Dozens injured in major Iranian rocket attacks across Israel
Israel was hit on Thursday by what appears to be the largest wave of attacks since the war with Iran broke out.
The Israeli military said search and rescue forces were working in 'several locations across the country'.
The National heard the sounds of missile interceptions and impacts for at least 10 minutes in Jerusalem. The fire service said there was a 'direct hit' on a residential building in the Tel Aviv area.
Israeli medics said 32 people were injured, including two seriously, in the barrage. Several of the injured are being treated 'at multiple scenes', the Magen David Adom ambulance service added.
In central Israel, missiles were said to have hit three residential buildings. In the south, the country's main Soroka Hospital in Beersheba sustained a direct hit, with officials reporting 'extensive damage'.
Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Sharren Haskel confirmed that Iran had hit Soroka Hospital with a ballistic missile. 'This is the main medical centre for Israel's entire Negev region,' she said. 'Deliberate. Criminal. Civilian target. The world must speak out.'
Social media footage showed medics at Soroka Hospital emerging to scenes of major destruction. Videos also showed extensive damage inside the building, where the door is said to have collapsed. Fires are still raging at some of the scenes.
A representative of the hospital said several areas of the building were damaged and people had been wounded in the attack. The hospital has requested that people do not come for treatment.
The hospital has more than 1,000 beds and provides services to the about one million residents of Israel's south, according to its website.
The attacks come less than a day after the Israeli military relaxed civilian rules regarding public activities.
In Iran, Israel's latest attack struck an area near the Arak heavy water reactor on Thursday morning, hours after it told people to leave, the Iranian Student News Agency reported.
Officials said the plant had been evacuated before the attack and that there was no radiation risk, ISNA added.
An Iranian state television reporter in the nearby town of Khondab said there was no damage done to civilian areas near the reactor.
The seventh day of the war came 24 hours after Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected US calls for surrender and warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause 'irreparable damage to them'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
37 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
Israeli army chief warns of 'prolonged campaign' in Iran
20 June 2025 22:04 JERUSALEM (AFP) Israel's military chief Eyal Zamir warned Friday that his country should be "ready for a prolonged campaign" against Iran, as the longtime foes exchanged fire for the eighth day."We have embarked on the most complex campaign in our history to remove a threat of such magnitude, against such an enemy. We must be ready for a prolonged campaign," Zamir said in a video statement to launched attacks against Iran last Friday which have combined targeted assassinations of key military personnel with strikes on Iran's nuclear and missile said the Israeli military had prepared for "years" for the campaign against Iran, even while Israeli troops continue their devastating campaign against Hamas in Iranian "operation was made possible thanks to the convergence of operational and strategic conditions, some of which were temporary," Zamir said, adding that "history would not forgive us if we failed to act now" against an "existential threat" to say Iran was severely weakened by Israeli strikes on allied militant groups Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon since 2023, while Israel damaged Tehran's air defences in tit-for-tat exchanges between the countries last hailed "extraordinary results" from fighter jet pilots flying missions "at the greatest range and intensity in the (air) force's history".He also said that Israelis needed to brace for more difficulties, as the country comes under daily attack from Iranian ballistic missiles. "Although we have made significant achievements, difficult days still lie ahead. We must remain alert and united until the mission is complete," he added. Israel-Iran Conflict Continue full coverage
The National
43 minutes ago
- The National
Iran's history points to the direction the country could take
Israel's attacks on Iran last week sent the two countries to war, marking a turning point in each of their histories. It is Iran's first major war since 1988, when its eight-year-long conflict with Iraq came to an end. Israel's shock-and-awe campaign has targeted not just Iran's nuclear programme, the main casus belli, but also the political and military leadership of the Islamic Republic. Israeli and American leaders, meanwhile, have engaged in doublespeak on the question of whether they seek regime change. Regardless of their war aims, the possibility of a seismic political shift has been starkly posed in Iran. This is particular so because of the many years of economic hardship and social upheaval that have exerted tremendous pressures on the current establishment. Many are now wondering about the political