MIT bans class president from graduation commencement after pro-Palestinian speech
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology banned the 2025 class president from Friday's graduation commencement ceremony after she delivered a pro-Palestinian speech during an event Thursday.
The university made the announcement on Friday without naming the student, saying that she delivered a speech at Thursday's OneMIT commencement ceremony that was not the one provided in advance.
"While that individual had a scheduled role at today's Undergraduate Degree Ceremony, she was notified that she would not be permitted at today's events," said university spokesperson Kimberly Allen. "MIT supports free expression but stands by its decision, which was in response to the individual deliberately and repeatedly misleading Commencement organizers and leading a protest from the stage, disrupting an important Institute ceremony."
The speech was shared online by the Palestinian Youth Movement, which named the student as Megha Vemuri. Vemuri wore a Keffiyeh during the speech, and called out MIT for having research ties with the Israel army and "aiding and abetting" the country with its "assault on the Palestinian people."
Israel's war in Gaza has killed over 52,000 people since Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas militants killed some 1,200 people in Israel and took 251 people hostage. Israel has received intense criticism from around the world, including from the United Nations, for its actions in Gaza, which include cutting off aid to the enclave.
"As scientists, engineers, academics and leaders, we have a commitment to support life, support aid efforts and call for an arms embargo and keep demanding now as alumni, that MIT cuts the ties," Vemuri said.
Her speech was met by cheers and applause from her fellow classmates, some of whom held up a Palestinian flag.
"Right now, while we prepare to graduate and move forward with our lives, there are no universities left in Gaza," Vemuri said. "We are watching Israel try to wipe out Palestine off the face of the earth, and it is a shame that MIT is a part of it."
Vemuri mentioned that the undergraduate body voted in favor of the university cutting ties with Israel, and faced "threats, intimidation and suppression coming from all directions, especially your own university officials."
"But you prevailed because the MIT community that I know would never tolerate a genocide," Vemuri said.
Vemuri then called on her fellow classmates to partake in the MIT tradition of turning their class rings that bear university mascot "Tim the Beaver."
"And as you lift it off your fingers, notice that the beaver is no longer facing you, it is now facing the world," Temuri said. "This is a world that we will be entering with an immeasurable responsibility. We will carry with us the stamp of the MIT name, the same name that is directly complicit in the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people.And so we carry with us the obligation to do everything we can to stop it."
NBC News has reached out to Vemuri for comment.
On Friday, MIT President Sally Kornbluth made her remarks at the commencement for the class of 2025, encouraging them to become ambassadors for scientific thinking and discovery. Kornbluth said that the university allows "a lot of room for disagreement, whether the subject is scientific, personal, or political," but encouraged the new grads to rely on the "beauty and power of the scientific method."
"I need you all to become ambassadors for the way we think and work and thrive at MIT," Kornbluth said.
Kornbluth did not mention any specific incident during her remarks, including the one involving Vemuri. It's not clear at this time if Vemuri was officially allowed to graduate from MIT.
Vemuri is not the only graduate who has been penalized for her political views.
Earlier this month, New York University withheld student Logan Rozos' diploma after he delivered an unapproved commencement speech to address what he called the 'atrocities currently happening in Palestine' during the Israel-Hamas war.
NYU condemned Rozos' speech, calling it an expression of "his personal and one-sided political views."
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump's heavy Iran choice: Letters to the Editor — June 21, 2025
The Issue: President Trump deliberation on whether to take military action against Iran's last nuke site. President Trump has raised concerns that a post-regime Iran might resemble Libya after Moammar Khadafy — fractured, chaotic and unstable ('Don fears Daffy decision,' June 20). But the comparison between Iran and Libya is deeply flawed. Advertisement Libya's Khadafy, though brutal, never possessed the strategic capabilities Iran now holds. Iran is already a regional power, capable of threatening Israel — and far beyond — through its ballistic-missile arsenal and emerging nuclear capabilities. Moreover, post-Khadafy Libya lacked a unifying opposition or a credible heir, which fueled its descent into civil war. Advertisement Iran is different. Exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi has emerged as a potential transitional figure, and reports suggest some elements within Iran's military are in quiet contact with his camp. Kim Ezra Shienbaum New Milford, Pa. Advertisement Iran has trained, armed, financed, encouraged and applauded terrorists who have killed American citizens. For almost half a century, Iran's leaders have preached 'Death to America.' There will never be a better opportunity to remove these leaders than now. This will go a long way to promoting peace in the Middle East. Advertisement The people in Iran, especially the women, will thank us. Joe Zeloof Hamilton, NJ Launching attacks on Iran, a nation of more than 90 million, risks an uncontrollable regional war with catastrophic consequences. It is not only immoral — it is insanity. Such escalation would bring mass suffering and global economic instability and further fuel anti-American sentiment. This is not America's war. It must not become one. Advertisement Congress must act now to prevent an unauthorized war and assert its constitutional war powers. We cannot bomb our way out of failed policies. More war will not bring peace or security — it will only deepen chaos. Say no to war with Iran. Advertisement Jagjit Singh Los Altos, Calif. Iran is not Libya. There is a large, oppressed population that is pro-Israel, pro-democracy and pro-United States. Advertisement We should not allow irrational fears of Iran turning into another Libya stop us from standing up for the oppressed Iranians. That would be like the allies in World War II not overthrowing the Nazis because of fear that Germany would descend into chaos. Iran was once a friendly country with a friendly regime that was overthrown by radical Muslims, who might have been stopped if it hadn't been for Carter administration pressure on the shah. We share in the responsibility that led to the regime change from a shah who loved his people and American values, to a regime that oppresses Iranians and hates the United States. Advertisement Gamaliel Isaac Manhattan This nation needs to pull in its swords overseas and attend to the war going on within our own country. It seems as if our government cannot get enough of spending our time and money to meddle in other nations' domestic affairs. Having been a part of these intrusions at one time, I can say most of our various expenditures have been most wasteful and negative. There is absolutely nothing heroic about 'loving war as long as we take few casualties.' This country of ours in now at war with itself and the opposing factions are becoming more polarized. We have enough on our hands right here. Michael G. Merhige Miami, Fla. After decades of failed global negotiations and agreements toward delaying and denying Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons, Israel has systematically and spectacularly attacked Iran's nuclear sites. However, destruction of the deeply buried Fordow uranium-enrichment site remains a serious challenge, likely resolvable only by American bunker buster bombs. Will America rise to this challenge? History surely will not be kind should this rarest of moments to finally eliminate this long overhanging threat not be firmly seized. Richard D. Wilkins Syracuse Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Judge orders Columbia protester Mahmoud Khalil freed from detention
Khalil was the first arrest under President Donald Trump's crackdown on students who joined campus protests against Israel's devastating war in Gaza. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Khalil must be expelled from the country because his continued presence could harm American foreign policy. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Farbiarz had ruled earlier that the government can't continue to hold Khalil on those grounds, but the government argued the legal U.S. resident was instead being held based on allegations that he lied on his green card application. Khalil disputes the accusations that he wasn't forthcoming on the application. Advertisement Khalil, a legal U.S. resident, was detained on March 8 at his apartment building in Manhattan over his participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. His lawyers say the Trump administration is simply trying to crack down on free speech. Khalil isn't accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. The international affairs graduate student served as a negotiator and spokesperson for student activists. He wasn't among the demonstrators arrested, but his prominence in news coverage and willingness to speak publicly made him a target of critics. Advertisement The Trump administration has argued that noncitizens who participate in such demonstrations should be expelled from the country as it considers their views antisemitic.
UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
Supreme Court allows terrorism victims to sue Palestinian groups
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday unanimously upheld a federal law that allows victims of terrorism to sue Palestinian entities in U.S. courts. File Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo June 20 (UPI) -- The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday unanimously upheld a federal law that allows victims of terrorism to sue two Palestinian entities in U.S. courts. The decision reversed the U.S. Court of Appeals in the New York-based 2nd Circuit that found the law denied the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority fair legal process. All nine justices ruled that the bipartisan 2019 law, called the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act, does not violate due process rights of the PLO and PA. The lawsuit and appeal involve cases from the early 2000s and not the Israel-Hamas war and airstrikes between Israel and Iran. It was based on the Antiterrorism Act of 1990, which creates a federal civil damages action for U.S. nationals injured or killed "by reason of an act of international terrorism." Founded in 1964, the PLO is internationally recognized as the official representative of the Palestinian people in the occupied territories. The PA, founded in 1994, is the Fatah-controlled government body that exercises partial civil control over the Palestinian enclaves in the West Bank. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the 46-page opinion that included a concurrence by Justice Clarence Thomas and backed by Justice Neil Gorsuch, who wanted to define the boundaries of the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause. Lawsuits by U.S. victims of terrorist attacks in Israel can move forward in American courts. "It is permissible for the Federal Government to craft a narrow jurisdictional provision that ensures, as part of a broader foreign policy agenda, that Americans injured or killed by acts of terror have an adequate forum in which to vindicate their right to ATA compensation," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court. In April, the high court consolidated two cases for arguments: a Justice Department appeal and an appeal by the family of Israeli-American Ari Fuld, who was fatally stabbed at a shopping mall in the West Bank in 2018. The Biden administration initially intervened in Fuld's case and another one brought by 11 American families who sued the Palestinian leadership groups and were awarded $650 million in a 2025 trial for several attacks in Israel.
