Meta teases smart glasses collaboration with Oakley; launch set for June 20
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tech major Meta is set to expand its smart glasses portfolio through a new collaboration with eyewear maker Oakley. A new Instagram handle, @oakleymeta, posted a teaser video with the Oakley and Meta logos side by side, much like the branding used for the Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses . The video ended with 'The next evolution is coming on June 20.'Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg reposted the teaser, adding to the anticipation, other senior executives shared the video as well.Meta first entered the smart glasses space in 2021 with the launch of Ray-Ban Stories glasses that came with built-in speakers and a camera, but without any augmented reality features. The second-generation version, released in 2023 for $299, added a better camera, improved audio, and an AI assistant.Oakley, like Ray-Ban, is owned by Italy-based eyewear conglomerate EssilorLuxottica. This collaboration is an extension of Meta's existing partnership with the group.According to a report in January by news agency Bloomberg, the Oakley-Meta glasses will be based on the Oakley Sphaera model and may feature a centrally placed built-in camera, unlike the Ray-Ban Meta glasses , where the camera sits on the edge of the frame. Earlier this month Snap Inc., the parent company of ephemeral messaging app Snapchat, announced that it will launch immersive smart glasses called Specs in 2026. This move aligns with other Big Tech players eyeing the lucrative smart eyewear market , as part of their push to make the next big leap in consumer tech hardware.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Meta wanted to buy a $30 billion AI startup: report. What it is trying instead.
Meta Platforms stock has climbed this year in response to the social media company's progress with artificial-intelligence. Now, it is reportedly stepping up its efforts, trying to acquire a major AI start-up and recruiting new AI executives. Meta looked to buy Safe Superintelligence earlier this year but was rebuffed by its founder Ilya Sutskever, CNBC reported late Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter. Safe Superintelligence was valued at $30 billion in a funding round in March. Meta and Safe Superintelligence didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. On the face of it, such an acquisition would have been an odd move. Safe Superintelligence hasn't released any products, as it concentrates on developing supersmart AI. Meta has also been getting along perfectly well on its own, with its stock up 19% so far this year. The real attraction of such a deal likely would have been to get Sutskever and his key employees on board. Sutskever was previously chief scientist at OpenAI, where he helped develop the technology behind ChatGPT. He left OpenAI last year following a break with its CEO Sam Altman, and subsequently launched Safe Superintelligence. Thwarted in his efforts to bring Sutskever on board, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has instead negotiated to recruit Safe Superintelligence's CEO Daniel Gross, as well as former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman, according to CNBC. Gross and Friedman are partners in the investment fund NFDG, which has backed several AI start-ups. So far, Meta has relied on in-house AI models, as opposed to acquiring or funding an AI start-up as Microsoft has done with OpenAI and has with Anthropic. However, there have been signs that Zuckerberg feels Meta's AI team needs bolstering. Last week, Meta completed an investment in Scale AI. The Wall Street Journal reported that Meta would pump $14 billion into the data-labeling company in exchange for a 49% stake and that Scale AI founder Alexandr Wang would join Meta. The bigger picture here is that multiple AI companies have delayed the releases of their next flagship models amid concerns they don't show sufficient improvement. That suggests the industry's 'scaling law," the idea that larger and more complex models are automatically more intelligent, is breaking down. Meta is among those struggling to make a breakthrough. Its 'Behemoth" model, originally meant to be released in April, is being delayed until fall or later, according to the Journal. The response from AI companies has been the development of so-called reasoning models that break down problems step-by-step. However, a recent paper from researchers at Apple found 'fundamental limitations" in such models. At tasks beyond a certain level of complexity, these AIs suffered 'complete accuracy collapse," according to the researchers. That suggests the industry will need to adopt new techniques to push AI to the next level of intelligence. Meta will hope that its new recruits can get there first.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Delhi: 44-year-old CA held for duping woman of ₹4.75 crore
A 44-year-old chartered accountant (CA) was detained for allegedly duping the director of a private share trading firm of over ₹ 4.75 crore by promising large profits through stock market investments, the police said on Friday. The accused, identified as Mukesh Garg, was nabbed from his residence in Kaushambi, Ghaziabad. (Representational image) The accused, identified as Mukesh Garg, was nabbed from his residence in Kaushambi, Ghaziabad. Police said they were able to recover ₹ 4.74 crore of the cheated amount after swiftly alerting the Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre (I4C) and freezing multiple layers of bank transfers involved in the fraud. 'We held Mukesh Garg after registering a case of cheating, impersonation, and use of forged documents under sections 318, 319, and 340 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,' said Aishwarya Sharma, additional deputy commissioner of police (southeast). The complaint was lodged by Ashima Nayyar, a director at a private share trading firm, who claimed that Garg had offered her high returns on stock market deals. On his assurance, she transferred ₹ 4.75 crore in seven tranches to his bank account. However, Garg stopped responding after receiving the funds and did not return the money despite repeated requests. Because the amount involved exceeded ₹ 50 lakh, the case has now been transferred to the Intelligence Fusion and Strategic Operations (IFSO) unit, which specialises in cybercrime investigations. 'He will now be handed over to the IFSO team for further interrogation,' Sharma added. Garg is also the director of a Noida-based firm where he allegedly ran his operations.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
India is missing the core elements needed to realise the AI dream