consequences of the war for the Islamic Republic and the rule of its 86-year-old leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. In trying to understand the present moment, historians inevitably turn to the past. Iran's centuries-long history provides many examples of upheavals and regime change. Which historical moments are most suitable to give us a sense of where the country is at today? One inescapable point of comparison is the 1979 revolution, which replaced Mohammad Reza Pahlavi – known more widely then as the Shah of Iran – with the current establishment. But as the Islamic Republic faces one of the biggest challenges in its 46-year history, what is the likelihood that Iranians will once again rise up for the reasons noted above? Any comparison between 2025 and 1979 quickly shows why a similar revolution is much less likely to happen today. In 1979, the Shah's opponents had an overarching leader to rally behind. Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini pulled together a diverse coalition of nationalists, Marxists and Islamists to support him as an alternative. Although he was a dyed-in-wool Islamist, Khomeini was careful not to dispel other groups, particularly in the early days. Any comparison between 2025 and 1979 quickly shows why a radical change in the country's power structure is much less likely today He had in his team more veterans from within Iran's nationalist movement than fellow clerics. Khomeini also used the broad network of mosques inside the country to organise. Other opposition groups also had extensive and disciplined networks across Iran. By contrast, the opponents of the Islamic Republic today are bitterly divided, lack networks inside the country and don't have any credible organisations either inside or abroad. Reza Pahlavi, the 64-year-old son of the Shah who is currently living in exile, has attempted to pitch himself as the singular leader of the opposition. But he lacks broad-based support or organisation, without either of which it is impossible to stage an uprising that seriously challenges the Islamic Republic. Even a spontaneous movement – such as the ones in 2017-19 and 2022-23 – is unlikely to go far without organised leadership. Rather than change being imposed from the outside, it is much likelier to happen from within the establishment. Again, Iranian history has a number of examples of military figures taking up the reins of their country during moments of acute crises. The best-known example in modern times is the one mounted by Mr Pahlavi's eponymous grandfather – and the father of the deposed Shah – who rose from a lowly military position to lead a British-backed coup in 1921. Reza Pahlavi appointed himself prime minister and, after considering the idea of establishing a republic, abolished the Qajar dynasty in 1925 and created a new monarchical dynasty. The Qajars, who had run Iran since the late 1700s, had become enfeebled by the early 20th century creating the conditions necessary for change. It is conceivable that figures from inside the Islamic Republic's establishment will similarly rise to assume power. It is also possible that instead of a typical military coup, a broadly representative committee consisting of politicians and military figures takes over. Iran also experienced regime change in 1941 and 1953, both of which took place with extensive support from foreign powers. In 1941, the Soviet Union and Britain invaded the country during the Second World War before deposing Reza Pahlavi and replacing him with his son, the Shah. Twelve years later, the CIA and MI6 helped bring down the democratically elected government of Mohammad Mosaddegh and reinstated the Shah, who had been reduced to a mere figurehead, as the country's ruler. It's worth pointing out that, while the British aided Reza Pahlavi during the 1921 coup, the support had been limited and the operation very much led from within. By contrast, the 1953 coup was planned and carried out by Washington and London, albeit with local support from Iran's armed forces. It's extremely unlikely that the US and its allies can carry out a similar operation today, since they lack the level of political penetration the West had in 1953. The US remains the only foreign power capable of mounting a ground invasion of Iran, but the American public has little appetite for such an intervention – particularly after the misguided invasion and occupation of Iraq two decades earlier. While it is possible for some to imagine the US and Israel deposing Mr Khamenei, this scenario also remains unlikely. For without boots on the ground, any transition process will be chaotic, unwieldy and perhaps even met with resistance from several quarters. There is also little guarantee that a more friendly government will emerge from this process. By comparing the current moment to what happened in 1921, 1941, 1953 and 1979, we can conclude that, if there was to be a change, something akin to the 1921 coup is perhaps the most relevant model. A primarily Iranian-led power usurpation is more likely than a popular revolution (1979), a foreign-organised coup (1953) or change as a consequence of foreign occupation (1941). It remains to be seen whether there are elements inside Iran's armed forces or political establishment who would make such an ambitious dash for power, given all the risks that it will involve. It certainly appears that the Islamic Republic is on the cusp of change, given the many pressures emanating from within and beyond Iran's boundaries today. Time will tell what that change actually entails.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Israeli forces push deeper into Syria as strikes with Iran enter second week
