The future of search: Why Location Bank matters in the age of AI?

With the explosive rise of AI-driven assistants like ChatGPT, Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant the way people search is fundamentally changing. Traditional typed searches are giving way to voice commands, conversational queries, and intelligent prompts. But, when it comes to location based searches (or prompts), behind this shiny new interface lies something essential: the same old data.
Whether someone asks Siri 'Where can i find a good burger in Rosebank' or types a query into an AI chat window, these platforms don't invent answers from thin air. They pull from structured, trusted data sources like Google Maps, Bing, Apple Maps, and more. And if your brand's location data isn't present, accurate, and consistent across these sources, you're invisible in this new AI-powered world.
'The future of search may look different on the surface but under the hood, it still depends on one thing: clean, trusted data,' said Neil Clarence, Co-founder of Location Bank. 'That's where we come in.'
Welcome to the new search ecosystem
The future of search is layered, decentralised, and intelligent but every layer still depends on accurate data. Here's how:
- ChatGPT pulls data through Bing → Location Bank integrates directly with Bing
- ChatGPT pulls data from a brands store locator - Location Bank powers these with consistent data.
- Siri now taps into ChatGPT + Apple Maps → Location Bank supports both.
- Google Assistant relies on Google Maps → Location Bank publishes to it natively.
Location Bank. (2025). Store Locator
As AI platforms scrape and learn from massive amounts of third-party data, the quality and consistency of your business's location presence has never mattered more.
Why Location Bank is now critical infrastructure
Location Bank ensures that your business is published correctly: name, address, phone number, hours, categories, and more across a powerful network of digital endpoints. This includes Google, Bing, Meta, Apple Maps, TomTom,
Here, and in-car navigation systems.
Here's what that means in practice:
- If a customer asks Siri 'Where can I find a good burger in Rosebank?" you show up because your data is there on Apple Maps.
- If a user asks ChatGPT 'Where can i find a good burger in Rosebank? and ChatGPT leans on Bing, you show up because your data was indexed.
- If someone uses Google Assistant, your business is found because your details are perfectly synced with Google Maps.
Even as consumer search habits change, your discoverability doesn't - because you are present where AI learns.
The trust factor in an AI world
AI systems are trained to prioritise accuracy, authority, and consistency. When your business details vary across platforms or worse, don't exist at all AI deprioritises you in favor of more reliable sources. Inconsistent data confuses search engines, but it completely disqualifies you from intelligent agents that rely on trustworthy signals.
That's why uniform, verified, and up-to-date location data is no longer just a local SEO best practice - it's a foundational strategy for AI-era visibility.
'In the age of AI, your discoverability is determined by the quality of your data,' added Neil Clarence. 'We don't just publish your locations, we make them findable, verifiable, and trustworthy across every digital touchpoint.'
AI might be transforming how people search but it still relies on structured data to deliver results. Location Bank helps ensure that your business isn't just listed, but trusted, synced, and ready for discovery no matter how or where consumers search.
In the era of AI, your visibility will be shaped by your data.
Location Bank makes sure your data is everywhere it needs to be.
About Location Bank
Location Bank is a leading MarTech platform that enables brands to centrally manage and sync their digital location data across key digital platforms. By delivering consistent, verified business information at scale, Location Bank helps brands enhance discoverability, build trust, and thrive in an AI-first digital landscape.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Al Etihad

