'My uncle's UK's most dangerous prisoner – there's now been a startling change'
Robert Maudsley has spent most of his life contained in the underbelly of the notorious HMP Wakefield but recently he was moved to a prison 125 miles away – and his worried uncle has now spoken
The nephew of serial killer Robert Maudsley has said his uncle is 'not in a great place' after being removed from HMP Wakefield in Yorkshire – also known as 'Monster Mansion'.
Maudsley, who is Britain's longest serving prisoner, is now 125 miles away after being relocated to Whitemoor prison in Cambridgeshire on April 8. Gavin, who has a close bond with his uncle, said he spent 40 years unbroken inside Wakefield, and has not reacted well to the sudden change.
Speaking to Behind Bars TV, he said: 'In Whitemoor, to the best of our knowledge, he hasn't got his stuff. His regime is an hour out of his cell each day, and that is not an hour in the yard, within this hour you have to get your shower and all that. Any time you take a shower, that comes off your yard time.'
He added: 'He is not in a great place right now. I am still trying to confirm and verify if he has a TV or if he has his books and stuff – but I can't imagine how it will be for him if he hasn't.'
Gavin, who is from Merseyside, last saw his uncle weeks before he was transferred and he has said him and his father are 'dying to get down to see him'.
Maudsley was once considered to be the most dangerous inmate in Britain having slaughtered two prisoners inside Wakefield. This was after having already tortured a patient to death inside Broadmoor after he was first caged for killing builder John Farrell in 1974 when he was 21.
He was even given the nickname Hannibal the Cannibal after being rumoured to have eaten the brains of one victim. Despite this being disproved, the nickname stuck.
But, referencing the horrific child abuse Maudsley, Gavin told reformed ex-prisoner Ricky Killeen: 'You will be hard pushed to find someone who can't empathise with what he has been through. I always say, nobody is born a serial killer, there is certain things to happen in one's life for it to end up in that place.'
Maudsley was reportedly moved to Whitemoor jail after a disagreement with staff over 'privileges' in Wakefield. The row resulted in him going on hunger strike for up to five weeks before he was moved to a specialist wing in Cambridgeshire.
The 71-year-old, who spent most of his life in a solitary cell after executing his own wave of vigilante justice, is now reportedly lodging an appeal about his transfer.
According to Gavin, his uncle found himself in a 'relatively comfortable' position in Wakefield. He said he accepted his whole life tariff and has never tried to appeal his sentence.
And giving an insight into prison life, Gavin said: 'Most of them (prison guards) respected him and would play chess with him, they would have conversations with him, and eventually he found himself in a position where he had a TV in his cell.
'He had a PlayStation in his cell, he had his music system, his CDs, he had his books, he would get an hour in the gym, he would get an hour in the yard, and he would get an hour in the kitchen.
'And for him, he said, 'All I ever wanted was my own space, Gavin, I've got it now.' Unfortunately it is in the underbelly of Wakefield, but he has got his own space.'
Gavin added: 'He had a phone in his cell in Wakefield, he doesn't now in Whitemoor. He had a phone and he could phone family and stuff like that.
'He had his canteen money, he was only ever on basic because he wouldn't go into psychology programs. He was only on basic but he had what he needed. He was comfortable.'
Gavin expressed concern for his uncle's mental state and claimed that he has been told that a return to Wakefield would be a 'difficult' task.
The Prison Service declined to comment on individual prisoners.
