Here's how many times Latter-day Saint leaders mention Jesus Christ at general conference
President Russell M. Nelson spoke for just under 15 minutes at the October 2024 general conference of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
He referred to Jesus Christ 86 times.
Maybe that should not surprise anyone, given that President Nelson is considered by members to be not only the church's president but a living prophet, apostle and special witness of Christ.
For decades, however, some outsiders and critics have accused church leaders of referring more to the church's founding prophet, Joseph Smith, and his successors in general conference talks than to Jesus Christ.
'Other Christians think, in their perspective, that we pay more attention to or more often speak about 'the Brethren' rather than the Brother,' said Darius Gray, an independent Latter-day Saint historian and former journalist.
The Deseret News reviewed the 34 talks given at the church's October 2024 general conference to count the number of times speakers referred to Jesus Christ, Joseph Smith and President Nelson.
'My guess is that they referred to Jesus dozens of times, Joseph Smith half a dozen times and President Nelson somewhere in between,' said Nathan Oman, a church member and historian and professor of law at William & Mary Law School in Williamsburg, Virginia.
The actual totals surprised even longtime Latter-day Saint historians and writers.
Total references to Jesus Christ — 1,604 (an average of 47.2 times per talk)
Total references to Joseph Smith — 104 (3.1 times per talk)
Total references to President Russell M. Nelson — 92 (2.7 times per talk)
'That's a wonderful, heartening statistic,' said Terryl Givens, senior research fellow at the Neal A. Maxwell Institute of Religious Scholarship at Brigham Young University. 'It has been subject to conversation that one hears in many quarters that one hears more references to President Nelson than Jesus Christ.
'This puts the lie to that claim and suggests that there has been a conspicuous recentering of Christ in leadership talks, and that's something that I think the church needs to hear.'
Gray laughed in wonder at the count.
'I'm somewhat surprised and very, very edified,' he said. 'It's been a complaint among some members and an accusation among others in the Christian family, so I'm just thrilled to hear that.'
Oman said that while he underestimated the magnitude of references to Jesus Christ, he was not caught off guard.
'I've been listening to general conference for 49 years and that's my experience,' he said. 'The language is Jesus-soaked, so the fact that it's more than 10 times the number of references doesn't surprise me at all.'
Another Latter-day Saint scholar said he could imagine April conferences delivering even more references to Jesus Christ because they regularly fall on or around Easter. In fact, this spring, President Nelson and his counselors in the First Presidency have encouraged an increase in Easter celebrations among church members.
'We are in the spring Easter season, right when we celebrate in more detail the life and especially the Atonement of Jesus,' said John W. 'Jack' Welch, a founding director of Scripture Central.
'There's no other church that is blessed with the commandment to gather in general conference twice a year, and we come together and we hear the most important things talked about. For us to have an Easter celebration every year is, I think, very rich, and it indicates what we really hold most sacred.'
Speakers mentioned Jesus Christ an average of 47 times per talk in the October conference.
President Nelson referred to Christ four times in one memorable portion of his talk.
'Here is my promise to you,' he said. 'Every sincere seeker of Jesus Christ will find him in the temple. You will feel his mercy. You will find answers to your most vexing questions. You will better comprehend the joy of his gospel.'
The only speaker who mentioned Christ more often than President Nelson was President Jeffery R. Holland, acting president of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, who referred to Christ 108 times.
President Holland used the names 'Jesus Christ,' 'Jesus' or 'Christ' a total of 19 times. He referred to Christ as 'this Refuge from the Storm,' 'the Headmaster' and 'our Messenger of Salvation.'
Many references were utilitarian. For example, in addition to calling Christ 'our Perfect Role Model' twice, 30 of the 74 references by President Dallin H. Oaks, first counselor in the First Presidency, were to 'he,' 'him' or 'his,' necessary and common references throughout the conference.
Many speakers referred to Christ as they quoted scripture or other church leaders.
A reference by President Holland to Jesus Christ as 'the great Jehovah of the Old Testament and Good Shepherd of the New' is an example of why the Deseret News did not use AI or a computer database to review the conference talks.
Latter-day Saint theology holds that God the Father and Jesus Christ are separate and distinct beings. The words 'God' and 'Lord' often are used regularly by leaders and members to refer to either Heavenly Father or Jesus Christ.
October conference speakers referred to God the Father 700 times, the Deseret News found. The analysis may not be perfect. If anything, however, it likely undercounts references to the Savior when making determinations between 'God' and 'Lord.' Context was critical to understanding the references to deity.
For example, one of the 70 references to Christ by Elder Ulisses Soares of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles noted, as President Holland did, that Latter-day Saints believe Jesus Christ is the Jehovah of the Old Testament.
