Finnish President Stubb Stresses U.S. Support for Ukraine Important in Interview with Yomiuri Shimbun
The Yomiuri Shimbun
Finnish President Alexander Stubb speaks in a recent interview in Tokyo.
Finnish President Alexander Stubb said in a recent interview with The Yomiuri Shimbun that continued U.S. involvement in Ukraine is important to end Russia's aggression against the country.
While Russia and Ukraine have held direct talks twice since May, negotiations have made little progress. Ukraine called for a ceasefire, but Russia rejected it, demanding Ukraine become a neutral country.
'Russia and Putin are not serious about the ceasefire,' said Stubb, who assumed the presidency in March 2024. 'That's why they are putting forward demands and papers, which are completely unacceptable and violate any tenant of international rules, law and norms.'
'They're sending such low-level delegations to Istanbul who basically don't have any kind of a mandate to negotiate,' added Stubb, who has previously served as Finland's prime minister, finance minister and foreign minister.
Stubb said there are two ways to force Russia to the negotiating table: applying sanctions and providing military and financial aid to Ukraine.
'That is then linked to air defenses like HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket System) [of the United States] or Tauruses that the Germans and others are providing,' Stubb said. 'So, these are the only things. We have to understand that the only language that Putin understands is power.'
The Finnish president emphasized the importance of continued U.S. involvement in Ukraine.
'That's why we keep on engaging a lot with our American friends, and especially with [U.S.] President [Donald] Trump, to convince our friends to be tough with the Russians,' he said.
In March, Stubb met with Trump at his residence in Florida and played golf with him. Stubb said he has been in contact with the U.S. president on a regular basis since then.
Trump has recently criticized Putin, but his stance on support for Ukraine has not been clear.
'I think President Trump is adamant to end this war,' Stubb said. 'He wants to do that, and he wants to do it sooner, rather than later, and I sense frustration with the fact that he hasn't been able to do that yet, and I know that in the heart of his heart, he sort of knows that it's Putin's fault.'
Stubb said a new U.S. sanction package would be a good incentive to force Russia to the negotiating table.
Regarding Finland's accession to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in 2023, Stubb said, 'We feel that we have a lot of responsibility inside the alliance, and I'm sure that will continue, but we also need close alliances with countries like Japan.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
U.S. Wants Japan to Raise Defense Spending to 5% of GDP; Pentagon Spokesperson Calls it ‘Common Sense' to Match Europe
WASHINGTON — The United States believes its allies in Asia, including Japan, should increase their defense spending to 5% of gross domestic product, according to a Pentagon spokesperson. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is considering proposing its member states raise their defense spending targets from 2% to 5% of GDP. NATO is envisaging a plan to set conventional defense spending, such as weapons purchases, at 3.5% and allocate 1.5% for defense-related expenses, such as the renovation of military roads. The Japanese government is proceeding with a plan to increase its security-related expenditures, including defense spending, from the current level of about 1.8% of the fiscal 2022 GDP to 2% in fiscal 2027. 'It is only common sense for Asia-Pacific allies to move rapidly to step up to match Europe's pace and level of defense spending,' Sean Parnell, chief spokesperson of the U.S. Defense Department, said in a statement, responding to a question by The Yomiuri Shimbun. To counter China and North Korea, Parnell stressed Japan should be in line with '5% of GDP spending on defense' — the target being mulled by NATO member states.
Yomiuri Shimbun
21 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Armitage Had Last Message for Japan as U.S.'S Friend;Fulfill Leadership Role, Don't Flinch Before Trump
The late Richard Armitage strongly hoped that Japan would stand fast and confident in its leadership role on the world stage, without flinching in the face of actions by U.S. President Donald Trump's administration, according to an unfinished essay he was preparing to be published in The Yomiuri Shimbun. The former U.S. deputy secretary of state was long known for his expertise on Japan. He passed away suddenly at the age of 79 on April 13. Amid growing uncertainty in the international situation under the second Trump administration, Armitage stressed the importance of Japan's role as a stable global leader. His message should be noted as the testament of a person who had passionately devoted himself to strengthening the Japan-U.S. alliance. Armitage had planned to visit Japan in May. Before that, his next contribution to 'Insights into the World' was scheduled to be published in The Yomiuri Shimbun. Although the draft was not kept in written form, Kara Bue, a founding partner in his consulting firm who also served as a deputy assistant secretary at the U.S. State Department, recalled his comments for the planned essay and shared them with The Yomiuri Shimbun. According to Bue, the tentative title of the draft is 'In an uncertain times, Japan must remain confident in its global role.' Japan's national security policy has continued to develop since the 1980s, evolving amid constraints including interpretations of the Constitution. According to Bue, Armitage felt that particularly during the second administration of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, Japan took the leading role in the Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade agreement and also served as a humanitarian force for good, growing to occupy 'a true leadership position on the global stage.' Bue also said that Armitage wanted Japan to remember 'not to be left uncertain or confused about what it should be doing' because 'the world needs Japan more than ever as a steady hand' amid the uncertainty and chaos brought about by the U.S. administration. She described his thoughts as a message of encouragement to Japan. Believing that having allies and friends was part of 'the strength of America,' Armitage criticized how Trump treats such nations, saying he 'didn't feel the Trump administration tended to them as they should.' What Armitage wanted people to remember was that the top two people in the nations' respective administrations — the prime minister and the president — were not the entire relationship, Bue said, adding that he encouraged people to feel reassured by the strength of the bilateral alliance.
