Toxic pesticide found in tampons, say British NGOs
A report co-authored by several British non-governmental organisations (NGOs) warns of the presence of glyphosate in over a dozen brands of menstrual tampons.
This finding is all the more worrying given that glyphosate is far from being the only harmful substance found in women's sanitary protection products.
Manufacturers of tampons, pads and other menstrual protection products still have a long way to go to protect the health of menstruating people.
The new report has revealed the presence of glyphosate in around 15 brands of tampons sold in the United Kingdom.
According to their investigation, concentrations of this pesticide (considered a probable human carcinogen) can be as high as 0.004 mg/kg ... 40 times the legal limit for drinking water in the UK!
One of the hypotheses put forward to explain how these substances end up in products designed for period protection is that glyphosate may have been present in certain weedkillers used in cotton fields.
In light of these findings, the NGOs behind the survey recommend that a regulatory system be put in place, along with a testing process to ensure that menstrual hygiene products are free of pesticides.
'Women, girls and people who menstruate use an average of 11,000 disposable menstrual products throughout their life.
'Despite the prolific use of these products, the potential health impacts of the chemicals and pesticides that they can contain remains largely unexamined,' says the executive summary, available on the website of Pesticide Action Network, a UK NGO that co-authored the report.
NGOs and scientists have been warning us about the toxic composition of menstrual products for several years now.
In July 2024, an American study revealed the presence of several heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead and vanadium) in 24 brands of tampons sold in Europe and the United States.
Other studies were previously conducted, particularly in France.
In 2019, the magazine 60 Millions de Consommateurs sounded the alarm in a comparative test carried out to check for the presence of chemical compounds in menstrual products.
The results reported the presence of residues of several harmful substances, such as phthalates, dioxins and ... glyphosate. – AFP Relaxnews
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Toxic chemicals found in food and wine
The report found there has been a 'sharp increase' in pesticide and chemical residues in wine bottled since 2010. — TNS A team of researchers has found 'alarmingly high' levels of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), a so-called 'forever chemical', in dozens of organic and non-organic pastas, baked goods and breakfast cereals from Europe, as well as in wine. 'In conventional grain products, the average levels were so high that a health risk to children can no longer be ruled out,' said Helmut Burtscher-Schaden, an environmental chemist part of the Brussels-based Pesticide Action Network (PAN) Europe, which describes TFA as a 'product of PFAS pesticides and industrial chemicals.' Forever chemicals, also known as PFAS, are thousands of long-lasting substances used in household and everyday products since the middle of the 20th century but which have been found to be difficult to remove from the environment and from human bodies. The latest research points to 'widespread contamination from PFAS (per- and poly fluoroalkyl substances) pesticides,' PAN Europe said, warning that TFA tends to build up in water and farmland. The amount of TFA in the food items was found to be three times that recorded in a similar study eight years ago, according to PAN Europe, which in April warned of 'dramatic rise' of TFA in wine. In a report covering wines from Austria, Belgium, Croatia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg and Spain, PAN Europe found that while pre-1988 vintages do not contain any such contamination, there has been a 'sharp increase' in pesticide and chemical residues in wine bottled since 2010. Such a 'steep accumulation' should be 'a red flag that calls for decisive action,' according to Michael Müller, a professor of pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry at the University of Freiburg. The European Chemicals Agency has warned that TFA 'may cause harm to the unborn child' and 'may impair fertility.' – dpa
New Straits Times
3 days ago
- New Straits Times
UK MPs to decide fate of assisted dying bill in critical vote
LONDON: British lawmakers could take a major step towards legalising euthanasia on Friday when they hold a knife-edge vote on whether to allow assisted dying for terminally ill people. MPs will either progress the legislation to the House of Lords upper chamber for further scrutiny or end it entirely following several hours of impassioned debate. Protesters both for and against the contentious bill are expected to gather outside parliament as the so-called third reading – the MPs' last chance to debate its contents – takes place inside. "It is about real people facing the prospect of a painful and undignified death either for themselves or a loved one," the legislation's proposer, MP Kim Leadbeater, told AFP in a statement. "The injustice and inhumanity of the status quo means we cannot wait any longer to offer them the hope of a better death." The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would allow assisted suicide in England and Wales for adults