"No one should be allowed to destroy our cultural symbols": BJP's Annamalai at TN Muruga conference
Chennai (Tamil Nadu) [India], June 23 (ANI): Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader K Annamalai, has said that no one should be allowed to destroy the country's cultural symbols, adding that there should not be any religious conversion from Hinduism.
Addressing the Muruga Bhaktargal conference organised by Hindu Munnani on Sundayin Madurai, Annamalai said that there should be no disturbance to our way of life. Our children should be able to go to school boldly, wearing thiruneer (sacred ash).
'From now on, no one should be allowed to destroy our cultural symbols. People should not convert to other religions, and those who have converted must be brought back to our religion,' the former BJP chief for Tamil Nadu said.
'Jews, who make up just 0.2 per cent of the world population, are engaged in conflicts with four countries merely because others are interfering with their way of life. That nation (Israel) has shut down schools and taken hospitals underground. Israel is standing firm, saying, 'If our way of life is disturbed, we will fight.' On April 22, in Jammu and Kashmir, 26 people were shot dead simply because they followed the Hindu religion. We launched an attack in retaliation. But for some people, even this has become a problem,' the former BJP president said.
He said that the primary purpose of this conference is to inspire every Hindu to rise and follow the way of life practised by our ancestors, while adding that Hinduism is the majority religion in only two countries.
'Through the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) Department, 44,000 temples in Tamil Nadu are being managed. Not only that, there are 340 temples that are over a thousand years old. But there is no proper discipline or system there. The treatment is different for those who have money and for those who don't. All of this needs to change,' he stated.
'Those who come to power by securing Hindu votes are now mocking the religion. They are playing politics based on the belief that Hindus will never unite. We must break and disprove that belief,' he said. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
AAP retains Ludhiana West against odds, a Rajya Sabha seat for Arvind Kejriwal may be next
In a significant boost for the embattled Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in Punjab, the party's Sanjeev Arora won the bitter Ludhiana West bypoll Monday by a decent margin of over 10,637 votes. Arora, a prominent industrialist, who is a sitting Rajya Sabha MP of the AAP, defeated the Congress's Bharat Bhushan Ashu, a former minister and two-time MLA. It was the second consecutive defeat for Ashu from Ludhiana West, an urban constituency dominated by Hindu voters. The Akali Dal's slide continues, with the party finishing even behind the BJP to end up fourth. In the 2022 Assembly elections, the AAP's Gurpreet Bassi Gogi had won from Ludhiana West, defeating Ashu. The bypoll was necessitated due to Gogi's death. The speculation all through the campaign was that if Arora won, the Rajya Sabha seat vacated by him would be filled by AAP convenor Arvind Kejriwal. Even if that does not happen, the Ludhiana West victory will come as a breather for the party that lost power to the BJP in Delhi, with even Kejriwal losing his seat, and whose Punjab government has been beset with problems. The takeaways from Monday's result: The Ludhiana West bypoll, coming soon after the AAP defeat in Delhi for the first time since its formation, was seen as a test of if the party could bounce back. Leaving nothing to chance, the AAP was the first to declare Arora as its candidate – doing so in February itself, long before the elections were even announced – and deployed an array of star leaders to campaign. In a major action, a protest by farmers on the Shambhu and Khanauri borders of Punjab, blocking highways for months and inconveniencing movement, was removed overnight, as the business community and industrialists, including from Ludhiana, complained to the AAP government over their mounting losses. During the campaign, Kejriwal made tall promises for Ludhiana and told voters to pick 'the humble and hardworking' Arora, not 'the angry and arrogant' Ashu, and to go with the ruling party in the state. If Arora won, Kejriwal said, he would be made a minister and 'get several projects to Ludhiana'. A defeat in Ludhiana West would have emboldened the Opposition, which has been accusing the AAP Delhi leadership of holding the reins of the Punjab government, including in appointments to government postings, of indulging in 'VVIP culture', and of failure to tackle the drug menace and meet pre-poll promises such as its cash scheme for women. One barb the AAP would