H-bomb creator Richard Garwin was a giant in science, technology and policy
Richard Garwin, who died on May 13, 2025, at the age of 97, was sometimes called 'the most influential scientist you've never heard of.' He got his Ph.D. in physics at 21 under Enrico Fermi – a Nobel Prize winner and friend of Einstein's – who called Garwin 'the only true genius' he'd ever met.
A polymath curious about almost everything, he was one of the few people elected to the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering and the National Academy of Medicine for pathbreaking contributions in all of those fields. He held 47 patents and published over 500 scientific papers. A giant trove of his papers and talks can be found in the Garwin Archive at the Federation of American Scientists.
Garwin was best known for having done the engineering design for the first-ever thermonuclear explosion, turning the Teller-Ulam idea of triggering a fusion reaction with radiation pressure into a working hydrogen bomb – one with roughly 700 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb. He did that over the summer when he was 23. Over the decades that followed, he contributed to countless other military advances, including inventing key technology that enabled reconnaissance satellites.
Yet Garwin was also a longtime advocate of nuclear arms control and ultimately of nuclear disarmament. Working on nuclear deterrence and arms control, now at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government, I got to know Garwin as a tireless and effective participant in dialogues with scientists and current or former officials in Russia, China, India and elsewhere, making the case for steps to limit nuclear weapons and reduce their dangers.
Garwin was an early participant in the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs, which won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1995 for its disarmament work. He was also a founding member, in 1980, of the National Academies' Committee on International Security and Arms Control, where he continued discussing ideas for reducing nuclear dangers with foreign colleagues throughout his life.
The deep respect that top Russian and Chinese nuclear weapons scientists had for him was palpable – even though he was often blunt in telling them where he thought their arguments were wrong. Once, at a workshop in Beijing, after listening to the leader of China's program to develop nuclear 'breeder' reactors lay out his program, Garwin started his remarks by saying, 'This is a poorly designed breeder program that will fail' – and then laying out why he thought that was the case.
Because nongovernment experts have a freedom to explore ideas that government negotiators lack, these kinds of dialogues played a key role in developing the concepts that led to nuclear arms control agreements and, I would argue, contributed to ending the Cold War. As an example, one committee team that included Garwin helped convince Chinese weapons scientists that their country had no more need for nuclear tests and should sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty – which it did soon after the discussion.
Only weeks before his death, he and I and others participated in a Zoom meeting with Russian nuclear weapons experts discussing what initial steps should be taken if U.S.-Russian political relations improved enough for them to resume discussions of nuclear restraint and risk reduction.
Garwin's mind seemed to be interested in everything at once – and he had a wry sense of humor that could enliven a dry meeting. When I was directing a National Academies study about dealing with the plutonium from dismantled nuclear weapons after the Cold War, he would send an email with a penetrating insight on some issue in the study, followed by an equally long query about the parking arrangements for the meeting.
We put him in charge of assessing all the especially strange options for dealing with the plutonium. Once, while diagramming on a chalkboard the option of diluting the plutonium in the ocean, he drew the ship that would be doing the work and then began drawing many smaller vessels. Someone asked him what those were, and he said: 'Oh, those are the Greenpeace boats.'
Garwin's unbelievable energies focused on three broad areas: fundamental science, new technologies and advising the government.
In fundamental science, he made major contributions to the detection and study of gravitational waves, and he helped to discover what physicists call parity violation in the weak nuclear force – a discovery that was one of the building blocks for what is now the standard model of the fundamental forces of the universe.
In new technologies, beyond weapons and satellites, he played a key role in the invention of touch screens, magnetic resonance imaging, laser printers and the GPS technology that enables us all to get directions on our cellphones. He was a researcher at IBM from 1952 to 1993.
Garwin advised the government on panels ranging from the President's Science Advisory Committee, to the JASON panel of high-level defense advisers, to leading the State Department's Arms Control and Nonproliferation Advisory Board (now called the International Security Advisory Board). He made major contributions to thinking about problems ranging from antisubmarine warfare to missile defense. He was a pungent critic of the 'Star Wars' missile defense program launched in the Reagan administration, pointing out the wide range of ways enemies could defeat it more cheaply. His range was remarkable: He was called on to offer ideas for capping the blowout of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig and on managing the COVID-19 pandemic.
His curiosity was not limited to important matters. Once, as I was sitting next to him waiting for a meeting to start, he told me that if you took a Superball – a small, extremely elastic rubber ball – and bounced it diagonally on the floor so that it bounced up onto the bottom of the table, it would bounce back onto the same spot on the floor and back into your hand. I said I didn't believe it for a minute – surely it would keep bouncing forward until it got to the other side of the table. He gave me an explanation I didn't fully understand, involving energy of forward motion being converted to torque, and then converted into energy of backward motion.
When I got home, I received an express package from him containing an article he'd written in the American Journal of Physics, titled 'Kinematics of an Ultraelastic Rough Ball,' with pages of equations explaining how this worked. The first figure in the paper is a stick-figure drawing of bouncing such a ball, with a footnote: 'This was first demonstrated to me by L. W. Alverez using a Wham-O Super Ball.' Luis Alverez was a Nobel Prize winner in physics.
