Most Germans want independent European nuclear deterrent – DW – 06/23/2025

A majority of Germans have backed calls for an independent nuclear deterrent to shield Europe. The poll shows broad support for reducing reliance on the US amid growing unease. Follow DW for the latest news from Germany.
Nearly two-thirds of Germans now back the idea of a European nuclear deterrent that doesn't rely on the US, according to a new Forsa poll.
Support stands at 64%, with solid backing across age groups, regions, and party lines — something rare in German foreign policy debates.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz had already floated the idea before taking office, eyeing talks with France and the UK to build a joint nuclear strategy for Europe amid Trump-era uncertainty. from a cloudy . Welcome to DW's coverage of developments in Germany on Monday, June 23.
A study has found that most Germans are in favor of Europe developing a nuclear deterrent that is independent of the United States.
Almost two-thirds of people who were asked said they were in favor of a shared nuclear strategy for Europe.
The aim would be to reduce Europe's reliance on the US nuclear umbrella, especially amid concerns over the unpredictability of President Donald Trump.
Stay with us here to keep up with the latest news from Germany.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Int'l Business Times

21 minutes ago

• Int'l Business Times

Bluff And Last-minute Orders: Trump's Path To Iran Decision

When Donald Trump said on Thursday he'd give himself two weeks to decide on bombing Iran, critics wrote it off as the US president using a familiar timeframe to put off difficult decisions. The next evening he left the White House for a fundraising dinner at his New Jersey golf resort, and much of the world seemed to believe that there was still space for diplomacy. In reality, Trump was already on the verge of making his mind up. A few hours after his arrival at Trump National Golf Club Bedminster on Friday night, the first B-2 stealth bombers took off from a US airbase. The next day, while the bombers were still in the air, Trump made the call on attacking three Iranian nuclear facilities, in the first direct US military strike on Iran since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. "The president gave the final order to the Secretary of Defense on Saturday," a senior White House official told AFP on condition of anonymity. "In the week leading up to the strike, the president was continuing to pursue diplomacy, mainly through Special Envoy (Steve) Witkoff's efforts, while the Pentagon was simultaneously preparing the operation," added the official. Trump's "two weeks" gambit appeared to be part of a broader campaign of what Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called "misdirection," which included several B-2s flying in the opposite direction as a decoy. Trump, the tycoon who prides himself as an expert on the "art of the deal," had ladled on the strategic ambiguity all week. First he flew home early from the G7 summit for talks with his national security team. Then he unleashed a barrage of bellicose social media posts against Iran's supreme leader. On Wednesday he said that "I may do it, I may not" when asked about striking Iran. Finally, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt read out a statement from Trump in the White House briefing room on Thursday, saying there was a "substantial" chance of talks and that he would decide "whether or not to go within the next two weeks." It played into a frequent criticism of Trump for setting two-week deadlines on everything from Ukraine to health care and then ignoring them. But behind the scenes, Trump was increasingly determined, US officials said. Trump had opposed Israel attacking Iran right up until it did so on June 13 -- but afterwards he openly admired Israel's success and was talking daily to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Israel's achievement of air superiority over Iran presented Trump with a unique opportunity to hit the nuclear program that he had railed against since his first term. Trump was "briefed daily on the Israelis' efforts and the operation itself as he decided whether to move forward," the senior White House official said. The US commander-in-chief held daily meetings with his National Security Council in the White House's basement Situation Room as he pondered his options. And to head off opposition in his "Make America Great Again" movement to another Middle Eastern "forever war", he reportedly met his influential former aide Steve Bannon. In public, Trump and the White House took pains to keep things under wraps. The normally talkative Trump said nothing to reporters as he returned to the White House on Saturday night, just one minute after his scheduled 6 pm arrival. The timing was precise for a reason. The first B-2 bomber dropped its bombs just 40 minutes later, at 6:40 pm US time, or 2:10 am Sunday Iranian time. The last submarine-fired Tomahawk missiles struck at 7:05 pm. Trump announced the "very successful" strikes in a Truth Social post at 7:50 pm. The White House then released pictures of a pensive looking Trump in the Situation Room, wearing his red "Make America Great Again" baseball cap. "This was a highly classified mission with very few people in Washington knowing the timing or nature of this plan," US Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Caine said on Sunday. But the tough decisions are far from over for Trump, who was meeting his top team again on Monday in the Oval Office. How will he respond to Iran's retaliation on Monday? If the US strikes did not completely destroy Iran's nuclear sites as he claimed, will he launch more? Above all, will Trump go further than striking Iran's nuclear plants? "If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???" Trump wrote on Truth Social on Sunday. US President Donald Trump's address to the nation is seen in the White House briefing room AFP US President Donald Trump steps off Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on June 21, 2025 upon return from his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey. AFP