Yomiuri Shimbun
a day ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Singapore Diplomat Bilahari Kausikan Says U.S. Has Long-term Competitive Strategy with China
Bilahari Kausikan, former permanent secretary of the Singapore Ministry of Foreign Affairs, told The Yomiuri Shimbun that the United States' tariff policy is part of a long-term competitive strategy against China, and Washington will continue to have the same policy even after the president changes. The following text, excerpted from his interview, has been edited for flow and you look at various things that [U.S. President Donald] Trump and other members said, Trump seemed to think of [the] tariff as a kind of universal tool. He tried to do several things at the same time. He tried to use the tariff as a tool for national security goals to stop drugs and migrants, to reduce the deficit, bring back manufacturing to the U.S., increase revenue. I personally don't think this policy is sustainable in the long run. The 90-day timeline is running out soon. I won't be surprised if he extended it — in individual cases. I guess they will extend the timeline for major countries like the U.K., Japan, India and China. [The U.S. tariff policy] will slow down the U.S. economy, increase inflation and it will hurt Trump's own base. I think [the tariffs are] dangerous for all of us, at least most of us. But the real danger I think is for low-income countries, and middle-income countries. For example, how did Japan, South Korea and Singapore become high-income countries? The growth path was the normal one — by exports. It is going to become much more difficult for Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia. In fact, it will even become much more difficult for some parts of China. So, I think that's the big danger. Because when you get countries stuck in a real income trap, they will get frustrated. When they get frustrated, there will be a kind of geopolitical problem. The competition between major powers is quite natural. You can see trade policies in the context of broader strategic competition. Why does he [Trump] want to bring manufacturing back to the U.S.? I think these are all preparations for long-term strategy competition with China. Trade is just one instrument. That is why there is really no difference in this trade policy. There is very little difference anyway between Biden and Trump. I don't know who is going to succeed Trump. Whoever it is, more or less should have the same policy because this strategic competition with China is a long-term thing. He's also concerned about transshipment from China, to Southeast Asia to the U.S. That is going to be a big problem for countries like Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia. It's not just a simple method of smuggling or backdooring. There are legitimate reasons why Chinese companies are moving to Southeast Asia. It is not all because of tariffs placed on China or geopolitical tensions. China is becoming a more expensive place to produce for many industries. Some Chinese industries are worried about their own government, so they are trying to move their own business out. Those are very legitimate things, and it is going to be not so straightforward for Southeast Asian countries to deal with it. The U.S. is still a very important market. There is no substitute for the U.S., for anybody. So, every country will make its own calculations — balance or benefit against cost. I don't think we should stop trying to attract Chinese investments or any kind of investment, but we have to be more careful about what kinds of things we work on with China. Economic integration is politically difficult for any country in any region. If you are in a period of slow growth, it is going to become even more politically difficult. And the hard fact is, while we have plans for economic integration, 10 ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) economies are competitive. Some leaders think that they are competitive. We need the integration, but whether we will get it is another matter. You have to make yourself an attractive place for people to want to invest in your country. I think some Asian countries have not done enough to keep themselves attractive. We hope you will continue to invest in ASEAN. Japan is one of the most important partners for all ASEAN countries. And you will continue to be so. We hope you will not lose faith in Southeast Asia and continue to invest here. On the other hand, I think Southeast Asian countries must do what they can to make themselves attractive for Japanese investments. The responsibility is ours. — This interview was conducted by Yomiuri Shimbun Correspondent Takashi Itoda. Bilahari Kausikan Kausikan, 71, joined the Singapore Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 1981. He has held posts such as ambassador to the United Nations and assistant secretary for Southeast Asian affairs. He served as permanent secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs from 2010 to 2013. Since retiring, he has spoken actively about the future of ASEAN and is known as a leading voice in Southeast Asia.
