Pakistan's proxy war against Baloch people: ISKP's threats and militarisation of Balochistan

In a region already plagued by decades of militarisation, enforced disappearances, and economic marginalisation, the insertion of an extremist element like ISKP could lead to widespread civilian casualties and further radicalisation read more
Rather than addressing the legitimate grievances of the Baloch people through political dialogue, the state appears to be repeating the failed tactics of proxy warfare. The image shows Baloch people protesting against the enforced disappearance of their family members: X/@MahrangBaloch_
In a striking development, the Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP) recently released a 36-minute propaganda video declaring war on Baloch armed groups, particularly the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and the Baloch Liberation Front (BLF). The group accused these Baloch organisations of killing its members and dismantling an ISKP terror camp in Mastung, Balochistan, during March 2025. More alarmingly, ISKP threatened to target unarmed Baloch civilians, marking a dangerous escalation in an already volatile region.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This declaration of hostility by ISKP has not received a response from Baloch armed groups yet, but it has raised serious concerns about the involvement of state-aligned forces in deploying religious extremism as a counter-insurgency tool against Baloch nationalist movements.
Understanding ISKP: Origins and Evolution
ISKP emerged in late 2014 in eastern Afghanistan as a regional offshoot of ISIS at a time when the latter was at its peak in Syria and Iraq. Composed of former members of the Afghan and Pakistani Taliban as well as recruits from Central and South Asia, ISKP quickly gained notoriety for its indiscriminate violence and anti-civilian operations. After a brief period of decline, the group resurfaced with new force after the Taliban's takeover of Kabul in August 2021.
One of ISKP's deadliest attacks occurred on August 26, 2021, during the US withdrawal from Kabul, killing 13 US servicemen and over 100 civilians at the airport. Since then, it has targeted Taliban officials, foreign diplomats, and religious minorities, using social media for recruitment and propaganda. Its ideological stance rejects the Taliban's vision of Sharia governance, accusing it of betraying Islamic law.
Balochistan as a Strategic Ground: The Proxy Element
The presence of ISKP in Balochistan has been reported multiple times over the years. Some sources allege that senior ISKP operatives have held meetings with remnants of ISIS leadership from Syria and Iraq in this region, indicating efforts to establish a strategic hub in Balochistan to expand its terror activities into South Asia.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Zabihullah Mujahid, spokesperson for the Afghan Taliban government, recently stated that ISKP militants were trained in Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan provinces under the supervision of Pakistani intelligence agencies and were used for cross-border attacks. Although both Islamabad and Kabul have traded accusations of supporting terrorism, neither side has presented concrete evidence. However, recurring ISKP activity in Balochistan lends weight to suspicions of covert facilitation.
The timing of ISKP's video, closely following a press conference by Pakistan's military spokesperson (DG ISPR), who explicitly declared war against Baloch armed groups and BYC leadership, suggests a coordinated psychological and ideological campaign.
State Strategy: Religious Extremism Against Nationalist Movements
The use of extremist proxies is not unprecedented in Pakistan's counterinsurgency doctrine. In the past, groups like Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, Sipah-e-Sahaba, Musallah Defa Tanzeem, and Jaish al-Adl were reportedly used to suppress Baloch nationalist sentiment. These outfits often targeted intellectuals, professors, students, and common citizens under the guise of religious orthodoxy, particularly in regions such as Awaran during the Zikri-Muslim tension.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Such tactics aimed to divide Baloch society along sectarian lines and delegitimise the secular-nationalist leadership. However, these efforts largely failed and instead generated further alienation, resistance, and political awareness among Baloch youth.
BYC Under Siege: Targeting Nonviolent Resistance
The Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC), a peaceful political organisation advocating for the rights of Baloch people, has become the face of civilian resistance. Led by figures like Mahrang Baloch, BYC has mobilised mass protests demanding the return of forcibly disappeared persons, accountability for state violence, and an end to resource exploitation in Balochistan.
Despite its peaceful nature, BYC is now facing a harsh crackdown. Since late March, key leaders have been arrested under draconian laws such as the Maintenance of Public Order (3MPO), while the military has accused BYC of being an Indian proxy—without presenting any credible evidence.
Connecting the dots between the DG ISPR's statements, the ISKP video, and threats to target BYC rallies, many analysts argue this reflects the old 'religious card' being played through a new proxy. The fear is that BYC's unarmed members, especially women and students participating in rallies, may become easy targets for both state-backed repression and extremist attacks.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Resilience of Baloch Armed Groups and Civil Society
The Baloch armed resistance today is at its most advanced phase in decades. Compared to previous insurgencies, groups like the BLA and BLF have developed a more structured command, modern weaponry, and guerrilla capabilities suited to Balochistan's rugged terrain. Reports suggest that Baloch fighters dismantled an ISKP camp in Mastung, allegedly killing up to 30 militants—though no group has formally claimed responsibility. This not only shows their operational strength but also sends a message: Balochistan will not be allowed to become a haven for religious terrorism.
Historically, Baloch nationalist groups have rejected religious extremism, advocating for a secular and democratic political future. They have consistently accused the Pakistani state of creating and manipulating extremist outfits to undermine their cause.
A Dangerous Escalation with Regional Implications
The ISKP video declaring war on Baloch insurgents, coupled with threats to civilian movements like BYC, marks a troubling turn. It reflects a broader strategy to criminalise both armed and peaceful resistance by invoking religious extremism as a counterforce.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In a region already plagued by decades of militarisation, enforced disappearances, and economic marginalisation, the insertion of an extremist element like ISKP could lead to widespread civilian casualties and further radicalisation.
Rather than addressing the legitimate grievances of the Baloch people through political dialogue, the state appears to be repeating the failed tactics of proxy warfare. This not only threatens Baloch society but could destabilise the region further, drawing in regional powers and worsening cross-border tensions.
If history is any guide, such strategies are unlikely to succeed in crushing the Baloch movement—but they may succeed in deepening the tragedy of Balochistan.
Amir Naeem (X: @AmirNaeem800124) is a student of International Relations, International University Islamabad, hailing from Balochistan. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the writer. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News18

