logo
Small Boat — a devastating novel about a migrant shipwreck and the cruelty of indifference

Small Boat — a devastating novel about a migrant shipwreck and the cruelty of indifference

Daily Maverick10-06-2025

The deadly results of detached officialdom are made painfully clear in this harrowing novel.
There's a particular kind of story that's rarely executed well – one without heroes, without lessons, without even the cold comfort of a villain you can confidently point at and say: there, that's the evil. Vincent Delecroix's Small Boat – a slim, bruising novel translated from its original French with quiet precision by Helen Stevenson – is that kind of story.
Small Boat, which was shortlisted for the 2025 International Booker Prize, centres on a real horror: the drowning of 27 people in the English Channel on 24 November 2021. They were crowded into an inflatable dinghy in the dark, reaching out over crackling radio lines, asking – in French, in English, in Kurdish – for help. They didn't get it.
What is known and not imagined in Delecroix's pages is that both the French and British coast­­guards received their calls. And both hesitated, passing re­­sponsibility back and forth like a poisoned parcel. People died while operators discussed jurisdiction.
The Cranston Inquiry, established to examine the failures of that night, is continuing, its transcripts and testimonies peeling back the layers of bureaucratic neglect.
Delecroix doesn't give us the migrants' stories directly. He focuses instead on a fictional French coastguard operator, a woman who spent that night on the radio doing (or not doing) what her training, her weariness, her own justifications allowed. In the aftermath, she is questioned – not in a court, but in a room filled with mirrors. She faces a policewoman who looks like her, thinks like her, speaks with her same clipped, professional cadence.
She listens back to recordings of her own voice on the rescue line, promising help that would not come, offering assurances she did not believe. She is left to reckon with the unbearable fact that someone, somewhere (was it her?) spoke the words: 'You will not be saved.'
She isn't especially monstrous. She's tired. She's professional. She has a young daughter at home and an ex-partner who sneers at her work. She runs on the beach to decompress. In one of the novel's most arresting turns, she compares herself to a mass-produced tin opener: efficient, functional, affectless. Delecroix draws her with enough delicacy that we cannot quite hate her. And that, of course, is far more unsettling.
Reading Small Boat, I thought – as one inevitably does – of Hannah Arendt's banality of evil. Not evil as grand spectacle or ideology, but as administration, the quiet conviction that one is simply fulfilling a role.
Arendt coined the phrase watching the trial of Adolf Eichmann, one of the chief Nazi organisers of the Holocaust. Eichmann organised the trains but claimed never to have hated the passengers. What Arendt saw was not a monster but a functionary – and that, of course, was the point.
I thought, too, about my own work as an anthropologist researching forced displacement across Ireland, Turkey and Australia. I've sat with people whose lives are shaped not by violence in its cinematic form, but by violence as policy: the hotel room without a kitchen, the letter that never arrives, the bed that's taken away with no warning.
I've heard a senior Irish official describe the state's provision of housing and support for asylum seekers as 'sufficient'. Meanwhile, people, stateless and waiting, are asked to prove their vulnerability again and again until even their grief is suspect.
Institutional indifference
The institutionalisation of indifference: that's the real story here. The smugness of protocols. The liturgy of duty rosters and shift reports. It wasn't evil that let those people drown in the Channel – it was ordinary people in warm offices citing rules, filling forms, following scripts.
We can see the birth of such indifference in policies like the UK's abandoned Rwanda plan, which casually proposed outsourcing asylum itself, as if refuge were a commodity.
Delecroix's brilliance lies in showing how violence at the border is carried out not by villains, but by workers. By women with mortgages, men on night shifts, people who've learnt to sort calls for help by urgency, credibility, accent. 'Sorting,' the narrator explains, 'is perhaps the most important part of the job.' Not all distress calls are equal. And the assumption – always lurking, never spoken – is that some lives are more likely to be saved.
At one point, the narrator's colleague, Julien, answers calls from migrants by quoting Pascal: 'Vous êtes embarqués.' You are already embarked. A fatalist shrug disguised as wisdom. As if to say: you should have thought of all this before you left. The shrug does the work of a policy, the quotation the work of a wall.
And yet, the narrator cannot fully perform indifference. She is haunted by the sea. She remembers loving it as a child. Now, it terrifies her. She feels it watching her, pursuing her, wanting to surge past the shore and swallow the continent whole. She runs along the beach to quiet her mind – a run that is almost the same length as the journey those on the dinghy tried to make.
If Small Boat has a flaw, it's that it sometimes flirts with making guilt into its own form of lyricism. But this too may be deliberate. It is easier, perhaps, to feel sorry than to feel implicated. And far easier to narrate moral confusion than to prevent its causes.
What Delecroix has written is not a redemption story. It's not a psychological thriller. It is a chamber piece for one voice and many ghosts. There are no grand gestures here, just small refusals, small failures. And the small, flickering boats of each human life, drifting towards – or away from – one another in the dark.
In a world ever more brutal towards those who flee war, hunger and despair, Delecroix's novel is a necessary and merciless indictment. It reminds us that the shipwreck is not theirs alone. It is ours too. DM
First published by The Conversation.
Fiona Murphy is an assistant professor in refugee and intercultural studies at Dublin City University in Ireland.
This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R35.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

