Scientists make jaw-dropping find at base of Antarctic glacier: 'May be greatly underestimated'
Antarctica was once believed to host little biodiversity beyond coastal areas and a few hardy microbes, but a team of scientists has made a shocking discovery beneath a slowly retreating glacier in Antarctica: a bustling network of microbial life.
A team of researchers aboard Germany's Polarstern research vessel traveled to the Larsemann Hills on the southern coast of Antarctica to analyze the biodiversity of disturbed soil near the glacier's edge.
Their findings, titled "Advocating microbial diversity conservation in Antarctica" and published in Frontiers, revealed 2,829 genetically defined species, and the study revealed associations among these species that suggest that these organisms don't merely coexist; they collaborate to survive.
One of the study's authors, Dr. Dirk Wagner, a professor at the GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences and the University of Potsdam in Germany, said, "Here we reveal unexpectedly abundant and diverse microbial community even in these driest, coldest, and nutrient-poorest of soils, which suggest that biodiversity estimates in Antarctic soils may be greatly underestimated."
By analyzing both DNA from living and extinct organisms, researchers revealed a dynamic history of life that now provides science with a better understanding of how ecological succession and symbiotic relationships have transformed Antarctica's hostile environment into a hospitable habitat.
One of the study's key discoveries is that these organisms cooperate. Cold-loving fungi could be breaking down organic matter to supply bacteria with carbon. Algae and bacteria appear to exchange nutrients, and different species have settled into unique zones proximal to the glacier. These discoveries suggest that this tightly knit ecological network could be the very thing that makes life hospitable in this harsh region.
A study published in March found that conserving diverse microbial ecosystems in Antarctica in the face of the changing climate is crucial, as these organisms thrive in extreme conditions and influence nutrient cycling and carbon sequestration.
The authors wrote, "By prioritizing microbial conservation, strengthening international cooperation, and integrating protection plans into policy frameworks, we can safeguard these invaluable ecosystems for future generations."
Do you think America is in a housing crisis?
Definitely
Not sure
No way
Only in some cities
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wild Things: Birds enjoy an insect boom
Wild Things columnist Eric Brown is buzzing with enthusiasm about the varied insects to be found during a record sunny spring and the benefits to birds relying on them for food. While it awaits a verdict on its future, Crossness Nature Reserve has come alive with a little sunshine particularly encouraging insects out into the open. Lesser emperor dragonflies are being regularly reported by observers at the Belvedere-based reserve under threat from industrial development. Wild Things: Good news for puffins Plenty of common butterflies like holly blue are around, too, plus three marbled whites seen in the Sea Wall Field area. The beautiful ruby-tailed wasp also seen on the reserve is a solitary cuckoo wasp with a dubious habitat of laying its eggs in the nests of other solitary wasp and bee species, particularly mason bees. When the eggs hatch the larvae eat the larvae of the host species in order to develop. Bird interest includes sedge warblers making use of the plentiful reeds with one observed feeding a fledgling. A slow worm was also discovered as Bexley Borough's top reserve maintains its reputation for biodiversity. Insects are busy at Chislehurst Common, too. A gaudy hoverfly known as xanthgogramma pedissequum showed up . It has no official common English name, but it is easy to see from the picture why it is known as 'superb dayglower' across Europe. Also around are speckled wood butterflies and orange-tailed mining bees, andrena haemorrhoa, with their brilliant orange thoraxes. Wild Things: Searching for butterfly royalty Mining bees are solitary bees. They do not form colonies, but live independently, tunnelling into the ground where they make a nest. The glade at the common, with areas of bare earth, is an ideal site. They collect pollen for young to feed on, and are important pollinators. Broad-bodied chaser dragonflies and hairy shieldbugs are among many other insect species to be found on Chislehurst Common. If you are nearby, why not make time for a walk around to see how many insect and bird species you can find ? From my house I have seen many large flying insects. This is good news for the local swifts I first spotted returning from Africa on May 1, six days earlier than my first "house" sighting of 2024. I've even seen one catching an insect and passing it to another swift on the wing. My largest swift count so far at one time has been five and I was delighted to also spot a group of five house martins in the same airspace. Previously I've been lucky to see just a couple of house martins all summer. On one memorable day I saw swifts, house martins and a swallow all pass my window. Maybe an increase in insects has been responsible for luring these birds in the sunniest spring on record. Certainly I expect to hear soon of an increase in butterfly numbers after last year's dismally wet spring hit their numbers.