have found it difficult to dodge was how it had 'used' Arora, just to get Kejriwal to Parliament. A two-time MLA from Ludhiana West (2012, 2017), Ashu hoped to make a comeback in the bypoll after his defeat to the AAP's Gogi in 2022. A victory would have also been a nice payback for the AAP government imprisoning him for nearly a year in an alleged corruption case. However, again, the Congress's campaign remained fragmented. The faction led by party Punjab chief and Ludhiana Lok Sabha MP Amrinder Singh Raja Warring and, including Leader of the Opposition Partap Singh Bajwa, stayed away from Ashu's campaign. The faction led by former CM Charanjit Singh Channi, and senior MLA Rana Gurjeet Singh and Pargat Singh threw its weight behind him. The AAP repeatedly raised the fact that Ashu and Warring were not on talking terms with each other. The BJP could not repeat its performance from the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, when it had led other parties in the Ludhiana West Assembly segment. However, BJP candidate Jiwan Gupta, whose candidature was announced at the fag end of nomination filing, managed a decent share of 22% votes. That is a contrast to its former ally SAD, whose existential crisis continues. The party's Ludhiana West candidate, Advocate Parupkar Singh Ghumman, got just 9% of the votes, even though SAD president Sukhbir Singh Badal camped in Ludhiana for days and headed the party's campaign in the bypolls. The ruling AAP faced massive allegations of distributing cash, freebies, ration etc to the voters during the bypoll, and several complaints were filed against it by the Opposition parties. The party also faced allegations of brazenly using administrative power and machinery in its campaigning. After the results were declared, CM Mann said: 'This victory shows that the people of Punjab are extremely happy with the working of our government. We are working day and night for the progress and development of Punjab. We will fulfill every promise made during the bypoll.' Ashu said he took 'the entire responsibility for this defeat'. 'I believe that the entire Congress was always with me. I will wholeheartedly support Arora whenever he needs me for Ludhiana's development. I congratulate him for the win.'
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
"Why are you wasting time on a quack?": Pawan Khera hits out at Nishikant Dubey for questioning Indira Gandhi over Shimla Agreement
Congress leader Pawan Khera on Monday slammed BJP MP Nishikant Dubey , who questioned former Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi over the Shimla agreement . Pawan Khera called Nishikant Dubey a "quack" and urged the media not to pay attention to him. Taking a dig at Nishikant Dubey, the Congress leader said that he is not even a student from " WhatsApp University " but of "WhatsApp Nursery". Khera further asked Dubey to go to the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) and discontinue the Shimla Agreement. "Why are you (the media) wasting time on a quack? These are not even students of WhatsApp University but of WhatsApp nursery. Ask him to go to the PMO and tell them to discontinue the Simla Agreement. Why is he wasting time?", Pawan Khera told ANI. Earlier, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Nishikant Dubey targeted former Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, alleging that she signed the Shimla Agreement between India and Pakistan under the pressure of the United States. Sharing a document of a Rajya Sabha debate on 'X', Nishikant Dubey questioned why Indian governed 5000 square mile territory was given to Pakistan by India's "iron lady".The BJP MP further queried why 57 Indian soldiers killed in Pakistan's jail dispute were returning the 93000 Pakistsoldiers, who had surrendered after the 1971 war. Live Events Nishikant Dubey mentioned that former Defence Minister Mahavir Tyagi had raised these questions, but former Indian PM Indira Gandhi left them unanswered. Earlier on Sunday, Nishikant Dubey slammed Rahul Gandhi , questioning the motives of the Congress leader to encourage learning English rather than local languages while also alluding to the "hypocrisy" of opposing the National Education Police (NEP) 2020 for language choice, stating that the 1986 NEP had similar goals. "Rahul Gandhi ji, your investigative advisor is hell bent on destroying you. This is the education policy of 1986 given by your father to the country. in this, your father is promising the country to promote Hindi, teach the Sanskrit language and translate English into regional languages. This same education policy is almost in place now. Students should also grow with regional languages, changes in this have been made by Prime Minister Modi ji in 2020," Dubey said in a post on X in Hindi.
