was swept up in an ICE arrest on March 8 and threatened with deportation, vowed not to be silenced by the Trump administration, even as they continue to seek a legal avenue to expel him from the United States. Khalil arrived back in New York on Saturday, hours after a federal judge ruled his detention was unconstitutional and demanded he be freed to return home to his wife and newborn baby, who was born while he was incarcerated. The 30-year-old Palestinian, who was born in a Syrian refugee camp, wore a shirt which read 'Lift the siege on Gaza ' as he celebrated his temporary victory. He clutched his wife Noor Abdalla's hand and threw his arms up in victory as the crowd cheered, thanking his supporters, legal team and protestors who had the 'courage' to continue to protest in the face of ICE deportations. Khalil told the crowd Columbia 'would do anything and everything it can to ensure that the words ''free Palestine'' are not uttered anywhere near it. But while we are here, Free, Free Palestine.' He said that while the administration had tried to paint him as 'violent', he argued he is simply 'a Palestinian who refused to stay silent while watching a genocide.' He went on to say 'genocide... is being funded by the US government.' His comments have sparked mass backlash from pro-MAGA loyalists on social media, who questioned why he opted to return to a protest and throw his freedom back in the administration's face. Others questioned why he wasn't spending time with his newborn child, given he missed the birth while he was detained. 'He's not a citizen. Why is he being allowed to continue terrorizing American students?' one critic asked. 'Mahmoud Khalil 's green card should be revoked permanently. He doesn't belong in the US when his whole purpose is to stir up discontent and rage. No other country would put up with this behavior from a foreigner with a green card,' another wrote. 'Apparently spending quality time with his 3 mo old baby wasn't high on his priority list—inciting violence against Jewish people came first,' a third added. Speaking to the New York Times after his release, Khalil warned President Trump that the actions of his ICE agents had done little to deter him. 'I don't think what happened to me would stop me [from protesting],' he said. 'If anything, it's actually reinforced my belief that what we're doing is right.' Khalil compared his arrest to the actions of government agents in Syria who acted outside of the scope of the law, noting: 'That's literally what made me flee.' After arriving back in New York, Khalil had said: 'If they threaten me with detention, even if they would kill me, I would still speak up for Palestine. 'I just want to go back and continue the work I was already doing, advocating for Palestinian rights, a speech that should actually be celebrated rather than punished.' But Khalil made a name for himself when he arrived on Columbia's campus in 2023 as he tried to organize guest speakers to discuss the so called apartheid in Israel on campus and led the pro-Palestinian movement. By 2024, he was acting as a negotiator between the University and protestors who had set up an encampment on campus in solidarity with Palestinians suffering in Gaza. Despite securing a green card in November 2024, Khalil was arrested by plain clothes ICE agents on March 8 while returning home with his wife from dinner with friends. Agents initially said his student visa had been canceled, but when it was noted that Khalil did not need a student visa, Secretary of State Marco Rubio revealed he had been identified as a foreign policy threat. Khalil was transferred to a detention facility in Louisiana, and spent a total of 104 days incarcerated while a team of high powered lawyers worked tirelessly to secure his freedom. Now, authorities are challenging his release and seeking ways to secure his deportation. Assistant Homeland Security secretary Tricia McLaughlin said: 'This is yet another example of how out of control members of the judicial branch are undermining national security. 'Their conduct not only denies the result of the 2024 election, it also does great harm to our constitutional system by undermining public confidence in the courts.'

The Guardian

37 minutes ago

• The Guardian

US-Iran crisis: what we know so far

US president Donald Trump has brought up the possibility of regime change in Iran following US military strikes against three of its key nuclear enrichment sites over the weekend, even as top members of his administration insisted the US was not seeking to topple the Iranian leadership. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' Trump wrote in a post on his social media platform Truth Social. Vice-president JD Vance had insisted the US was 'not at war with Iran, we're at war with Iran's nuclear programme' while US secretary of state Marco Rubio said that that the US was 'not looking for war in Iran'. The US state department has issued a 'worldwide caution' for Americans, saying the conflict between Israel and Iran could put those travelling or living abroad at an increased security risk. World leaders are now awaiting Iran's response to the US attacks. Iran's president, Masoud Pezeshkian, told France's Emmanuel Macron: 'The Americans must receive a response to their aggression.' Speaking in Istanbul, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi said his country would consider all possible responses. 'The US showed they have no respect for international law. They only understand the language of threat and force,' he said. He later flew to Moscow to discuss 'common threats' with President Vladimir Putin on Monday. Iran's parliament has reportedly approved the closing of the key strait of Hormuz shipping lane. Reuters reported Iran's supreme national security council will make the final decision on the move, which could hamstring global trade by shutting the narrow passage between Iran and Oman. US secretary of state Marco Rubio urged China to advise Tehran against closing the vital trade route, telling Fox News: 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the strait of Hormuz for their oil. If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake.' Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel is very close to meeting its goals in Iran of removing the threats of ballistic missiles and the nuclear programme. Speaking to Israeli reporters, he said: 'We won't pursue our actions beyond what is needed to achieve them, but we also won't finish too soon. When the objectives are achieved, then the operation is complete and the fighting will stop.' A social media account associated with Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, later said Israel has made a 'grave mistake' and 'must be punished and is being punished'. The UK, France and Germany released a joint statement after the US strikes, calling upon Iran to engage in negotiations leading to agreement that addresses all concerns associated with its nuclear program. The three countries also urged Iran 'not to take any further action that could destabilise the region', adding: 'We have consistently been clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon and can no longer pose a threat to regional security.' Iran's health ministry said the US strikes had wounded an unspecified number of people but that none 'showed any signs of radioactive contamination'. 'For years, the ministry of health has set up nuclear emergency units in the nearest medical facilities to nuclear sites,' ministry spokesperson Hossein Kermanpour said on X. Israel said its fighter jets had struck 'dozens' of targets across Iran on Sunday, including a long-range missile site in Yazd in the centre of the country for the first time, Agence France Presse reported. A military statement said that 'approximately 30 IAF [air force] fighter jets struck dozens of military targets throughout Iran' – including 'the 'Imam Hussein' strategic missile command center in the Yazd area, where long-range Khorramshahr missiles were stored'. US secretary of state Marco Rubio said that 'there are no planned military operations right now against Iran.' In a new interview with CBS, Rubio added that 'no one will know for days' whether Iran had moved some of its nuclear materials prior to the strikes. Pete Hegseth, the US secretary of defence, said the impact of the airstrikes was still being assessed, but that the bombing had hit the areas that had been identified in the planning of the operation. Hegseth said: 'The battle damage assessment is ongoing, but our initial assessment as the chairman said is that all of our precision munitions struck where we wanted them to strike, and had the desired effect.'

The Independent

2 hours ago

• The Independent

Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton suffers lower right leg injury in Game 7 of NBA Finals

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.