China targeting US military members for spy operations, fmr. CIA chief warns
A former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) station chief recently warned that U.S. military members and employees of the federal government are in the 'crosshairs' of China's spy operations as China tries to access information related to the U.S. military.
Dan Hoffman, a former CIA station chief, told Fox News that China is likely targeting anyone in the U.S. military or the federal government to participate in various Chinese espionage operations.
'I think anybody who serves in the U.S. government is in the crosshairs. And China will do it,' Hoffman stated. 'Sometimes they'll run their recruitment operations posing as someone else. So maybe somebody doesn't want to go spy for China, but they might pretend to be somebody else. Or they might contact you on social media, on LinkedIn or some other site and pose as someone not so nefarious when in fact they are.'
The former CIA station chief told Fox News that one of the Chinese government's 'highest requirement' is acquiring intelligence from the U.S. military.
'They want to recruit U.S. military because there's a probability we might go to war with China, and not just U.S. military, but NATO members as well, and throughout Asia,' Hoffman said. 'So they've got a massive intelligence apparatus.'
READ MORE: Chinese naval activity increases in the Pacific: Report
In March, the Department of Justice announced that two active-duty U.S. Army soldiers, identified as Jian Zhao and Li Tian, and one former U.S. Army soldier, identified as Ruoyu Duan, had been arrested and charged for allegedly selling secret military information to China.
According to the Department of Justice, Tian and Duan were charged for conspiring to commit bribery and theft of government property, and Zhao was charged for conspiring to obtain and transmit national defense information to an individual not authorized to receive the information, for theft of government property, and for bribery.
Fox News reported that prosecutors said the espionage efforts involving Tian, Duan, and Zhao reflect China's use of individuals trusted by Chinese intelligence organizations to obtain information that could benefit the Chinese government. According to Fox News, those individuals, known as 'cut-outs,' are then used to recruit people with access to sensitive U.S. government information.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel previously addressed China's espionage operations, saying, 'While bribery and corruption have thrived under China's Communist Party, this behavior cannot be tolerated with our service members who are entrusted with sensitive military information, including national defense information. The FBI and our partners will continue to work to uncover attempts by those in China to steal sensitive U.S. military information and hold all accountable who play a role in betraying our national defense.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cosmopolitan
21 minutes ago
- Cosmopolitan
What it's like dating as a trans woman
Once as a freshman in college, I found myself on a third date with a guy named Matthew*. It was 2017 and we'd met on Bumble — he was a model, which set off my Power Couple radar, something I genuinely cared about back when I was just starting my own modelling journey. At the time, I hadn't officially come out yet, and there was a thrill in not disclosing I was trans on the apps — in dating as a woman without a complicated backstory; in just living the life I believe I was intended to live. I've always had the privilege of 'passing', meaning I look like a cisgender woman, and revealing that I'm trans was something I only got into when a relationship approached physical intimacy. (I fully acknowledge this gave — and continues to give — me a general sense of safety not all trans women have.) My first two dates with Matthew had been fun, and for our third, we hit an upscale Chinese food restaurant in NYC's chic Chelsea neighbourhood with his model colleagues. It felt glamorous to be counted among all the long limbs and symmetrical faces. Matthew was attentive and seemed proud to be with me, and as the night stretched on, the conversation turned to people's greatest fears. Face-altering acid attacks and home invasions came up. I shared that my biggest one was my own demise. Then Matthew announced to the table that his started with the letter 'T'. Shouted-out guesses included tigers, terrorism, and tsunamis. 'Worse,' he replied. 'Transgenders!' In my mind, the entire room expeditiously shunned Matthew for his hateful views. In reality, though, what happened was... nothing. As the blood drained from my face and my heart dropped into my stomach, the rest of our table barely reacted. Some of the male models even nodded in agreement. No one said a word in defence of the community they had no idea I was a part of. I was suddenly terrified that everyone could see right through me. And as a wave of self-doubt washed over me, a growing awareness of my own blind spots felt infuriating. How had I wound up on a third date with a transphobe? I faked an emergency and excused myself, rage-texting every trans friend I had on the way home in search of support and understanding. Back in my dorm, I blocked Matthew's number and made the decision to put a gender marker, 'trans woman', on my dating profiles. Even if I wasn't out publicly, I would be on these apps. Two years later, in a mutually transgender, or T4T, relationship and in love for the first time, I took it a step further. Inspired by my then-boyfriend's openness, I took to my YouTube channel with a new video titled 'I'M TRANSGENDER' for my 100,000+ subscribers. Surely, I thought, the internet would work its magic, serving this truth algorithmically to anyone I might cross paths with in the future. My work was done: I had come out and would never have to come out again. Except that's not at all what happened. As I've continued to date, I've learned that the work of coming out — and protecting yourself while doing so — is never really over. And that no matter what I do, the burden remains almost entirely my own. Thanks in part to this hyper-charged political moment, where hateful voices are so often empowered, I've had to develop an extremely thorough screening process (deep dives on Google, full reads of social media; I will stalk you for any hint of transphobia). But even so — and even with my own gender identity completely searchable on the internet and the apps — I still find myself with dates who haven't put in anywhere near the same