
BCI probe of area state rep finds 'concerning and suspicious' behavior, raises concerns with case handling
May 13—A state investigation of alleged sexual misconduct involving state Rep. Rodney Creech, R-West Alexandria, and a minor teenage female this news organization has chosen not to identify concluded in October with no criminal charges but findings of "concerning and suspicious" behavior by the state lawmaker, a Dayton Daily News investigation found.
While no charges were filed, investigative records obtained by the Dayton Daily News raise questions about how Preble County Sheriff Mike Simpson and then-prosecutor Martin Votel — who both later recused themselves from the case due to their relationships with Creech — originally handled the allegation.
Simpson and Votel allegedly took no investigative action and created no record of the allegation when initially told a potential crime was committed, delaying a criminal investigation until it was reported a second time over a month later to a different law enforcement agency.
A month after the case was closed with no charges brought, Creech won his third successive term in the Ohio House of Representatives. The entrepreneur and former Preble County commissioner carried 77% of the votes of his district, which includes all of Preble County and portions of Butler and Montgomery.
According to state investigative records, Creech was accused of conduct that state investigators believed could have risen to a charge of sexual imposition — a misdemeanor that Ohio law forbids being brought against someone unless there's corroborating evidence.
This news organization does not identify alleged victims of sexual assault, and is not reporting details of the allegations in order to avoid identifying the alleged victim.
When interviewed by state investigators, Creech denied any and all conduct that could have been seen as sexual imposition.
After Preble County officials recused themselves, the allegation was investigated by the Ohio Attorney General's Bureau of Criminal Investigation. Clark County Prosecutor Daniel Driscoll, also a Republican, was asked to review the investigation and decide on whether to pursue charges.
Driscoll opted not to pursue charges.
"After a full review I find that (Creech's) behavior during the time of the investigation was concerning and suspicious. However, the evidence falls short of the threshold needed for prosecution. I have spoken with the investigator in this case and believe he has pursued all leads to an end. I find the statements of (the victim) to be persuasive but find no independent evidence to support their claims. At this point I consider the case closed," Driscoll wrote on Oct. 9, 2024.
In an interview with the Dayton Daily News, Driscoll clarified that he was referring to Creech's behavior both during the investigation and during the time that was being investigated.
Driscoll's additional commentary is unusual. He told this outlet that he intentionally wrote the memo in case some other entity were to pick up the case in the future.
Creech responds
When reached for comment, Creech told this news outlet that he believes the publicization of the state's criminal investigation into his behavior is political in nature.
"I'm deeply disappointed to see my political opponents dig up an old false allegation, for which a law enforcement investigation cleared my name. It seems to be no coincidence that this political smear piece is appearing just days after I announced my campaign for Ohio Senate," Creech said Tuesday in a written statement.
"These allegations have been found to be demonstrably false, and I have already begun pursuing legal action against those who are pushing this filth. Like President Trump, I am no stranger to false media attacks. This will not deter my important work on behalf of my constituents, and I look forward to eventually running my Senate campaign on the issues that matter to Ohioans."
Creech on Monday announced his 2026 candidacy to replace term-limited Sen. Steve Huffman, R-Tipp City, in the Ohio Senate. This came several days after the Dayton Daily News spoke to Creech's representatives requesting comment for this story.
Ohio House Speaker Matt Huffman last week removed Creech from all four of his committee assignments, including the Ohio House Agriculture Committee where he served as chair.
A spokesperson for Huffman, R-Lima, did not return a request for comment on why Creech was stripped of his committee posts.
'Dereliction of duty'
The mother of the alleged victim told state investigators that the early May 2023 incident was first reported by the alleged victim's stepfather — an Ohio police chief — in early July 2023 directly to Preble County Sheriff Simpson.
There was no investigation opened nor report created, the Dayton Daily News has confirmed.
"This is an absolute dereliction of duty by a public official," the mother wrote in a summary of the allegation provided to BCI.
She wrote that the stepfather first called Montgomery County Sheriff Rob Streck, who advised him to report the information in Preble County, where the alleged incident occurred. The stepfather then called Simpson directly, a call which Simpson later confirmed with this news outlet.
The contents of that early July call, however, are under dispute.
Here's how lead investigator BCI Special Agent Perry Roeser reported what Simpson told him in a November 2023 meeting about that phone call:
"(The stepfather) apparently told Simpson that he felt he had to say something due to his position as a mandatory reporter. (Redacted) sent Simpson text messages that outlined (redacted) actions. Simpson told SA Roeser he took the text messages to his county prosecutor, Martin Votel, for his opinion. Simpson said Mr. Votel indicated there was no criminal complaint at that time. No report or other action took place from the sheriff's office."
