How Donald Trump fooled the world and outwitted Iran with bold misdirection before nuclear strikes
President Donald Trump 's attack on Iran 's nuclear sites caught the world - and its target - by surprise.
However the strikes were carried out as a part of a bold plan to wrongfoot Iran, according to new reports.
Trump was leaning towards pulling the trigger for several days when he told the press on Thursday that he was giving Iran a two-week deadline before he made a decision, CNN reported.
He believed issuing the ultimatum would 'throw off the Iranians and conceal his plans', sources reportedly said.
The statement was used to lull Iran into a false sense of security even though Trump had all but made up his mind to strike.
Bombs rained down on Iran 's Natanz and Fordow nuclear facilities just two days later in a targeted US strike, sending shockwaves throughout the world.
According to administration insiders, the 'two-week' ploy was just one part of a concerted effort to conceal the true conversations taking place in Trump's 'war room.'
Separately, the Pentagon deployed several B-2 bombers to serve as decoys, flying west from their base in Missouri in the hopes that they would be picked up by flight trackers.
Iranian intelligence would, if all went to plan, calculate the timing of any potential attack based on the flight path over the Pacific Ocean, coming from the west.
In reality, seven other B-2 bombers actually departed Missouri, heading east. They refueled several times undetected and attacked three nuclear facilities from the opposite direction that Iran was expecting the attack from.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of the success of the mission, telling reporters on Sunday: 'Our B-2s went in and out and back without the world knowing at all.'
Officials added it was the most B-2 bomber strikes carried out in history.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan Caine said: 'A large B-2 strike package comprised of bombers launched from the continental United States as part of a plan to maintain tactical surprise.
'Part of the package proceeded to the west and into the Pacific as a decoy, a deception effort known only to an extremely small number of climbers and key leaders here in Washington.'
Caine claimed no Iranian planes were deployed to intercept the bombers, and the U.S. planes used in the strike were not hit with any fire.
Caine said the mission was named 'Operation Midnight Hammer' and was meant to degrade the country's nuclear programs.
'Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated,' Hegseth added, noting the operation was an 'incredible and overwhelming success.' It did not target Iranian troops or Iranian people, the defense secretary stressed.
But assurances that the operation was an overwhelming success have been questioned by local Iranian media after reports from Iranian lawmakers that the damage was 'quite superficial.'
Iran is believed to have filled in tunnels at its underground Fordow enrichment facility before the strike in an effort to protect the sites from the strikes.
Trump faced backlash for his faux two-week deadline at the time, facing mockery for seemingly backing out of making a decision after days of hinting at US involvement.
He had already delivered a terrifying warning to Iranians to leave Tehran amid Israel's bombings, marking the first warning sign that he was planning to intervene.
'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' the U.S. president wrote in a Truth Social post, as he was attending the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Canada on Monday.
But Trump has been known to give such two week deadlines in the past, including most recently to Russia over the invasion of Ukraine, which ultimately passed by with no action.
He was referred to as 'TACO' online, an abbreviation for 'Trump always chickens out', while others praised him for taking the diplomacy route.
But Trump didn't respond to either the criticism or praise for his decision.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the New York Times Trump 'successfully accomplished one of the most complex and historic military operations of all time.'
She said 'many presidents have talked about this, but only President Trump had the guts to do it.'
The surprise attack on Saturday utilized seven B-2 stealth bombers that dropped 14 30,000-pound 'bunker buster' bombs on Iran's primary nuclear facility.
Over 125 U.S. aircraft participated in the mission, including bombers, fighters, and refueling tankers, Caine said.
Trump has described the attacks as a 'spectacular military success' and later taunted Iran further by suggesting there should be a change of regime.
'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change?' he wrote.
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee urged US citizens in the country to evacuate if an opportunity arose to escape safely.
'The Department of State has begun assisted departure flights from Israel,' Huckabee said. 'With airspace mostly closed, the challenges are great. If given an option, TAKE IT.'
According to new reports, Iran had warned Trump it would unleash sleeper cell terrorists to wreak havoc on US soil if he intervened.
Trump received a communiqué from the regime just days before he ordered US military strikes on its nuclear facilities, sources told NBC News.
The State Department on Sunday doubled the number of emergency evacuation flights it is providing for American citizens wishing to leave Israel, ordered the departure of nonessential staff from the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon and is stepping up travel warnings around the Middle East because of concerns Iran will retaliate.
In an alert sent to all Americans worldwide and posted to its website on Sunday, the State Department warned all U.S. citizens abroad to exercise caution.
'The conflict between Israel and Iran has resulted in disruptions to travel and periodic closure of airspace across the Middle East,' it said.
'There is the potential for demonstrations against US citizens and interests abroad. The Department of State advises US citizens worldwide to exercise increased caution.'
The war between the two countries began when Israel launched what it called Operation Rising Lion on Friday, June 13.
Israel targeted nuclear sites and military sites within Iran, while also killing many of Iran's top military commanders.
