US judge blocks Trump ban on gender neutral passports – DW – 06/18/2025
The Trump administration had ordered passports to only show the applicant's gender at birth. A judge said the order likely violated constitutional rights by discriminating on the basis of sex.
A US federal judge on Tuesday ordered the US State Department to continue issuing passports to transgender US citizens with "X" as a gender designation.
The move blocks the State Department's enforcement of an executive order from President Donald Trump in January that directed the US government to officially recognize genders as only male and female.
The State Department's passport policy was changed to "request the applicant's biological sex at birth," and barred applicants from self-identifying their sex.
US District Judge Julia Kobick in Boston wrote in the ruling that the State Department's passport policy "likely violates the constitutional rights of thousands of Americans" by discriminating on the basis of sex.
Since October 2021, under former President Joe Biden, individuals identifying as non-binary, intersex, and gender non-conforming could put an X identification marker rather than the gender assigned at birth.
Trans people in the US fear massive setbacks under Trump
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
What is the background of the ruling?
In April, six transgender people joined a lawsuit from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) challenging the passport policy.
At the time, Kobick issued a preliminary injunction against the policy, but that ruling only applied to the six people involved in the lawsuit who were allowed to obtain passports consistent with their gender identity.
Tuesday's ruling extends the initial injunction to include all transgender and non-binary US citizens who need passport services.
The April injunction stated that the passport policy discriminating on the basis of sex failed to meet the requirement that the government "demonstrate that its actions are substantially related to an important governmental interest."
Kobick said that the individuals involved in the injunction demonstrated that the passport policy violates their constitutional rights to equal protection.
Trump declares US to only recognize two genders
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
How has Trump admin responded?
In its initial response to the lawsuit, the Trump administration said that the policy "does not violate the equal protection guarantees of the Constitution" and that plaintiffs would not be harmed as they are still free to travel abroad.
The White House claimed Tuesday's ruling that it was "yet another attempt by a rogue judge to thwart President Trump's agenda and push radical gender ideology that defies biological truth."
The ruling applies pending a decision by a higher court should the case go to appeal, or a judgement on the merits of the case.
Edited by: Zac Crellin
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
How China wields rare earths as a strategic weapon – DW – 06/23/2025
China's grip on rare earths — vital for smartphones, EVs, and military tech — has left the US, Europe and India vulnerable. Until global supplies increase, Beijing wields great power over the West's critical industries. China's chokehold on rare earths — the minerals essential for electronics, automotive and defense systems — gave it significant leverage over the United States during recent tariff talks in London. Controlling about 60% of global rare-earth production and nearly 90% of refining, China tightened its grip in April by imposing export controls on seven rare-earth elements and permanent magnets. The curbs, partly in response to sky-high tariffs on Chinese exports imposed by US President Donald Trump, exposed US vulnerabilities, as the country lacks domestic refining capacity. "The whole world economy relies on these magnets from China," Jost Wübbeke, managing partner at the Berlin-based Sinolytics research house specializing in China, told DW. "If you stop exporting those, it will be felt across the globe." The resulting supply chain disruptions have hit American industries hard. US carmaker Ford, for example, announced two weeks ago (June 13) it had been forced to scale back SUV production in Chicago due to shortages, while auto parts suppliers Aptiv and BorgWarner said they were developing motors with minimal or no rare-earth content to counter supply constraints. Michael Dunne, a China-focused automotive consultant, told the that China's curbs "could halt America's automotive plants entirely." A survey by the American Chamber of Commerce in China revealed that 75% of US firms expect their rare-earth stocks to be exhausted within three months. US producers urged Washington to negotiate an end to the restrictions, and in London, China agreed to speed up export license approvals, although a large backlog persists. It is also unclear whether the deal includes access for US military suppliers, who rely on these minerals for fighter jets and missile systems. China's strategic use of rare earths as a geopolitical tool is not new. In 2010, Beijing halted exports to Japan for two months amid a territorial dispute, triggering price spikes and exposing supply chain risks. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Gabriel Wildau, managing director at New York-based CEO advisory firm Teneo, warned that China's export licensing regime is a permanent fixture, not merely a response to Trump's tariffs. In a note to clients, he wrote that "supply cutoffs will remain an ever-present threat," signaling China's intent to maintain leverage over Washington. The US is not the only country facing a rare-earth shortage. The European Union relies on China for 98% of its rare-earth magnets needed for auto components, fighter jets and medical imaging devices. The European Association of Automotive Supplies (CLEPA) warned earlier this month the sector was "already experiencing significant disruption" due to China's export curbs, adding that they had caused "the shutdown of several production lines and plants across Europe, with further impacts expected in the coming weeks as inventories deplete." Alberto Prina Cerai, a research fellow at the Italian Institute for International Political Studies (ISPI), told DW that Brussels urgently needed to "buy time." "In terms of scale, we [the West] cannot catch up with China," Prina Cerai warned. "They have an integrated, mine-to-magnet supply chain that is very hard to replicate." But while a complete decoupling from China is "unthinkable" in the short term, he said the EU should "manage this interdependence with a coherent industrial strategy." The European Commission, the bloc's executive arm, aims to produce 7,000 tons of EU-based magnets by 2030 under the Critical Raw Materials Act, with several mining, refining, and recycling projects underway. A huge rare-earth processing plant is due to open in Estonia later in the year, and another large facility in southwestern France will be operational next year. After meeting with his Chinese counterpart earlier this month, EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic called China's curbs "extremely disruptive" to Europe's auto and industrial sectors. China did propose a "green channel" to expedite license approvals for EU firms, but experts warn approvals could still take up to 45 days. Despite having the world's fifth-largest rare-earth reserves, at 6.9 million metric tons, India contributes less than 1% of the global supply of rare earths. The South Asian country lacks the refining capacity to process them for use in high-tech applications. India also relies on Chinese exports, which have also faced restrictions. Although New Delhi has stepped up efforts to diversify its supply through deals with the US, Australia and Central Asian nations, progress has so far been slow. News agency Reuters reported recently that New Delhi ordered its state-run miner IREL to stop exports of the domestically produced minerals, including to Japan, to safeguard supplies for the country's producers. Last year, IREL delivered a third of the 2,900 metric tons of the rare earths it mines to Japan, via a Japanese processing firm. With China's stranglehold unlikely to be rivaled anytime soon, G7 leaders meeting in Canada on June 15 tentatively agreed on a strategy to anticipate critical rare-earth shortages, vowing a joint response to deliberate market disruption, such as China's, as well as moves to diversify production and supply. "Recognizing this threat to our economies, as well as various other risks to the resilience of our critical minerals supply chains, we will work together and with partners beyond the G7 to swiftly protect our economic and national security," the group of advanced economies said in a document called G7 Critical Minerals Action Plan. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video ISPI's Prina Cerai told DW that access to rare earths will become more critical for the West as advanced technologies emerge, noting how "robotics and humanoids might be an important market" in the medium term. After China's 44 million tons of rare-earth deposits, Brazil, India and Australia have the next largest deposits, collectively around 31.3 million tons, according to the US Geological Survey. Around 20 million tons were recently discovered in Kazakhstan. The US and Australia are the most advanced in ramping up their own rare-earth mining and processing output, while other countries' plans are still in the early to mid-stages, requiring 5-10 years, environmental considerations and billions in investment. Another future source could be Greenland, despite its harsh weather conditions. The US and EU have already signed cooperation agreements, and in 2023, the Tanbreez Project, in southern Greenland, was ranked as the top rare earth project by mining industry data provider Mining Intelligence, with an estimated 28.2 million tons of minerals. Reuters reported earlier this month that the US Export-Import Bank was set to approve a loan of up to $120 million (€104 million) to the firm running Tanbreez, in what would be the Trump administration's first overseas investment in a mining project. Trump has repeatedly threatened to acquire Greenland for US strategic purposes, but the island nation, which is a Danish territory, has rejected the overture. The EU, meanwhile, has identified 25 of the 34 minerals on its official list of critical raw materials in Greenland, including rare earths, in another sign of the country's increasingly crucial role in the global economy. But until alternative rare-earth supplies are significantly scaled up, China will continue to wield this critical resource as a powerful geopolitical weapon, holding global industries and nations in its grip. Sinolytics' Wübbeke is skeptical about whether other countries will ever tackle China's stranglehold on rare earths due to the market leader's huge cost advantage. "Once China takes down export controls, prices will go down and the supply situation will ease. Nobody will talk about it [overrealiance on China] again because then it'll be about prices," Wübbeke told DW. "Non-Chinese mines and refineries have to compete with these prices and normally they cannot."