Garwin's brilliance was obvious to all who encountered him and won him wide recognition. In addition to election to all three national academies, he was awarded the National Medal of Science in 2002 by President George W. Bush. In 2016, President Barack Obama awarded him the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Amid all this activity, Garwin was a family man. His marriage to his beloved wife, Lois, lasted over 70 years, until her death in 2018. They have three children, five grandchildren and one great-grandchild.
The advances Garwin contributed to have enhanced our understanding of the universe and benefited millions of people around the world. And as dark as nuclear dangers may seem today, the world is further from the nuclear brink than it would have been if Richard Garwin had never been born.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Matthew Bunn, Harvard Kennedy School
Read more:
Hiroshima attack marks its 78th anniversary – its lessons of unnecessary mass destruction could help guide future nuclear arms talks
Russia announces its suspension from last nuclear arms agreement with the US, escalating nuclear tension
New postage stamp honors Chien-Shiung Wu, trailblazing nuclear physicist
Matthew Bunn is a member of the National Academies Committee on International Security and Arms Control and a board member of the Arms Control Association. He is a member of the Academic Alliance of the United States Strategic Command and a consultant to Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Write, submit an idea, learn: Don't wait or hold back, just do it
We often imagine that the people who achieve great things in life – whether in science, art, or any field of impact – do so only when everything is in place. When they feel ready. When they have the resources. When confidence arrives like a green light. But that's rarely the case. If you wait until you feel fully skilled, fully prepared, fully sure – you'll be waiting forever. Because readiness isn't a moment that arrives before action. It's something that is built through action. The truth is, nobody has it all figured out from the start. Not even the ones who changed the world. Take Marie Curie. When she first began her groundbreaking research on radioactivity, she worked in what could barely be called a laboratory – just a leaky, unheated shed behind a school in Paris. Her equipment was rudimentary, her working conditions far from ideal. But she started anyway. Slowly, painstakingly, she uncovered the elements polonium and radium, and changed the course of science forever. She didn't wait to be invited into the halls of recognition. She walked in with curiosity and courage, even when everything around her said, not yet. Or consider Paul Lauterbur and Peter Mansfield, awarded the 2003 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their work on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). When Lauterbur first proposed his idea of spatial encoding of MRI signals – basically tracking movements of water molecules in our body under changing magnetic fields – he was told by several peers that the concept wouldn't work. His initial paper was even rejected by academic journals. But he didn't stop. He kept refining, experimenting, pushing forward. Peter Mansfield, working independently in the UK, added mathematical precision and practical applications to Lauterbur's vision. Together, through trial, failure, and persistence – not certainty – they helped create a medical breakthrough that has saved millions of lives. No one handed them a perfect roadmap. They began with what they had and allowed the process to show them the rest. The same is true of the Wright brothers. Neither Wilbur nor Orville had formal engineering training. They were bicycle mechanics with an obsession for flight. When they began designing their first aircraft, they had no guarantees. What they did have was a workshop, a windy field, and an unshakable willingness to try. And fail. And try again. On Dec 17, 1903, after years of trial and error, they achieved powered flight. What united these individuals wasn't certainty – it was movement. Because progress doesn't come from waiting for the perfect moment. It comes from doing what you can with what you have. From taking the first step, even when the second is unclear. That's where clarity comes from. That's where confidence begins – not before action, but after you begin. But too often, we let hesitation wear the mask of wisdom. We say we're preparing. Planning. Waiting for 'the right time.' But behind that delay often lives fear. Fear of getting it wrong. Fear of judgment. Fear of being seen before we feel complete. Yet what's worse than failing is never starting at all. Perfection is a seductive illusion. It convinces us that we need one more certificate, one more tool, one more dose of courage before we begin. But all perfection really does is delay progress. Because messy beginnings still move you forward. The first draft is always rough. The early stages of anything – be it a project, a paper, a plan – are supposed to feel shaky. That's not failure. That's momentum. Even in technology and research, we rarely launch with a finished product. Software goes live in beta. Hypotheses evolve mid-experiment. Scientific understanding is always, by nature, iterative. So why should we expect our personal or creative pursuits to be perfectly formed from the outset? Start before you feel ready. That's not recklessness. It's wisdom wrapped in action. Because here's the truth: you cannot think your way into certainty. But you can act your way into it. Each step you take reveals the next. Each small effort sharpens your direction. And over time, the fear that once held you back gets replaced by something far more valuable: belief in your ability to adapt. So if you've been holding back – waiting to feel smarter, braver, richer, more experienced – consider this your permission to begin. With shaky hands. With limited resources. With uncertainty still in the air. Start writing the thing. Submit the idea. Try the method. Take the class. Launch the version you have now. Imperfect action beats perfect procrastination every single time. Just stop waiting. The views expressed here are the personal opinion of the writer and do not necessarily represent that of Twentytwo13.