effort. Once when I was out with a Disney Channel 'star' (he was actually more of a recurring extra) I met on Raya, he said something that made it obvious he had no idea I was trans. I came out to him then and there... and spent the rest of the date watching him decide if he was down for a doll. These moments can definitely be tough or awkward, but they have also taught me to keep an open mind. I'm not offended when a date is clearly (and respectfully) navigating unexplored-for-them terrain. It can be mutually exciting and a good opportunity for growth. I've also gotten a lot more comfortable discussing my gender. It's no longer something I worry about — it's simply part of who I am. And in a society that wants people like me to be invisible, loudly proclaiming my identity protects me while also forcing everyone else to acknowledge my existence. If a guy seems clueless, I just ask, 'Have you been with a trans woman before? Did you know that I'm one?' Less satisfying is the realisation that there's no one thing I can do to ensure dates understand that I'm trans before we meet. (Unfortunately, many cishet men are too lazy or privileged to take the extra step of looking up a match beforehand.) And that means I need to stay vigilant. Trained by Matthew-like incidents and plenty of other horror stories, my instincts are now constantly on high alert. Before a first date even begins, I've got an escape route planned. I arrive early to connect with restaurant staff so they know who I am and that I'm meeting a guy for dinner. When the conversation veers toward transness, I keep eye contact, locking in on their facial expressions. I'm an expert at clocking any fetish-y, fearful, or hateful vibes. If someone's lips curl down, if they cross their arms or legs, if they physically pull away, I can practically hear sirens. And then I'm out. I've done everything from going to the bathroom, calling a car, and ghosting to lying about explosive diarrhoea. Safety is everything. Is all this ideal? Obviously, no. But I like to think by sharing my story, I'm helping others avoid the hurtful, harmful situations I've been in. Speaking of, Matthew did come around again after my public coming-out. Not with an apology or a change of heart though. He overcame his 'biggest fear' to ask me for advice on growing his social media presence. I blocked him again immediately. *Name has been changed For a list of resources specific to the trans community, visit the LGBT Foundation. Ella Snyder is a model, photographer, and writer living in New York City. When she's not on set, she's in a method acting class or drafting a diaristic entry for her Substack, Esoteric It Girl.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Olympic sprint finalist Knighton at sports court for appeals in doping contamination case
LAUSANNE, Switzerland (AP) — United States sprinter Erriyon Knighton went to court Monday to defend his claim he was contaminated in a positive doping test case that risks a ban from the next world championships. A two-time Olympic finalist in the 200 meters aged just 21, Knighton was cleared to run at the Paris Summer Games last year only after an American tribunal ruled he was not at fault for the positive test for trenbolone, a steroid used in livestock farming. The World Anti-Doping Agency and track and field's Athletics Integrity Unit have challenged that ruling in combined appeals to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. CAS has scheduled the appeal hearing for two days and said a verdict is likely within several weeks. The U.S. track and field national championships start July 31 in Eugene, Oregon. They are trials to pick the U.S. team for the 2025 worlds that open Sept. 13 in Tokyo. Knighton's attorney Howard Jacobs suggested last year Knighton could be 'collateral damage' in an ongoing feud between WADA and the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, fueled by how a case of alleged contamination of Chinese Olympic swimmers was handled by the global watchdog. USADA prosecuted Knighton's original case after he tested positive in March last year and accepted the 'no-fault' ruling based on the explanation the contamination was by oxtail from a bakery in central Florida. The USADA investigation included obtaining the meat and testing it, plus interviews with the manager of the bakery, Knighton, his girlfriend and his mother. They backed up the athlete's claim of contamination. In the Chinese case, an explanation of contamination with a banned heart medication in a hotel kitchen in 2021 was accepted without evidence backing the theory. WADA lawyers and officials decided the agency was unlikely to win any appeals brought to CAS without being able to gather independent evidence in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Knighton is the sixth-fastest 200 runner in track history with a personal best time of 19.49 seconds set in 2022. Usain Bolt's world record is 19.19. He placed fourth in the 200 at past two Olympic Games, and took one silver medal and one bronze from the past two editions of worlds.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Trump Goes to War. And These Are His Advisers?
Beginning today, this newsletter will be published on Monday mornings. If you missed the previous newsletter, you can read it here. When an American president makes an especially weighty decision, there's some small comfort in knowing that seasoned, steady aides were in the mix, complementing the commander in chief's instincts with their expertise. President Trump dropped 15-ton bombs on uranium enrichment sites in Iran with Tulsi Gabbard as his director of national intelligence and Pete Hegseth as his defense secretary. I, for one, am not comforted. By some reports, Hegseth wasn't consulted all that much — which, I suppose, is its own perverse solace. Trump apparently learned his lesson when Hegseth decided that a Signal group chat was the proper venue for an emoji-laden pep rally about imminent military strikes against the Houthis; clue Hegseth in on the Iran plan, and he might wind up divulging it in the form of charades on 'Fox & Friends.' And Gabbard? Her relationship with Trump is strained, to say the least; he told reporters on Air Force One to pay no heed to her statement several months ago that Iran wasn't close to or all that focused on developing a nuclear weapon. 'I don't care what she said,' Trump blurted. Apart from how warm and fuzzy that brushoff must have made Gabbard feel, it spoke volumes about the limits of Trump's confidence in — and use for — her. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
