logo
AirPods 2025 年無大更新?相機、心率計加持的 AirPods Pro 3 和「輕量版」Max 未來 2 年內登場

AirPods 2025 年無大更新?相機、心率計加持的 AirPods Pro 3 和「輕量版」Max 未來 2 年內登場

Yahoo19-05-2025

知名分析師郭明錤今日發 X 文預測,AirPods 在年內都不會有重大更新。他重申搭載紅外線相機(可能還有 Powerbeats Pro 2 同款心率計)的 AirPods Pro 3 將於 2026 年登場,另外 Apple 可能還會在 2027 年量產「輕量版」AirPods Max。
AirPods may not see significant updates until 2026 (aligning with my earlier prediction that IR camera-equipped AirPods would enter mass production in 2026). A lighter version of the AirPods Max is expected to enter mass production in 2027.AirPods可能要到2026年才會有顯著更新…
— 郭明錤 (Ming-Chi Kuo) (@mingchikuo) May 18, 2025
根據郭之前的說法,紅外線模組給 AirPods 帶來的改進主要集中在兩方面。首先是強化空間音訊和空間運算生態,比如用戶在配戴 Vision Pro 時使用新款 AirPods,當你轉動頭部,相機便能判斷方向並加強相應的音源。除此之外,相機亦能偵測到影像上的變化,因此新 AirPods 也完全有可能支援隔空手勢(Apple 曾申請過這方面的專利)。
至於「輕量版」AirPods Max,暫時還沒什麼細節可供分享。但想來初代 Max 推出多年只換了個 USB-C,新品要做的應該不只是瘦身那麼簡單吧?
更多內容:
AirPods 會在 2026 年加上紅外線相機?作用是強化空間音訊和手勢互動
AirPods Pro 3 可能有心率計,但準確度還是 Apple Watch 比較高
Beats Powerbeats Pro 2 正式登場:升級降噪搭配心率監測
緊貼最新科技資訊、網購優惠,追隨 Yahoo Tech 各大社交平台!
🎉📱 Tech Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/yahootechhk
🎉📱 Tech Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/yahootechhk/
🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 社群:https://chat.whatsapp.com/Dg3fiiyYf3yG2mgts4Mii8
🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 頻道:https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va91dmR545urVCpQwq2D
🎉📱 Tech Telegram 頻道:https://t.me/yahootechhk

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I ditched my AirTag for this smarter key tracker — and I love it
I ditched my AirTag for this smarter key tracker — and I love it

Tom's Guide

time2 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

I ditched my AirTag for this smarter key tracker — and I love it

Everyone I know raves about how helpful it is for them to attach an AirTag on their keychain to keep track of their keys, but my issue is that AirTags are quite obvious — which gives potential thieves a quick opportunity of removing them. That's why I ditched mine in favor of this smart key tracker that doubles as a handy key organizer. The KeySmart iPro is a smart key organizer that neatly organizes my keys together, while also acting as a lifesaving tool in the event it goes missing thanks to its Find My support. Essentially, it's an AirTag disguised as a key organizer and I love it. For less than the cost of two AirTags, I think the KeySmart iPro still has value. I'd go far to say it's one of the best key finders around. Here's why. Keep your keys organized and in one place with the KeySmart iPro, which also supports Apple's Find My function to keep track of its location in the event it's lost or missing. There's also a built-in flashlight when you need check: $49 @ KeySmart I have so much stuff on my keychain that it's gotten so out of control in the last year, so I needed a change — but still want the peace of mind that an AirTag offers. I got all of that and more when I finally switched to the KeySmart iPro because of how it better organizes my keys. In fact, it can support up to 14 keys thanks in part to its design that lets me quickly expand it. While I don't have that many keys on me, I did manage to get the six main keys I need for my home. Much like a Swiss Army Knife, all the keys fold inside of it — but it typically accommodates standard keys that are uniformly flat. Meaning, I can't install my car key because of how the fob has a thicker base for its controls. Despite this, I managed to get all my other keys to fit inside of the KeySmart iPro after carefully figuring out how to best place them inside. What I really love most about it is how it supports Apple's Find My function, which practically gives it the same tracking abilities of the AirTag — but in a discreet design. Through the Find My app, I can see its location on a map and even play a sound to help me track it down easier around my home if I forgot where I put it last. On top of that, I really appreciate the notification I get every time it senses that I've left it behind. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Unlike other smart key finders, like those from Tile or Nomad's Tracking Card, it doesn't rely on a battery I need to replace — nor does it require a proprietary charging cable. Instead, the KeySmart iPro features a USB-C port covered by a plastic flap that's much more convenient in my opinion. Not only is it rated for up to 30 days of battery life, but the simple fact it's a USB-C port makes it more ideal because I can charge it just about anywhere. There's also a built-in flashlight, which isn't as powerful as my phone's flashlight, but nonetheless helpful when I can't find anything else around. Now that I've been using this, I don't plan on going back to a regular keychain with an AirTag attached to it. For its $49 cost, I think it justifies its value over other smart key finders, especially when it actually organizes my keys. And yes, it comes with a bottle opener as well so now I don't have to ask a waiter for one at a BYOB restaurant.