'The Pharisees' reaction to Jesus was clear evidence that their presumptuous attitude left no place in their hearts for the Savior's words and God's way,' Elder Soares said. 'In response, Jesus wisely and courageously declared that if they were true covenant children of Abraham, they would do the works of Abraham, especially considering that the God of Abraham was standing before them (italics added) and teaching them the truth at that very moment.'
Oman said listening for context is part of Latter-day Saint culture.
'One of the weird things about Latter-day Saints is we do almost all of our theology in sermons,' Oman said. 'Russell M. Nelson is not writing theological treatises. Latter-day Saints have written theological treatises in the past, but I don't think there's any general authority that's tried to write a theological treatise since (Elder) Bruce R. McConkie.
'So when general authorities talk theology, the genre, the medium that they use to talk theology is almost always a sermon, but in sermons you're oftentimes sort of theologically imprecise. Sometimes the purpose of the sermon is to clearly explain doctrine. Someone like President Oaks is trying to be precise and clear about doctrine, but I think there are other folks for whom that's not really their main goal.
'What they're trying to do is motivate people to feel the spirit and connect to God, or warn people about this particular danger or temptation or something like that. They have rhetorical tasks in their sermons where an enormous amount of theological precision just isn't particularly important.'
Where speakers used 'they' and 'their' to refer to both the Father and the Son, the Deseret News counted a reference for both. The same was done for a handful of instances when speakers referred to the Trinity and the Godhead.
President Nelson's emphasis on using the correct, full name of the church led to a couple dozen references to Jesus Christ.
The Deseret News found that many of the references to Joseph Smith and President Nelson were to their teachings about Jesus Christ. Church leaders and members generally quote the current church president because he is set apart to receive revelation for the church and act as Christ's spokesman on earth.
In some ways, criticism has been abating, said Welch, author of 'Charting the Book of Mormon,' which includes charts about names for Christ used by Book of Mormon authors, including 'First-Fruits' and 'the Very God of Israel.'
'Those making those criticisms (about references to Christ) haven't been listening to conference for the past 10 years. This is an old criticism,' he said. 'It goes back to the days when the less-friendly people wanted to brand us as not Christian, even though the name of the church is the Church of Jesus Christ.'
In the past, some critics tried to exclude Latter-day Saints from some interfaith groups. Today, Latter-day Saints work broadly with other faiths around the world on efforts ranging from religious freedom legislation to humanitarian aid and more.
Other names for Christ used by church leaders in October included 'God of Hope,' 'Rescuer' and 'Master Potter.'
One other reference stood out in the Deseret News review of the talks on the church's website. Elder Patrick Kearon of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, who is from England, maintained the British spelling of 'Saviour' in the written version of his talk.
Regardless of the names used for Jesus Christ, Gray said he was thrilled to learn that he had been spoken of so often.
'I am happy to hear that,' Gray said. 'I am more than happy to hear that.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
State of Faith transition
This article was first published in the State of Faith newsletter. Sign up to receive the newsletter in your inbox each Monday night. I don't think anyone dreams of being a religion reporter when they grow up. It's not the type of job you bring up during playground debates on the relative merits of being a fireman, superhero or unicorn trainer. Instead, religion reporter is the type of role you start thinking of when you're already mostly grown. Some of my reporter friends adopted the dream while in college, as I did, while others were already full-time reporters when they discovered the magic of writing about faith. And it really is magic, if you ask me. Religion is an endlessly fascinating topic, the kind of beat that allows you to write about politics, sports, psychedelic mushrooms, outer space and reality TV all at once, as I did over the past 11 years at the Deseret News. But now, I'm stepping away from that magic, at least for a little while. I've accepted a job as managing editor of SCOTUSblog, where I'll still be able to dabble in religion writing, but mostly think about the Supreme Court. Even two weeks after making the decision, I'm still sort of shocked to read that sentence: I'm stepping away. I've loved this work and will miss it — and this newsletter! — dearly, but I feel confident that now is the right time to try something new and to reorient my relationship to religion. It's the right time to focus on my faith again, and not just faith stories. Although I'm moving on, this newsletter isn't going anywhere. My former editors at the Deseret News will keep it going with writers that I'm grateful to call my friends. Please keep following along and celebrating the wild, wonderful world of religion. The Supreme Court said no, but this legal battle lives on The faith-related surprise in a new survey on famous quotes As I noted above, my new job is with SCOTUSblog. The 'SCOTUS' part of the name is an acronym for Supreme Court of the United States. SCOTUSblog was founded in 2002 and provides in-depth, nonbiased analysis of the Supreme Court's work. It's perhaps best known for hosting a chatroom, or live blog, on Supreme Court decision days. SCOTUSblog was an important resource for me during my time at the Deseret News. I'm honored to now have an opportunity to help lead the site. The Forward's recent feature on a Jewish farmer in Illinois who is working with a dying synagogue in Pennsylvania is as powerful as it is surprising. It's a testament to what's possible when strangers become friends. Speaking of powerful stories, The Atlantic's recent essay on the death penalty left me wrestling with dozens of difficult, faith-related questions. In mid-May, Deseret's Margaret Darby had a chance to visit the set for 'The Chosen' in rural Utah. I loved the story she did about fans of the show who flew in from all over the world to help with filming. Thank you all for following my work. Your support has meant the world to me. I hope you'll share that same support with the new shepherds of this newsletter. The Deseret News does amazing work, and I'm looking forward to reading State of Faith week after week moving forward.