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Germany: Racism against Sinti and Roma increasing – DW – 06/23/2025
A new report about antiziganism in Germany has revealed alarming figures — and criticized the media for feeding clichés. But the community is counting small successes. Sinti and Roma are especially affected by prejudice, discrimination, racism, according to the Antiziganism Reporting and Information Center in Germany (MIA), which has documented the nature and scale of antiziganism in Germany in its latest annual report. The report recorded 1,678 antiziganism cases in 2024, ranging from verbal abuse to assaults — a significant increase on the 621 reported in its first edition, published for the year 2022. "The incidents documented in this report clearly show that verbal stigmatization and antiziganism propaganda paves the way for discrimination and for physical attacks up to life-threatening violence," Mehmet Daimagüler, Germany's first ever federal commissioner against antiziganism, wrote in the foreword. A lawyer by profession, Daimagüler was appointed in 2022, but was replaced by the new German government in June this year with Michael Brand, a member of the Bundestag for the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and state secretary at the Family Ministry, which supported the MIA report. Brand took over the office in difficult times. "It is absolutely clear, in light of the increase in extremism fanned from within and outside Germany, that we must now especially protect minorities such as the Sinti and Roma from the effects of extremism and discrimination," the conservative politician said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The significantly higher number of antiziganist incidents can be attributed to the growing awareness of the MIA's work. But beyond the raw figures, the report shows that those affected are reporting a generally hostile atmosphere. The almost 70-page report includes numerous concrete examples of degrading, sometimes violent discrimination: In one incident caught on camera, a Sinti boy who was bullied in school was held down by several boys after school one day, tied to a bench and beaten. According to the report, the incident escalated further when the parents of the boy and two of their relatives confronted the parents of the perpetrators: Several people joined the row and attacked the Sinti family, one of whom suffered a broken foot. Another was threatened with a knife and injured. A study has shown that such excesses are occurring repeatedly in German kindergartens and schools. The root of this development is what the MIA calls an increasingly hostile political debate: "The MIA observes that anti-Roma and Sinti statements, especially by right-wing parties, are poisoning the social climate." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Romani Rose, who has headed the Central Council of German Sinti and Roma since 1982, draws a pessimistic conclusion in the MIA report. "Unfortunately, we must acknowledge that despite our almost 50 years of political work in this country, a change in consciousness has only just begun," he said. Rose also recalled the systematic extermination of his ethnic group by the National Socialists. By the end of the Second World War, more than half a million Sinti and Roma throughout Europe had been persecuted or murdered. Today, an estimated 80,000 – 140,000 live in Germany. Europe-wide, their population numbers between 10 and 12 million. The MIA also blamed the media for shaping the clichéd image of Sinti and Roma. Distorted or false portrayals are found in commercial media outlets and public service broadcasters alike, the report found, and there have been more frequent complaints about stigmatizing or false depictions. One documented case concerned the supposed large-scale misuse of public funds by Roma allegedly posing as Ukrainian refugees: "More than 5,000 cases of social fraud via fake Ukrainians," read a March 2024 article published by the Ippen media group, which appeared on numerous German news outlets. The background to the text was stories circulating shortly after Russia's invasion of Ukraine about people said to have posed as refugees. According to the MIA report, this was a typical case of media failure, as the story was specifically directed against Roma, who were accused either of travelling to Germany with forged Ukrainian passports or concealing possible Ukrainian-Hungarian dual citizenship. In fact, Ukrainian Romani people have suffered discrimination in Germany. The publishing of the report in the newspaper was the trigger for a successful complaint to the German Press Council, the self-regulating body for Germany's print media and their online channels. According to the council, the reports violated fundamental journalistic principles: Instead of scrutinizing the numbers, other media outlets were simply taken as a source. The council went on to condemn the story on three counts: Violating journalistic due diligence, the non-discrimination rule, and disregarding the presumption of innocence. Due to limited resources, the MIA is still unable to carry out its own systematic media monitoring: "Nevertheless, we closely follow the discourse and developments in media coverage," the organization's annual report said. The MIA welcomed the fact that the post of an antiziganism federal commissioner had been retained after all — something that had been in doubt because there was no commitment to the post in the coalition agreement of Germany's new federal government. Now the MIA team can breathe a sigh of relief and appeal to policymakers to strengthen the office with the appropriate resources and personnel. The initial statements by the new antiziganism commissioner are likely to raise hopes in the Sinti and Roma community: "Where discrimination occurs, it must be clearly and decisively confronted – by the state and society alike," emphasized Brand, adding: "It is important to me to also highlight the many positive examples of cooperation between the majority society and minorities." While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter Berlin Briefing.
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Most Germans want independent European nuclear deterrent – DW – 06/23/2025
A majority of Germans have backed calls for an independent nuclear deterrent to shield Europe. The poll shows broad support for reducing reliance on the US amid growing unease. Follow DW for the latest news from Germany. Nearly two-thirds of Germans now back the idea of a European nuclear deterrent that doesn't rely on the US, according to a new Forsa poll. Support stands at 64%, with solid backing across age groups, regions, and party lines — something rare in German foreign policy debates. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz had already floated the idea before taking office, eyeing talks with France and the UK to build a joint nuclear strategy for Europe amid Trump-era uncertainty. from a cloudy . Welcome to DW's coverage of developments in Germany on Monday, June 23. A study has found that most Germans are in favor of Europe developing a nuclear deterrent that is independent of the United States. Almost two-thirds of people who were asked said they were in favor of a shared nuclear strategy for Europe. The aim would be to reduce Europe's reliance on the US nuclear umbrella, especially amid concerns over the unpredictability of President Donald Trump. Stay with us here to keep up with the latest news from Germany.