I tested 10 flagship phones. This one has the best battery
I tested 10 flagship phones. This one has the best battery

Digital Trends

time2 hours ago

  • Digital Trends

I tested 10 flagship phones. This one has the best battery

When it comes to selecting the best phones, three key areas are most important. The display and the best smartphone camera are integral parts of the experience on most phones — especially with the display on the best folding phones — but battery life is important to every smartphone user. Between different types of battery technology and a lot of variety in capacity and charging speeds, there's a lot to take into consideration when evaluating the best smartphone battery life, especially as usage patterns vary so wildly as well. Recommended Videos Yet, the question remains unanswered: which phone has the best battery life and charging? Since the iPhone launch last year, I've been testing the best phones as they've come into my possession. I've tested over 50 phones — folding and non-folding — over the past year, and here's what I've found. Understanding battery technology Before we dig into the testing, a quick primer on battery technology. For almost three decades, the smartphone industry has been using lithium-ion batteries to power phones and other electronic devices that require a battery. The next generation of smartphone batteries uses Silicon Carbon technology, which offers higher energy density, faster charging capabilities, and potentially a longer lifespan. This means you can fit a bigger battery in the same-sized phone or a bigger battery in a thinner device, making it ideal for the best thin phones. The first smartphone with a Silicon Carbon battery was the Honor Magic V5 Pro, which was introduced two years ago. Since then, we've seen many other Asian phone makers launch phones that utilize this battery technology. Samsung, Apple, and Google have yet to follow suit, but OnePlus launched the OnePlus 13 in January, making it the first smartphone in the US to utilize this architecture. Curating the best phones for testing There are so many phones released each year, both inside and outside the US, that testing every single device wouldn't be feasible, at least not for this mid-year test. However, the data I collected over the past year, combined with my own subjective experiences with each device, means it's possible to calculate which phones to include in these tests. To simplify the testing and results, I've split the shortlist into two categories: candybar phones and the best folding phones: Here's a quick overview of the key battery specs for the shortlist: Battery Size (mAh) Battery Type Charging Speed (W) Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4,685 mAh Lithium-Ion 37W Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5,000 mAh Lithium-Ion 45W Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3,900 mAh Lithium-Ion 25W Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5,060 mAh Lithium-Ion 37W OnePlus 13 6,000 mAh SIlicon Carbon 80W Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4,700 mAh SIlicon Carbon 68W Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 4,000 mAh Lithium-Ion 25W Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 4,400 mAh Lithium-Ion 25W Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4,650 mAh Lithium-Ion 21W Oppo Find N5 5,600 mAh SIlicon Carbon 80W How I tested these phones I have been reviewing phones for almost twenty years, and have been objectively testing phones since 2015. To reduce the number of variables, I ensured that these tests were run after a factory reset, with a specific test account installed on the phone. This helped limit any potential data corruption caused by a particular app or background data usage. Each phone underwent the same testing. Each test was conducted with the display set to 200 nits of brightness to minimize variations caused by auto-brightness or different display brightness controllers. For the folding phones, the tests were conducted on the cover display. To test the phones, I charged each to 100% and then ran various tests. The first involved browsing a looping set of websites and social feeds, while the second ran the same test, but with a looped video. The gaming test involved playing Genshin Impact for 60 minutes and extrapolating battery usage from there. The best battery life for web browsing and social media Let's first take a look at the results of the browsing and social media test for each of the five non-folding phones: Rank Phone Capacity Duration Points 1st Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4,700 mAh 15:48 h 10 2nd Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4,685 mAh 15:42 h 9 3rd OnePlus 13 6,000 mAh 15:02 h 8 4th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5,060 mAh 11:58 h 7 5th Oppo Find N5 5,600 mAh 11:25 h 6 6th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4,650 mAh 11:01 h 5 7th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5,000 mAh 10:57 h 4 8th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3,900 mAh 8:59 h 3 9th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 4,400 mAh 8:58 h 2 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 4,000 mAh 7:59 h 1 The biggest surprise through all of this testing is just how capable the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra battery proves to be. In this test, it outranks the iPhone 16 Pro Max, which lasted considerably longer than any other phone since the iPhone 15 Pro Max. Both of these devices outperform your expectations based on their capacity, whereas the opposite is true of the Galaxy S25 Ultra, which should be better. The best battery life for video playback Of course, web browsing and social media playback is only one test, albeit the most varied one I tried. A more strenuous test is video playback, especially as it engages the graphics card more strenuously than the simpler first test. Rank Phone Capacity Duration Points 1st OnePlus 13 6,000 mAh 23:21 h 10 2nd Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4,685 mAh 23:04 h 9 3rd Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4,700 mAh 19:22 h 8 4th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5,000 mAh 18:42 h 7 5th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3,900 mAh 16:58 h 6 6th Oppo Find N5 5,600 mAh 15:01 h 5 7th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 4,400 mAh 14:58 h 4 8th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4,650 mAh 14:31 h 3 9th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 4,000 mAh 14:21 h 2 10th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5,060 mAh 14:02 h 1 The OnePlus 13 unsurprisingly outperforms the competition here, as the larger capacity and software optimizations work their magic. The iPhone 16 Pro Max meets expectations here as Apple's software and hardware integration proves to be magical for endurance. It'll be interesting to see how the new background tasks feature in iOS 26 affects this. I'm very impressed by the Galaxy S25 Edge here, as it has the smallest battery in this list — unsurprising as it's the thinnest non-folding phone — but it ranks 5th in one of the more strenuous tests. If you watch a lot of movies, this phone will likely handle what you throw at it. The best battery life for gaming The first two tests have