‘A clear pattern of influence' — how corporate lobbying has delayed SA's climate policies

South Africa's biggest polluting companies have worked behind the scenes for nearly two decades to delay and dilute climate policy, according to a new report by nonprofit shareholder activist organisation Just Share.
The Obstruction Playbook: How corporate lobbying threatens South Africa's Just Transition documents how powerful industry actors — including Sasol, Business Unity South Africa (Busa) and the Minerals Council South Africa — have worked persistently, in public and in private, to derail an effective climate policy response by the South African government.
A window into closed-door meetings
Over the past two decades, major polluters and industry associations have regularly met in private with the Treasury and other government officials to discuss climate legislation — engagements that are largely invisible to the public.
While companies made formal submissions during public consultations, much of the real influence happened behind closed doors, through bilateral meetings and direct communication with policymakers.
To uncover the extent of industry influence, Just Share spent two years gathering evidence from public records and documents obtained through Promotion of Access to Information Act (Paia) requests. These included Treasury budget papers, policy documents, draft legislation, and submissions to the Davis Tax Committee.
Just Share reported that accessing records of private meetings between government officials and major polluters was especially difficult — some responses to Paia requests taking months, and even then the information was often incomplete or vague.
'It's not clear whether the government isn't keeping proper records or is just reluctant to share them — we suspect it's the former,' said Emma Schuster, Just Share's senior climate risk analyst, during a webinar to launch the report on Tuesday.
'Especially when it comes to bilateral meetings between the government and high-emitting companies which remain entirely hidden unless specific Paia requests are made. Even then, we have no idea whether we're getting the full picture.'
She noted that despite the length of their report, 'what is striking is how much we can't see — especially bilateral meetings between the government and high-emitting companies, which remain entirely hidden unless someone makes a specific request for that information.
'So, what we offer here is not by any means a comprehensive record of government/business interactions, but even so it demonstrates a clear pattern of influence,' said Schuster.
An unregulated landscape
Unlike in the US or EU, lobbying in South Africa is unregulated. There are no legal requirements for companies or government officials to disclose private meetings or written communications.
'For the most part, it's not even acknowledged as something that happens,' said Schuster. 'Interactions are framed as 'engagements' or, more concerningly, 'partnerships'. And certainly not as the kind of lobbying we associate with the US or Europe.'
The report shows the government often gives in to industry pressure, but this report does not allege corruption — rather, it highlights how an under-resourced state, struggling to deliver on its mandates, often turns to business for support, inadvertently allowing vested interests to take the lead in shaping policy.
'The state's record-keeping is abysmal,' said Schuster. 'This opacity allows corporate influence to flourish unchecked.'
The key players
The report identifies Sasol — South Africa's largest private emitter — alongside powerful industry associations Busa and Minerals Council SA, as central actors in a coordinated effort to stall climate action.
Industry associations play a critical role. 'They allow individual companies to project public commitment to climate action, while the association lobbies on their behalf for weaker regulation,' explained Schuster. Because associations are not subject to customer or shareholder pressure, their lobbying is harder to scrutinise.
'It was particularly striking to us how the positions taken by Busa — which is meant to represent a broad set of corporate interests across multiple sectors — appear to be dominated by the interests of its high emitting members,' she said.
She noted that the report doesn't cover Eskom due to its parastatal status, but acknowledged its significance.
Three core narratives dominate these lobbying efforts:
Positive contribution framing: 'We're essential to jobs and economic growth; don't regulate us.'
Developing country framing: 'SA's emissions are small; others should take the lead.'
Pace and scale framing: 'We support the transition — but not too fast or ambitiously.'
It should be noted that The Presidential Climate Commission's own report, The State of Climate Action in South Africa (2024), challenges fossil fuel companies' narrative that they are indispensable for jobs and economic growth by demonstrating that South Africa's just energy transition (JET) will create significantly more jobs in renewable energy, green hydrogen, and electric vehicles than those lost in coal.
Far from harming the economy, the JET is projected to attract more than R1-trillion in investments, boost energy security, and drive sustainable economic growth, positioning South Africa competitively in the global green economy while addressing climate risks
Daily Maverick reached out to Sasol, Minerals Council SA and and Busa, who are the three main players, for comment in response to the report's findings.
Minerals Council SA described itself as 'the principal advocate for mining in South Africa in engagements with government on policy, taxes and other areas affecting mining', and said it aimed to create 'a conducive policy, legislative and operating environment that facilitates growth and investment to grow the mining industry for the benefit of the economy and all South Africans'.