Simpson responds
In a recent interview with this outlet, Simpson denied that he had been given a tip in July 2023. Instead, Simpson said the stepfather called him specifically asking if he, as a police chief, was mandated to report what he believed might have been a crime committed against his stepdaughter.
"(The stepfather) reached out to me and he had questions on whether or not he thought that he might be a mandated reporter on some issues that he had learned as part of a family discussion. He called me, I asked if he wanted me to check with our county prosecutor (Votel) ... just to see if he thought that (the stepfather) would be a mandated reporter, he said that would be great," Simpson told the Dayton Daily News. "I did that, returned (the stepfather's) call, told him that we didn't believe, or the prosecutor didn't believe, it was a mandated reporter situation. He thanked me for checking with him and that was the end of that conversation and that request on his part."
It's unclear why Votel would have found that the stepfather, a police chief, wouldn't be a mandated reporter. Votel, who is now a Preble County Common Pleas Court judge, did not return a request for comment.
Ohio law forbids law enforcement officials, among many other mandated reporters acting in official capacities, from failing to immediately report scenarios where they know, or have reasonable cause to suspect, that a minor "has suffered or faces a threat of suffering any physical or mental wound, injury, disability, or condition of a nature that reasonably indicates abuse or neglect of the child."
Simpson said he was never requested to complete an investigation or to file a report by either the mother or the stepfather.
"I want to make it very clear that if that family or anybody else would have walked in here to request an investigation or anything like that, we absolutely would have done it," Simpson told this outlet. "It makes no difference who's involved, whether it's Rodney Creech or anybody else. We don't operate over here that way."
Using Ohio public records law, the Dayton Daily News requested from the Preble County Sheriff's Office all relevant electronic communications regarding this allegation. The sheriff's office provided communication from November 2023, but not the text messages from July 2023 referenced in the state's investigation. The sheriff's office has not filled a follow-up request for those messages.
The mother and stepfather of the alleged victim declined to comment for this story.
BCI investigation
The state investigation was opened in November 2023 after the alleged incident was reported a second time in Montgomery County. That time, Simpson and Votel recused themselves because of their personal and political connections to Creech.
Votel did not provide comment to the Dayton Daily News on his relationship to Creech. Simpson said he considers Creech a personal friend and that the matter was further conflicted due to Creech's role as Preble County's state representative.
In September 2023, the allegations against Creech resurfaced during a forensic interview at Montgomery County CARE House Child Advocacy Center during an unrelated investigation.
The Montgomery County Sheriff's Office developed a case file based on a follow-up interview about the allegations against Creech and sent it to Simpson in a sealed envelope, according to state investigators.
"Simpson told (Special Agent) Roeser he never looked into the sealed envelope due to his conflict of interest with (redacted). Simpson also explained his county prosecutor, Martin Votel, was conflicted as well," Roeser wrote after meeting with Simpson.
Simpson contacted BCI about taking over the investigation in November 2023.
Streck did not respond to a request for comment about his involvement in either the July 2023 or September 2023 reports.
Rep. Plummer interview
The state's investigation, records of which this outlet received from the Ohio Attorney General's Office, included interviews with Creech, the alleged victim's mother, and Dayton-area state Rep. Phil Plummer, R-Butler Twp., who spoke to BCI about a conversation he had with Creech.
According to both Plummer and Creech, Creech approached Plummer as a colleague and longtime sheriff. Plummer says this happened as the two were walking to a committee meeting at the Statehouse. Creech reportedly asked for advice on what to do about the allegations. According to Plummer, Creech made a comment that was "disgusting and uncalled for" about the allegations. Creech denied this to state investigators.
When approached about the conversation by state investigators, Creech noted that he and Plummer had a good relationship. "Whatever Phil told you I probably said," Creech initially told state investigators before being talked down by his lawyers.
When Creech was asked whether or not he made the comments Plummer criticized, Creech responded: "Never. So yeah, don't believe anything he said. That's ridiculous. Why? That's insane. That's insane."
State investigators continued to probe around Creech's alleged comment. Eventually, Creech's lawyer Tony Cicero questioned Plummer's credibility and told investigators to move on.
"No no no, we are done. It's obvious that Phil is trying to play politics in this situation and is making stuff up," Cicero said. "He's answered the question that no way, no how, move on to your next set of questions. We're done with anything that Phil Plummer claims was said."