2 hours ago
Court blocks Louisiana law requiring schools to post Ten Commandments in classrooms
NEW ORLEANS -- A panel of three federal appellate judges has ruled that a Louisiana law requiring the Ten Commandments to be posted in each of the state's public school classrooms is unconstitutional. The ruling Friday marked a major win for civil liberties groups who say the mandate violates the separation of church and state, and that the poster-sized displays would isolate students — especially those who are not Christian. The mandate has been touted by Republicans, including President Donald Trump, and marks one of the latest pushes by conservatives to incorporate religion into classrooms. Backers of the law argue the Ten Commandments belong in classrooms because they are historical and part of the foundation of U.S. law. The plaintiffs' attorneys and Louisiana disagreed on whether the appeals court's decision applied to every public school district in the state or only the districts party to the lawsuit. 'All school districts in the state are bound to comply with the U.S. Constitution,' said Liz Hayes, a spokesperson for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which served as co-counsel for the plaintiffs. The appeals court's rulings 'interpret the law for all of Louisiana,' Hayes added. "Thus, all school districts must abide by this decision and should not post the Ten Commandments in their classrooms.' Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill said she disagreed and believed the ruling only applied to school districts in the five parishes that were party to the lawsuit and that she would seek to appeal the ruling. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' order stems from a lawsuit filed last year by parents of Louisiana school children from various religious backgrounds, who said the law violates First Amendment language guaranteeing religious liberty and forbidding government establishment of religion. The mandate was signed into law last June by Republican Gov. Jeff Landry. The court's ruling backs an order issued last fall by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles, who declared the mandate unconstitutional and ordered state education officials not to take steps to enforce it and to notify all local school boards in the state of his decision. Law experts have long said they expect the Louisiana case to make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, testing the conservative court on the issue of religion and government. In 1980, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a similar Kentucky law violated the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which says Congress can 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion.' The high court found that the law had no secular purpose but served a plainly religious purpose. In 2005, the Supreme Court held that such displays in a pair of Kentucky courthouses violated the Constitution. At the same time, the court upheld a Ten Commandments marker on the grounds of the Texas state Capitol in Austin.
American Press
2 hours ago
- American Press
Court blocks Louisiana law requiring schools to post Ten Commandments in classrooms
Gov. Jeff Landry on Wednesday signed a bill mandating the displays of the 10 Commandments in all Louisiana public schools. (Crystal Stevenson / American Press) A panel of three federal appellate judges has ruled that a Louisiana law requiring the Ten Commandments to be posted in each of the state's public school classrooms is unconstitutional. The ruling Friday marked a major win for civil liberties groups who say the mandate violates the separation of church and state, and that the poster-sized displays would isolate students — especially those who are not Christian. The mandate has been touted by Republicans, including President Donald Trump, and marks one of the latest pushes by conservatives to incorporate religion into classrooms. Backers of the law argue the Ten Commandments belong in classrooms because they are historical and part of the foundation of U.S. law. The plaintiffs' attorneys and Louisiana disagreed on whether the appeals court's decision applied to every public school district in the state or only the districts party to the lawsuit. 'All school districts in the state are bound to comply with the U.S. Constitution,' said Liz Hayes, a spokesperson for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which served as co-counsel for the plaintiffs. The appeals court's rulings 'interpret the law for all of Louisiana,' Hayes added. 'Thus, all school districts must abide by this decision and should not post the Ten Commandments in their classrooms.' Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill said she disagreed and believed the ruling only applied to school districts in the five parishes that were party to the lawsuit and that she would seek to appeal the ruling. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' order stems from a lawsuit filed last year by parents of Louisiana school children from various religious backgrounds, who said the law violates First Amendment language guaranteeing religious liberty and forbidding government establishment of religion. The mandate was signed into law last June by Republican Gov. Jeff Landry. The court's ruling backs an order issued last fall by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles, who declared the mandate unconstitutional and ordered state education officials not to take steps to enforce it and to notify all local school boards in the state of his decision. Law experts have long said they expect the Louisiana case to make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, testing the conservative court on the issue of religion and government. In 1980, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a similar Kentucky law violated the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which says Congress can 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion.' The high court found that the law had no secular purpose but served a plainly religious purpose. In 2005, the Supreme Court held that such displays in a pair of Kentucky courthouses violated the Constitution. At the same time, the court upheld a Ten Commandments marker on the grounds of the Texas state Capitol in Austin.
