New York's food banks brace for triple whammy of federal cuts, tariffs and even higher costs

A tiny storefront in Bensonhurst, Brooklyn, has been a lifeline for Marco Ramirez and his family of four.
Three years ago, the 56-year-old began visiting the food pantry operated by Reaching-Out Community Services after his hours as a restaurant cook were cut. Every two weeks, he stops by to select items from a computer kiosk and waits for staff to wheel out his order, free of charge.
On a recent Wednesday afternoon, Ramirez packed his bags with staples like rice, meat, cooking oil and juice. Without the pantry's help, he said, his family wouldn't be able to afford pricey items like eggs.
The pantry is part of a vast network supported by the Food Bank for New York City, which recently lost 75 tractor trailer loads of food — 2.5 million meals — due to cancelled shipments from the US Department of Agriculture following President Donald Trump's abrupt cancellation of over $1 billion in nutrition funding in March.
'We're the country's largest USDA-supplied food bank, and anytime there's a cut or a rollback or a pause, the impact to us is that much more exponential,' said president Leslie Gordon. The organization serves the New York City area, where a recent study estimated the poverty rate hit a new high of 25 percent.
For food banks across New York state, the state of emergency that began with the pandemic in 2020 never ended.
Already stretched thin from years of rising food costs and food insecurity, hunger relief organizations are now contending with a panoply of federal cuts and tariffs, which are expected to severely disrupt supply chains and further hike prices. Headlines about steep declines in port activity have renewed fears that shelves nationwide could go empty in a matter of weeks.
Trump's cuts have derailed programs like the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement Program (LFPA), which allowed food banks to purchase food from local farms, and the Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), which ships food directly to banks and helps cover operational costs. In recent years, the USDA has expanded TEFAP to meet increased demand from more Americans turning to pantries to stay afloat.
New York's newly passed state budget provided little relief. For months, advocates had urged Governor Kathy Hochul to join the legislature in increasing funding for two state-run hunger programs as a way to cushion the blow of federal cuts.
But funding for both programs remained largely unchanged in the final deal released last week. Nourish New York will see a modest increase of $750,000 for a total of $55 million, while the Hunger Prevention and Nutrition Assistance Program will remain flat at $57.8 million. The legislature had proposed funding the programs at $75 million each.
In the wake of federal cuts, the Regional Food Bank will distribute 2 million less meals across 23 eastern New York counties, which span from just north of Westchester to the Canadian border — after opening a new 50,000-square-foot distribution center in Montgomery in December.
'These cuts mean families going hungry; kids, veterans, and seniors going hungry, and farmers going out of business,' said Congressman Pat Ryan after visiting the food bank last month.
'Trump needs to put country before politics, reverse these cuts immediately, and restore the food shipments to put money back in our farmers' pockets and nutritious meals back on Hudson Valley families' tables.'
Over 16 million pounds of food across the state will no longer be distributed due to federal cuts, according to Ryan Healy, advocacy manager of Feeding New York State, which represents 10 food banks across the state, including the ones interviewed for this story.
'Not only is the impact of these cuts felt by our food banks and community partners, it's felt by the farmers and agricultural producers,' Healy said. In addition to USDA shipments, eight of the network's food banks received LFPA funding, which has been a boon to local farms across the state.
'We had about a million pounds of food that were cancelled that we were expected to be distributing right about now,' said Ryan Brisk, vice president of operations and procurement at Feeding Westchester. 'A million pounds is 25 tractor trailer loads of food.'
That particular shipment included what Brisk called the 'most highly coveted items' sought by food pantry users, like fresh produce and frozen meat. TEFAP shipments have accounted for a quarter of the organization's food supply.
In 2024, Feeding Westchester saw an average of 229,000 visits each month, including 80,000 children and 36,000 seniors. Many visits come from families where adults work multiple jobs, as well as veterans and seniors living on fixed incomes, Brisk said. That need has not tapered off since the onset of Covid-19: 'It was the pandemic passing the torch to inflation.'
In Long Island's Nassau and Suffolk counties, Island Harvest has doubled the amount of food it distributes since 2019. 'The need for emergency food is greater now than it was during the pandemic,' said Gregory May, director of government and community relations. 'The trends are really going in the wrong direction.'
Island Harvest relies heavily on donated food, which makes up roughly 75 percent of its stock. May worries whether those donations will continue as businesses feel the crunch of a tightening economy.
The situation could become even more grim if the federal government moves forward with cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program(SNAP), also known as food stamps, May said. Congressional Republicans are now considering a drastic overhaul of the program as a way to partially cover another round of Trump tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy.
'I don't think a lot of people realize how connected they are to the emergency food system,' May said. 'A cut to one program is really a cut to every program.'
Staff at FeedMore Western New York are still trying to make sense of how a variety of cuts — TEFAP, LFPA, and funding from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which has also been paused — will impact their bottom line. Feedmore serves Erie, Niagara, Cattaraugus, and Chautauqua counties.
'We are being impacted in every way you can imagine by decisions being made by the federal government,' said public relations manager Catherine Shick.
Last year, the organization received nearly $15 million in federal support to operate its food bank network, provide SNAP outreach, deliver meals to the homebound, and supply community kitchens. FeedMore has increased the number of people it serves by 46 percent since 2021.
Tariffs add yet another 'unknown' that FeedMore has to monitor, with some vendors warning of potential food price increases, Shick said.
Inflation was cited as a top affordability concern for Billi-Jo Mendez, a first-time pantry user in Brooklyn who was next in line to Ramirez on Wednesday.
'In all my years, I've never come to a pantry,' said Mendez, 52. 'I came for extra help.'
Mendez said she and her husband have been making do on their own, but recently received custody of their three grandchildren. Her basket included sacks of apples and carrots, as well as cereal and baked chips for the kids. 'It's so sad,' Mendez said of federal cuts. 'A lot of people are going to go hungry without assistance from a program like this.'
Gordon at Food Bank for New York City said it's too soon to tell exactly what impact tariffs will have, but the the current situation is unlike past 'rough patches.'
'There's a lack of predictability that is causing things to be more upended than they have been before,' Gordon said. 'We definitely have not seen this convergence of external factors to this degree, and all at once, impacting the good work we're trying to do for people who need us.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Politico