Plummer is a potential primary opponent against Creech in the 2026 Republican primary to replace Huffman in the Ohio Senate. He told this outlet Tuesday that he hasn't decided what his next political steps are.
"I'm not doing this for political motivation. I'll beat him any day of the week. He ain't even on my radar," Plummer told state investigators in February 2024.
"(The allegations against Creech are) very disgusting to me. With me doing what you (investigators) are doing my entire career, it's very white and black with me: If you break the law, you get reported," said Plummer, a former Montgomery County sheriff. "So that's my skin in the game, just doing what's right."
------
Timeline
Early May 2023: Alleged incident between state Rep. Rodney Creech, R-West Alexandria, and a teenage minor female.
Early July 2023: Alleged victim's stepfather — a police chief — spoke on the phone with Preble County Sheriff Mike Simpson about the alleged incident. No report or investigative action was taken; Simpson denies that the father reported a criminal tip to him.
September 2023: A forensic interview at Montgomery County CARE House resulting from an unrelated case alerts Montgomery County law enforcement to the allegations against Creech.
Sept. 26, 2023: Montgomery County Sheriff's Office requests one of its detectives assist CARE House Child Advocacy Center with a forensic interview of the alleged victim.
Oct. 12, 2023: The alleged victim participates in a forensic interview at Montgomery County CARE House.
Oct. 12 — Nov. 8, 2023: At some point during this time, Montgomery County Sheriff's Office sends its investigative records regarding the allegations against Creech to Preble County Sheriff Mike Simpson in a sealed envelope.
Nov. 8, 2023: Simpson asks the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation to take over the case due to his conflict of interest with Creech.
Nov. 15, 2023: Ohio BCI officially opens its investigation into the allegations against Creech.
Nov. 21, 2023: State investigators meet with Simpson to discuss the origins of the case.
Dec. 5, 2023: State investigators meet with the mother of the alleged victim to discuss the allegations.
Feb. 23, 2024: State investigators meet with state Rep. Phil Plummer, R-Butler Twp., to discuss a conversation he had with Creech about the allegations.
March 1, 2024: State investigators meet with Creech and his lawyers to discuss the allegations.
Oct. 9, 2024: The state's criminal investigation into Creech is closed with no charges brought on advice from Clark County Prosecutor Daniel Driscoll, who is asked to review the case. Driscoll notes "concerning and suspicious" behavior from Creech.
Nov. 5, 2024: Creech is elected to his third successive term in the Ohio House of Representatives.
May 12, 2025: Creech announces his 2026 candidacy for Ohio Senate.
May 13, 2025: Creech is removed by Republican House leadership from all of his committee posts.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Republicans line up behind Trump after strike on Iran — with few detractors
Republicans on Capitol Hill quickly lined up behind President Trump after he announced that the U.S. conducted a strike on three Iranian nuclear facilities, a strong show of support for the White House with few detractors inside the GOP. Trump announced on Truth Social just before 8 p.m. EDT on Saturday that the U.S. 'completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran,' including Fordow, the nuclear site hidden in a mountain south of Tehran. He is scheduled to address the nation from the White House at 10 p.m. Republican leaders in the House and Senate backed the action, which had become a debate of sorts in Washington — especially among GOP — since Israel struck Iranian nuclear facilities earlier this month in what it called a 'pre-emptive' attack. Live updates: US bombs Iranian nuclear sites, Trump to address nation 'The military operations in Iran should serve as a clear reminder to our adversaries and allies that President Trump means what he says,' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) wrote in a statement on X. 'The President gave Iran's leader every opportunity to make a deal, but Iran refused to commit to a nuclear disarmament agreement. President Trump has been consistent and clear that a nuclear-armed Iran will not be tolerated. That posture has now been enforced with strength, precision, and clarity.' 'The President's decisive action prevents the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism, which chants 'Death to America,' from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet,' he added. 'This is America First policy in action. God bless our brave men and women in uniform – the most lethal fighting force on the planet – as we pray for their safe return home. May God bless America.' Johnson was briefed on the strike beforehand, a source familiar with the matter told The Hill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) wrote in a statement with X: 'I stand with President Trump.' 'The regime in Iran, which has committed itself to bringing 'death to America' and wiping Israel off the map, has rejected all diplomatic pathways to peace. The mullahs' misguided pursuit of nuclear weapons must be stopped,' he said. 'As we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm's way.' Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford (R-Ark.), similarly, backed Trump after the strike and applauded him for making the 'right call.' 'Iran has waged a war of terror against the United States for 46 years. We could never allow Iran to get nuclear weapons. God bless our brave troops. President Trump made the right call and the ayatollahs should recall his warning not to target Americans,' Cotton wrote on X. 'As I have said multiple times recently, I regret that Iran has brought the world to this point,' Crawford echoed in a statement. 