French champagne makers face prison in human trafficking trial
French champagne makers face prison in human trafficking trial

eNCA

time16 hours ago

  • eNCA

French champagne makers face prison in human trafficking trial

LONDON - French prosecutors have requested two years behind bars for an employer in the champagne sector accused of human trafficking, exploiting seasonal workers and housing them in appalling conditions during the 2023 grape harvest. More than 50 mostly undocumented migrant harvesters lived in accommodation that harmed their "security, health and dignity", according to the prosecution. A prosecutor at the Chalons-en-Champagne criminal court in eastern France late Thursday requested a four-year prison sentence, including at least two behind bars, for a director of the vine-growing servicing company Anavim on charges including human trafficking. The director, a Kyrgyz woman in her forties, has also been accused of concealed labour, submitting vulnerable or dependent persons to undignified housing conditions, and employing foreign nationals without authorisation. "We cannot accept any champagne bottle concealing unregulated subcontracting and blatant mistreatment," the prosecutor said. Communicating with the help of a translator, the main defendant denied she was responsible for the housing conditions, and blamed two other defendants suspected of recruiting the harvesters hailing from Mali, Mauritania, Ivory Coast and Senegal. The prosecutor requested a three-year sentence for those two men, including at least one year without parole. Both Anavim, the company that provided the housing to the 57 seasonal workers, and a wine cooperative that traded with it were also tried as responsible parties in court. The prosecutor requested that Anavim be dissolved and the cooperative fined 200,000 euros ($230,500). French law defines human trafficking as "recruiting, transporting, transferring, housing or receiving a person to exploit them," by means of coerced employment, abusing a position of authority, abusing a vulnerable situation or in exchange of payment or benefits. - 'Like slaves' - Camara Sikou, one of the labourers, said in court that the workers had been treated "like slaves". Another worker, Modibo Sidibe, told AFP: "They put us in an abandoned building with no food, no water, nothing. And then they took us to harvest the grapes from 5:00 am to 6:00 pm." After a neighbour alerted the French police, investigators in September 2023 inspected the living conditions of the harvesters, according to prosecutor Annick Browne. The accommodation, a warehouse and a house under construction in the village of Nesle-le-Repons, contained "worn and dirty sanitation facilities", an outdoor kitchen and living areas that were unprotected from the weather, and bedding strewn on the floor. The accommodation also failed to respect electrical "security measures", the prosecutor said. Following the inspection, regional authorities ordered the closure of the accommodation, citing "unsanitary" and "undignified" living conditions. According to a report conducted by the labour inspectorate, the accommodation was in a state of "dilapidation", and the toilets and shared living spaces were "disgusting" due to lack of cleaning. Maxime Cessieux, the lawyer of the victims, said before the trial that the defendants had shown "total contempt" and disrespect for "human dignity". - 120,000 seasonal workers - Every year, around 120,000 seasonal workers are brought in the Champagne region to handpick grapes grown across 34,000 hectares (84,000 acres) and used to make its iconic bubbly. The famed winemaking region's reputation took a hit in 2023 when four grape harvesters died, possibly the result of sunstroke after working in scorching heat. David Desgranges, vice president of the Committee Against Modern Slavery, said the public should "be made aware of the extent of human trafficking in the agricultural sector", and producers "should know that they may face legal procedures". The court is to issue a verdict on July 21.

