Wrong to think 'Modi is India and India is Modi': Congress slams BJP's criticism of Rahul
The Congress on Wednesday (June 4, 2025) said it is wrong to think that "Narendra Modi is India and India is Narendra Modi", as it slammed the BJP for its criticism of Rahul Gandhi over his dig at the Prime Minister and doubled down on the 'Narendra-surrender' jibe.
Congress' media and publicity department head, Pawan Khera, claimed that Mr. Gandhi's "Narender... surrender" remarks encapsulated how the Prime Minister has time and again "surrendered India's national interests, in situations, where it was required to show the requisite deft and 'vishwaguru' status.
"The BJP people were making a film for their hero for the last 11 years, 'Muqaddar Ka Sikandar'. But when the film was ready, it turned out to be 'Narender Ka Surrender'. Actually, there is no injection of bravery, but it is inbuilt in the character of a person. The history of BJP-RSS people has been of cowardice," he alleged while addressing a press conference at the Congress' Indira Gandhi Bhawan headquarters.
When such a person takes over the reins of the country, the future of the country comes in danger, which is being witnessed at present, Mr. Khera claimed.
His remarks come a day after Mr. Gandhi said in Bhopal that "as soon as Trump signalled from there, picked up the phone and said, 'what are you doing Modi ji? Narender, surrender'... and Modi ji obeyed Trump's orders with 'Ji Huzoor'".
Calling on people to remember 1971, Mr. Gandhi said that back then, a phone call had not been made, but the U.S. had sent its 7th Fleet, weapons, and an aircraft carrier. However, Indira Gandhi didn't surrender and stated that she would act in the national interest.
Referring to the BJP and the RSS, Mr. Gandhi said they are habituated to writing "surrender letters" since Independence.
BJP's accusation
The opposition party's assertions came after the BJP accused Gandhi of insulting the armed forces with his "surrender" barb at Prime Minister Modi, saying that it amounted to undermining the success of Operation Sindoor.
BJP national spokesperson Sudhanshu Trivedi said the Congress leader has surpassed even the Pakistani Army Chief, its Prime Minister, and terrorist masterminds based there in speaking in support of the neighbouring country, and alleged that his jibes reflect a sick and dangerous mindset.
Hitting back at the BJP, Mr. Khera said, "When the brave Indian Army had Pakistan on its knees, Trump called, and Narendra Modi surrendered. Trump said many times that we got the ceasefire done by threatening with trade, but Narendra Modi has not replied to Trump to date."
"He will not even answer, because name is Narender, work is surrender–this is the reality and truth," Mr. Khera alleged.
"We have been asking this for the past one month- Why was this deal made with the self-respect of the country? On what conditions was the ceasefire finally done? Where are terrorists like Hafiz Saeed, Azhar Masood?" Mr. Khera said.
But for the last one month, instead of answers, people have been hearing only "cheap" dialogues, the Congress leader said.
'We ask the Prem Chopra of rallies, why doesn't he give a reply to Donald Trump (on his claims). If you don't have the guts to answer him, why don't you answer us, those who ask questions are labelled as speaking in the language of Pakistan,' Mr. Khera said.
The Congress leader claimed that the opposition, which is asking questions, is taking the voice of crores of people of the Country to Prime Minister Modi.
"Narendra Modi can be the PM, but the country is not the Prime Minister. One can be the PM, the servant of the country, but India is known by different names like 'Jambudweep', Hindustan, Bharat, India, and not Narendra Modi, nor can it ever be known by that name," Mr. Khera said.
Those who state that talking of Narendra Modi's surrender is like talking of the surrender of India should open their ears and listen that this country belongs to 140 crore people and it belongs to everyone as much as it does to Narendra Modi, he said.
"So do not think that Narendra Modi is India and India is Narendra Modi. It is wrong to thinks so. Narendra Modi is the Prime Minister of the country, but he is not the country," Mr. Khera said, slamming the BJP criticism.
U.S. President Donald Trump's repeated claims–11 in 21 days–that the U.S. intervened between India and Pakistan to "broker a ceasefire" has shown how Mr. Modi Government "surrendered" India's interests, "admonished" India's long-standing stand in the Shimla Agreement, hyphenated India and Pakistan, allowing the U.S. to even talk about talks at a 'neutral site', Mr. Khera alleged.