New Delhi: India's mushrooming artificial intelligence-focused startups are attracting a lot of buzz, but a lack of innovation and groundbreaking research means the country is way behind the US and China in the tussle for AI supremacy. This is a result of what the industry calls 'secondary' innovation—technologies that cannot be patented globally to influence global economics in the long run. Spending on foundational engineering, research and development (ER&D) work in AI is minuscule, at least five executives involved in AI-related work told Mint. In November, the World Intellectual Property Organization (Wipo's) annual report said that India was the sixth region in the world in terms of overall patent applications—behind China, the US, Japan, Korea and the European Union. However, the gap was stark—China filed 1.7 million patents through 2024, almost 3x more than the US, with 600,000 patents. India filed only 90,000 patents—5% of what China did. Also read: AI firms getting GPU sops may see govt at the table The gap is even more evident in generative AI, the core battlefield in global technology right now. Last year, China filed over 38,000 patents in generative AI with Wipo, the global patent authority, ahead of the US with around 6,500 patents. India ranked sixth here too with 1,350 patents in generative AI—3.5% of China's advancements, and around a fifth of the US. Ashwini Vaishnaw, Union minister for electronics and IT, promised last month that 'India's first foundational AI model is still on track to be released by the end of this year". Yet, the patent filings suggest a US-China war for AI supremacy threatens to leave India out of the league of nations that would influence global innovation and economy over the next decades. Fund scarcity Founders argue that much of this is due to the lack of large early-stage funds. US-based Essential AI, founded by Ashish Vaswani, the former Google Brain engineer who co-invented the transformer model that backs all generative AI applications, emerged from stealth in December 2023 with a $56.5-million series-A funding round. Others that have raised large capital in the US over the past three years include Adept AI's $65-million Series A funding round in April 2022, Cursor's $60-million Series A in August and more. Each of these ventures is currently investing in building foundational technologies that, in the long run, would be patented and licensed to run AI applications and services around the world. Also read: Sovereign silicon: India targets indigenous 2nm, Nvidia-level GPU by 2030 Executives leading global ventures agree that India is behind the curve in AI at the moment. There is 'definitely a lack of enough AI engineers working on core engineering in the field in India", said Pranav Mistry, founder and chief executive Mistry, former global chief of Samsung's advanced research division, spoke withMinton the sidelines of a gathering in Bengaluru earlier this month. 'There is certainly a mindset difference between India and the US in terms of how ventures approach AI engineering in the two nations. In the end, being able to hold patents is what will give geographies access to geopolitical soft power over the years to come—and India should definitely focus on this field," Mistry said. Vaswani of Essential AI said, 'There's no reason for India to not build its own AI models—and there should be more ventures focused on doing it in and for India, within India." Developing vision Investors argue that a lack of vision for the long run from founders is a key part of why core ER&D work is not being found among India's AI startups. 'Any entity pitching for undertaking foundational AI engineering comes with a five-year road map, which is the equivalent of multiple decades in the modern-day AI world. It is absolutely true that India is still working on building on top of the engineering that US and other entities are undertaking—and work that could be licensed globally and impact industries holistically are still at a very limited stage in India," said Pratip Mazumdar, co-founder and partner at early-stage venture capital firm, Inflexor Ventures. But the lack of funds is also a key reality. In India, apart from Sarvam's $41-million Series A funding round in December 2023, there have been no large early-stage investments in AI-focused startups. Noida-based and Bengaluru's two startups that, alongside Sarvam, have been the first to be backed by the Centre's $1.2-billion IndiaAI Mission, have raised $5.25 million and $4 million in funding so far, respectively. Gurugram-based Soket AI Labs, the fourth of the first government-backed startups, has yet to raise a venture capital round and only has 'around $3 million from angel investors" so far, according to its founder and chief executive, Abhishek Upperwal. Government support 'This is why the government's AI Mission reducing the cost of access to processors for training AI models is crucial, and we're happy to offer equity to the government in exchange for the access," Upperwal said. Also read: The brain behind Generative AI has his sights set on India 'Venture capital investors in India have a limited appetite for investing in deep-tech R&D, which is crucial for AI startups to build a new foundational AI architecture that can be patented and licensed out for global usage in the long run—we've been trying to raise capital for the past two years, but to no avail," he said. The issue, policy experts said, goes beyond just the startups. A startup 'is only as able as the whole ecosystem—and no single entity can alone solve a fundamental issue in an entire industry", said Rohit Kumar, founding partner of The Quantum Hub and a consultant in various government and public sector initiatives. 'Fundamentally, R&D in India is still not well-prioritized—budgets are too little, and institutions do not have the means that their US and China counterparts have to pursue fundamental innovation," said Kumar. 'Incubators in top engineering institutes are hampered by bureaucratic processes, which isn't seen internationally—India is heavily shackled in these ways." In the long run, though, investors believe that a key balance between core innovation and nifty application development would be the right way forward. Vishesh Rajaram, managing partner at deep tech-focused venture capital firm Speciale Invest, said that while India is 'a little behind the curve at the moment, we haven't missed the bus in AI yet." 'A lot of the foundational work is hard, and has multiple challenges to the tale—access to infrastructure is limited, and the kind of talent that can actually undertake work that would be foundational or be patented is also limited. As a result, there's, of course, room for startups to catch up in terms of core engineering efforts, unlike how many refer to India having missed the opportunity to influence the global electronics and semiconductor industries," Rajaram said. Prayank Swaroop, partner at venture capital firm Accel, said for startups, 'the real opportunity lies in purpose-built AI applications that solve specific problems at scale. We're seeing Indian startups creating targeted solutions using existing foundational models as building blocks—this approach allows faster innovation cycles and can deliver significant value." Others, however, believe that more weight to fundamental innovation is the need of the hour for India. The Quantum Hub's Kumar cited China's technological progress as an example. 'The high-volume, low-margin secondary innovation markets also need to be captured. But, as China has proved, gains made in innovation at scale need to be reinvested into fundamental innovation," he said. 'China is a clear example of how that works, and we need to replicate this in India more efficiently."