'That said, I am thankful President Trump understood that the red line — articulated by President of both parties for decades — was real. The United States and our allies, including Israel, are making it clear that the world would never accept Iran's development of a nuclear weapon.' While the majority of Republicans backed Trump in the wake of the strike, there were some GOP detractors on Capitol Hill. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who has been advocating for the U.S. to avoid intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict, wrote on X minutes after Trump announced the offensive: 'This is not Constitutional.' Massie helped lead a bipartisan war powers resolution to prohibit U.S. involvement in the Middle East dispute. Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) suggested that the move was unconstitutional. 'While President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional. I look forward to his remarks tonight,' he wrote on X. Trump's decision to strike a trio of Iranian nuclear sites came after a week of debate on Capitol Hill over whether the U.S. should take action in Iran after Israel launched an attack on Iran, prompting a back-and-forth between the two countries. Trump on Thursday said he would decide whether to take action within the next two weeks. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiation that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go in the next two weeks,' Trump said in the statement read by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. The big question had been whether the U.S. would deploy a large bomb known as a 'bunker buster' to strike the Fordow facility, which is underground. While some lawmakers advocated for the move, others — including some of the president's most vocal supporters on the right-flank — pushed against the U.S. directly getting involved in the conflict. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), for example, said 'Me and my district support President Trump and his MAGA agenda, it's what we voted for in November, and foreign wars weren't a part of it.' On Saturday night, she offered prayers for the safety of U.S. troops and Americans in the Middle East. 'Let us pray that we are not attacked by terrorists on our homeland after our border was open for the past 4 years and over 2 Million gotaways came in.🙏 Let us pray for peace. 🙏,' she added. But across the GOP conferences on Capitol Hill, Republicans were quick to back the move by the president. 'Our commander-in-chief has made a deliberate —and correct— decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime,' Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) wrote in a statement on X. 'We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies and stability for the middle-east. Well-done to our military personnel. You're the best!' House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), the No. 3 House Republican, said Trump 'was right then, and he is right today: NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE.' 'A nuclear Iran posed a threat to the Middle East and to the world. @POTUS has been consistent that this dangerous regime should NEVER possess a nuclear weapon,' he added in a statement on X. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Republican lawmaker on US bombs against Iran: ‘This is not constitutional'
Rep. Thomas Massie (Ky.), one of the most vocal Republicans pushing against American intervention in Iran, posted on the social platform X that President Trump's bombing of Iranian nuclear sites is unconstitutional. Trump announced that American forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites — Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan — and that all planes are out of Iranian airspace. 'A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow. All planes are safely on their way home. Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE! Thank you for your attention to this matter,' he posted on Truth Social. Massie wanted to introduce a war powers resolution in the House on Tuesday that would prohibit American involvement in Iran. 'This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our constitution,' he posted on X on June 16. The Constitution's Article 1, Section 8 gives the power 'to declare war' to Congress. However, the president also has war powers dictated in Article 2 of the Constitution. Since the president is commander in chief of the armed forces, these two articles are a source of constitutional debate. Also, there has been no declaration of war. Republican Rep. Warren Davidson (Ohio) echoed a similar sentiment to Massie's in a post on X. 'While President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional,' Davidson wrote. 'I look forward to his remarks tonight.' Many members of the GOP support the president's actions against Iran. Sen. John Cornyn (Texas) was one Republican who supported the president on X, saying, 'President Trump made the courageous and correct decision to eliminate the Iranian nuclear threat. God Bless the USA. Thank you to our extraordinary military and our indomitable POTUS. This is what leadership on the world stage looks like.' Updated on June 22 at 10:47 a.m. EDT. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Cheering support and instant condemnation: US lawmakers respond to attack on Iran
