Trump has 'no plans' to speak to Musk as feud persists
Donald Trump says he has no plans to speak with Elon Musk, signalling the US president and his former ally might not resolve their feud over a sweeping tax-cut bill any time soon.
Addressing reporters on Friday aboard Air Force One, Trump said he wasn't "thinking about" the Tesla CEO.
"I hope he does well with Tesla," Trump said.
However, Trump said a review of Musk's extensive contracts with the federal government was in order.
"We'll take look at everything," the president said.
"It's a lot of money."
Trump may get rid of the red Tesla Model S that he bought in March after showcasing Musk's electric cars on the White House lawn, a White House official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Musk, for his part, did not directly address Trump but kept up his criticism of the massive Republican tax and spending bill that contains much of Trump's domestic agenda.
On his social-media platform X, Musk amplified remarks made by others that Trump's "big beautiful bill" would hurt Republicans politically and add to the nation's $US36.2 trillion ($A55.8 trillion) debt. He replied "exactly" to a post by another X user that said Musk had criticised Congress and Trump had responded by criticising Musk personally.
Musk also declared it was time for a new political party in the United States "to represent the 80 per cent in the middle!"
People who have spoken to Musk said his anger has begun to recede and they think he will want to repair his relationship with Trump, according to one person who has spoken to Musk's entourage.
The White House statements came one day after the two men battled openly in an extraordinary display of hostilities that marked a stark end to a close alliance.
Tesla stock rose on Friday, clawing back some losses from Thursday's session, when it dropped 14 per cent and lost $US150 billion ($A231 billion) in value, the largest single-day decline in the company's history.
Musk, the world's richest person, bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. Trump named Musk to head a controversial effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending.
Trump feted Musk at the White House a week ago as he wrapped up his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk cut only about half of one per cent of total spending, far short of his brash plans to axe $US2 trillion ($A3.1 trillion) from the federal budget.
Since then, Musk has denounced Trump's tax-cut and spending bill as a "disgusting abomination". His opposition is complicating efforts to pass the bill in Congress where Republicans hold a slim majority.
Trump had initially stayed quiet while Musk campaigned to torpedo the bill, but broke his silence on Thursday, telling reporters he was "very disappointed" in Musk.
Musk, who spent nearly $US300 million ($A462 million) in the 2024 elections, said Trump would have lost without his support and suggested he should be impeached.
Trump suggested he would terminate government contracts with Musk's businesses, which include rocket company SpaceX and its satellite unit Starlink.
The billionaire then threatened to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, the only US spacecraft capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station. Musk later backed off that threat.
A prolonged feud could make it harder for Republicans to keep control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections if Musk withholds financial support or other major Silicon Valley business leaders distance themselves from Trump.
Musk had already said he planned to curtail his political spending, and on Tuesday called for "all politicians who betrayed the American people" to be fired in 2026.
His involvement with the Trump administration has provoked widespread protests at Tesla sites, driving down sales while investors fretted that Musk's attention was too divided.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
35 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Major doubts raised about impact of US strikes on Iran's nuclear program as intelligence shows enriched uranium moved
Experts have raised major doubts about the impact of US strikes on Iran's nuclear program, with intelligence indicating large amounts of enriched uranium were moved ahead of time. President Trump has claimed the strikes caused "monumental" damage to the nuclear sites, while Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said Israel is "very close" to eliminating the nuclear program. The US was the only country with weapons capable of destroying Iran's Fordow nuclear enrichment facility, which is built 80 to 90 metres under a mountain. Satellite imagery of the site shows six large holes where B2 stealth bombers dropped 14 massive bunker buster bombs - each weighing 13.6 tonnes and capable of penetrating 18 metres into concrete and 61 metres into earth. But satellite imagery expert Decker Eveleth, an associate researcher with the CNA Corporation, said the hall containing hundreds of centrifuges is "too deeply buried for us to evaluate the level of damage based on satellite imagery". Several experts have also cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of Fordow before the strike early Sunday morning and could be hiding it and other nuclear components in locations unknown to Israel, the U.S. and U.N. nuclear inspectors. They noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showed "unusual activity" at Fordow on Thursday and Friday, with a line of 13 cargo trucks waiting outside an entrance of the facility. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the near weapons-grade 60 per cent highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the U.S. attack. The New York Times has also reported that Israeli officials with knowledge of the intelligence believe Iran had moved equipment and uranium from the site in recent days, including 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 per cent purity. This was confirmed by the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), who told the Times Iran had "made no secret" of the fact they had moved the materials. US Vice President JD Vance has also admitted the White House does not know the fate of the enriched uranium. The uranium would need to be enriched to around 90 per cent purity to be used in a weapon, but it is reportedly enough to make nine or 10 atomic bombs. Jeffrey Lewis of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey said there were "almost certainly facilities that we don't know about" and the strikes have likely only set back Iran's nuclear program "by maybe a few years". US Senator Mark Kelly, a Democrat from Arizona and a member of the Senate intelligence committee who said he had been reviewing intelligence every day, expressed the same concern. "My big fear right now is that they take this entire program underground, not physically underground, but under the radar," he told NBC News. "Where we tried to stop it, there is a possibility that this could accelerate it." Iran lashed out at the US after the attacks, accusing it of crossing a "very big red line" by striking the nation's "peaceful" nuclear facilities. The nation's foreign minister also hinted that Iran may withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty - which Iran's parliament began preperations after Israel launched its first strikes "It cannot be emphasised enough how much of a devastating blow that the US, a permanent member of the Security Council, dealt to the global Non-Proliferation regime," Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said at a press conference in Turkey. According to Arms Control Association head Daryl Kimball, "the world is going to be in the dark about what Iran may be doing". Mick Mulroy, a former CIA officer who served in the Pentagon during Trump's first term, told the New York Times the US strike would "likely set back the Iranian nuclear weapon program two to five years'. -With Reuters
Perth Now
35 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Trump slump smashes major Aussie company
A brutal two-punch combo of Trump tariffs and inflation shocks is crushing the stock prices of major Australian fashion retailers, with luxury brand Cettire leading the dramatic slump. The company started off the year with a market capitalisation of nearly $600m, but a precipitous 81 per cent decline in its share price since January 2 value means it is now worth just $115m. Moomoo market strategist Jessica Amir warned 'serious alarm bells' were ringing about the survival of the company, which sells high-end products worldwide through its online platform. 'It's safe to say there are some serious questions about a potential receivership,' she said. In a trading update from June 12, Cettire announced just $500,000 in earnings for the financial year ending May 31, though sales revenues lifted 1.7 per cent to $693.8m. Luxury retailer Cettire is leading a slump in ASX-listed fashion stocks this year. Supplied Credit: Supplied City Chic has warned US tariff policies could impact its earnings. Supplied Credit: Supplied The company now has $45m left in cash, down from $79m in March. Cettire founder and CEO Dean Mintz blamed trade uncertainty around US tariff policy in part for the difficult trading environment. 'Recent results from luxury industry participants point to continued challenges in the sector, amplified by trade uncertainty surrounding US tariff policy,' he said. 'As a result, elevated promotional activity persists across the market.' While Cettire's share price is tanking, there are avenues the company could pursue to avoid any fall into administration, for example a capital raise or taking on a new debt facility. It is not the only ASX-listed apparel business to record a disturbing slump in value this year. Footwear retailer Accent Group has slumped 45 per cent, while KMD Brands, which sells the Kathmandu and Rip Curl brands, has tumbled 33 per cent. City Chic has retreated 26 per cent. Graphic Aussie Fashion Stocks - Jan 2-June 23 (2) At the start of the year, KMD was worth about $300m. Now it is worth less than $200m. Some of the retailers point to US President Donald Trump's tariff shock for creating additional challenges in their businesses. In a trading update from June 19, KMD estimated tariffs would strip about $1m in earnings from the company across the 2025 financial year. 'The (company) continues to closely monitor the fluid US tariff situation and it remains too early to estimate the impact on consumer demand in the US,' the company said. 'Given the uncertainty in the US market, agility remains the (company's) main priority heading into 2026.' In an update from May 5, City Chic has warned some 20 per cent of its revenue was generated in the US and 90 per cent of its products were sourced from China, a big target for tariffs. KMD Brands, which owns Kathmandu, has warned tariffs could strip out $1m in earnings for FY25. NewsWire / Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia 'Due to the tariff situation and its potential impact on consumer demand, USA sales expectations have been reduced for FY26,' the company said. But global trade chaos is not the only pressure mounting on fashion stocks, Ms Amir cautioned. Rising oil and electricity prices are also eating away at consumer spending power. 'The things we're paying every quarter and every month are far higher than they were,' she said. 'Petrol costs are up markedly and that's because the oil price is up. 'It means you've got less money left over to buy things like a luxury designer handbag from Cettire, or that Rip Curl jumper. 'You might want to get out your needle and thread and sow up your Kathmandu. You're not exactly going to go out and buy another one.' The benchmark ASX200, which tracks the 200 largest companies on the Australian stock market, has advanced 3 per cent year-to-date.
