Fetterman Calls California Protests ‘Anarchy' as He Criticizes Democrats

Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania warned fellow Democrats that they could face a political backlash if they were seen as failing to sufficiently condemn acts of violence by protesters in Southern California, which local officials have said were limited.
On Monday, he posted a photo on social media of a car engulfed in flames and a masked, shirtless person waving a Mexican flag. He suggested that Democrats — many of whom have in fact criticized acts of destruction or violence — should go further in denouncing unruly demonstrations.
'This is anarchy and true chaos,' he wrote. 'My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement.'
Local officials in California have described the violence as limited, under control and exacerbated by President Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard and deploy troops over the governor's objection.
'I unapologetically stand for free speech, peaceful demonstrations, and immigration — but this is not that,' Mr. Fetterman wrote. 'This is anarchy and true chaos.'
Mr. Fetterman, elected in 2022, has become one of the Democrats whom Republicans love to quote as he has broken with some of his party's orthodoxies. He checked himself into a hospital for depression early in his first year in office, and his mental health has recently been the subject of both concern and scrutiny.
Democrats on Capitol Hill tried to shrug off his latest comments on Tuesday.
'Everyone is entitled to their opinion,' said Representative Yvette D. Clarke of New York, the chair of the Congressional Black Caucus.
Some praise appeared to arrive, however, from Elon Musk, the owner of the social media site X, where Mr. Fetterman made his comment. Mr. Musk replied to the post with an American flag emoji.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Hill

36 minutes ago

• The Hill

Senate parliamentarian strikes key SNAP spending cuts from GOP megabill

The Senate parliamentarian on Friday ruled against several more Republican provisions in President Trump's megabill, including language to bar immigrants who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents from receiving food assistance under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, also ruled against a key Republican pay-for in the bill, a proposal requiring states to pay for a certain percentage of food assistance under SNAP depending on those states' error rates in delivering aid. The proposal to shift SNAP costs onto the states was a sticking point with Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Susan Collins (Maine). The parliamentarian's ruling could make it easier for Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) to pick up Murkowski's and Collins's support as the SNAP-related pay-for will now need to be stripped from the legislation. The Senate bill as drafted would have required states to pay between 5 and 15 percent of food benefits in 2028 on their rate of error in paying out food benefits. Almost every state in the country has had error rates of 6 percent or higher, which would have shifted a significant percentage of the cost for delivering food assistance onto the states. The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities estimated that the Senate language would have cost North Carolina, for example, to pay up to $438 million for food aid in 2028. MacDonough struck another blow against the GOP leadership's agenda by ruling against a section to extend the suspension of permanent price support authority, something that traditionally has been part of the farm bill. Congress passed a one-year extension of the farm bill in December after Democrats and Republicans failed to reach a deal on a multi-year extension of the law due to disagreements over SNAP funding. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the ranking member on the Senate Budget Committee, applauded the parliamentarian's decision on Friday. 'The Senate parliamentarian has begun providing guidance that certain provisions in the Republicans' One Big, Beautiful Betrayal will be subject to the Byrd Rule — ultimately meaning they will need to be stripped from the bill or altered to comply with the rules of reconciliation,' Merkley said in a statement. 'As much as Senate Republicans would prefer to throw out the rule book at advance their conservative families lose and billionaires win agenda, this process has rules and Democrats are making sure those rules are enforced,' he added. 'We will be fighting this bill every single day until Republicans bring it to the floor.' Provisions of the reconciliation package that the parliamentarian decides violate the Senate's Byrd Rule are not eligible to pass with a simple-majority vote. If Thune and Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) don't remove provisions found to be in violation of the Byrd Rule, the Republican package would need to muster 60 votes to advance. The parliamentarian ruled against several provisions of the bill under the Commerce Committee's jurisdiction, including a section that appropriated $250 million to Coast Guard stations on South Padre Island, Texas, damaged by fire in 2025. She also ruled that language allocating $85 million to transfer the space shuttle on display at the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum to a non-profit group in Texas would not be eligible for the budget reconciliation fast track. Provisions found not to comply with the Byrd Rule would need at least 60 votes to overcome a point-of-order objection.