3 hours ago

• Politico

Senate Ag's math problem

Presented by With help from Samuel Benson, Jordain Carney, Ari Hawkins QUICK FIX — Senate Republicans are scrambling to salvage their reconciliation plans after the chamber's parliamentarian rejected their proposal to push SNAP costs onto states. — Amid anxiety about immigration raids on farms, President Donald Trump said he's exploring policies for farmers to 'take responsibility' for their workers' legal statuses. — The Trump administration is weighing an executive order to move programs from USDA's Rural Development agency to the Small Business Administration. IT'S MONDAY, JUNE 23. Welcome to Morning Agriculture. I'm your host Grace Yarrow. Send tips to gyarrow@ and follow your favorite ag team at @Morning_Ag for more. Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories. Driving the day BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD: Senate Republicans' plan to force states to share the cost of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to pay for their policy megabill has been halted by the chamber's rules, leaving lawmakers scrambling for backup plans and other ways to cut agriculture spending. The Senate parliamentarian determined that the cost-sharing plan would violate the so-called Byrd Rule, which limits what can be included in the reconciliation process, and would be subject to a 60-vote filibuster threshold, as yours truly wrote. The Senate Ag Committee introduced a scaled-back version of the House GOP's cost-sharing plan earlier this month. Without it, Senate Republicans will struggle to find enough cuts to pay for their policy priorities and the $67 billion farm bill package they included. They're staring down a deadline of delivering the megabill to President Donald Trump's desk by July 4, meaning they need to introduce and pass the bill this week before heading home for next week's recess. Republicans are hoping to finalize bill text as soon as tonight and begin moving the legislation as soon as Wednesday. What now? Senate Ag Chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) and his staff are exploring how to revamp the cost-share plan so that it could survive the Byrd Rule. But it's not clear what could receive the parliamentarian's stamp of approval while maintaining the committee's net $150 billion or so in savings. Boozman's other options aren't much easier: The committee could look to directly cut SNAP benefits by reversing Biden-era increases to the program or abandon the expensive farm bill programs, which have the backing of powerful ag lobbying groups and farmers. Republicans could also simply move forward with a bill containing smaller slashes, meaning less money for Republicans to spend on tax cuts and immigration policy — but that would ruffle feathers among fiscal hawks in the House who are already worried the megabill won't go far enough to reduce spending. Other droppings: The Senate parliamentarian also struck measures that would remove SNAP eligibility for immigrants who are not lawful permanent residents. Another Byrd dropping is the extension of a key farm bill provision that allows federal officials to update farm payment programs, meaning a heavier lift for lawmakers when they attempt to pass a farm bill later this year. Dems' victory lap: Senate Ag Democratic staff, led by ranking member Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) challenged the cost-sharing proposal and other key pieces of the GOP-led bill during a bipartisan meeting with the parliamentarian Thursday. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called the ruling a 'small but important win' as Democrats look to battle the partisan policy package with minimal legislative leverage. Schumer added in a statement that even without the cost-sharing plan, the megabill 'still includes the most brutal assault to food assistance in American history.' Klobuchar also said in a statement that the remainder of the bill will 'still be devastating to families, farmers, and independent grocers across the country.' At the White House HAPPY, HEALTHY AND FAT: President Donald Trump said he's looking for farmers to 'take responsibility for the people that they hire' as ag business groups are increasingly anxious about how ICE raids will impact farm workers. Trump told reporters that the administration doesn't 'want to hurt people that aren't criminals.' 'You've had people that have worked on farms for 20 years, it's very hard to go in there and say, you know, 'you're coming out.' But we're going to let the farmers take responsibility, they're great people, they'll do it, they know the good and the bad,' Trump said. His remarks came just days after the Department of Homeland Security abruptly reversed its guidance to pause raids on farms, restaurants and hotels, after the Trump administration initially planned to exempt those worksites from immigration enforcement efforts. 