become progressively more strenuous, but how does each phone endure when tested under heavy gaming conditions? Where applicable, I enabled game mode (or a similar feature) but left the settings at their default values. Rank Phone Capacity Duration Points 1st Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5,000 mAh 9:42 h 10 2nd Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 4,685 mAh 9:38 h 9 3rd Oppo Find N5 5,600 mAh 7:58 h 8 4th Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 4,700 mAh 7:42h 7 5th OnePlus 13 6,000 mAh 7:13 h 6 6th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 5,060 mAh 7:03 h 5 7th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 4,400 mAh 6:58 h 4 8th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 4,650 mAh 6:40 h 3 9th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 3,900 mAh 6:03 h 2 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 4,000 mAh 6:02 h 1 I was taken aback by the Galaxy S25 Ultra's results here, but a retest revealed similar results, so this is a clear example of how a feature like Samsung's Game Booster can extend your battery life under heavy gaming conditions. This is made even more surprising, given that it shares the 8-core Snapdragon 8 Elite processor with the OnePlus 13, albeit Samsung has developed an optimized version of the processor for its flagship devices. The iPhone proves to be an endurance champion yet again, and the Find N5 and Razr 60 Ultra both continue to prove that folding phones can offer better battery life than non-folding phones. The rest of the results are as I expected: the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, Z Fold 6, and Flip 6 all rank low in most of the tests. Before we head to the charging tests, here's a quick look at the overall top 3 in the battery tests: iPhone 16 Pro Max (27 points), Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (25 points), and OnePlus 13 (24 points). The phones that charge the fastest Of course, when your battery is running low, you need fast charging, so which of these phones charges the fastest? First, a quick note about mAh/min. It's a metric I have been using for years, and it's designed to standardize charging speeds while eliminating the variability of battery capacity and charging speed. It also applies to the 15-minute reading, where we record the battery percentage reported by the phone and multiply it by the capacity to estimate the mAh charged during those 15 minutes. Let's take a look, first, at the time taken for a full charge: Rank Phone Speed Full charge m/Ah min Points 1st OnePlus 13 80W 35 mins 171.4 10 2nd Oppo Find N5 80W 50 mins 112 9 3rd Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 68W 48 mins 93.8 8 4th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 45W 64 mins 78.1 7 5th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 37W 78 mins 64.9 6 6th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 25W 67 mins 58.2 5 7th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 25W 91 mins 48.4 4 8th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 21W 105 mins 44.3 3 9th Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 37W 114 mins 41.1 2 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 25W 102 mins 39.2 1 For more than a decade, one thing has been clear: companies like Huawei, Oppo, Honor, and OnePlus have all figured out how to recharge phones quickly and safely. This has been the case since long before the introduction of the new generation of Silicon Carbon batteries, and the technology is significantly faster than its competitors. The result is that it's no surprise that OnePlus and Oppo dominate the list. However, the biggest surprise comes from the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and its new 68W charging, which significantly increases charging speeds. I don't know about you, but I often forget to charge my phone, or the battery runs low when I only have a short moment to recharge. For those times, I also noted the percentage each phone added to the battery after a 15-minute charge. Rank Phone Speed % at 15 m ~mAh Points 1st OnePlus 13 80W 55% 3,300 10 2nd Oppo Find N5 80W 42% 2,352 9 3rd Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 68W 48% 2,160 8 4th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 45W 40% 2,000 7 5th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 37W 35% 1,771 6 6th Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 37W 27% 1,265 5 7th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 25W 30% 1,170 4 8th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 25W 26% 1,144 3 9th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 21W 24% 1,116 2 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 25W 23% 920 1 This overall charging test is when Apple's core weakness becomes apparent. The battery life of the iPhone 16 Pro Max is fantastic, but the charging speeds leave much to be desired. As you'll see below, however, this is not always the case, and the slower overall iPhone charging speeds are usually due to the device charging more slowly (to protect the battery) once it reaches 80%. The phone with the best battery is… There's a lot more testing to do on these phones and many of the best upcoming folding phones like the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Galaxy Z Flip 7, but where do Samsung's current folding phones stand? How about the new Galaxy S25 Edge? How does the thin body affect that battery compared to its beefier sibling? Let's look at the final results to find out! Rank Phone Total Points 1st OnePlus 13 44 2nd Motorola Razr 60 Ultra 41 3rd Oppo Find N5 37 4th Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 35 5th Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max 33 6th Google Pixel 9 Pro XL 25 7th Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 21 8th Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 17 9th Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold 16 10th Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 6 It's no surprise that the Galaxy Z Flip 6 comes last, especially given it's been there for most of these tests, but it does have me curious whether they'll be able to improve it in the upcoming Z Flip 7. The Galaxy S25 Edge performs admirably given the capacity constraints, especially as it has the smallest battery of all. In the top 5, Apple is the most interesting. Improving charging speeds would eliminate the gap to the top of the leaderboard, especially since it currently ranks first in the battery life tests. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a solid contender, but it shows that there's still room for Samsung to improve. The top 3 are very interesting. The Oppo Find N5 has the best book-style folding phone battery life that I've tested, and this rings true in the testing. The same applies to the Razr 60 Ultra, which proves that flip phones can be just as capable as non-flip ones. I'm very surprised by just how capable the Razr 60 Ultra battery life proves to be in this test. The best phone for overall battery life, however, is the OnePlus 13, which continues the OnePlus trend of offering outstanding battery life and super-fast charging. This is the biggest and best battery in a OnePlus phone to date, and shows that Silicon Carbon is the smartphone battery future we've been waiting for.

