logo
A new route for a cross-border pylons plan - can it appease locals?

A new route for a cross-border pylons plan - can it appease locals?

BBC News07-04-2025

Energy network bosses hope that a revised route for taking energy to England will appease at least some rural residents of the Scottish Borders.Since plans for the Cross Border Connection were revealed last year protest groups have been formed in communities near the proposed pylons.Following the backlash, Scottish Power Energy Networks (SPEN) have altered several sections of the 57-mile route between Lauder and the border, south of Newcastleton.But Rosi Lister from Action Against Pylons - a collection of local community protest groups - warned: "It's all very well revising the route, but as soon as you move it from one place you affect another community."
SPEN project manager Ewan Borthwick said: "Historically we've had energy coming from the south - England and Wales - through nuclear and hydro, so it's now our turn to send renewable energy the other way."
The Cross Border Connection is seen as a vital link in the UK upgrade of the national grid.Dozens of wind farms and solar energy parks - from the Highlands all the way down to the Borders - are already connected to the grid, with many more projects in the pipeline.Finding a suitable route for the 60-metre high pylons, between a proposed new electricity substation near Lauder and awaiting cables at the border near Carlisle, is proving problematic for SPEN.
And bosses have ruled out an underground solution.Mr Borthwick added: "We know from previous projects that it is between six and nine times more expensive for an underground cable solution, rather than overhead."Going underground would take this project from the hundreds of millions [of pounds] into the billions, and we have a licence from Ofgem to come up with the most cost-efficient solution."It will be the electricity bill payers that will be paying for this over the next 50 years or so."
The revised route has taken the planned pylons further away from the villages of Roberton and Etrrickbridge - but moved them closer to settlements at Craik and Yarrow Feus.There is also more use of areas already covered in forestry and the new route will have less impact on the World War II prisoner of war camp at Stobbs, outside Hawick.
SPEN's environmental planner Malrlene Marimbe said: "We reviewed all of the feedback from the public and statutory stakeholders during the consultation for the original route and modified the original preferred route."We believe this alternative route is more balanced when it comes to the concerns we received about visual impact and also the attractiveness of the landscape."We also took into account concerns about environmental impact as well as health impacts of proximity to residential properties."
The latest consultation over the route will end on May 2, with the official proposed Cross Border Connection route being published later in the year.Around half a dozen community protest groups along the route have come together to form Action Against Pylons.Rosi Lister from the group said: "We believe this will destroy a large part of the Scottish Borders."It's all very well revising the route, but as soon as you move it from one place you affect another community."There are no winners with these pylons."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump is relying on a small circle of advisers as he weighs Iran strikes
Trump is relying on a small circle of advisers as he weighs Iran strikes

NBC News

time2 days ago

  • NBC News

Trump is relying on a small circle of advisers as he weighs Iran strikes

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is increasingly relying on a small group of advisers for critical input as he weighs whether to order U.S. military action in Iran targeting its nuclear program, according to two defense officials and a senior administration official. At the same time, another senior administration official said, Trump has been crowdsourcing with an array of allies outside the White House and in his administration about whether they think he should greenlight strikes in Iran — a question that has divided his core supporters. Despite routinely asking a broader group of people what they think he should do, Trump tends to make many decisions with just a handful of administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is also the interim national security adviser, the senior administration official said. Trump also leans on his Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, when he weighs decisions that fall under his portfolio, the official said. As he decides whether to directly involve the United States in a war with Iran, Trump has expanded his circle in some ways while shrinking it in others. He has sidelined National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard, who opposes U.S. strikes in Iran, and he has not been routinely turning to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth as part of his decision-making process, according to the two defense officials and the senior administration official. Defense Department spokesman Sean Parnell pushed back against the notion that Hegseth has not been heavily involved. "This claim is completely false. The Secretary is speaking with the President multiple times a day each day and has been with the President in the Situation Room this week," Parnell said in a statement. "Secretary Hegseth is providing the leadership the Department of Defense and our Armed Forces need, and he will continue to work diligently in support of President Trump's peace through strength agenda." Trump is listening to Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Gen. Erik Kurilla, the commander of U.S. Central Command; and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, the two defense officials and a former administration official said. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday that Trump will decide whether the United States should get involved in the Israel-Iran conflict within the next two weeks. In contrast to virtually every president before him since World War II, Trump does not rely on senior officials to carefully prepare foreign policy and military options and then discuss them with him in a structured, deliberate way, according to two sources with knowledge of the matter. He discusses foreign policy with officials in his administration, as well as a myriad of foreign leaders and contacts outside the government. But those discussions are more informal and freewheeling. As a result, there are arguably fewer opportunities for officials or senior military commanders to question his assumptions or raise concerns about a course of action, the two sources said. When Trump announced last month that he was lifting sanctions on Syria after he met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, senior officials were taken by surprise, the two sources with knowledge of the matter said. Treasury Department officials had no warning that he would make such an announcement, and no technical preparations had been made to carry out a step that required discussions with foreign banks and Syrian government officials, the sources said. Since he returned to the White House in January, Trump has drastically scaled back the National Security Council, which traditionally collaborates with other federal agencies to craft policy options and outline their possible consequences, particularly when it comes to possible military action.