"If you look at the 11 years of tenure of Narendra Modi, you will see him surrendering every time. They used to say that they will bring back black money, eliminate unemployment, double the income of farmers, and show red eyes to China - but they surrendered," he claimed.
"The situation has become such that when they (government) talk about China, they give them a clean chit ....they are unable to take China's name and make fun of the looks of the people of North-East and insult Lord Ganesha. It is said that Ganesh ji's eyes are small and they do not open. Why does Narendra Modi not make a policy that goods will not be purchased from China?" Mr. Khera said.
Mr. Khera alleged that Mr. Modi had taken training from actor Paresh Rawal in mouthing dialogues and speeches.
He alleged that in the Modi government, all the policies within the country are being run by trolls, and the Foreign Policy outside the country is being run by a person "who has surrendered".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
31 minutes ago
- India.com
Pakistan finally breaks silence over US strikes on Iran nuclear sites, leaves everyone in shock, says...
New Delhi: America's entry in the war between Israel and Iran has increased the stir in the Middle East. America carried out rapid attacks on three major nuclear bases of Iran. Meanwhile, Pakistan has strongly condemned the US attack on Iran's nuclear bases. Pakistan's Foreign Ministry posted on its official social media account that America has violated all the rules of international law by carrying out airstrikes. Under the United Nations Charter, Iran has full right to defend itself. The statement said that we have expressed deep concern about the current tense situation in the Middle East. The situation arising from this is very worrying because it will have dire effects in the Middle East and beyond. These attacks are a violation of international law and Iran has full right to defend itself. Let us tell you that Pakistan shares its border with Iran. Pakistan shares a 900 km long border with Iran. Pakistan had also called upon Israel and Iran to end this war as soon as possible. Pakistan had said that diplomacy is the only way to peace, not military conflict. Pakistan had lobbied for the Nobel Prize for Trump Pakistan had lobbied for the Nobel Peace Prize for US President Donald Trump a day earlier. The Pakistan government had formally proposed Trump's name for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. The Pakistan government had said that the way Trump resolved the war with India in 2025 through diplomatic intervention and important leadership, it has been decided to propose Trump's name for the Nobel Peace Prize. The neighbouring country had said that it was because of Trump's efforts that a ceasefire took place between India and Pakistan, which averted the major threat of war. For this reason, Trump is the most deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize. After the Pahalgam terrorist attack, Islamabad started Operation Bunyan Un Marsoos in response to India's Operation Sindoor.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-Canada diplomatic reset boosts student confidence
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Popular in NRI 1. Harvard and Trump administration resume talks to resolve ongoing feud Reset in diplomatic relations between India and Canada has restored confidence among Indian students and parents, with most study-abroad platforms expecting a 20-30% increase in admissions in Canadian colleges this latest improvement in bilateral ties comes as a huge relief for students who had to stall their Canada study plans for more than a year. It also marks a blessing for those who had shortlisted the US as their only overseas study option but were forced to consider other destinations due to stricter visa and immigration rules adopted by the Donald Trump administration earlier this Sharma, a Delhi-based student, who had deferred her Fall 2024 offer from the University of Toronto due to visa uncertainty is now busy packing her bags. 'Following the improved bilateral climate, she reactivated her application and is now headed to study Computer Science this Fall,' said Adarsh Khandelwal, co-founder, Collegify, a study-abroad platform that helped with the admission.'Since the easing of tensions, we have observed a 31% increase in active Canadian applications for the Fall 2025 intake,' said permit approvals for Canada from India plunged 42% to 131,000 in 2023 from 226,000 in the year before, according to IRCC/Immigration, Refugees And Citizenship Canada/ data. Approvals fell a further 31% in Q1 2025 to 30,640 permits but experts predict a recovery in the coming Group, a study-abroad consulting firm, saw a 10-12% drop in Indian students' interest in Canadian academic institutions due to the diplomatic standoff, said founder Sanjay Laul.'There's a growing sense that it's getting harder to navigate the visa process for the US. Even students with strong academic profiles are facing unpredictability,' said Laul, adding that the current scenario is turning Canada a more attractive destination for Indian visa policies introduced by Canada and tighter measures taken by the Trump government especially on limiting foreign student enrolment had cast a cloud of doubt and uncertainty, according to Atul Verma, co-founder, Masterclass Space.'The signal of improving diplomatic ties between India and Canada comes as a welcome whiff of fresh air,' he current trends are all positive as there is an increase in student confidence and positive sentiment, noted Piyush Kumar, regional director, South Asia, IDP Education.'Canada has consistently remained a preferred destination, and this renewed engagement will contribute positively to students' plans for future intake,' said said IDP continues to see strong interest from Indian students in traditional English-speaking countries like Canada, the US, the UK and Australia.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
