What the tomato teaches us about free trade

Jonathan Levin,
Tribune News Service
Most tomatoes from Mexico will face a 21% tariff effective July 14, the US Department of Commerce said recently. Ironically, the 'love apple' may be the perfect illustration of how trade contributes to economic prosperity — and of the folly of President Donald Trump's protectionist policies. First and foremost, the tomato trade gives Americans access to wintertime produce. While fresh US tomatoes are abundant and delicious in the summer, most states simply can't produce the fussy fruit on a year-round basis (Florida is the primary exception here, and I'll return to it shortly.) Before agricultural trade boomed under the North American Free Trade Agreement, US consumers had to pay significantly more for a tomato in December or January than in August or September. The growth of trade has not only slowed tomato inflation, it's also made supply and prices more stable.
Second, trade has allowed the US and its partners to focus on their comparative advantages, just as the British economist David Ricardo famously predicted. In Mexico, tomatoes and other crops thrive thanks to year-round warm and arid conditions, as well as access to low-cost labor. Meanwhile, Mexican growers have perfected the use of greenhouses — often erected with government subsidies, to the chagrin of US competitors — to efficiently produce tasty tomatoes without all the pesticides. While Florida has a proud winter tomato-growing tradition, its comparatively humid weather makes it a haven for pests and fungal diseases. And the prevalence of hurricanes makes it significantly less hospitable to greenhouses.
Fortunately, US consumers get the benefits of the Mexico tomato trade with only modest collateral damage. When Florida farmers retreat from the tomato business, they tend to sell out to residential real estate developers, sometimes netting a fortune. Florida cropland has seen some of the fastest growth in value and is now the nation's third-most expensive after California and New Jersey. Just last month, the Palm Beach Post reported that one family had received approval to turn its five-decade-old tomato farm into a patch of 'large estate homes.' A few years ago, another family sold its 332-acre tomato, squash and pepper farm to residential builder GL Homes for $215 million.
While Florida has lost millions of acres of farmland, the decline actually happened at a much faster clip prior to the enactment of NAFTA, now called the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. The most abrupt declines happened between 1970 and 1990, coincident with Florida's emergence as a retirement haven. Since 1990, the retreat has basically mirrored the broader national trend. Evidently, Florida's Ricardian comparative advantage is not fresh produce but residential real estate, hotels and theme parks. While the state has lost agricultural jobs, they tend to be the sorts of positions that Floridians shy away from anyway (farms are staffed by temporary workers on H-2A agricultural visas). At the same time, the economy has gained opportunities for construction workers, not to mention the myriad service-industry professions catering to the booming population.
If there's an obvious downside, it's environmental. A report from the University of Florida last year showed that the loss of rural land and the unfettered march of residential development makes the area much more susceptible to the effects of climate change. But that's an issue better managed through specific land-preservation initiatives rather than tomato tariffs. And while farms may be better than McMansions, Florida's industrial agriculture business — with its reliance on powerful pesticides — has hardly been kind to the environment. All this said, the tomato trade has survived many prior protectionist pushes, including the Supreme Court's Nix v. Hedden decision of 1893, which unanimously held that tomatoes were vegetables (despite what the dictionary says) and were therefore not eligible for the fruit exemption under the Tariff of 1883. Since 1996, the Mexico-US tomato trade has operated under several so-called suspension agreements, under which the US agrees to put off anti-dumping cases partially in exchange for commitments by Mexican producers to sell above an often-renegotiated reference price. Like clockwork, every half-decade or so the US has gone to the brink of restarting anti-dumping investigations, only to reach an 11th-hour deal that broadly maintains the status quo.
Americans who love fresh tomatoes with their pasta can still hold out hope that this spat will get resolved in a similar fashion. And all Americans, even those misguided few who don't like tomatoes, should hope that the Trump administration soon comes to its senses and realises that trade leaves both parties better off.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Gulf Today

an hour ago

• Gulf Today

Israel-Iran war stretches into second week

Hours of talks aimed at de-escalating fighting between Israel and Iran failed to produce a diplomatic breakthrough as the war entered its second week with a fresh round of strikes between the two adversaries. European ministers and Iran's top diplomat met for four hours on Friday in Geneva, as President Donald Trump continued to weigh US military involvement and worries rose over potential strikes on nuclear reactors. European officials expressed hope for future negotiations, and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said he was open to further dialogue while emphasising that Tehran had no interest in negotiating with the US while Israel continued attacking. "Iran is ready to consider diplomacy if aggression ceases and the aggressor is held accountable for its committed crimes,' he told reporters. No date was set for the next round of talks. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel's military operation in Iran would continue "for as long as it takes' to eliminate what he called the existential threat of Iran's nuclear programme and arsenal of ballistic missiles. Israel's top general echoed the warning, saying the Israeli military was ready "for a prolonged campaign.' But Netanyahu's goal could be out of reach without US help. Iran's underground Fordo uranium enrichment facility is considered to be out of reach to all but America's "bunker-buster' bombs. Trump said he would put off deciding whether to join Israel's air campaign against Iran for up to two weeks. People, who were stuck in Iran due to Israeli strikes on Iran, gather at the border crossing point on Armenia-Iran border near Agarak village in the Meghri Municipality of the Syunik Province in southern Armenia, on Thursday. AP The war between Israel and Iran erupted June 13, with Israeli airstrikes targeting nuclear and military sites, top generals and nuclear scientists. At least 657 people, including 263 civilians, have been killed in Iran and more than 2,000 wounded, according to a Washington-based Iranian human rights group. Iran has retaliated by firing 450 missiles and 1,000 drones at Israel, according to Israeli army estimates. Most have been shot down by Israel's multitiered air defenses, but at least 24 people in Israel have been killed and hundreds wounded. Associated Press

Middle East Eye

2 hours ago

• Middle East Eye

British voters have spoken on Gaza. How will leaders respond?