American politicians reacted to the news of the US bombing of nuclear targets in Iran with a mix of cheering support and instant condemnation, reflecting deep divisions in the country that cross party lines as Washington grapples with yet another military intervention overseas. Donald Trump announced on Saturday night that the US had completed strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran, directly joining Israel's effort this month to destroy the country's nuclear program. Earlier this week, the US president had signaled that Iran would get two weeks before he would make a decision about joining Israel's military effort or steering clear – a timeline that evidently was shattered this weekend as the waiting posture was quickly reversed. Related: Trump says US has attacked three nuclear sites in Iran The US attack came after more than a week of missile, drone and airstrikes by Israel on Iran's air defences and offensive missile capabilities and its nuclear enrichment facilities. But it was widely held that only the US had the offensive firepower to reach a core part of Iran's nuclear operations that were buried deep underground – an attack that has now taken place. The move sparked condemnation from the Democratic California congressman Ro Khanna, a progressive in the party who has been critical of any US military action against Iran. Khanna and the hard-right Republican congressman Thomas Massie were planning to introduce a measure that would force Trump to get congressional approval to enter Israel's conflict with Iran. Khanna posted on X that Congress needed to vote on such action. 'Trump struck Iran without any authorization of Congress. We need to immediately return to DC and vote on @RepThomasMassie and my War Powers Resolution to prevent America from being dragged into another endless Middle East war,' he said. Massie himself tweeted on X: 'This is not Constitutional.' Massie and Khanna represent a rare moment of cross party cooperation in the deeply divided US political landscape, though some other Republicans also expressed doubt. The far-right congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene – a stalwart of Trump's Make America Great Again (Maga) politics – has been critical of any US attack on Iran and posted simply on X: 'Let us all join together and pray for peace.' The US Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, a Democrat of New York, demanded of the Senate majority leader and South Dakota Republican, John Thune, that he should immediately call a vote on the matter. Schumer said the US Congress must enforce the War Powers Act 'and I'm urging leader Thune to put it on the Senate floor immediately'. The law is also known as the War Powers Resolution of 1973 and is intended as a check on the US president's power to commit the United States to armed conflict without the consent of the US Congress. Meanwhile, at a rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma, on Saturday, on his 'fighting oligarchy' tour, the leftist Vermont senator Bernie Sanders read out Trump's statement announcing the attack, prompting boos and rapid, loud chanting of 'no more war' from the crowd. Sanders said: 'I agree.' He then called the attack 'alarming' and added: 'It is so grossly unconstitutional'. The New York Democratic congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez went further and called for Trump's impeachment – something that has been tried twice before. 'The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers. He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment,' she said on X. Hakeem Jeffries, the top Democrat in the House, said Trump had 'misled' Americans. 'The risk of war has now dramatically increased, and I pray for the safety of our troops in the region who have been put in harm's way,' he said in a statement. He added: 'Trump misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East.' The US vice-president, JD Vance, reposted Trump's post on X announcing the US strikes, where the president had said: 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three nuclear sites in Iran … There is not another military in the world that could have done this … Now is the time for peace!' Vance did not add any comment when he reposted. Both he, particularly, and Trump campaigned in the presidential election against US involvement in foreign wars. Other Democrats also came out strongly against the attack, echoing Khanna's stance. 'President Trump has no constitutional authority to take us to war with Iran without authorization from Congress, and Congress has not authorized it,' said the Virginia congressman Don Beyer. The Illinois congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi told the Guardian: 'If Iran was not fully committed to building a nuclear bomb in an accelerated timeframe I'd be shocked if they are not now – have we just unleashed something that's worse than what was happening before?' However, the strike on Iran also had support among some Democrats, notably the Pennsylvania Democratic senator John Fetterman, who has been a hawkish supporter of Israel and advocated for the US to join Israel's assault on Iran. 'This was the correct move by @POTUS. Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities,' Fetterman posted. More predictably, hawks among Republican ranks reacted to the attack with congratulations to Trump for making the decision to intervene. 'This was the right call. The regime deserves it. Well done, President @realDonaldTrump. To my fellow citizens: We have the best Air Force in the world. It makes me so proud. Fly, Fight, Win,' said the South Carolina Republican senator Lindsey Graham, an Iran hawk who has long advocated for taking a hard line in support of Israel's attack on Iran, on X. The former Republican congressman Matt Gaetz likened the attack to the US killing of the powerful Iranian general Qassem Suleimani in 2020 as he was being driven away from Baghdad international airport. 'President Trump basically wants this to be like the Solimani strike – one and done. No regime change war. Trump the Peacemaker!,' Gaetz said on X. Thune earlier in the evening, before Schumer's comments, had said: 'The regime in Iran, which has committed itself to bringing 'death to America' and wiping Israel off the map, has rejected all diplomatic pathways to peace. The mullahs' misguided pursuit of nuclear weapons must be stopped. As we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm's way.' The Oklahoma senator and Republican Trump loyalist Markwayne Mullin posted on X: 'America first, always.' Reuters contributed reporting