West Australian
44 minutes ago
- West Australian
ASX-listed fashion retailers record brutal share price declines on Trump tariffs, inflation shocks
A brutal two-punch combo of Trump tariffs and inflation shocks is crushing the stock prices of major Australian fashion retailers, with luxury brand Cettire leading the dramatic slump. The company started off the year with a market capitalisation of nearly $600m, but a precipitous 81 per cent decline in its share price since January 2 value means it is now worth just $115m. Moomoo market strategist Jessica Amir warned 'serious alarm bells' were ringing about the survival of the company, which sells high-end products worldwide through its online platform. 'It's safe to say there are some serious questions about a potential receivership,' she said. In a trading update from June 12, Cettire announced just $500,000 in earnings for the financial year ending May 31, though sales revenues lifted 1.7 per cent to $693.8m. The company now has $45m left in cash, down from $79m in March. Cettire founder and CEO Dean Mintz blamed trade uncertainty around US tariff policy in part for the difficult trading environment. 'Recent results from luxury industry participants point to continued challenges in the sector, amplified by trade uncertainty surrounding US tariff policy,' he said. 'As a result, elevated promotional activity persists across the market.' While Cettire's share price is tanking, there are avenues the company could pursue to avoid any fall into administration, for example a capital raise or taking on a new debt facility. It is not the only ASX-listed apparel business to record a disturbing slump in value this year. Footwear retailer Accent Group has slumped 45 per cent, while KMD Brands, which sells the Kathmandu and Rip Curl brands, has tumbled 33 per cent. City Chic has retreated 26 per cent. Graphic Aussie Fashion Stocks - Jan 2-June 23 (2) At the start of the year, KMD was worth about $300m. Now it is worth less than $200m. Some of the retailers point to US President Donald Trump's tariff shock for creating additional challenges in their businesses. In a trading update from June 19, KMD estimated tariffs would strip about $1m in earnings from the company across the 2025 financial year. 'The (company) continues to closely monitor the fluid US tariff situation and it remains too early to estimate the impact on consumer demand in the US,' the company said. 'Given the uncertainty in the US market, agility remains the (company's) main priority heading into 2026.' In an update from May 5, City Chic has warned some 20 per cent of its revenue was generated in the US and 90 per cent of its products were sourced from China, a big target for tariffs. 'Due to the tariff situation and its potential impact on consumer demand, USA sales expectations have been reduced for FY26,' the company said. But global trade chaos is not the only pressure mounting on fashion stocks, Ms Amir cautioned. Rising oil and electricity prices are also eating away at consumer spending power. 'The things we're paying every quarter and every month are far higher than they were,' she said. 'Petrol costs are up markedly and that's because the oil price is up. 'It means you've got less money left over to buy things like a luxury designer handbag from Cettire, or that Rip Curl jumper. 'You might want to get out your needle and thread and sow up your Kathmandu. You're not exactly going to go out and buy another one.' The benchmark ASX200, which tracks the 200 largest companies on the Australian stock market, has advanced 3 per cent year-to-date.