The council noted that it participated in multi-stakeholder workshops and provided data and responses to industry challenges.
'Our members are supportive of climate action within the national context and are compliant with the relevant laws,' it said.
The council also highlighted that the mining sector was 'leading South Africa's energy transition, with about 16,000 MW of embedded renewable energy projects with an investment value of R275-billion', citing Operation Vulindlela data. These investments, it said, were helping to reduce load shedding, lower operational costs, and support national and global decarbonisation goals.
Sasol said it had 'noted the release of Just Share's report, and we will study this further'.
Business Unity South Africa (Busa) had not responded by the time of publication.
The Carbon Tax Act — a case study in delay and dilution
First proposed in 2006, South Africa's Carbon Tax was designed to apply the 'polluter pays' principle by putting a price on greenhouse gas emissions to encourage reductions.
However, implementation was delayed for more than a decade. The tax only came into effect in June 2019 — and remains one of the weakest carbon pricing mechanisms globally.
Although the nominal tax rate has increased over time, generous tax-free allowances of up to 95% mean the effective rate is far below the global average. The Treasury has proposed maintaining many of these allowances until 2030 or 2031.
Currently, companies pay just R35.40 ($1.90) per ton of CO₂ for combustion emissions, and R11.80 ($0.63) for process emissions — far below the $75 to $100/tCO₂e recommended by the World Bank to meet climate targets.
Sasol, while publicly supporting carbon pricing, has consistently lobbied to retain these allowances. Paia documents show that in Treasury workshops, the company argued that 'higher rates without allowances would harm productivity and job creation', a claim the report calls 'self-serving'.
A clear example of interference
In November 2024, The Treasury released a long-overdue discussion paper on Phase 2 of the carbon tax. The paper proposed key reforms: raising the tax rate by 2030, gradually reducing tax-free allowances, and applying higher rates for emissions above companies' carbon budgets.
'The carbon tax has been delayed for so long, and these were all proposals that really should have been implemented five or more years ago,' explained executive director of Just Share, Tracey Davies
A stakeholder workshop followed in January 2025, attended by industry and civil society groups, where, Davies said,'the Treasury really seemed to be standing firm on this being finally the time to move forward'.
But by February, the national Budget review dropped most of the key proposals.
The proposals had been dropped, just completely disappeared — and it is really fair to say that we were gobsmacked. We could not understand how this could have happened.
So Just Share filed a Paia request to uncover what had changed. The Treasury responded with a list of private meetings it held with Sasol executives in the lead-up to the Budget — three meetings between December 2024 and January 2025, each involving five to seven senior Sasol representatives.
'We don't get the minutes of those meetings — apparently, that is protected by taxpayer confidentiality, even though it's massively in the public interest,' said Davies. 'But the subject of those meetings was the carbon tax discussion paper.'
During the webinar's public Q&A, David le Page, an attendee from Fossil Free South Africa, pointed out that, 'some of the world's most democratic countries — Norway, Sweden and Finland — make tax returns public'.
Davies added that not long after the budget, both Sasol and Minerals Council SA publicly welcomed the decision to drop or dilute Phase 2 proposals. And then Sasol's chief financial officer confirmed the Phase 2 proposals 'would have had a significant impact on Sasol's free cash flow' and welcomed the Treasury's decision to withdraw them.
'So I think there are very logical conclusions to be drawn from that sequence of events,' said Davies.
Climate Change Act
The Climate Change Act, passed in 2024 after years of delays, faced similar corporate pushback.
The report illustrates how corporates successfully pushed to remove criminal penalties for companies that exceed their carbon budgets. Instead, the government proposed a higher carbon tax for over-emitters — an alternative that still requires new regulations and changes to the Carbon Tax Act, none of which have materialised.
Meanwhile, the key sections of the act — those governing corporate carbon budgets — remain dormant. Emitters have also lobbied to align these budgets with the already-weak Carbon Tax Act, effectively making limits more lenient and compliance voluntary.
Combating the imbalance
The report offers several recommendations to begin addressing the power imbalance:
Regulate lobbying: Introduce mandatory disclosure of meetings, submissions and communications between government and private sector actors.
Record and publish meetings: Keep accurate records of all engagements — and make them public by default.
Strengthen civil society input: Ensure meaningful representation from non-industry voices in all climate policy forums.
Reform consultation processes: Prioritise the interests of those most affected by the climate crisis, not just those most able to influence policy.
'This is about more than climate policy — it's about democracy, accountability, and justice,' said Schuster. 'And unless there is action taken to rebalance power in policy making, we risk locking ourselves and future generations into a more dangerous and a less fair world.' DM