Bloomberg

an hour ago

• Bloomberg

EU Frets Over US Demands in Trade Talks It Sees as Unbalanced

The US is demanding the European Union make what the bloc's officials see as unbalanced, unilateral concessions as part of ongoing trade talks, setting up a tough decision over whether to move ahead with countermeasures if the terms of any deal don't improve. The best-case scenario remains an agreement on principles that would allow the negotiations to continue beyond an early July deadline, according to people familiar with the matter.

Yahoo

an hour ago

• Yahoo

How a contrarian trade can help you as an investor stay ahead of the Israel-Iran conflict

As President Donald Trump decides whether or not the U.S. will join Israel's attacks against Iran, investors and traders have been considering the scale of a possible disruption to the international oil market. Iran's government might attempt to block shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, which saw a daily average of 20.9 million barrels of oil in 2023, 'the equivalent of about 20% of global petroleum liquids consumption,' according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The obvious trade would be to invest in oil-delivery contracts directly or by holding shares of funds that track oil prices or energy stocks. Examples include: Israel-Iran clash delivers a fresh shock to investors. History suggests this is the move to make. Why the biggest-ever 'triple witching' options expiration could deliver a jolt to Friday's trading 'I'm at my wit's end': My niece paid off her husband's credit card but fell behind on her taxes. How can I help her? Why the stock market will be performing a high-wire act over the summer, according to UBS 'I prepaid our mom's rent for a year': My sister is a millionaire and never helps our mother. How do I cut her out of her will? During an interview with Joseph Adinolfi, Marko Papic, chief strategist at BCA Research, said that if Iran blocks the Strait of Hormuz in an attempt to disrupt the world oil market, investors should look further ahead, beyond the obvious, and do these two things. Related coverage: There is so much coverage of generative artificial intelligence and its incorporation into so many products and services that investors might be taking this technological leap for granted. When interviewed by Barbara Kollmeyer for the Need to Know column, Patrick Kelly, who co-manages the Alger Focus Equity Fund ALAFX, said this particular AI industry would 'probably dwarf the size' of the market for smartphones. The Alger Focus fund has a five-star rating (the highest) within Morningstar's large growth category. The Need to Know column provides insights every business morning for investors and traders, with comments from professional money managers. You can sign up here to have it waiting in your inbox. Related coverage: Amazon CEO says AI will mean fewer jobs at the company. Here's his advice on how people can keep theirs. People who are ready to wrap up their careers and have built up retirement accounts face decisions on how to make sure their money will generate enough income for them to live on. And those choices can vary over time. Brett Arends explained how recent bond-market trends have set up an ideal pricing environment for annuities. You might be able to convert some or all of your retirement account into an annuity that provides an income yield of more than 7% for the rest of your life. But annuities aren't for everyone. Arends broke down the decision points and pricing factors. More from Brett Arends: Aarthi Swaminathan covers the residential real-estate market. This week she listed U.S. housing markets with the largest percentages of home sellers lowering their prices. Read on: More builders slash prices as home buyers stay away from the housing market Quentin Fottrell — the Moneyist — helped a woman concerned that if she left money to her niece, the inheritance might be mismanaged. More from the Moneyist: Myra P. Saefong looked into a fascinating development in trading markets for precious metals. Related: Gold is the new 'risk-free' asset as Israel-Iran conflict rattles investors One might think gold and virtual currencies have little in common. But Gordon Gottsegen explained why many individual investors are embracing both. For individual investors: Meme stocks and Robinhood users show why long-term investing is your best bet On Monday, President Trump's sons Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump rolled out Trump Mobile — a new mobile-phone service with a competitive monthly price, especially when you factor in extra services that other carriers charge for. You can use your own phone with this service or opt for a Trump-branded gold phone when it is made available. Jurica Dujmovic addressed the controversy surrounding this type of service being offered by the president's family. But he also looked deeply into what customers will get for $47.45 a month, while addressing concerns over data security. Here are 10 things he learned about Trump Mobile. I'm 75 and have a reverse mortgage. Should I pay it off with my $200K savings — and live off Social Security instead? I'm 51, earn $129K and have $165K in my 401(k). Can I afford to retire when my husband, 59, draws Social Security at 62? Tech companies lead list of double-digit gains in June for stocks in the S&P 500 Israel-Iran conflict poses three challenges for stocks that could slam market by up to 20%, warns RBC My mother-in-law thought the world's richest man needed Apple gift cards. How on Earth could she fall for this scam? Sign in to access your portfolio