with an incurable illness who have a life expectancy of fewer than six months. They would have to be able to administer themselves the life-ending substance, and any patient's wish to die would have to be signed off by two doctors and a panel of experts. A change in the law would see Britain emulate several other countries in Europe and elsewhere that allow some form of assisted dying. Supporters say euthanasia would give the terminally ill greater protections and choice at the end of their lives, but critics worry that vulnerable people could be coerced into dying. The Royal College of Psychiatrists said last month that it had "serious concerns" about the safeguarding of people with mental illness and said it cannot support the bill in its current form. MPs backed the proposed legislation by 330 to 275 votes at an initial vote in parliament last November. Since then the bill has undergone several changes, including applying a ban on adverts for assisted dying and allowing all health workers to opt out of helping someone end their life. Several lawmakers in the 650-seat parliament have subsequently switched positions, and parties are not telling them how to vote, making the outcome difficult to predict. An ITV News tracker of around half the parliamentarians estimates that 153 MPs plan to vote for changing the law, with 141 against. Some 21 remain undecided with another 21 due to abstain. Both the House of Commons and the House of Lords need to approve the legislation before the end of the current parliamentary year, likely sometime in the autumn, or the bill will fail. If it passes and receives royal assent, then it would be four years before an assisted dying service is implemented. A government impact assessment published this month estimated that approximately 160 to 640 assisted deaths could take place in the first year, rising to a possible 4,500 in year 10. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to vote in favour but several of his top ministerial team, including the health and justice secretaries, have publicly opposed changing the law. Assisted suicide currently carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
The Star
3 days ago
- The Star
British lawmakers to vote on landmark assisted dying law
FILE PHOTO: A protestor holds a placard as they gather outside the parliament as British lawmakers debate the assisted dying law, in London, Britain, November 29, 2024. REUTERS/Mina Kim/File Photo LONDON (Reuters) -British lawmakers will vote on Friday on whether to proceed with a bill to legalise assisted dying for terminally ill people, in what would be the biggest social reform in the country for a generation. Last November, lawmakers voted 330 to 275 in favour of the principle of allowing assisted dying, paving the way for Britain to follow Australia, Canada and other countries, as well as some U.S. states. Now, after months of scrutiny, amendment and emotional debate, the bill must clear another stage of voting to keep it on the road to legalisation, a process that could still take months. A vote against would stop it in its tracks. The Labour lawmaker who has proposed the new law, Kim Leadbeater, said there could be a reduction in the number of members of parliament who support the bill on Friday, but she was confident it would still be approved. One member of parliament who supports the legislation said there were about a dozen votes between those in favour and against, with a number yet to declare their position. Dozens of lawmakers earlier in June signed a letter to the leader of the House of Commons saying that there had not been enough time to debate the details of such a consequential law change. Leadbeater said her biggest fear was that if the legislation was voted down, then it could be another decade before the issue returns to parliament. The issue was last considered in 2015 when lawmakers voted against it. "It works and it is safe, and it provides dignity to terminally ill people," she told reporters before the vote. "This is not an either or when it comes to palliative care or assisted dying. It is about choice for people." PUBLIC SUPPORT Opinion polls show that a majority of Britons back assisted dying, and supporters say the law needs to catch up with public opinion. But, since the initial vote, some lawmakers say they are worried the bill's protections against the coercion of vulnerable people have been weakened. Under the proposed law, mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with six months or fewer to live would be given the right to end their lives with medical help. In the original plan, an assisted death would have required court approval. That has been replaced by a requirement for a judgement by a panel including a social worker, a senior legal figure and a psychiatrist. Lawmakers have also raised questions about the impact of assisted dying on the finances and resources of Britain's state-run National Health Service and the need to improve palliative care. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government is neutral on the bill, meaning politicians can vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Lawmakers will hold a final debate on the legislation on Friday morning before a likely vote in the afternoon. If it passes, the legislation will be sent to the House of Lords, parliament's upper chamber, for further scrutiny. (Reporting by Sarah Young and Andrew MacAskill; Editing by Andrew Heavens)
