logo
Major doubts raised about impact of US strikes on Iran's nuclear program as intelligence shows enriched uranium moved

Major doubts raised about impact of US strikes on Iran's nuclear program as intelligence shows enriched uranium moved

Sky News AU9 hours ago

Experts have raised major doubts about the impact of US strikes on Iran's nuclear program, with intelligence indicating large amounts of enriched uranium were moved ahead of time.
President Trump has claimed the strikes caused "monumental" damage to the nuclear sites, while Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said Israel is "very close" to eliminating the nuclear program.
The US was the only country with weapons capable of destroying Iran's Fordow nuclear enrichment facility, which is built 80 to 90 metres under a mountain.
Satellite imagery of the site shows six large holes where B2 stealth bombers dropped 14 massive bunker buster bombs - each weighing 13.6 tonnes and capable of penetrating 18 metres into concrete and 61 metres into earth.
But satellite imagery expert Decker Eveleth, an associate researcher with the CNA Corporation, said the hall containing hundreds of centrifuges is "too deeply buried for us to evaluate the level of damage based on satellite imagery".
Several experts have also cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of Fordow before the strike early Sunday morning and could be hiding it and other nuclear components in locations unknown to Israel, the U.S. and U.N. nuclear inspectors.
They noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showed "unusual activity" at Fordow on Thursday and Friday, with a line of 13 cargo trucks waiting outside an entrance of the facility.
A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the near weapons-grade 60 per cent highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the U.S. attack.
The New York Times has also reported that Israeli officials with knowledge of the intelligence believe Iran had moved equipment and uranium from the site in recent days, including 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 per cent purity.
This was confirmed by the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), who told the Times Iran had "made no secret" of the fact they had moved the materials.
US Vice President JD Vance has also admitted the White House does not know the fate of the enriched uranium.
The uranium would need to be enriched to around 90 per cent purity to be used in a weapon, but it is reportedly enough to make nine or 10 atomic bombs.
Jeffrey Lewis of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey said there were "almost certainly facilities that we don't know about" and the strikes have likely only set back Iran's nuclear program "by maybe a few years".
US Senator Mark Kelly, a Democrat from Arizona and a member of the Senate intelligence committee who said he had been reviewing intelligence every day, expressed the same concern.
"My big fear right now is that they take this entire program underground, not physically underground, but under the radar," he told NBC News.
"Where we tried to stop it, there is a possibility that this could accelerate it."
Iran lashed out at the US after the attacks, accusing it of crossing a "very big red line" by striking the nation's "peaceful" nuclear facilities. The nation's foreign minister also hinted that Iran may withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty - which Iran's parliament began preperations after Israel launched its first strikes
"It cannot be emphasised enough how much of a devastating blow that the US, a permanent member of the Security Council, dealt to the global Non-Proliferation regime," Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said at a press conference in Turkey.
According to Arms Control Association head Daryl Kimball, "the world is going to be in the dark about what Iran may be doing".
Mick Mulroy, a former CIA officer who served in the Pentagon during Trump's first term, told the New York Times the US strike would "likely set back the Iranian nuclear weapon program two to five years'.
-With Reuters

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Michaelia Cash: Australia must stand up for its interests in the wake of US Iran strikes
Michaelia Cash: Australia must stand up for its interests in the wake of US Iran strikes

West Australian

time24 minutes ago

  • West Australian

Michaelia Cash: Australia must stand up for its interests in the wake of US Iran strikes

The old adage that 'a week is a long time in politics' has been starkly demonstrated as an enduring truth with the significant world events that have unfolded recently. Israel has further exercised its sovereign right to defend its people and ensure the security of future generations. The Unites States strongly backed Israel with a series of precision strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran. It appears the US strikes will end Iran's nuclear capacity for now. The Coalition supports actions taken by the US to ensure that the Iranian regime is stopped from acquiring nuclear weapons. We can never allow the Iranian regime the capacity to enact its objectives of the destruction of the US and Israel. The world can never accept a nuclear-armed Iran and acting now to ensure that is the case is the right thing to do. These events are a long way from Australia but have implications for us and the rest of the world. President Donald Trump left the G7 meeting in Canada early to deal with the situation in the Middle East. For Australia this meant a planned meeting between the President and our Prime Minister on the sidelines of the G7 was cancelled. Given the situation in the Middle East, the decision by the President to cancel the meeting is completely understandable but to the detriment of Australia. This was an important opportunity for the Prime Minister to seek assurances on AUKUS and protect Australia from tariffs. Given global volatility and the growing list of issues in our relationship with the US, this underscores that the Prime Minister should not have merely relied on meeting with the President on the sidelines of international summits. The Prime Minister should have been more proactive in seeking to strengthen this relationship — Australia's most important — and we encourage him to change his approach to advance our national interest. As Australians we must step up our engagement across the board with the US. President Trump won the US election more than 200 days ago and has held meetings with leaders from the UK, Canada, Germany, Ireland, France, Japan, Norway and South Africa. Our Prime Minister has only spoken to the President on the phone. On the international stage, Australia needs its leader to stand up for our interests so we can build a stronger Australian economy. President Trump's tariffs on our steelmakers are not in the spirit of our century-old partnership, nor in line with our 20-year-old free trade agreement. We urge the US administration to give Australia a fair go and remove the tariffs, as they have done for the UK. And we urge the Albanese Government not to compromise on policies that ensure affordable healthcare, bio-security, and a fair economic landscape for Australian businesses and families. It must not sell out our Australian farmers and producers. Success can not be achieved through putting our world-class agriculture at risk. In regard to AUKUS, the Coalition put it in place and we want it to succeed. But the fact AUKUS is under review by the Pentagon is concerning because any delay or downgrade in the US commitment will impact our future defence capability. The Prime Minister must seek assurances from President Trump to safeguard the AUKUS agreement. AUKUS is the most important strategic initiative Australia has entered into in decades. It provides the nuclear-powered submarines and technological edge we need to deter conflict and defend our sovereignty in a more contested Indo-Pacific. This is not business as usual. The Prime Minister cannot afford to be a bystander in our relationship with the US. Anthony Albanese must put Australia's case clearly and secure the commitments we were promised. We will always support bipartisan co-operation on national security, but that co-operation cannot mask inaction from the Government. The Coalition wants the Government to succeed here because that is in our national interest. Michaelia Cash is the shadow minister for foreign affairs

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store