World Bank and IMF climate snub 'worrying', says COP29 presidency
The hosts of the most recent UN climate talks are worried international lenders are retreating from their commitments to help boost funding for developing countries' response to global warming. Major development banks have agreed to boost climate spending and are seen as crucial in the effort to dramatically increase finance to help poorer countries build resilience to impacts and invest in renewable energy. But anxiety has grown as the Trump administration has slashed foreign aid and discouraged US-based development lenders such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund from focussing on climate finance. Developing nations, excluding China, will need an estimated $1.3 trillion a year by 2035 in financial assistance to transition to renewable energy and climate-proof their economies from increasing weather extremes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Laxmi Ji Idol For Wealth, Peace & Happiness Luxeartisanship Shop Now Undo Nowhere near this amount has been committed. At last year's UN COP29 summit in Azerbaijan, rich nations agreed to increase climate finance to $300 billion a year by 2035, an amount decried as woefully inadequate. Azerbaijan and Brazil, which is hosting this year's COP30 conference, have launched an initiative to reduce the shortfall, with the expectation of "significant" contributions from international lenders. But so far only two -- the African Development Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank -- have responded to a call to engage the initiative with ideas, said COP29 president Mukhtar Babayev. "We call on their shareholders to urgently help us to address these concerns," he told climate negotiators at a high-level summit in the German city of Bonn this week. "We fear that a complex and volatile global environment is distracting" many of those expected to play a big role in bridging the climate finance gap , he added. - A 'worrisome trend' - His team travelled to Washington in April for the IMF and World Bank's spring meetings hoping to find the same enthusiasm for climate lending they had encountered a year earlier. But instead they found institutions "very much reluctant now to talk about climate at all", said Azerbaijan's top climate negotiator Yalchin Rafiyev. This was a "worrisome trend", he said, given expectations these lenders would extend the finance needed in the absence of other sources. "They're very much needed," he said. The World Bank is directing 45 percent of its total lending to climate, as part of an action plan in place until June 2026, with the public portion of that spilt 50/50 between emissions reductions and building resilience. The United States, the World Bank's biggest shareholder, has pushed in a different direction. On the sidelines of the April spring meetings, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged the bank to focus on "dependable technologies" rather than "distortionary climate finance targets." This could mean investing in gas and other fossil fuel-based energy production, he said. Under the Paris Agreement, wealthy developed countries -- those most responsible for global warming to date -- are obliged to pay climate finance to poorer nations. Other countries, most notably China, make voluntary contributions. - Money matters - Finance is a source of long-running tensions at UN climate negotiations. Donors have consistently failed to deliver on past finance pledges, and have committed well below what experts agree developing nations need to cope with the climate crisis. The issue flared up again this week in Bonn, with nations at odds over whether to debate financial commitments from rich countries during the formal meetings. European nations have also pared back their foreign aid spending in recent months, raising fears that budgets for climate finance could also face a haircut. At COP29, multilateral development banks (MDBs) led by the World Bank Group estimated they could provide $120 billion annually in climate financing to low and middle income countries, and mobilise another $65 billion from the private sector by 2030. Their estimate for high income countries was $50 billion, with another $65 billion mobilised from the private sector. Rob Moore, of policy think tank E3G, said these lenders are the largest providers of international public finance to developing countries. "Whilst they are facing difficult political headwinds in some quarters, they would be doing both themselves and their clients a disservice by disengaging on climate change," he said. The World Bank in particular has done "a huge amount of work" to align its lending with global climate goals. "If they choose to step back this would be at their own detriment, and other banks like the regionally based MDBs would likely play a bigger role in shaping the economy of the future," he said. The World Bank declined to comment on the record.