'I never want to hurt our farmers. Our farmers are great people,' Trump said. 'They keep us happy and healthy and fat.' Reality check: Forty-two percent of all U.S. crop workers are undocumented, according to USDA estimates from 2022. And ICE has reached well beyond violent offenders as they work to meet an aggressive goal of arresting 3,000 people per day. IN MORE LABOR NEWS: The Labor Department is pausing enforcement of a 2024 rule relating to H-2A visas, effectively shelving the Biden administration's overhaul of the seasonal migrant labor program, our Samuel Benson writes. The rule, which took effect in June 2024, increased wage transparency and offered workers limited union representation and protections against labor trafficking. Three federal courts issued preliminary injunctions against the rule, blocking enforcement of certain provisions or the entire rule in certain regions across the country. DOL said it was suspending enforcement because the injunctions sparked 'legal uncertainty, inconsistency, and operational challenges' for farmers. AROUND THE AGENCIES RURAL DEVELOPMENT TURF WAR: The Trump administration is weighing whether to transfer some programs from USDA's Rural Development agency to the Small Business Administration, according to documents obtained by POLITICO. Staff at the Small Business Administration drafted an executive order for Trump that would give SBA control over three programs in the Rural Business-Cooperative Service, which offers grants, loan guarantees and other capital products. Internal tensions: USDA officials pushed back against the proposal in a briefing memo meant for Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, arguing that SBA is not equipped to handle those programs and that transferring them would detract from the administration's priorities. Top officials from Rollins' office met to discuss the draft executive order on June 12, according to the documents. USDA spokesperson Alec Varsamis said Rollins has not reviewed the memo, which he described as 'pre-decisional, scenario planning documents.' Read the full scoop from our Marcia Brown here. TRADE CORNER TOMATO, TOMATO, LET'S CALL THE WHOLE THING OFF: Farm groups and GOP lawmakers are making a last-ditch push to block a 20.91 percent duty on tomatoes set to kick in July 14 — putting them at odds with Florida Republicans backing the hike, as Commerce exits a deal with Mexico. Signed in 2019, the so-called 'Tomato Suspension Agreement' delayed anti-dumping duties approved by the U.S. International Trade Commission, replacing them with a new arrangement with Mexico. That duty is now set to return after Commerce announced in April it would not be renewed, claiming it 'failed to protect' U.S. growers from unfairly priced Mexican imports. Florida tomato growers, who export to most of the country and play a dominant role in the Eastern and Midwestern agriculture markets, have long called to terminate the agreement. But growers and producers elsewhere in the country defend the deal and the access it provides to lower-cost Mexican products. In the weeks since the surprise end of the deal, industry groups have stepped up outreach to pressure the Trump administration to change course, targeting officials from USDA, Commerce, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, as well as Republican lawmakers from the Sunbelt. 'We anticipate retail prices to go up,' said Tom Stenzel, executive director of the Controlled Environment Agriculture Alliance, which represents tomato growers in states around the country. 'You're not punishing some Mexican grower somewhere with this decision. This is going to come and hit U.S. consumers and U.S. companies.' Reminder: Florida growers have been battling Mexican tomato imports since at least 1994, when the North American Free Trade Agreement went into force, phasing out tariffs between the United States and Mexico. Since then, the Florida Tomato Exchange has periodically sought anti-dumping duties on Mexican tomatoes, claiming that they are unfairly priced. Row Crops — The Protect American Lamb Coalition is asking Trump to implement higher tariffs and tariff-rate quotas on imported lamb, calling the 'collapse' of the sheep industry a 'threat' to agriculture and national security. — Start your coffee pots: The House Appropriations Committee will reconvene tonight to continue debate on amendments to the Ag-FDA fiscal 2026 funding bill. — Authorities in western India are taking steps to improve labor conditions for sugar cane cutters after a court ruling and an investigation by The New York Times and The Fuller Project highlighted serious abuses of workers. (The New York Times) — USDA's wildland fire agency representatives raised the national fire preparedness level with a focus on prevention as peak fire season begins, Rollins announced Saturday. THAT'S ALL FOR MA! Drop us a line and send us your agriculture job announcements or events: gyarrow@ marciabrown@ jwolman@ sbenson@ rdugyala@ and gmott@