For more than 20 months, we have watched the devastation in Gaza unfold: entire neighbourhoods razed, families buried beneath the rubble, the healthcare system obliterated. Even the most basic rights to safety, clean water and food are being systematically denied. Despite mounting and credible evidence that Israel's actions in Gaza meet the definition of genocide under international law, many western leaders have equivocated, delayed or outright denied the scale of the atrocities. But the British public is not being fooled. New polling commissioned by Action For Humanity, in partnership with the International Centre of Justice for Palestinians and conducted by YouGov, shows that the public is far ahead of the political establishment. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters A majority of respondents - 55 percent - now oppose Israel's military campaign in Gaza. Among them, a striking 82 percent say Israel's actions constitute genocide. That means nearly half of all UK adults - 45 percent - view Israel's actions in Gaza as genocidal. This is not a fringe opinion. It reflects the reality on the ground - a reality that, despite relentless efforts to spread doubt, has become increasingly difficult to deny. From the targeting of civilians, journalists and humanitarian workers to the destruction of infrastructure essential to life, the evidence has grown steadily. So, too, has public awareness. Media silence While many mainstream outlets have downplayed or obscured the scale of atrocities being committed in Gaza, social media - and courageous platforms like Middle East Eye - have provided an unflinching view of what is happening. People cannot unsee what they have seen. Even securing coverage in mainstream media for these shocking polling results, conducted by a highly reputable organisation like YouGov, has proven difficult. The message could not be clearer: the British public believes in international law. They believe in accountability, and they want action Upon closer examination of the data, the picture becomes even clearer. Nearly two-thirds of Britons - 65 percent - believe the UK must enforce the International Criminal Court's arrest warrant against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he were to visit the country. Among Labour voters, the figure rises to 78 percent. The message could not be clearer: the British public believes in international law. The people believe in accountability. And they want action. While the ICC has taken the first steps towards justice, doing what many western governments have refused to do, the UK government has so far failed to match this legal progress with political will. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war As our polling shows, voters - particularly those who helped deliver Labour a landslide victory just weeks ago - are demanding a meaningful change in approach. This is not only about justice for Gaza. It is about what kind of country Britain wants to be. Will we uphold our commitments to international law, or retreat behind the shield of diplomatic convenience? A turning tide The polling also shows strong public support for meaningful political solutions. Among Labour voters, 43 percent support the immediate recognition of Palestine as an independent state - with only 2 percent opposed. More than half - 56 percent - support the creation of a humanitarian visa scheme for Palestinians from Gaza, a 'Homes for Gaza' initiative modelled on the one introduced for Ukrainian refugees. Why the UK refuses to do the one thing that could stop Israel's 'intolerable' war on Gaza Read More » The time for mealy-mouthed statements and diplomatic hedging has long passed. When atrocities reach the threshold of genocide, silence is complicity - and the public understands this. The polling shows that Labour's position on Gaza is out of step with its own supporters. The cost of inaction is not just moral - it is political. Leaders who continue to ignore the will of the people on Gaza risk abandoning their moral responsibility and alienating their voters. While this may seem a cynical lens through which to view such suffering, it is difficult not to feel cynical when faced with the ongoing inaction of world leaders in the face of deliberate, systematic brutality. This is not just a British phenomenon. In Canada, recent polling suggests that nearly half the public believes Israel's actions in Gaza amount to genocide. It is safe to say that the tide is turning - across the West and globally. As an organisation working on the front lines in Gaza and other conflict zones, we have seen firsthand the human cost of global impunity. But we have also seen the power of solidarity - of justice pursued, and of public opinion transformed into policy. Western governments' failure to recognise the scale of the crimes being inflicted on Gaza places them not only on the wrong side of history, but on the wrong side of the present. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

The National

2 hours ago

• The National

Harvard gets victory in court on Trump's ban on international student enrolment

In a major victory for Harvard University, a judge upheld a decision on Friday that blocks US President Donald Trump's order barring international students from enrolling. The Trump administration in May attempted to block Harvard's ability to enrol international students following a series of disagreements revolving around university autonomy. If the move by Mr Trump were successful, it would have been a significant blow to Harvard, with most estimates showing that about 25 per cent of the university's students coming from outside the US. Harvard has become a major target for Mr Trump, who has accused several universities of promoting liberal bias and anti-Semitism, with much of the tension between the administration and institutions rooted in the widespread pro-Palestine campus protests that erupted in the spring of last year. The White House has sought in particular to crack down on foreign students demonstrating in support of Palestine, and has also demanded that universities make changes to various policies that would bring them more in line with the administration's agenda. At the request of Mr Trump, later in May, the State Department rolled out a pilot programme directing US consulates and embassies to engage in " additional vetting" of social media accounts of international Harvard applicants seeking visas. The new policy targets students, professors and employees, as well as guest speakers at Harvard. Harvard has repeatedly objected to the various moves aimed at controlling university policy, but the Trump administration has shown no signs of backing down. The White House has also previously said that it intends on revoking Harvard's tax-exempt status. 'The government has long exempted universities from taxes in order to support their educational mission," a Harvard representative said in May. "The tax exemption means that more of every dollar can go towards scholarships for students, life-saving and life-enhancing medical research, and technological advancements that drive economic growth."