Second woman accuses French senator of drugging her
Second woman accuses French senator of drugging her

eNCA

time16 hours ago

  • eNCA

Second woman accuses French senator of drugging her

LONDON - A French senator accused of drugging an MP with the intent to assault her is facing an accusation from another woman, according to French television. The woman, who has not been named, accused Joel Guerriau of abusing her at his home in Paris in May 2022. The 67-year-old already faces charges over drugging centrist deputy Sandrine Josso's drink in November 2023, an accusation he has denied. "I decided to bury it deep inside me," said the woman, speaking with her face covered and voice altered on France 2 late Thursday. The woman said she felt "dizzy" before coming to her senses in the senator's bedroom, who she knew from political circles and with whom she had a legal dispute. France 2 said the woman has contacted police but has not yet filed a complaint. A lawyer for Guerriau told France 2 that the centre-right senator "strongly denies these new rumours", calling them "absurdities with the sole purpose of bringing Joel Guerriau to the public gallows." France's Horizons party, led by former prime minister Edouard Philippe, suspended Guerriau in November 2023 after he was formally charged with drugging Josso as part of a plot to carry out a sexual assault. Josso who is nearly two decades his junior said she felt ill after accepting a drink at the Paris home of the senator, with whom she was not in a relationship. Tests revealed that Josso had ecstasy in her system, prompting her to file the criminal complaint. Guerriau has denied any intention to sexually assault the lawmaker and has rejected the accusation that he deliberately drugged her, describing it as a "handling error". He has so far ruled out resigning, calling it "totally unfair" to step down before the court's ruling. The latest allegation against Guerriau comes months after the world was shocked by Frenchman Dominique Pelicot, who was jailed for 20 years for repeatedly drugging his wife so he and strangers could rape her. The shocking case, involving scores of men, brought widespread attention to the issue of consent. The French Senate passed a bill on Wednesday to include lack of consent in the country's criminal definition of rape, paving the way for its official adoption in the coming months. Consent-based rape laws already exist in several European countries including Germany, the Netherlands, Spain and Sweden.

Hundreds support Irish group Kneecap at UK court terrorism hearing
Hundreds support Irish group Kneecap at UK court terrorism hearing

Daily Maverick

time3 days ago

  • Daily Maverick

Hundreds support Irish group Kneecap at UK court terrorism hearing

Liam O'Hanna, whose stage name is Mo Chara, is alleged to have waved the flag of banned militant group Hezbollah during a Kneecap gig in London in November 2024. The 27-year-old was charged last month under the Terrorism Act, under which it is a criminal offence to display an article in a way which arouses reasonable suspicion that someone is a supporter of a proscribed organisation. Belfast-based Kneecap, who rap in Irish and English and regularly display pro-Palestine messages during their gigs, previously said the flag had been thrown on stage and described the charge against O'Hanna as an attempt to silence them. Prosecutor Michael Bisgrove told the court the case was not about O'Hanna's support for the people of Palestine or his criticism of Israel. 'He is well within his rights to voice his opinions and his solidarity, as is anybody else,' he said. 'The allegation in this case is a wholly different thing and deals with the video recording showing that, in November of last year, Mr O'Hanna wore and displayed the flag of Hezbollah … while saying 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah'.' O'Hanna's lawyer, Brenda Campbell, said the defence would argue the charge was brought after the six-month limit to bring such a charge. 'If we are right in relation to that, then this court has no jurisdiction and there ends the case,' she added. A further hearing will be held on August 20 to determine whether the charge was brought too late, Judge Paul Goldspring said. Hundreds of supporters had gathered outside Westminster Magistrates' Court ahead of the hearing, including some Northern Irish politicians and musicians, singing and waving Irish and Palestinian flags. O'Hanna had to push past a huge scrum of photographers when he arrived, with some supporters forcing their way into the entrance of the court, chanting 'Free Palestine' and 'Free Mo Chara'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store