However, a source told us that prisoners in Whitemoor prison receive at least one hour out of their cell per day. They also stressed that Maudsley has access to the exercise yard and that he does have his belongings along with a telephone in his cell.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
5 hours ago
- Metro
'I beat the system and proved I didn't need a TV licence'
A man who thought he 'beat the system' by getting his TV licence cancelled after proving he only watches streaming services still ended up being threatened with a criminal conviction. Lee Stuart applied for one when he moved into a new home in Kirkby, Merseyside, but later decided to scrap it because he preferred bingeing Netflix and Amazon Prime. He was visited by an inspection officer last September and says they agreed he did not watch any live TV or use the BBC iPlayer. But in January this year, a letter came through saying he was being prosecuted under the controversial single justice procedure (SJP). The SJP was set up in 2015 to allow magistrates to decide on minor offences, such as using a television without a licence or driving without car insurance, without defendants going to court. Wake up to find news on your TV shows in your inbox every morning with Metro's TV Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your show in the link we'll send you so we can get TV news tailored to you. Around 25,000 people were convicted of not paying their TV licence in the year ending June 2024, the Standard reports. There have been calls to reform the system after it was revealed sick pensioners, people with mental health problems and bereaved families were being given criminal convictions for failing to pay. Lee said of his inspection: 'I told him I didn't pay for a TV licence because I didn't think I needed one because I don't watch live TV. I don't even have an aerial installed in my TV.' He said he 'just watches Netflix and Amazon Prime through the PlayStation', which the inspector agreed. 'To be honest, I was really made up with myself, thinking I'd beaten the system and proved I didn't need a licence,' he added. But that relief was wiped out when the SJP notice came through the letter box in January. Speaking to the Echo, he said: 'It said if I pleaded not guilty, the fine would be larger, and I may have to pay court costs. So, I'm not sure what's going on at this point.' He said the inspector's statement was included in the paperwork but the question 'May I come in to inspect the TV receiver?' was marked 'No'. It also stated he had admitted to watching the news days earlier. More Trending Lee decided to contest the case in court – despite warnings he faced a large fine as well as prosecution costs – and ended up proving his case a second time. 'I can see why people just accept it, but I knew I was innocent, and I wasn't paying for a TV licence that I didn't need so I fought it,' he said. Magistrates threw out the case due to insufficient evidence. A TV Licensing spokesperson said: 'This was reviewed by TV Licensing following the court hearing in April 2025 as is standard practice, and no failings were highlighted.' A TV licence covers you for: All TV channels – like BBC, ITV, Channel 4, U&Dave and international channels – like BBC, ITV, Channel 4, U&Dave and international channels Pay TV services – like Sky, Virgin Media and EE TV – like Sky, Virgin Media and EE TV Live TV on streaming services – like YouTube, Netflix, and Amazon Prime Video – like YouTube, Netflix, and Amazon Prime Video Everything on BBC iPlayer This includes watching, recording and downloading. On any device. The full list of rules can be found here. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: BBC star Naga Munchetty facing bullying allegations and inappropriate 'sex jibe' claims MORE: Netflix's rudely axed Mindhunter could be returning with a twist MORE: More schedule changes confirmed as EastEnders is pulled from BBC One
Daily Mirror
9 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'My uncle's UK's most dangerous prisoner – there's now been a startling change'
Robert Maudsley has spent most of his life contained in the underbelly of the notorious HMP Wakefield but recently he was moved to a prison 125 miles away – and his worried uncle has now spoken The nephew of serial killer Robert Maudsley has said his uncle is 'not in a great place' after being removed from HMP Wakefield in Yorkshire – also known as 'Monster Mansion'. Maudsley, who is Britain's longest serving prisoner, is now 125 miles away after being relocated to Whitemoor prison in Cambridgeshire on April 8. Gavin, who has a close bond with his uncle, said he spent 40 years unbroken inside Wakefield, and has not reacted well to the sudden change. Speaking to Behind Bars TV, he said: 'In Whitemoor, to the best of our knowledge, he hasn't got his stuff. His regime is an hour out of his cell each day, and that is not an hour in the yard, within this hour you have to get your shower and all that. Any time you take a shower, that comes off your yard time.' He added: 'He is not in a great place right now. I am still trying to confirm and verify if he has a TV or if he has his books and stuff – but I can't imagine how it will be for him if he hasn't.' Gavin, who is from Merseyside, last saw his uncle weeks before he was transferred and he has said him and his father are 'dying to get down to see him'. Maudsley was once considered to be the most dangerous inmate in Britain having slaughtered two prisoners inside Wakefield. This was after having already tortured a patient to death inside Broadmoor after he was first caged for killing builder John Farrell in 1974 when he was 21. He was even given the nickname Hannibal the Cannibal after being rumoured to have eaten the brains of one victim. Despite this being disproved, the nickname stuck. But, referencing the horrific child abuse Maudsley, Gavin told reformed ex-prisoner Ricky Killeen: 'You will be hard pushed to find someone who can't empathise with what he has been through. I always say, nobody is born a serial killer, there is certain things to happen in one's life for it to end up in that place.' Maudsley was reportedly moved to Whitemoor jail after a disagreement with staff over 'privileges' in Wakefield. The row resulted in him going on hunger strike for up to five weeks before he was moved to a specialist wing in Cambridgeshire. The 71-year-old, who spent most of his life in a solitary cell after executing his own wave of vigilante justice, is now reportedly lodging an appeal about his transfer. According to Gavin, his uncle found himself in a 'relatively comfortable' position in Wakefield. He said he accepted his whole life tariff and has never tried to appeal his sentence. And giving an insight into prison life, Gavin said: 'Most of them (prison guards) respected him and would play chess with him, they would have conversations with him, and eventually he found himself in a position where he had a TV in his cell. 'He had a PlayStation in his cell, he had his music system, his CDs, he had his books, he would get an hour in the gym, he would get an hour in the yard, and he would get an hour in the kitchen. 'And for him, he said, 'All I ever wanted was my own space, Gavin, I've got it now.' Unfortunately it is in the underbelly of Wakefield, but he has got his own space.' Gavin added: 'He had a phone in his cell in Wakefield, he doesn't now in Whitemoor. He had a phone and he could phone family and stuff like that. 'He had his canteen money, he was only ever on basic because he wouldn't go into psychology programs. He was only on basic but he had what he needed. He was comfortable.' Gavin expressed concern for his uncle's mental state and claimed that he has been told that a return to Wakefield would be a 'difficult' task. The Prison Service declined to comment on individual prisoners. However, a source told us that prisoners in Whitemoor prison receive at least one hour out of their cell per day. They also stressed that Maudsley has access to the exercise yard and that he does have his belongings along with a telephone in his cell.