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
How your AI prompts could harm the environment
AI Sustainability Climate change EconomyFacebookTweetLink Follow Sign up for CNN's Life, But Greener newsletter. Our limited newsletter series guides you on how to minimize your personal role in the climate crisis — and reduce your eco-anxiety. Whether it's answering work emails or drafting wedding vows, generative artificial intelligence tools have become a trusty copilot in many people's lives. But a growing body of research shows that for every problem AI solves, hidden environmental costs are racking up. Each word in an AI prompt is broken down into clusters of numbers called 'token IDs' and sent to massive data centers — some larger than football fields — powered by coal or natural gas plants. There, stacks of large computers generate responses through dozens of rapid calculations. The whole process can take up to 10 times more energy to complete than a regular Google search, according to a frequently cited estimation by the Electric Power Research Institute. So, for each prompt you give AI, what's the damage? To find out, researchers in Germany tested 14 large language model (LLM) AI systems by asking them both free-response and multiple-choice questions. Complex questions produced up to six times more carbon dioxide emissions than questions with concise answers. In addition, 'smarter' LLMs with more reasoning abilities produced up to 50 times more carbon emissions than simpler systems to answer the same question, the study reported. 'This shows us the tradeoff between energy consumption and the accuracy of model performance,' said Maximilian Dauner, a doctoral student at Hochschule München University of Applied Sciences and first author of the Frontiers in Communication study published Wednesday. Typically, these smarter, more energy intensive LLMs have tens of billions more parameters — the biases used for processing token IDs — than smaller, more concise models. 'You can think of it like a neural network in the brain. The more neuron connections, the more thinking you can do to answer a question,' Dauner said. Complex questions require more energy in part because of the lengthy explanations many AI models are trained to provide, Dauner said. If you ask an AI chatbot to solve an algebra question for you, it may take you through the steps it took to find the answer, he said. 'AI expends a lot of energy being polite, especially if the user is polite, saying 'please' and 'thank you,'' Dauner explained. 'But this just makes their responses even longer, expending more energy to generate each word.' For this reason, Dauner suggests users be more straightforward when communicating with AI models. Specify the length of the answer you want and limit it to one or two sentences, or say you don't need an explanation at all. Most important, Dauner's study highlights that not all AI models are created equally, said Sasha Luccioni, the climate lead at AI company Hugging Face, in an email. Users looking to reduce their carbon footprint can be more intentional about which model they chose for which task. 'Task-specific models are often much smaller and more efficient, and just as good at any context-specific task,' Luccioni explained. If you are a software engineer who solves complex coding problems every day, an AI model suited for coding may be necessary. But for the average high school student who wants help with homework, relying on powerful AI tools is like using a nuclear-powered digital calculator. Even within the same AI company, different model offerings can vary in their reasoning power, so research what capabilities best suit your needs, Dauner said. When possible, Luccioni recommends going back to basic sources — online encyclopedias and phone calculators — to accomplish simple tasks. Putting a number on the environmental impact of AI has proved challenging. The study noted that energy consumption can vary based on the user's proximity to local energy grids and the hardware used to run AI partly why the researchers chose to represent carbon emissions within a range, Dauner said. Furthermore, many AI companies don't share information about their energy consumption — or details like server size or optimization techniques that could help researchers estimate energy consumption, said Shaolei Ren, an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of California, Riverside who studies AI's water consumption. 'You can't really say AI consumes this much energy or water on average — that's just not meaningful. We need to look at each individual model and then (examine what it uses) for each task,' Ren said. One way AI companies could be more transparent is by disclosing the amount of carbon emissions associated with each prompt, Dauner suggested. 'Generally, if people were more informed about the average (environmental) cost of generating a response, people would maybe start thinking, 'Is it really necessary to turn myself into an action figure just because I'm bored?' Or 'do I have to tell ChatGPT jokes because I have nothing to do?'' Dauner said. Additionally, as more companies push to add generative AI tools to their systems, people may not have much choice how or when they use the technology, Luccioni said. 'We don't need generative AI in web search. Nobody asked for AI chatbots in (messaging apps) or on social media,' Luccioni said. 'This race to stuff them into every single existing technology is truly infuriating, since it comes with real consequences to our planet.' With less available information about AI's resource usage, consumers have less choice, Ren said, adding that regulatory pressures for more transparency are unlikely to the United States anytime soon. Instead, the best hope for more energy-efficient AI may lie in the cost efficacy of using less energy. 'Overall, I'm still positive about (the future). There are many software engineers working hard to improve resource efficiency,' Ren said. 'Other industries consume a lot of energy too, but it's not a reason to suggest AI's environmental impact is not a problem. We should definitely pay attention.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists may have found evidence of a fifth ‘force of nature'
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. Every action in our world is powered by a 'force of nature.' Currently, there are four main forces that scientists cling to; gravity, electromagnetism, weak interaction, and strong interaction. The latter two are technically considered nuclear forces. However, some scientists believe a fifth force of nature may exist, and a new paper claims to have found evidence of it. A group of researchers from Switzerland, Australia, and Germany believe that this fifth force could be hiding deep within the hearts of atoms. While the Standard Model of physics has evolved over the years to help explain quantum and cosmic examples, there are still some massive gaps that leave scientists and physicists baffled. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 Dark matter is a big one, of course, and even gravity hasn't been fully solved, despite being one of the primary forces of nature. Introducing a fifth force of nature, as well as other fields and particles, could broaden our understanding of the universe in important ways. But finding the evidence to prove these forces actually exist is the difficult part. That's why the researchers involved in this new study started small. Instead of trying to work at a cosmic scale, they started looking at things on an atomic level. They focused their attention on the nuclei of four different kinds of calcium. Typically, electrons are confined by the attraction between their own charge and the positively charged particles in the center of the atom. But if you give them a little kick, they can actually transcend to a higher orbit. This phenomenon is known as atomic transition. The exact timing of the jump depends heavily on the construction of the nucleus, which means an element can have multiple atomic transitions depending on the number of neutrons found within it. The researchers believe that a fifth force of nature could be the driving engine behind these small interactions. Their experiments found that there was a small amount of room between the atomic transitions — just enough room for a particle with a mass believed to be somewhere between 10 and 10 million electronvolts. Determining whether or not that ambiguity is indeed another force of nature will require additional experimentation and improved calculations, though. More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the
