Moderates fight back as GOP crafts major food assistance changes
Proposed reductions in federal funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) are the latest flash point for Republicans as they work through sticking points on the 'big beautiful bill' of President Trump's legislative priorities.
SNAP benefits, formerly known as food stamps, are currently funded entirely by the federal government, while costs of administering it are split between the federal government and states that operate it.
But House Republicans are considering proposals to shift a portion of the cost of SNAP benefits to states as they aim to meet cost savings targets for the House Agriculture Committee's portion of the massive bill. Lawmakers are considering proposals to shift from around 10 percent up to as much as a quarter of the benefit costs, one GOP source told The Hill, starting in fiscal year 2028.
While Trump and top Republicans have said they do not want to see cuts to SNAP benefits, cost sharing would be a major overhaul of the program that opponents argue could strain state budgets and lead them to reduce benefits or eligibility. The prospect is fueling Democratic messaging against the bill — and making moderate Republicans and those in competitive districts squirm.
Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.) wrote a letter to House Agriculture Committee Chair GT Thompson (R-Pa.) tearing into a proposal that would place as much as a quarter of the costs of SNAP on states.
'I write today in strong opposition to the reckless proposals under consideration that would impose up to 25% of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) costs on state governments,' Van Orden said in the letter, WSAW-TV reported.
Instead, Van Orden proposed tying cost sharing to each state's SNAP 'error rate' — the rate at which it overpays SNAP benefits. Republicans on the panel are considering incorporating the error rate into how it calculates cost sharing percentages.
Those error rates vary greatly, from percentages under 5 percent to up the 20- or 30-percent range. Van Orden's Wisconsin has an error rate of 4.7 percent. Some red states have high error rates, too: South Carolina's is 20.94 percent, while Florida's is 11.25 percent.
Van Orden also joined with Reps. Zach Nunn (Iowa) and Don Bacon (Neb.) to introduce a procedural resolution to show their opposition to reducing benefits to SNAP or Medicaid. The 'point of order' resolution would prohibit the House from considering any reconciliation bill that reduces benefits from Medicaid or SNAP for children, seniors, pregnant women, or individuals with disabilities.
The House Agriculture Committee is tasked with finding $230 billion in deficit reductions over the course of a decade as it crafts its portion of the Trump priorities bill, which is moving through the special reconciliation process that allows Republicans to bypass the need to secure support from Democrats in the Senate for passage.
Republicans on the committee, according to one source, believe they can reach about $150 billion fairly comfortably with less-controversial proposals like improving 'program integrity' such as by tightening work requirements and other measures the committee is considering.
But asked if the panel can hit that number without cost-sharing, Thompson, the panel's chairman said: 'I don't think we can. It's a huge number.'
The White House, Thompson added, is 'very supportive' of cost sharing for SNAP.
Proponents of cost-sharing for SNAP argue that other federal assistance programs, like Medicaid, share costs with states, and argue that it would incentivize states to better administer SNAP benefits and reduce overpayments.
'If they have to do a cost share with the states, I think that's totally reasonable,' said House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris (R-Md.) 'We cost share Medicaid with the states … I think we should come down to the average cost share — and again, ratchet it down over several years, so every state has the ability to, you know, compensate for it in their budget.'
Harris argued that cost sharing 'doesn't cut any benefit. The only way a benefit would be cut if a state said, 'Well, we don't want to pay our fair share.' Okay, yeah, that's a state decision. That's not a federal decision.'
Democrats, meanwhile, are arguing that Republicans are just blaming states for cuts to SNAP that they know they would have to make.
'Just a 10 percent cost share, if they choose to move in that direction, is a $400 million-a-year hit to the state of Pennsylvania. It is $4.27 billion over the next 10 years,' House Agriculture Committee Chairwoman Angie Craig (D-Minn.) said in a press conference on Tuesday.
'My colleagues, they truly have a choice here. They've said that they don't want to cut SNAP benefits and truly I believe that Chairman Thompson does not want to. But I also believe that Chairman Thompson is going to be rolled by Republican leadership, is going to be rolled by the White House,' Craig said.