9 hours ago

At least 6 killed in Kyiv by Russian drone, missile strikes on Ukraine, mayor says

LONDON -- At least six people were killed and 22 injured in Kyiv overnight as Russian drone and missile attacks again rocked Ukraine's capital, Mayor Vitali Klitschko said early on Monday, describing Moscow's latest attack as "terrible." Most casualties came from a single strike on a residential building in Kyiv's northwestern Shevchenkivskyi district, Klitschko said in a post to Telegram, alongside which he published a video from the impact site showing extensive damage to nearby apartment blocks. Ukraine's air force said in a post to Telegram that Russia launched 352 drones and 16 missiles into the country overnight, with Kyiv the primary target. Of those, the air force said 339 drones and 15 missiles were shot down or otherwise neutralized. Direct hits were reported in six locations, the air force said, with falling debris reported in 25 locations. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy posted a statement on Telegram condemning the "cynical strike," which he said included the use of North Korean ballistic missiles. Noting Russia's condemnation of recent Israeli and U.S. strikes on Iran, Zelenskyy said Moscow remains "silent" on its own ongoing bombardment of Ukrainian cities using Iranian-supplied attack drones. "A significant part of the drones and missiles were shot down by our sky defenders," Zelenskyy wrote. "But not all. And everyone in countries close to Russia, Iran and North Korea should think about whether they will be able to protect lives there if this coalition of killers persists and continues to spread terror." The Ukrainian president will visit the U.K. on Monday, as British leaders prepare for the NATO summit in the Netherlands on Tuesday. Zelenskyy said that air defense capabilities will be among the topics to be discussed, capabilities he said "should become the basis for a much stronger joint defense." "And we will also agree on new and strong steps to put pressure on Russia for this war and to stop the strikes," Zelenskyy wrote in his statement.