Los Angeles mayor lifts downtown curfew she imposed during protests against immigration raids
Los Angeles mayor lifts downtown curfew she imposed during protests against immigration raids

NBC News

time3 days ago

  • NBC News

Los Angeles mayor lifts downtown curfew she imposed during protests against immigration raids

LOS ANGELES — Downtown Los Angeles businesses hoped customers would return quickly on Tuesday after Mayor Karen Bass lifted a curfew she had imposed last week to prevent vandalism and break-ins during nighttime protests against President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. The protests, which have been concentrated in a few blocks of downtown where federal and local government buildings are, were in response to President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown in the city and subsequent deployment of the National Guard and Marines. The curfew set in place June 10 provided "successful crime prevention and suppression efforts" and protected stores, restaurants, businesses and residents, the Democratic mayor said. It covered a relatively tiny slice of the sprawling city. Little Tokyo neighborhood hit hard On Tuesday afternoon, the impact of days of protests could be seen in the boarded-up windows lining the streets of Little Tokyo, a historical Japanese American district right next to a federal detention building still heavily guarded by military troops. A steady stream of tourists stopped in the neighborhood to take photos of baseball superstar Shohei Ohtani wearing Dodgers blue in a massive mural on the side of a hotel. Don Tahara, the owner of Far Bar, said businesses in the area have been hit hard with vandalism and some break-ins. On June 8, thousands of protesters took to the streets in response to Trump's deployment of the Guard, blocking off a major freeway as law enforcement used tear gas, rubber bullets and flash bangs to control the crowd. Photos captured several Waymo robotaxis set on fire. A day later, police officers used flash bangs and shot projectiles as they pushed protesters through Little Tokyo, where bystanders and restaurant workers rushed to get out of their way. Some protesters set off fireworks and threw water bottles at the officers, yelling, "Shame!" But Tahara, a third-generation Japanese American immigrant, said he also understands why the protests were necessary, seeing similarities between the current administration's immigration raids and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. "The problems that Little Tokyo had 75 years ago was basically the federal government coming in and imprisoning all of them in concentration camps," Tahara said. "They were uprooted from their homes and businesses, their churches ... we're seeing a repeat of that." Since people assumed the curfew would still be in place Tuesday, Far Bar has still had many cancellations of reservations and events. They decided to open earlier for lunchtime in the past few days, but employees have lost hours from their paychecks. Combined with the lingering effects of the LA wildfires earlier this year, tariff-induced price increases and other increased costs, it has been a challenging climate for businesses to navigate, Tahara said. On Monday, Bass trimmed back curfew hours from beginning at 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. after a drop in arrests in the area. Bass faulted a relatively small group of "bad actors who do not care about the immigrant community," a nod to thousands of protesters who exercised their rights peacefully. Trump directed federal immigration officials Sunday to prioritize deportations from Democratic-run cities, a move that comes after a weekend of large protests all across the country against his administration. Cindy Reyes, head server at Rakkan Ramen, said they completely shut down the shop for Saturday's protests and closed early on Sunday. The curfew was especially difficult for their night-shift workers because the ramen joint is usually open until midnight. "Dinner shift makes the most money because we're the last restaurant standing so people come to us in the end," she said. Historic Core of downtown LA also hurt The Historic Core of downtown LA, further away from where the protests have occurred and home to many nightclubs and bars, has also suffered from break-ins. Many closed down for the duration of the curfew because their core business happens in the evening. Rhythm Room owner Vincent Vong said he has lost tens of thousands of dollars from closing for a whole week, not just from the loss of business but also to keep paying his employees. "I have to schedule people to come in because I need to get them paid somehow," he said. He wished there was more support from the city and deployment of law enforcement resources to protecting the "most vulnerable areas," pointing out that his street has often been the target of vandalism and theft during large demonstrations. Even as the curfew is lifted, Vong said it will be difficult to bring customers back to an area that still has boarded-up windows and feels "apocalyptic."

GOP lawmaker criticizes Trump's military parade: 'Never liked the idea'
GOP lawmaker criticizes Trump's military parade: 'Never liked the idea'

The Herald Scotland

time5 days ago

  • The Herald Scotland

GOP lawmaker criticizes Trump's military parade: 'Never liked the idea'

"I grew up in the 70s and 80s, and the only parades I can remember are Soviet parades for the most part, or North Korean parades. And the parades I remember from our history were different," he said, referencing the iconic photograph of a sailor kissing a woman in New York City's Times Square at the end of World War II. "We were rejoicing the end of war and we were rejoicing our soldiers coming home, and that absolutely ought to be we never glorified weapons so much. And I know he means well. I don't think he means for any of this to be depicted in another fashion, but I'm just not a big fan," Paul added. Paul also knocked the cost of the parade. "We're $2 trillion in the hole and just an additional cost like this, I'm not for it," he said. An Army estimate for its commemoration totaled $40 million, USA TODAY previously reported. Trump defended his decision to stage the parade, saying in remarks on June 14 that, "Every other country celebrates their victories. It's about time America did, too." It's not the first time Paul has bucked Trump in recent weeks. He's also voiced opposition to the president's sweeping tax and domestic policy bill, arguing that it would only balloon the country's budget deficit. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that it would add roughly $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. The legislation would also have major impacts on Medicaid, taxes, food programs and more. Paul told Welker that he spoke with Trump on June 14 after the parade, and he's not an "absolute no" on Trump's bill. "I don't have as much trouble with the tax cuts. I think there should be more spending cuts. But if they want my vote, they'll have to negotiate," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store