At least 722 people, including 285 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 2,500 wounded, according to a Washington-based Iranian human rights group.
Iran has retaliated by firing more than 450 missiles and 1,000 drones at Israel, according to Israeli army estimates. The strikes killed at least 24 people.
Iran has long maintained its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but it is the only non-nuclear-weapon state to enrich uranium up to 60 percent - a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90 percent.
Israel is widely
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
Hague NATO summit aims to focus on Trump's spending goal but Iran looms large
THE HAGUE, June 23 (Reuters) - The NATO alliance has crafted a summit in The Hague this week to shore itself up by satisfying U.S. President Donald Trump with a big new defence spending goal - but it now risks being dominated by the repercussions of his military strikes on Iran. The two-day gathering is also intended to signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin that NATO is united, despite Trump's previous criticism of the alliance, and determined to expand and upgrade its defences to deter any attack from Moscow. The summit and its final statement are meant to be short and focused on heeding Trump's call to spend 5% of GDP on defence - a big jump from the current 2% goal. It is to be achieved by investing more in both militaries and other security-related spending. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, however, upset NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte's preparations on Sunday as he declared Madrid did not need to meet the new spending target even as Spain approved the summit statement. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has had to settle for a seat at the pre-summit dinner on Tuesday evening - rather than a formal session with the leaders when they meet on Wednesday - due to his volatile relationship with Trump. The U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites at the weekend makes the summit much less predictable than Rutte - a former prime minister of the Netherlands hosting the gathering in his home city - and other NATO member countries would like. Much will depend on the precise situation in the Middle East when the summit takes place - such as whether Iran has retaliated against the U.S. - and whether other NATO leaders address the strikes with Trump or in comments to reporters. If the meeting does not go to plan, NATO risks appearing weak and divided, just as European members confront what they see as their biggest threat since the end of the Cold War - Russia - while bracing for possible U.S. troop cuts on the continent. Under the new defence spending plan, countries would spend 3.5% of GDP on "core defence" - essentially, weapons and troops - and a further 1.5% on security-related investments such as adapting roads, ports and bridges for use by military vehicles, protecting pipelines and deterring cyber-attacks. Such an increase - to be phased in over 10 years - would mean hundreds of billions of dollars more spending on defence. Last year, alliance members collectively spent about 2.6% of NATO GDP on core defence, amounting to about $1.3 trillion, according to NATO estimates. The lion's share came from the United States, which spent almost $818 billion. Washington has insisted it is time for Europeans to take on more of the financial and military burden of defending their continent. European leaders say they have got that message but want an orderly and gradual transition, fearful that any gaps in their defences could be exploited by Putin. They are particularly keen to stress their spending commitment as Trump has previously threatened not to protect allies that do not spend enough on defence. A prepared text summit statement agreed by NATO governments and seen by Reuters says: "We reaffirm our ironclad commitment to collective defence as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty - that an attack on one is an attack on all." As part of their efforts to keep Trump onside, NATO officials have shunted difficult topics to the sidelines of the summit or kept them off the agenda altogether. While many European nations see Russia as an ever-growing threat, Trump has expressed a desire for better economic relations with Moscow - a prospect that Europeans think would help Russia to strengthen its military and threaten them more. Similarly, many Europeans are deeply wary of Trump's moves to lessen Russia's diplomatic isolation as part of his efforts to secure a deal to end the war in Ukraine. The brief summit statement will include just one reference to Russia as a threat to Euro-Atlantic security and another to allies' commitment to supporting Ukraine, diplomats say.
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
In the wake of Trump's strikes on Iran, what are Keir Starmer's options?