Newsweek
2 days ago
- Newsweek
French Scientists Discover New Blood Group
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A group of French researchers have discovered a new, "ultra rare" blood group in a Guadeloupean woman after years of researching and sequencing her blood, the French Blood Establishment (EFS) said in a Friday press release. Newsweek has reached out to EFS's press team for comment via email on Saturday. Why It Matters The discovery marks the 48th known blood group system in the world. Understanding blood types is critical for ensuring safe and effective transfusions and organ transplants, as well as identifying certain health risks. Blood classification helps medical providers determine compatibility—or lack thereof—between donors and recipients. There are approximately 14 million units of blood transfused annually in the United States, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Outside of the well-known ABO system, there are a series of rare blood groups. What To Know In a social media post on LinkedIn, the EFS said in French that "this discovery was officially recognized in early June in Milan by the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT)." The woman is the only known carrier of a rare blood type called "Gwada negative." The case first drew attention in 2011 when she required a blood transfusion, but no compatible donor could be found. Researchers later revisited her case in 2019 and identified the unique blood type through further analysis, according to the EFS's Friday press release. Thierry Peyrard, a medical biologist at the EFS involved in the discovery, told Agence France-Presse (AFP) that a "very unusual" antibody was found in the patient's blood in 2011. She was 54 years old at the time when she underwent a series of tests prior to surgery, according to Le Monde. Due to limited resources at the time, research into her blood type had been halted. Peyrard said the woman inherited the blood type from her parents who had the mutated gene. EFS, in French, said that the discovery "brings hope to patients, especially those with a rare blood type. Remember that the safety of a transfusion depends on the compatibility of blood groups." The group says it has been responsible for identifying 10 of the past 17 blood group systems discovered in the past decade. Karl Landsteiner discovered the first blood groups in the early 1900s and was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1930 for his work. Serum tubes with blood samples from patients are processed in the central medical laboratory of the St. Georg Clinic in Leipzig. Serum tubes with blood samples from patients are processed in the central medical laboratory of the St. Georg Clinic in Leipzig. Waltraud Grubitzsch/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images What People Are Saying The official Nobel Prize account posted on X, formerly Twitter, on June 17: "The discovery of blood groups completely changed the view on blood transfusions, and it didn't take long before the first successful attempts were carried out. During WWI, blood transfusions were first performed on a large scale. Countless lives were also saved through surgeries, which previously had been unfeasible due to the blood loss involved." What Happens Next? Scientists continue to study blood types, advancing global health care and improving the precision and effectiveness of transfusions.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Nobel laureate concerned about AI-generated image of black hole at the center of our galaxy
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The monster black hole at the center of our galaxy is spinning at ear "top speed," according to a new artificial intelligence (AI) model. The model, trained partially on complex telescope data that was previously considered too noisy to be useful, aims to create the most detailed black hole images ever. However, based on the questionable quality of the data, not all experts are convinced that the AI model is accurate. "I'm very sympathetic and interested in what they're doing," Reinhard Genzel, an astrophysicist at the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics in Germany and one of the winners of the 2020 Nobel Prize in physics, told Live Science. "But artificial intelligence is not a miracle cure." For decades, scientists have been trying to observe and characterize Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the heart of our galaxy. In May 2022, they unveiled the first-ever image of this enormous object, but there were still a number of questions, such as how it behaves. Now, an international team of scientists has attempted to harness the power of AI to glean more information about Sagittarius A* from data collected by the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT). Unlike some telescopes, the EHT doesn't reside in a single location. Rather, it is composed of several linked instruments scattered across the globe that work in tandem. The EHT uses long electromagnetic waves — up to a millimeter in length — to measure the radius of the photons surrounding a black hole. However, this technique, known as very long baseline interferometry, is very susceptible to interference from water vapor in Earth's atmosphere. This means it can be tough for researchers to make sense of the information the instruments collect. "It is very difficult to deal with data from the Event Horizon Telescope," Michael Janssen, an astrophysicist at Radboud University in the Netherlands and co-author of the study, told Live Science. "A neural network is ideally suited to solve this problem." Janssen and his team trained an AI model on EHT data that had been previously discarded for being too noisy. In other words, there was too much atmospheric static to decipher information using classical techniques. Through this AI technique, they generated a new image of Sagittarius A*'s structure, and their picture revealed some new features. For example, the black hole appears to be spinning at "almost top speed," the researchers said in a statement, and its rotational axis also seems to be pointing toward Earth. Their results were published this month in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics. Pinpointing the rotational speed of Sagittarius A* would give scientists clues about how radiation behaves around supermassive black holes and offer insight into the stability of the disk of matter around it. RELATED STORIES — New view of the supermassive black hole at the heart of the Milky Way hints at an exciting hidden feature (image) — Sagittarius A* in pictures: The 1st photo of the Milky Way's monster black hole explained in images — The 1st Milky Way black hole image was groundbreaking — the next could be even better However, not everyone is convinced that the new AI is totally accurate. According to Genzel, the relatively low quality of the data going into the model could have biased it in unexpected ways. As a result, the new image may be somewhat distorted, he said, and shouldn't be taken at face value. In the future, Janssen and his team plan to apply their technique to the latest EHT data and measure it against real-world results. They hope this analysis will help to refine the model and improve future simulations. This story was provided by a sister site of
