Netflix period drama fans say 'stunning' show is 'better than Bridgerton series one'
The Bridgerton universe has taken the world by storm, with Netflix viewers obsessed over the latest instalment - Queen Charlotte: A Bridgerton Story - which has been dubbed 'better than season one'
This period drama has so enraptured its audience it boasts an almost impeccable review rating on Rotten Tomatoes, coupled with several nominations at the Emmy Awards.
Devotees of Bridgerton have been ceaseless in their chatter about its spin-off, Queen Charlotte: A Bridgerton Story, which has utterly captivated them since dropping in 2023. Although a dramatised rendition of historical events, the plot draws inspiration from the ascendancy of Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz to her 18th-century reign.
In true Bridgerton fashion, the offshoot promises a feast for the eyes with lavish costumes and sumptuous set designs, brimming with colour and theatricality in each episode. Highlighting this, the show snagged nominations for costume design, make-up, and hairstyling at the Primetime Emmy Awards, and even Julie Andrews received a nod for her narrational contributions.
One viewer said: "Love, love, LOVED. Cried, laughed, and felt the romance. Best season of the Bridgerton universe thus far. Thank you, Shonda!" Another echoed similar sentiments, commenting: "Amazing, incredible, show-stopping, beautiful. A must-see, definitely."
Audiences who became acquainted with Queen Charlotte in Bridgerton had numerous questions about her backstory. The character, known for her formidable leadership yet tenderly caring for her mentally ailing husband King George III, was not fully explored in the original Netflix series, reports the Express.
However, the eagerly anticipated spin-off delves into the untold narrative of her rise to power and the king's condition.
The spin-off featuring Queen Charlotte struck a chord with viewers, rocketing to number one in an astounding 91 countries within its first week. Central to the show's appeal are the performances by Adjoa Andoh as Lady Danbury and India Amarteifio, portraying the young monarch.
The series has been hailed for its fresh perspective on historical drama, particularly spotlighting Black women in leading roles. One review enthused: "It is inspiring how Queen Charlotte depicts a fearless woman, mother and queen. There is so much heart to the story. This is my 5th time watching this series, and I just love it."
Another viewer expressed preference for the spin-off over the original series, praising India Amarteifio's performance: "I liked this spin-off better than the main show."
India Amarteifio is so good. Would love to see her as the lead in a TV adaptation of the Ending Fire trilogy; she is everything you want in a heroine!
" Naturally, audiences can't resist comparing it to Bridgerton, and it's quite a formidable benchmark given the explosive popularity of the initial series. Nevertheless, many concur that Queen Charlotte may surpass its predecessor, which speaks volumes about its quality.One viewer was effusive in their praise: "Wonderful - I laughed and cried.
The best of the Bridgerton series by far. "Another comment suggested an even bolder opinion: "Better than seasons 1 and 2 of the main show."
For those eager to delve into a fresh portrayal of the opulent 19th-century Royal life, Queen Charlotte: A Bridgerton Story is currently streaming on Netflix.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
23 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Ronnie O'Sullivan enjoying 'quieter life' as manager reveals snooker plans for season after quitting UK
Jason Francis, Ronnie O'Sullivan's long-serving manager, has explained the Rocket's plans for the new snooker season as he enjoys his new life in the Middle East Ronnie O'Sullivan's manager has revealed the snooker icon's plans for the new season after a tumultuous 2024/25 campaign both on and off the table. The Rocket's struggles reached a climax during a Championship League match in January. He snapped his cue in frustration, discarded it, and promptly withdrew from the Masters at Alexandra Palace, a title he was set to defend. That led to a string of other late tournament pull-outs, leaving fans eager to see the seven-time world champion in action feeling let down. Equipped with a new cue, he made his much-anticipated return to the World Championship in April, reaching the semi-finals despite ongoing equipment problems. After his loss to eventual winner Zhao Xintong, O'Sullivan disclosed his plans to relocate to the Middle East, where he has a snooker academy in Saudi Arabia, sparking fresh uncertainty about his future in the sport. Meanwhile, the Rocket has reportedly reconciled with actress Laila Rouass, following a split from his long-term partner nine months ago. The pair are said to be planning for a new life in Dubai, a two-hour flight away from his academy in Riyadh. Jason Francis, the Rocket's long-time manager, says the 49-year-old has been reaping the benefits of a change of scenery and anticipates him participating in the Shanghai Masters, a prestigious invitational event, which begins at the end of July. "Ronnie's moved out to the Middle East for a while. You'll probably see him first in Shanghai. He's had a little break from the UK," Francis told the Express. "You're talking about someone who can't go to the shop without being asked for a selfie, a photo. Where he is, he's finding a life a little bit quieter at the moment. "Ronnie's Ronnie. He'll decide when he wants to play and everyone knows he can come from nowhere to win a major tournament. You won't see Ronnie play a full schedule [this season] but I think you'll see him try and properly prepare for the tournaments he plays in. "He'll still be the sport's most commercial player in the short-term. Whether Zhao Xintong or [Judd] Trump can pick up that mantle now as we transition... Ronnie will be 50 in December, people have to remember that. They still expect him to turn up and win everything." Francis described O'Sullivan's run at the Crucible as "absolutely incredible", adding: "He didn't even have a cue a few weeks before! "But that's Ronnie for you. He had one bad session [losing all eight frames of the second session]. I'm not saying he could have beaten Xintong – there was a feeling his name was on the trophy – but apart from one bad session, he was still toe to toe with him. "I think if he had beaten Xintong, him and Mark Williams would have been an incredible final. But it's great for snooker to have a Chinese world champion and it's for World Snooker to exploit that over there." The Shanghai Masters, which begins on July 28, will see the top 16 players in the world rankings, including O'Sullivan and Zhao, joined by the next four highest-ranked Chinese players. The tournament has a prize fund of £825,000, with the winner pocketing £210,000.