The Wire
27 minutes ago
- The Wire
Why Indian Rivers Should Be Granted the Rights They Deserve
As North Eastern states experience disasters under flooding, rivers wreaking havoc, parts of the country also see an extreme season with the drying of its rivers having adversarial impact on soil, agriculture, and livelihoods of millions on depend upon it. Rivers and their critical vitality in shaping, managing and nurturing livelihoods have captured imagination of writers, artists, and scholars for centuries. In the ancient Hindu imagination, the Ganga is not a river. She is a mother. A bearer of life. A witness to history. For thousands of years, poets, priests, and pilgrims have also knelt at her banks, offering flowers and ashes alike. But in the courtroom, such reverence has not translated into responsibility. For Indian rivers today, personhood is poetry – but not yet law. And yet, the idea is not as far-fetched as it once seemed. If the river has a legal standing in a court of law In 2017, the Uttarakhand High Court declared the Ganga and Yamuna 'living entities' with the rights of a legal person. For a brief moment, the river had standing in a court of law. It could, in theory, sue a polluter, resist a dam, or demand its flow be restored. But the decision was swiftly stayed by the Supreme Court, citing practical difficulties: Who would represent the river? Who would be liable if the river 'committed' harm, like flooding? The Ganga returned to her pre-modern role: sacred but silent. Eight years later, in 2025, the waters are rising again – this time not just in volume, but in voice. Earlier this year, Rajya Sabha MP Satnam Singh Sandhu too introduced a bill proposing that Indian rivers be granted legal personhood through statute. In a nation where rivers are worshipped yet routinely strangled by concrete and sewage, the symbolism is powerful. But what matters more is the potential shift in power: from human dominion to ecological dignity. We have reached the limits of technocratic solutions to ecological collapse. India's flagship Namami Gange mission, launched with fanfare by the PM in 2014, has spent tens of thousands of crores and built miles of sewage infrastructure. Yet, the state of the Yamuna river – an important tributary of Ganga – in Delhi remains a chemical soup, where, fish die-offs are routine, and residents routinely gag at its banks. No amount of money can save a river if its right to flow, breathe, and exist is not recognized in law. In February, a Supreme Court-appointed committee reported that illegal embankments had been constructed through Kalesar National Park, obstructing the Yamuna's natural flow. On paper, it was a clear violation of forest and water laws. But the implications ran deeper. These embankments were not just environmental infractions – they were symbolic of a larger rupture: the quiet, everyday mutilation of riverine systems under the guise of 'development.' When a river's path is bent without its consent, it is not merely diverted; it is disenfranchised. Climate activist Ridhima Pandey, who first came into national consciousness for suing the government over climate inaction stood against the Kalasa-Banduri diversion project in Karnataka. Her protest was against a legal structure that treats rivers as passive infrastructure rather than living systems with embedded rights. Not isolated acts of environmental negligence but democratic failures in slow motion These are not isolated acts of environmental negligence. They are democratic failures in slow motion. Rivers may not cast votes, but they irrigate the very geographies our electoral maps are drawn on. To exclude them from legal personhood is to ignore that their depletion undermines the people who depend on them and the constitutional promises made to those people. Critics scoff. They warn of legal absurdities. Who defends the river in court? Can a river own property? The answer lies not in abandoning the project but in refining it. Guardianship models – where citizens, tribal councils, or environmental boards act as legal stewards – have worked elsewhere. In New Zealand, Maori iwi serve as co-guardians. India, too, can empower communities that have lived with and for rivers, rather than outsourcing custodianship to bureaucratic boards 500 kilometers away. It is a reckoning with the doctrine of human supremacy. Our legal system, forged in colonial logic, sees rivers as resources, not relationships. They are either dams to be built or drains to be dredged. But this worldview has failed us. Climate change is not just an engineering challenge; it is a civilisational crisis. The law must evolve. To grant rivers rights is not to anthropomorphise them, but to decolonise the way we see the world. This is critical for their being and sustenance through a realisation, recognition of rights that matter. The Ganga, after all, has outlived empires. She will likely outlast this one too. But what shape will she take – choked and canalised, or flowing freely as a subject of law and reverence? Personhood is not a silver bullet. But it is a beginning. A way of saying: the river has been speaking all along. It's time we learned how to listen. Deepanshu Mohan is a Professor of Economics, Dean, IDEAS, and Director, Centre for New Economics Studies. He is a Visiting Professor at London School of Economics and an Academic Visiting Fellow to AMES, University of Oxford.