Israeli forces advanced several kilometres into southern Syria this week, where they destroyed homes and razed vast acres of land, as Israel's strikes with Iran entered its second week. Local residents told Middle East Eye that heavily armed Israeli soldiers advanced at least 1.5 km into the southern province of Quneitra on Thursday, where they destroyed at least 15 homes and vast areas of forest and agricultural land. The residents said that Israeli soldiers launched their advance towards several towns, including al-Hamidiyah, with Israel claiming they were targeting "extremist militants" or preventing "attacks linked to Hezbollah or Iran". Israel and Iran have been trading strikes since last Friday, 13 June, in what Israel describes as an effort to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons. Israel has failed to provide any evidence that Iran was close to developing a nuclear bomb, and the latest assessments of the international community, including from the US, have indicated that Iran had not made a decision to weaponise its nuclear programme, something it had abandoned in 2003. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Syria's geographic location has made its skies a battleground for the tit-for-tat strikes, with the Israeli air force repeatedly violating the country's airspace. Debris has repeatedly crashed on the ground, particularly in the southern provinces of Quneitra and Daraa, near the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. Mohammad al-Ali, an al-Hamidiyah resident, told MEE that his community was gripped by fear after Israel's latest incursions into southern Syria. "They (Israeli soldiers) arrived and suddenly told us we had to evacuate," he said. "I was prepared for anything when I left under the threat of weapons with my wife and three children, but I did not expect they would demolish our home, with all its furniture and memories, in such a savage way." 'Major instability' Mohammad al-Saeed, the director of the Media Directorate in Quneitra Province, suggested that whilst the world's and the Syrian government's attention was focused on the hostilities between Israel and Iran, Israel was exploiting the situation to seize more territory in Syria. "These Israeli assaults create major instability, particularly with the security checkpoints that the Israeli army sets up deep inside Syrian territory," he said. "Some have reached up to 17km into Syria, including areas like Tel al-Mal." According to multiple reports, Israeli forces have intensified efforts to grab land in a buffer zone between the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights and a 1974 ceasefire line since the fall of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in early December. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported on Thursday that Israeli forces, using tanks, Humvees and SUVs, had amassed near three towns in Quneitra: Mashara, Jaba and al-Samdaniya al-Gharbiya, with the aim of establishing new military checkpoints. This came as Israeli forces began excavating forests in the Jubata al-Khashab Nature Reserve and land in adjacent areas, reportedly with the aim of establishing Israeli military bases and observation points. Syria's new rulers face unprecedented criticism as Israel uses air space to attack Iran Read More » Basel Othman, a long-time resident of Salam city, formerly known as al-Baath, said that the Israeli army had "bulldozed hundreds of hectares of farmland under the pretext that it obstructs the military's visibility". "Entire groves of trees that had stood for centuries were cut down simply because Israel suffers from paranoia of being attacked," he told MEE. Since the fall of the Assad dynasty, the Israeli army has carried out regular air raids and ground incursions into Syria, sometimes injuring and killing residents. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed to double the number of Israeli settlers in the occupied Golan Heights, territory which is still recognised as part of Syria by the international community, with the exception of the United States. Al-Quds al-Arabi reported on Thursday that in recent days, Israeli forces deliberately attacked water pipelines and critical infrastructure when they stormed al-Hamidiyah and the village of Juba in Quneitra, resulting in hundreds of homes losing access to safe drinking water. Saeed, the director of the Media Directorate in Quneitra Province, said that the Israeli military's decision to set up random checkpoints was causing widespread alarm, with many in the area complaining about "systematic humiliation". "They (Israeli soldiers) often deliberately humiliate people by searching their phones and photos, detaining some for hours, and then releasing them," he said. "This is clearly aimed to instil fear and suppress morale."