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Prince William celebrates 43rd birthday with puppy photo
A photo of Prince of Wales playing with puppies has been posted by Kensington Palace to mark his 43rd birthday."Happy birthday! Love C, G, C, L, Orla and the puppies!" the Palace wrote alongside the previously unseen picture of Prince William, referring to his wife, the Princess of Wales, their children George, Charlotte and Louis, and their cocker was given to the royal couple by Catherine's brother, James Middleton, in 2020, shortly after the death of their previous dog dog - seen walking behind William in the picture - gave birth to four puppies in May. It follows a birthday message from the King and Queen, accompanied by an image of the prince sitting on a wall with a field behind picture was taken while the prince visited farmers and food producers on the Duchy of Cornwall - a parcel of land William now owns - in the lead-up to his birthday, Prince William attended the Trooping the Colour parade to mark King Charles' official birthday, appearing on the balcony of Buckingham Palace for an RAF flypast.A few days later, he and the Princess of Wales shared photos of Prince William with his children to mark Father's Day.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Squid Game: the show's worst characters are back … and they're as unbelievably wooden as ever
Look alive – Squid Game returns this week! There's still no sign of any squid, which is the kind of false advertising that ruined The Pink Panther. But that's good, because squid are terrifying. Once, showing off on holiday, I offered to cook for a group of friends. I didn't speak the language where we were, and ended up leaving the fishmonger with a big bag of tentacles. As I attempted to remove the head, guts, beak and skin of the creatures, their internal sacs burst, coating me in viscous black ink. I suffered an allergic reaction, don't eat squid any more, and don't see those friends. Squid Game the TV show (Netflix, Friday 26 June) has proved even more traumatising. Set on a hidden island, the competition pits hundreds of desperate, indebted people against each other in a series of children's games. The winner gets millions, while the losers are executed by guards, or die via gruesome, in-game accidents. The show's brilliance is the way it amplifies the emotional stakes of each set-up. Players bond, form alliances, then have to murder each other to survive. The weak are ganged up on, cowards exploit loopholes in the rules to screw over everyone else, while those who make selfless choices are punished. Usually. It's hard to discuss Squid Game without spoilering it to Buckaroo. It is such an enclosed world, a Jenga puzzle of individual choices and group consequence. This third, final series was intended to be part of the second, and filmed back to back. Which is to say, don't drop in here if you haven't seen the first two. It'll still be upsetting, it just won't make any sense. Let's speak broadly of the characters, voluntary kidnappees on a starvation diet. The winner of the first Squid Game, who re-entered the second to take revenge on its creators, is now dealing with the fallout of a failed insurrection. They spend much of their time chained to a bunk, looking more haunted than a Coney Island funfair. Their nemesis is the Front Man – an overseer who wears a voice-distorting mask and looks like Kryten from Red Dwarf dipped in petrol. Other players include a drugged-up psychopath, whose simple pleasures involve watching the light fade in the eyes of the dying. There is also a mother and son, who probably won't get to stay on the same team. Very upsetty, no spaghetti. Sadly, the VIPs also recur. Members of a wealthy elite, who created the tournament for their amusement. Wearing golden animal masks to make it crystal clear they are ciphers of decadence, they spectate from a neon pot-planted chamber, betting on who lives or dies. Imagine if the participants of Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut ran a board game night. These flimsy characters deliver dialogue so wooden it could have fallen off the back of a Jewson's lorry. If our world has shown us anything, it is that the evil billionaires are not lazy, grape-eating emperors. They are narcissistic businessmen who get up at 4am to ruin the entire world, not just one small island. I'm also less engaged by the storylines of organ-harvesting guards, or the ongoing efforts of detective Hwang Jun-ho to locate the island and find his missing brother. Squid Game is compelling because of its games. These diabolical tests plumb the depths of avarice and selfishness, or offer occasions for self-sacrifice and stoicism, depending how they're played. 'Do you still have faith in people?' is a question the overseer poses the hero, who stands on the precipice of an impossible choice. As characters, they embody opposite answers. Game theory, a branch of mathematics that analyses competitive strategies between rational actors, has proved that cooperation outperforms exploitation. In other words, it's in all our interests to not be bastards. The problem is people are not rational; and having a gun to their heads tends not to help. Moreover, you know what a few rotten apples do to a barrel. This is why Squid Game grips us – we're afraid of who we really are. We need to be shown ourselves, in the least flattering mirror, yet still be shown not all bad. What will the show's verdict on us be? There is such cruelty in its premise, vivid glee in its sadism, and previous seasons have hardly ended on an upper. But the game's not over till it's over. Let's see, through a squid darkly.