DW

35 minutes ago

• DW

Iran launches retaliatory strike at US base in Qatar – DW – 06/23/2025

Iran has responded to US strikes over the weekend with its own strikes against Al Udeid air base in Qatar. Meanwhile, Israel has said it is carrying out strikes in Iran with "unprecedented intensity." DW has more. Iran said it fired missiles at US base in Qatar Earlier, Qatar closed its airspace amid threats of Iranian retaliation for US strikes on Iran Iran has said its military was deciding on 'timing, nature, scale' of response to US strikes on nuclear facilities Israel's defense secretary said the IDF hit Evin Prison in Tehran among numerous other targets US President Donald Trump suggests regime change in Tehran to 'Make Iran Great Again'Following the Iranian strikes on US bases in Qatar and Iraq, other countries in the Persian Gulf region have begun closing their airspace. Bahrain and Kuwait said they had temporarily closed their airspace as a precautionary measure. Bahrain's Ministry of Transport said it was closely monitoring the situation while Kuwait's Directorate General of Civil Aviation said it was suspending air traffic until further notice. Qatar said it "reserves the right to respond" following Iran's attack on the US Al Udeid base. "We affirm that the State of Qatar reserves the right to respond directly in a manner proportional to the nature and scale of this blatant aggression," foreign ministry spokesman Majed Al-Ansari said in a statement. The ministry described the strike as a "a flagrant violation of Qatar's sovereignty, its airspace, and international law." Meanwhile, Qatar's Defense Ministry says its air defense systems successfully intercepted missiles targeting Al Udeid Air Base, and no casualties were reported. Iran's strikes against US bases suggest that Iran is hoping for de-escalation, rather than escalation. Iran said it had targeted the US base in Qatar because it was outside of urban areas. It also said it dropped the same number of bombs that had been dropped by US heavy bombers over Iran on early Sunday. Reuters reported that Iran also gave Qatar advance warning of the attack, allowing it to close its airspace. US news outlet Axios reported that US President Donald Trump's administration was aware of the threat in advance. It remains to be seen how the US will respond to Iran's retaliation. Qatar said that no casualties were reported from the strike. As well as launching strikes against a major US air base in Qatar, Iran said it had fired missiles toward a US base in Iraq. "The operation of Iranian missiles against American bases located in Qatar and in Iraq has begun, and is called 'Blessing of Victory'," the official press agency IRNA said. Iraqi media earlier reported that a state of maximum alert had been declared at the Ain al-Asad Air Base in western Iraq. Iran has confirmed that it launched missile strikes against the US's Al Udeid base in Qatar. Iranian state-run news agency Tasnim cited the Revolutionary Guard Corps saying it had responded to the "clear military aggression of the criminal regime of the United States of America." AFP and Reuters journalists reported hearing explosions over the Qatari capital Doha late on Monday. The reports came amid fears of an Iranian attack on the US air base in the country in response to US attacks against Iranian nuclear facilities early on Sunday. Axios reported, citing Israeli officials, that Iran had launched six missiles at the base. US President Donald Trump dealt a heavy blow to Europe's hopes to be a meaningful actor in bids to end the conflict between Israel and Iran last week. First, he branded Europe's efforts irrelevant, then he ignored the EU's calls for de-escalation by bombing Iranian nuclear facilities. But Monday's apparent irrelevance was not inevitable. A decade ago, Europe had a seat at the table. The so-called E3, France, Germany and the UK, were key players in negotiating the original 2015 Iran nuclear deal. China and Russia were involved, too, as permanent members of the UN Security Council. French and German ministers who gathered in Brussels with their EU counterparts on Monday stressed that they think Europe can have a role again. "Europe has the experience and deep understanding necessary to open space for negotiations that would bring about strict oversight of Iran's destabilizing activities," France's Jean-Noel Barrot told reporters at the talks. However, EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas would not discuss whether and when she and the E3 might hold fresh talks with their Iranian counterpart. When asked how the bloc was pressuring the Americans to come to the table, she said, "Via diplomacy, of course, via different channels— also talking to all the parties, [saying] that this escalation benefits no one." The primary victims of the conflict are civilians in Iran and Israel caught up in the crossfire and others fearing spillover in the region. But there is no doubt that Europe has skin in the game here, too. If Iran were to block the Strait of Hormuz, this could heavily impact European energy security. Kallas acknowledged the gravity of that scenario on Monday. The EU once relied on Russia for fossil fuel imports, and since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the bloc has been seeking out new partners, including in the Gulf. If exports from that region can't reach Europe, that's bad news for the continent. Diplomats in Brussels told DW they also fear a spike in oil prices could be a boon for Russia. Moscow has managed to replace its old European customers with other buyers, especially in Asia, and the concern here is that beefed-up oil revenues could help Russia further fund its war in Ukraine. There are nuances to how EU leaders responded to the Israel-Iran conflict and the United States' role. EU Council chief Antonio Costa, a center-left politician from Portugal, said he was "alarmed" by the escalation after US strikes and stressed the impact on civilians. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who hails from Germany's center-right, centered her statement on Iran and pressure for the regime to engage in a "credible diplomatic solution." But EU powers seem to be broadly on the same page on a few key points. They say Iran must never have a nuclear bomb and Russian President Vladimir Putin has no credibility as a potential broker given the war he is waging in Ukraine. Now, Europe is under pressure to prove it has the credibility and clout to help shift the dial. As Israeli airstrikes intensify and the US enters the war, Iranians are fleeing to safety, with thousands crossing into Julia Hahn spoke to some in Kapikoy near the eastern Turkish city of Van — one of the main crossing points. Iranian authorities have arrested an individual they accuse of spying for Israel in the city of Hamedan. The state-run news agency Tasnim said that an individual had been determined to be from a European country, but it did not say which one. The agency reported that the suspect had entered Iran on a tourist visa. It also said they had been gathering information on Iran's missile systems. Iran has arrested numerous people accused of spying for Israel, especially since Israel launched its barrage of strikes on the country just over a week ago. Qatar has announced the temporary closure of its airspace amid fears over how Iran might respond to attacks by the US over the weekend. The Foreign Ministry said the move was made to ensure the safety of residents and visitors. Earlier in the day, the US urged its citizens in the country to shelter in place. The US has a major air base in the country which lies just across the Persian Gulf from the southern coast of Iran. The US embassy in Qatar has told US citizens in the country that they should "shelter in place until further notice." The warning came after the US joined Israel's bombing campaign against Iran over the weekend and amid fears of an Iranian reprisal. Qatar is home to a major US air base. "Out of an abundance of caution, we recommend American citizens shelter in place until further notice," the embassy said in a notice posted on its website. Reuters also reported that the British government had issued a similar warning to its own citizens in Qatar. Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari stressed that issued security guidelines do not necessarily indicate a real threat. US authorities told some embassy staff stationed around the Middle East to leave the region a day before Israel launched its bombing campaign against Iran. Qatar, a popular mediator in the Middle East, is just across the Persian Gulf from Iran. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has said Iran must not be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons as Israel and Iran exchanged new strikes on Monday. "My greatest fear is that Tehran gets a nuclear weapon," Rutte said, warning it would give Iran a "stranglehold" over Israel and the rest of the world. "When it comes to NATO's stance on Iran's nuclear program, allies have long agreed that Iran must not develop a nuclear weapon," he told reporters ahead of a NATO summit in The Hague. Following a protest action that damaged two military planes in the United Kingdom, the British government has said it would use anti-terrorism laws to ban the Palestine Action activist organization. The ban would put the group on the same level as Hamas, al-Qaeda and the so-called "Islamic State" and could result in up to 14 years in prison for the group's members. Palestine Action has carried out several major campaign actions throughout the years targeting sites connected to the Israeli defense company Elbit Systems, as well as other companies connected to Israel. But a recent action saw two members of the group enter a Royal Air Force base in central England on Friday and spray paint into the engines of military aircraft. Further damage was done with crowbars. "The disgraceful attack on Brize Norton ... is the latest in a long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action," Interior Minister Yvette Cooper said in a written statement to parliament, referring to the attack on the air force base. "The UK's defense enterprise is vital to the nation's national security, and this government will not tolerate those who put that security at risk." Palestine Action called Cooper's ban "unhinged," saying, "The real crime here is not red paint being sprayed on these war planes." The UK Parliament will vote on the ban on June 30. Iran has reportedly moved its highly enriched uranium from the Fordo nuclear facility. DW spoke with nuclear expert William Alberque about Iran's relationship with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the IAEA. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video US President Donald Trump is reportedly still open to diplomacy with Iran following strikes carried out by US bombers over the weekend, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said. "If the Iranian regime refuses to come to a peaceful diplomatic solution, which the president is still interested in and engaging in, by the way, why shouldn't the Iranian people take away the power of this incredibly violent regime that has been suppressing them for decades?" Leavitt said on Fox News. Trump earlier in the day suggested regime change if the Iranian government cannot "MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN," he said in a post on his Truth Social platform. Many of Trump's supporters and allies are opposed to the US getting involved in another war for regime change in the Middle East, some two decades after toppling Saddam Hussein in neighboring Iraq. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Int'l Business Times