Wales Online
2 days ago
- Wales Online
'I thought I'd beaten the TV licence system, then I received a letter'
'I thought I'd beaten the TV licence system, then I received a letter' Lee Stuart thought he's answered all a TV licensing inspector's questions and wouldn't need a licence, then he found himself in court - here's what happened next Lee Stuart (Image: Colin Lane/Liverpool Echo ) A man is celebrating after a court case about his TV licence was dismissed. Lee Stuart applied for a TV licence when he moved into his property, but cancelled it later as he only watched online streaming platforms and never any live television. Guidance on the TV Licensing website says that viewers are required to have a licence to watch or record live TV on any channel or device, including live programming streamed online via services such as ITV Hub, All 4, YouTube, and Amazon Prime Video. A licence is also required for using BBC iPlayer, the Liverpool Echo reports. A TV Licensing spokesperson said: "If a property we believe should be licensed is unlicensed, letters are sent to that address advising of the requirement for a TV Licence if the occupant watches live TV or other licensable content. "This stops for one year when the occupant declares they don't need a licence, when letters will resume to check if circumstances have changed." Last September a TV Licensing inspection officer visited Mr Stuart. Don't miss a court report by signing up to our crime newsletter here "I told him I didn't pay for a TV licence because I didn't think I needed one because I don't watch live TV," Mr Stuart said. Article continues below "I don't even have an aerial installed in my TV, and I invited him to do his checks. He was a bit apprehensive, but he looked at everything and asked me what I used the TV for. "So I told him I just watch Netflix and Amazon Prime through the PlayStation, and he asked me if I used BBC iPlayer and I said, 'no'." Mr Stuart said the officer then confirmed he wasn't breaching the television licensing requirements. He said the officer also documented their conversation and also read back the main points, including that no live TV was being watched and no BBC iPlayer account was used. "It was official, and I agreed with what he had said, so when I was presented with the big white signature box, I just signed it, and then he left. To be honest, I was really made up with myself, thinking I'd beaten the system and proved I didn't need a licence." Then, in January this year, Mr Stuart received a Single Justice Procedure Notice (SJPN), covering people who are alleged to have watched TV without a licence. "It said if I pleaded not guilty, the fine would be larger and I may have to pay court costs. So I'm not sure what's going on at this point. "I look through it all and at the back was the inspector's statement. Straight away I clock the question, 'May I come in to inspect the TV receiver?' and it said 'no' in the answer box, so that was wrong because I did. "The next point was saying I admitted to watching the news last week. So I've refused him entry and then admitted on the step I watched live news last week? It didn't make any sense." Mr Stuart decided to contest the notice and represent himself in court. He said: "I can see why people just accept it, but I knew I was innocent and I wasn't paying for a TV licence that I didn't need so I fought it." "I'll be totally honest, I was surprised by the outcome and I thought it might be good to share my experience." Sefton Magistrates court dismissed the case due to insufficient evidence. A TV Licensing spokesperson said: "This was reviewed by TV Licensing following the court hearing in April, 2025, as is standard practice, and no failings were highlighted." The spokesperson said the officer and Mr Stuart gave credible testimony in person but that the magistrates could not find the case was proved beyond reasonable doubt. Mr Stuart, who was satisfied with the outcome at first then received a further letter from TV Licensing advising of the licence requirement. He has now submitted a formal complaint and a No Licence Needed (NLN) declaration. Article continues below He added: "The form asks at the end, 'What outcome do you want from this?' and I just put 'All I want is to be left alone, but an apology wouldn't go amiss'." TV Licensing confirmed it had now received Mr Stuart's NLN declaration.