The choices Keir Starmer makes in the next few days could define his premiership. Tony Blair never escaped the accusation he had been George Bush 's 'poodle' over the invasion of Iraq. And how far the current Labour PM goes in backing another US president in another foreign conflict could help or haunt him for years to come. Despite the prime minister last week repeatedly saying ' de-escalation is the priority ', the Trump administration pressed ahead with strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran overnight on Saturday. The prime is now walking a tightrope between supporting the UK's closest ally and attempting to call for calm. In the wake of the strikes, Sir Keir appeared to give the US his cautious backing – describing Iran's nuclear programme as a 'grave threat to international security'. But he has also issued stark warnings about the conflict escalating beyond the region. As the situation in the Middle East continues to escalate, the prime minister is caught between a rock and a hard place. He is currently sat firmly on the fence - with his most senior ministers refusing to say whether Trump's strikes were either legal or even 'the right thing to do'. And while the US did not ask Britain for help in its first round of strikes, at some point, the prime minister will be forced to make a decision. So what are his options? One option – albeit the most diplomatically tricky – is to withhold support entirely. Sir Keir has spent months trying to build a special relationship with President Trump. Anything less than support for their actions is likely to go down badly in the White House. However, the Attorney General Lord Hermer, a close political ally of Sir Keir, is reported to have raised legal concerns about any potential British involvement in the conflict beyond defending its allies. Lord Hermer is reportedly reluctant to sign off any offensive operations, with a source telling The Spectator: 'The AG has concerns about the UK playing any role in this except for defending our allies.' The weight the Labour leader places on his old friend's legal judgement could limit the extent of any support for the US, if Trump does decide to act militarily. The PM's own background will also play a role in the decision. The energy minister Miatta Fahnbulleh said on Thursday that he 'who is a lawyer and a human rights lawyer, he will obviously do everything that is in accord with international law.' But will he really risk infuriating President Trump at a time when the Republican's tariffs on goods entering the US have already led economists to downgrade their forecasts for the UK economy? Another option, considered the most likely, is to allow the use of the UK-US airbase at Diego Garcia in the Chagos Islands. On Saturday, Trump's strikes on Iran were launched directly without the use of the Diego Garcia base. But in future military actions, the US may ask Britain's permission to use the joint airbase in the Chagos archipelago. The type of B-2 stealth bombers which are often based there are the ones that are capable of carrying specialised 'bunker buster' bombs which were used in the operation over the weekend. This is a middle ground seen as the most likely option for the UK government to back. It would not require action from the UK, but could protect the relationship with the US by seeming to offer support. He is already under pressure over the issue at home. Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel has said the UK should give permission for the US to use Diego Garcia to launch bunker-buster bombs. One step beyond the Diego Garcia option is to provide logistical support to the US, and what that would look like in practice is being wargamed in Whitehall. The benefit of this option is that it would allow the UK to appear to be more supportive of Present Trump than just simply allowing him to use a US airbase, and at the same time risking only a limited response from Iran. The UK is keen not to allow Tehran a pretext to strike British bases or interests and has sent extra assets to the region, with another six Typhoon jets sent to RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, joining the eight already there. The final option, considered the least likely, is full UK military intervention. Britain is still pushing hard behind the scenes for a de-escalation in the Middle East. The UK's most favoured outcome is a diplomatic solution, in which both sides dial down the aggression. Keir Starmer is also, as a politician, a gradualist and as such is considered less likely than some of his predecessors as prime minister to commit the UK military to support this kind of intervention, even if it is in the aid of one of our key allies, the United States.
The National
19 minutes ago
- The National
David Lammy refuses to say if US Iran strikes were illegal
The US attacked three sites in Iran at the weekend, inserting itself into Israel's war aimed at destroying the country's nuclear programme. Asked about the lawfulness of the strikes on Monday, the Foreign Secretary told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that as the UK was "not involved" it was "for the Americans to discuss those issues". It was put to him that the UK Government had a firm view on whether Russia attacking Ukraine was legal, which he said was not a 'moral equivalence'. READ MORE: Kenny MacAskill: Donald Trump bombing Iran is illegal and insane He said: 'There isn't a moral equivalence here'. He added it had been "crystal clear' that Moscow invaded a sovereign nation. When it was put to him that it was extraordinary he could not answer the question as critics argue Iran is also a sovereign nation which was attacked without warning, he said: 'I don't think it is extraordinary because this was not the UK's action, we were not involved, we were clear when this began and Israel's attacks began that we were not involved… so I don't say it's not legitimate, but I can tell you as Foreign Secretary that we were not involved.' Lammy added that Iran has to 'get serious about the off-ramp that is being made available to them' and that 'ultimately this can only be dealt with in diplomacy.' (Image: Kin Cheung) The Foreign Secretary said Donald Trump's action 'may well have set back Iran several years', and enrichment of uranium at 60% cannot be allowed to 'slide'. Trump has floated the possibility of leadership change in Iran, hours after his team said replacing the Iranian government was not the aim of US attacks. Iran's military has vowed a "decisive response" after Trump said US strikes caused "monumental damage" to Iranian nuclear sites. The UN's nuclear watchdog has called for a ceasefire in order to inspect the damage. Asked about Trump's posts on Truth Social about regime change in Tehran, Lammy said: 'There will be further tweets on many issues over the next three-and-a-half years of Donald Trump's leadership that you will be discussing… the rhetoric is strong but actually I can tell you, having spoken to the Secretary of State, having sat in the White House, that this is targeted action to deal with Iran's nuclear capability.' READ MORE: UK providing 'political cover' for US and Israel after Iran attack He added: 'I'm very conscious that when I met colleagues in the White House on Thursday that they were considering all of the options… we knew that, you knew that as journalists. And Donald Trump made a decision to act to degrade that capability. "It may well have set back Iran by several years. That was a decision that he took.' Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Iran's nuclear programme is a 'grave threat' which the US military action would 'alleviate'. He has been accused of providing "political cover" for Israel and the US. The US attacked three sites in Iran including the Fordo facility, which is buried deep underground. In an address to the nation from the White House, Trump warned there could be further strikes if Iran retaliates. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi warned the attacks 'will have everlasting consequences' and that Tehran 'reserves all options' to retaliate.