27 minutes ago

• News18

Pakistan Politicians Urging Govt To Reconsider Trump's Nobel Peace Prize Nomination: Report

Pakistani leaders are urging their government to reconsider the decision to nominate Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, calling it contradictory to his record on conflicts.

Mint

43 minutes ago

• Mint

Iran-Israel War: Khamenei's advisor threatens – ‘US bases could be attacked in retaliation'

US Strikes Iran: Iran has threatened to target US bases in the Middle East in retaliation after strikes on three nuclear sites of the Islamic Republic on Sunday. Ali Akbar Velayati, an advisor to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said on June 22 that the bases used by US forces could be attacked in retaliation. "Any country in the region or elsewhere that is used by American forces to strike Iran will be considered a legitimate target for our armed forces," he said in a message carried by the official IRNA news agency and reported by AFP news agency. The US officials said on Sunday that the country's military "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites using 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft. The strikes mark an escalation in the ongoing Middle Eastern conflict, with Israel beginning to strike Iran on June 13. Israeli strikes on Iran have so far killed at least 950 people, wounded 3,450 others, news agency AP quoted a human rights group as saying. Iran has said that the United States decided to destroy diplomacy with its strikes on the country's nuclear programme and that the Iranian military will decide the 'timing, nature and scale of Iran's proportionate response.' "America has attacked the heart of the Islamic world and must await irreparable consequences," Velayati said. Amid escalating tensions, the US State Department issued a worldwide caution alert for its citizens travelling or living abroad. Flagging potential travel disruptions and demonstrations, the security alert read, 'The conflict between Israel and Iran has resulted in disruptions to travel and periodic closure of airspace across the Middle East. There is the potential for demonstrations against US citizens and interests abroad.' President Donald Trump urged Iran to end the conflict after he launched surprise strikes on a key underground uranium enrichment site at Fordo, along with nuclear facilities in Isfahan and Natanz. "We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the 'bomb' right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!)" he said on social media. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called on China to encourage Iran not to shut down the Strait of Hormuz after Washington carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Rubio's remarks came after Iran's Press TV reported that the Islamic Republic's parliament has approved the measure to close theStrait of Hormuz, a chokepoint between Iran and Oman through which around 20 per cent of global oil and gas flows. America has attacked the heart of the Islamic world and must await irreparable consequences. Key Takeaways The US military strikes signify a major escalation in the ongoing conflict with Iran. Iran's response may involve targeting US military bases, increasing regional tensions. Diplomatic relations between the US and Iran are severely strained, impacting global security.

Time of India

an hour ago

• Time of India

US issues 'worldwide caution' for Americans over Mideast conflict

The US State Department issued a " worldwide caution " for Americans on Sunday, saying the conflict in the Middle East could put those traveling or living abroad at an increased security risk. "The conflict between Israel and Iran has resulted in disruptions to travel and periodic closure of airspace across the Middle East. There is the potential for demonstrations against US citizens and interests abroad," the State Department's security alert said. "The Department of State advises US citizens worldwide to exercise increased caution." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Neurologists Amazed: These Barefoot Shoes Help Seniors Lose Weight and Live a Life with Less Pain Barefoot Vitality Learn More Undo The statement made no mention of the United States intervening in the conflict overnight when American planes bombed nuclear facilities in Iran, a move that Tehran said would have "irreparable consequences." The Islamic republic on Sunday threatened US bases in the Middle East and warned that US forces could be attacked in retaliation for the unprecedented air strikes that the Pentagon said devastated Iran's nuclear program. Live Events "Any country in the region or elsewhere that is used by American forces to strike Iran will be considered a legitimate target for our armed forces," Ali Akbar Velayati, an advisor to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said in a message carried by the official IRNA news agency. The United States on Saturday began evacuation flights from Israel for American citizens and permanent US residents living in Israel or the West Bank. It also ordered staff at its diplomatic missions in Iraq and Lebanon to leave those countries.