37 minutes ago

• Al Etihad

AI can aid counter-extremism if developed responsibly, says new Hedayah report

20 June 2025 19:26 ABU DHABI (ALETIHAD)Made possible through the generous support of the United Arab Emirates, Hedayah — the International Center of Excellence for Countering Extremism and Violent Extremism — launched a new research brief examining how Artificial Intelligence (AI) may be responsibly leveraged to support terrorism prevention efforts, as the use of AI grows across all sectors of report, 'Artificial Intelligence for Counter Extremism'', underlines that while terrorist exploitation of AI remains largely experimental at present, it is expected to grow and adapt over time. The report offers a balanced, evidence-based analysis of both the risks associated with AI misuse and the opportunities it presents to strengthen counter-extremism from a review of 52 academic publications and insights from five expert roundtables involving stakeholders from government, academia, the tech industry and civil society, the research maps out the evolving landscape of AI-enabled extremism and corresponding policy its key findings, the report notes that extremists are already testing AI tools such as multilingual translation, content adaptation, and deepfake technology to spread disinformation and accelerate radicalisation. While much of the existing research focuses on predicting future threats, there has been less emphasis on understanding current applications of AI and its role in eroding public trust within the broader information the prevention side, AI's use has primarily centred on content moderation. However, Hedayah identifies broader opportunities, including improved strategic communications and enhanced messaging campaigns aimed at fostering social resilience against extremist ideologies. The report also flags a pressing need to address systemic biases in AI systems, warning that such disparities risk marginalising already vulnerable communities and exacerbating social support effective and ethical deployment of AI in counter-extremism, Hedayah recommends promoting greater diversity within AI development teams to ensure inclusive design. It calls for prioritising 'safety by design' and integrating human oversight into AI processes. The report advocates for robust collaboration between sectors and disciplines to ensure diverse perspectives are incorporated and urges the inclusion of AI literacy in broader media literacy programmes. It also recommends a continuous monitoring approach to AI trends and threats, coupled with proportionate, evidence-based risk assessments that avoid both alarmism and Al Qasimi, Executive Director of Hedayah, underscored the importance of embracing the opportunities presented by AI technology.'Generative AI is a powerful tool - we must focus on harnessing it wisely to prevent radicalisation, enhance safety, and counter extremism.' He added: 'This moment also calls for bold and purposeful collaboration between the tech sector, policymakers, and civil society to ensure AI becomes a force for reducing extremism and violent extremism globally.'Emphasising the urgency of timely action, Anna Sherburn, Deputy Executive Director of Hedayah, noted: 'Our findings show that although terrorist use of AI is still in its early stages, the risk is growing as the technology becomes more widely accessible. The time to act is now - not with panic, but with clear purpose.' She continued: 'Hedayah's AI report helps to shift the conversation. Instead of only asking 'what could go wrong with AI?', we ask 'what could go right?' if we design responsibly, collaborate strategically, and build trust across all sectors.' Hedayah's report urges governments, practitioners, and the private sector to engage collaboratively in shaping the responsible use of AI in preventing and countering extremism efforts and to avoid the pitfalls of viewing AI solely as a threat. Source: Aletihad - Abu Dhabi

UAE Moments

2 hours ago

• UAE Moments

Sheikh Mohammed Announces an AI System as UAE Cabinet Member

The Prime Minister and Ruler of Dubai, His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid, announced that an AI system will serve as an advisory member of the UAE Cabinet. H.H. Sheikh Mohammed said on Friday, June 20, that the National Artificial Intelligence System will join the UAE Cabinet as an advisory member from January 2026. The Ruler of Dubai wrote on X, "We also announce that the National Artificial Intelligence System will be adopted as an advisory member of the Cabinet, the Ministerial Development Council, and all boards of directors of federal entities and government companies, starting in January 2026." He added, "The goal is to support decision-making in these councils, conduct immediate analyses of their decisions, provide technical advice, and enhance the efficiency of government policies adopted by these councils across all sectors."

Arabian Post

3 hours ago

• Arabian Post

EU Intensifies Oversight of Musk's xAI–X Deal

European Commission regulators have launched an in-depth inquiry into the corporate restructuring of X following its $33 billion acquisition by Elon Musk's AI venture, xAI in March. Officials have issued formal information requests probing whether the deal reshaped the obligations and liabilities under the Digital Services Act, which could trigger fines of up to 6 per cent of global turnover or even a suspension of operations within the EU. At stake is not merely compliance but scope. Brussels is examining if revenue from Musk's wider corporate empire—including xAI, SpaceX, Neuralink and The Boring Company—should be aggregated with X's earnings when calculating any DSA penalty. Such consolidation would dramatically increase the financial stakes, positioning the potential fine among the largest ever under the regulation. This intensified scrutiny builds upon a probe initiated in December 2023 over allegations that X failed to curb harmful content and employed deceptive design. The spotlight has honed in on features such as the blue check verification, which critics say misled users into attributing credibility purely on subscription status. X has contested these accusations, reflecting the gravity with which Brussels regards compliance under the DSA. ADVERTISEMENT Regulatory sources indicate that Brussels aims to reach a decision before its summer recess in August 2025—though there remains a possibility that deliberations will extend. If a penalty is levied, whether tied solely to X or inclusive of Musk's other holdings, the platform could face a multi‑billion‑dollar bill. Repeat offenders risk more severe sanctions, including operational bans within the bloc. The commission's current line of inquiry follows earlier requests for internal documentation on X's algorithmic decision‑making and moderation protocols issued in January 2025, aimed at uncovering systemic bias or political amplification. EU digital chief Henna Virkkunen has signalled that the commission's enforcement of the DSA will be uniform across all major platforms—regardless of headline-grabbing personalities or companies. For the xAI–X merger, Brussels appears particularly concerned with whether the March acquisition alters liability thresholds or the classification of X as a 'Very Large Online Platform'—a designation that comes with more rigorous reporting and compliance obligations. The structure of the deal could influence if DSA fines are calculated based solely on X or on the broader Musk group. European digital regulators are keen to demonstrate the potency of the DSA, which took effect in late 2022, aiming to set a precedent in holding tech giants accountable across interconnected corporate structures. X's contested manoeuvres with the blue checkmark and structural repositioning have become emblematic of the challenges regulators face enforcing meaningful accountability. Musk's companies have so far declined to respond to the commission's most recent information requests. Meanwhile, EU officials continue to gather internal documents, revenue data and structural filings to determine the extent of exposure under DSA provisions before any final ruling.