39 minutes ago

• Int'l Business Times

US Strikes On Iran Open Rift In Trump's Support Base

Donald Trump's decision to strike Iran has been cheered by mainstream Republicans but it has exposed deep fissures between the hawks and the isolations in the "MAGA" movement that swept the self-styled peacemaker US president back to power. Trump ran as an "America First" Republican who would avoid the foreign entanglements of his predecessors, tapping into his movement's unease about prolonged wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as more recent conflagrations in Gaza and Ukraine. Establishment Republicans -- and in particular the congressional party -- rallied behind their leader after Saturday's military action, welcoming what many see as an about-face and rejecting claims that the president had violated the Constitution. Beyond Washington's Beltway, some of the die-hard members of Trump's "Make America Great Again" coalition who follow him on the rally circuit also appear willing -- for now, at least -- to give him the benefit of the doubt. "I don't think we're going to end up in war. I think Trump is leader, and he's going to just obliterate them, and there won't be any war," 63-year-old Jane Sisk, a retired mother-of-six from Richmond, Virginia, told AFP. But the louder, more visible, more online faction of MAGA influencers and media personalities who oppose their government reaching beyond the US shoreline are desperate to sway Trump's supporters in the opposite direction. In a long post on X Monday, far-right lawmaker Marjorie Taylor Greene bemoaned having traveled the country campaigning for Trump, only to see him break his anti-interventionist covenant with his supporters. "Only 6 months in and we are back into foreign wars, regime change, and world war 3," she thundered on the social media site. "It feels like a complete bait and switch to please the neocons, warmongers, military industrial complex contracts, and neocon tv personalities that MAGA hates and who were NEVER TRUMPERS!" While the post was astonishing for its uncompromising language -- Greene appropriated a Democratic talking point to add that Trump was "not a king" -- it was far from the first sign of MAGA dissent. Thomas Massie -- a House conservative who has piqued Trump's irritation with anti-war posts -- told CBS that members of his faction within MAGA were "tired from all these wars." And as Trump gave his televised address confirming details of strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, his former top strategist Steve Bannon told viewers of his online "War Room" show that the president has "some work to do" to explain his decision. Other figures among Trump's right-wing support base have started to come around after initially voicing shock. Far-right influencer Charlie Kirk -- a leading MAGA anti-war voice before the weekend -- warned his millions of YouTube viewers that US involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict would cause "a major schism in the MAGA online community." But he appeared to have shifted his stance over the weekend, praising Trump for "prudence and decisiveness." The U-turn is symptomatic of a broader trend, analysts argue, among the softer MAGA isolationists to fall into line and simply embrace the White House's "trust in Trump" mantra now that they have lost the argument. Conservative Hoover Institution fellow Lanhee Chen believes the president will hold his coalition together as long as they see Saturday's action as more akin to the 2020 US assassination of Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani than the start of a protracted war. "I think you saw some of that disagreement leading up to last night. I haven't seen a lot of disagreement since then," Chen told NBC on Sunday. Trust in Trump could be eroded, his allies warn, if Iran retaliates, dragging the United States into an escalating cycle of violence. But, for now, the president's coalition is on board with his warnings over Iran's nuclear threat. Polling conducted after the US strikes will take several days to filter through, but in the latest J.L. Partners survey just ahead of the mission, 67 percent of "MAGA Republicans" agreed that "Israel's war is America's war" while only 20 percent wanted the country to remain on the sidelines. "I don't think Trump's going to send soldiers over there," said Sisk, the Virginia supporter interviewed by AFP. "I don't think he's gonna get us involved in the war, just like he said."