She added about proposals to strengthen work requirements: 'Do not allow my Republican colleagues to try to characterize this as anything but taking food out of the mouths of hungry children in our country.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas governor vetoes bill that would ban all THC products
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas Gov. Greg Abbott vetoed a bill Sunday to ban all THC consumables, allowing the booming market flush with THC-infused vapes, gummies and other products to continue to be sold across the state. Abbott, a Republican, waited until the final moment to veto the bill in what would have been one of the most restrictive THC bans in the country and a significant blow to the state's billion-dollar industry. The law would have made it a misdemeanor to own, manufacture or sell consumable THC, or tetrahydrocannabinol, products and was the latest push by states to regulate THC after a 2018 federal law allowed states to regulate hemp, a similar plant to marijuana that can be synthetically processed to produce THC, the compound giving marijuana its psychoactive properties. Loopholes in existing law have allowed many THC-infused goods to enter the market across the country, including states with strict marijuana laws. Texas has some of the strictest marijuana laws in the country, prohibiting all recreational use and providing a limited medical marijuana program. The consumables market has allowed residents to legally access goods giving a similar high to marijuana. Republican lawmakers have criticized the products as dangerous due to a lack of federal oversight in how the goods are manufactured. Texas' ban is one of the more far-reaching among states that have taken similar steps. Several states, including California, have imposed age limits and restrictions on the potency of THC products. Critics of the Texas bill say it allows people who cannot access marijuana through the state's medical marijuana program to acquire goods that can provide a similar relief. Many retailers across the state also pointed to the thousands of jobs and millions in revenue the industry brings each year. Last year, Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis vetoed a bill that would have put age restrictions on THC consumables, claiming it would hurt small businesses. ___ Lathan is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Nadia Lathan, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Associated Press
12 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Texas governor vetoes bill that would ban all THC products
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas Gov. Greg Abbott vetoed a bill Sunday to ban all THC consumables, allowing the booming market flush with THC-infused vapes, gummies and other products to continue to be sold across the state. Abbott, a Republican, waited until the final moment to veto the bill in what would have been one of the most restrictive THC bans in the country and a significant blow to the state's billion-dollar industry. The law would have made it a misdemeanor to own, manufacture or sell consumable THC, or tetrahydrocannabinol, products and was the latest push by states to regulate THC after a 2018 federal law allowed states to regulate hemp, a similar plant to marijuana that can be synthetically processed to produce THC, the compound giving marijuana its psychoactive properties. Loopholes in existing law have allowed many THC-infused goods to enter the market across the country, including states with strict marijuana laws. Texas has some of the strictest marijuana laws in the country, prohibiting all recreational use and providing a limited medical marijuana program. The consumables market has allowed residents to legally access goods giving a similar high to marijuana. Republican lawmakers have criticized the products as dangerous due to a lack of federal oversight in how the goods are manufactured. Texas' ban is one of the more far-reaching among states that have taken similar steps. Several states, including California, have imposed age limits and restrictions on the potency of THC products. Critics of the Texas bill say it allows people who cannot access marijuana through the state's medical marijuana program to acquire goods that can provide a similar relief. Many retailers across the state also pointed to the thousands of jobs and millions in revenue the industry brings each year. Last year, Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis vetoed a bill that would have put age restrictions on THC consumables, claiming it would hurt small businesses. ___ Lathan is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pakistan condemns Trump for bombing Iran a day after recommending him for a Nobel Peace Prize
ISLAMABAD (AP) — Pakistan condemned U.S. President Donald Trump for bombing Iran, less than 24 hours after saying he deserved a Nobel Peace Prize for defusing a recent crisis with India. Relations between the two South Asian countries plummeted after a massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir in April. The nuclear-armed rivals stepped closer to war in the weeks that followed, attacking each other until intense diplomatic efforts, led by the U.S., resulted in a truce for which Trump took credit. It was this 'decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership' that Pakistan praised in an effusive message Saturday night on the X platform when it announced its formal recommendation for him to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. Less than 24 hours later, however, it condemned the U.S. for attacking Iran, saying the strikes 'constituted a serious violation of international law' and the statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, in a phone call Sunday with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, expressed his concern that the bombings had targeted facilities that were under the safeguards of the IAEA. Pakistan has close ties with Iran and supports its attacks on Israel, saying it has the right to self-defense. There was no immediate comment on Monday from Islamabad about the Trump Nobel recommendation, which also followed a high-profile White House lunch meeting between the president and Pakistan's powerful army chief, Asim Munir. Thursday's meeting, which lasted more than two hours, was also attended by the Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff, the U.S. Special Representative for Middle Eastern Affairs. According to a Pakistani military statement, a detailed exchange of views took place on the 'prevailing tensions between Iran and Israel, with both leaders emphasizing the importance of the resolution of the conflict.' While Pakistan was quick to thank Trump for his intervention in its crisis with India, New Delhi played it down and said there was no need for external mediation on the Kashmir issue. The Himalayan region of Kashmir is divided between Pakistan and India but claimed by both in its entirety. India accuses Pakistan of backing militant groups in the region, which Pakistan denies.