Boston Globe

2 days ago

• Boston Globe

In US court, due process rulings have been word for word

In orders asserting their Advertisement They pointed to language in a landmark 1982 Supreme Court ruling that upheld the rights of undocumented children to a free public education, which reads: 'even aliens whose presence in this country is unlawful, have long been recognized as 'persons' guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment.' US District Judge Indira Talwani, in an order issued April 28, was the first to stress the constitutional rights of immigrants, when she prevented the government from transferring an immigrant to another jurisdiction. The next day, Judge Leo T. Sorokin wrote a nearly identical order, then a dozen other judges adopted that language in orders barring the out-of-state transfer of immigrants who filed habeas petitions. The rulings have provided critical relief for immigrants in Massachusetts at a time when many are immediately being shipped to detention facilities hundreds of miles away or deported without a hearing, according to advocates. Advertisement 'It's been heartening to see,' said attorney Benjamin Tymann, who represents several immigrants who filed habeas petitions. 'These are completely reasonable orders for judges to put in place because all they are saying is, 'OK, let's hit pause' ... and make the government make some showing on the merits of their arrest.'' Immigration lawyers have accused Immigration and Customs Enforcement of moving immigrants across the country to disrupt or delay efforts to challenge their arrests and removal from the United States, and to place them under the jurisdiction of more conservative federal courts. In one case, US District Judge Denise Casper temporarily barred the government from transferring 25-year-old Luis Fernando Olmos Ramirez while she considered his claim that ICE violated his rights when its agents arrested him in Lynn on May 24. Tymann argued there was 'no lawful basis' to arrest Ramirez, who was granted special immigrant juvenile status after coming to the United States from his native El Salvador as an unaccompanied minor in 2015 and has since lived with his father in Lynn. He has no criminal record and has an application pending for a Green card, according to Tymann. In her order, Casper wrote that relocating Ramirez to a facility outside Massachusetts 'will exponentially increase the risks that he will be further deprived of due process and unlawfully removed from the United States to dangerous conditions in El Salvador or elsewhere.' On June 10, Ramirez voluntarily dismissed his petition after an immigration judge released him on bond. But Tymann credits Casper's intervention with paving the way for his release. Advertisement 'Without the no-transfer order, he may have been sent to Texas or somewhere else,' Tymann said. US Attorney Leah Foley, whose office represents the government in habeas petition cases, acknowledged in a statement that the Supreme Court 'has established that all persons in the United States have Constitutional protections, regardless of their immigration status.' She said her office has no authority to tell ICE where to house immigrants in its custody, but immediately forwards the agency the judges' orders barring the out-of-state transfer of immigrants. A spokesperson for ICE did not respond to requests for comment about the habeas petitions and allegations that agents have made unlawful arrests. But the agency has made clear that it has worked to ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons said during a press conference last month that agents were targeting dangerous and violent criminals, but will arrest anyone they encounter who is in the country illegally. And he argued that their rights are not being violated. 'ICE doesn't just scoop people off the street and remove them,' Lyons said. 'Everyone gets due process and that is what the US attorney's office is for. It's what the immigration courts are for.' Some of the petitions before US District Court judges were filed by people who entered the country without permission, then surrendered themselves to immigration officials and had been allowed to remain free as they pursued lawful status. They allege they were arrested without probable cause or due process while driving to work or dropping their children off at school. Advertisement In some cases, petitioners allege they were leaving the Chelmsford immigration court after judges set hearings for a future date, only to be arrested in the hallways by immigration agents and told they were facing expedited removal from the country. 'What we are seeing in this country is just an assault on the rule of law,' said attorney Todd Pomerleau, whose Boston firm, Rubin Pomerleau, filed habeas petitions on behalf of five immigrants in recent weeks. One of Pomerleau's clients, Andre Damasio Ferreira, 40, was born in Brazil, came to the United States nearly 20 years ago, and lives in Everett with his wife, who is battling cancer. Their two children, 13 and 8, are US citizens. Ferreira, who works for a flooring company, was a passenger in a pickup truck being driven by a co-worker on May 30 when they were stopped by armed ICE agents who demanded to see their passports and questioned them about their immigration status, according to Pomerleau. Ferreira was arrested and is being held at the Plymouth County Correctional Facility pending removal proceedings. US District Judge William G. Young issued an order June 5 temporarily blocking Ferreira's transfer out of state, using the same language as his colleagues while stressing Ferreira's constitutional rights. Young wrote that although federal district courts don't generally have jurisdiction to review orders of removal by an immigration court, they do have jurisdiction over violations of the Constitution. The government argued in court filings on June 12 that Ferreira's arrest was lawful and urged Young to dismiss his petition. ICE agents stopped Ferreira because he looked like someone else they were targeting, then discovered he was unlawfully present in the country and had previously been removed in 2005, according to the government. The judge has yet to rule on the case. Advertisement In at least two cases, immigrants were mistakenly transferred — one to Louisiana and the other to Mississippi — in violation of judges' orders, according to court filings. The US attorney's office apologized and the petitioners were brought back to the state. Though judges have issued orders halting transfers by the Trump administration as early as January, they specifically began adopting the language reinforcing immigrants' constitutional rights after the arrest of Tufts PhD student She was arrested by masked ICE agents outside her Somerville apartment in March. By the time her lawyers filed last month, a federal judge in Vermont ordered her released, while he considers her claim that the government violated her free speech and due process rights. 'Now we are seeing a lot more detentions that violate due process rights and that's not an issue that immigration judges are usually able to address,' said Shantanu Chatterjee, a Chelsea attorney who has filed habeas petitions on behalf of several immigrants. He said more immigration lawyers are seeking relief for their clients in federal district courts. The flurry of rulings 'sends a message to everyone that Advertisement Shelley Murphy can be reached at