傳蘋果將捨棄Google合作 將收購AI搜尋黑馬Perplexity
傳蘋果將捨棄Google合作 將收購AI搜尋黑馬Perplexity

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

傳蘋果將捨棄Google合作 將收購AI搜尋黑馬Perplexity

科技中心/李宜樺報導 ▼▲蘋果傳新併購消息!恐捨棄Google,轉密會AI搜尋新星Perplexity。(圖/翻攝自YT@Apple) AI戰升溫,科技巨頭火力全開!繼Meta投資Scale AI後,如今傳出蘋果也悄悄布局,要收購AI搜尋新貴「Perplexity AI」,甚至傳出考慮放棄Google作為預設搜尋引擎。這場看似平靜的搜尋戰場,已悄然掀起風暴! 根據《彭博》知名科技記者Mark Gurman爆料,蘋果併購部門主管Adrian Perica已在內部討論是否收購Perplexity,雖仍處於早期階段,但若交易成真,將是蘋果史上最大規模併購案──該公司估值高達140億美元,遠超2014年30億美元收購Beats的紀錄。 除了併購,蘋果也考慮另一合作模式,將Perplexity整合至Safari與Siri,作為替代Google搜尋的AI解決方案。畢竟蘋果與Google的搜尋合作協議,正面臨美國反壟斷調查威脅,恐有被迫拆夥的可能。 Perplexity成立僅兩年,卻以AI驅動搜尋技術嶄露頭角,透過自動總結、引文標示等功能挑戰Google霸主地位,甚至已與三星展開深度合作,成為蘋果收購計畫的潛在障礙。 Perplexity對收購傳聞低調回應,稱「目前沒有相關消息」,但該公司近期與多家科技巨頭接觸頻繁,包括Meta也曾試圖收購、並挖角其CEO Aravind Srinivas,顯示AI搜尋市場人才爭奪戰已進入白熱化。 當AI搜尋成為下一代搜尋引擎的競爭主戰場,蘋果此舉無疑是對Google發出重大威脅。科技巨頭的版圖重組已開始,誰能掌握搜尋流量與AI技術,誰就能主宰未來。 更多三立新聞網報導2025報稅必知/報稅倒數9天 你真的報完了嗎?「這一步」沒做=白報!美軍參戰 介入以伊戰爭!衝突升級 冷靜異常的黃金現補漲行情?全球熱錢瘋搶亞洲 高盛曝對沖基金5年最大買盤新光金、新壽5月再虧破百億 靠準備金撐盤仍難止血?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store