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

IOL News

2 hours ago

• IOL News

Celebrating educated young black farmers

Lizzy Nyathi is a member of the youth network ACTIVATE! Change Drivers who used a seedling donation by the network to plant a business that has grown its fruits and influence in many communities, and as a supplier to many retail stores. Lisima Farming Project employs four permanent staff who work at the farm and four seasonal labourers. Her story may not have drawn the attention of the Oval Office on 21 May; however, her commitment to sustainable farming and developing the next generation of young African farmers is adding to the good South African story of the immeasurable role of agriculture Lizzy Nyathi is a member of the youth network ACTIVATE! Change Drivers who used a seedling donation by the network to plant a business that has grown its fruits and influence in many communities, and as a supplier to many retail stores. An educated black female farmer, she is from Mpumalanga and the director of the Lisima farming project (Lisima Trading and project) that is based in the Bushbuckridge Municipality, in a small village called Welverdiend. Educated and passionate about sustainable farming Lizzy holds a degree in agricultural management from the University of Limpopo. For Lizzy, the idea to farm was born during her years as a student, and it grew its legs when she began to facilitate agricultural programs that focused on plant production and horticulture. Through her friends and family's support, she managed to raise funds to the sum of R50,000 to start crop farming. In 2023, she cleared 1ha (hectare) out of 3 and fenced it and started producing from it and ultimately made her first sale in August 2023 to Lebamba Hoedspruit. Nearly two years later, Lizzy has never looked back and recounts both challenges and opportunities that farming has brought her way. Some of her achievements include being a local crop supplier at Spar, Makhoma, Roots, Boxer, Lebamba, Street vendors, community members and several game lodges. Farming requires you to innovate As a small-scale farmer, Lizzy reflects on the challenges of having sufficient resources to meet the demands and make a profit. 'Sometimes our crops get affected when there are seasonal changes, but I kept it up throughout the whole year. With me now supplying the game lodges, I had to consider planting special crops and herbs. I then realised we, as small-scale farmers, incurred so many losses in our production due to an unplanned production system', Nyathi. 'We also tend to have more losses of products like tomatoes because they have a short shelf life. I came up with a way of preserving it for a different function. Now we are happy to say we also produce sun-dried tomatoes, pepper sauce and basil pesto, which we supply to many game lodges, and we also make spices from the herbs we plant on the farm. Some of these dried herbs are used on our processed products', she adds elated. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Zamayirha Peter is an Advocacy Communications Specialist with over eight (8) years of experience in multimedia journalism and communications. Image: Supplied Giving back to those in need Lizzy's approach to farming has been multifaceted and comprised of dynamic interventions to get to her bottom line. Lisima Farming Project not only focuses on growing crops and livestock but also provides a space to teach the next generation of farmers and gives back to the communities that support the business through their social investment project. 'Some of our products are allocated to those in need. We go into households that are without food, and schools that cater for minor kids, such as creches, and we have a program in the community that annually gives Christmas hampers to the needy households on Christmas Day', Nyathi. For Lizzy, farming does not begin and end with what you plant, but with your impact at the community level. 'As a business, we comply with the South African Good Agricultural Practices (SAGAP) standard, and we are HACCP (Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Point) certified', Nyathi. 'For us, farming is not just about production, but we also ensure that we produce food that is healthy to consume, we minimise the use of agrochemicals, and in any way possible, we avoid them altogether', she adds.

Eyewitness News

2 hours ago

• Eyewitness News

Growing calls for SA to lead the UN in drafting a new Human Rights Treaty

JOHANNESBURG - There are growing calls for South Africa to take a lead role in shaping a new United Nations (UN) treaty on crimes against humanity including apartheid. Human rights groups, including international organisation Madre, are urging government to contribute to the drafting process. The calls come after a two-day dialogue co-hosted by the Nelson Mandela foundation, bringing together lawyers, feminists, and civil society to address the legacy of apartheid and other global atrocities. International lawyer Wendy Isaack said existing laws don't go far enough. "International human rights law is not enough because it does not enable individual prosecution of those that should be held accountable for the crime of apartheid which means inhumane acts committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination on the basis of race, and these acts include murder, torture and assassinations that were committed by apartheid era security forces and agents of the state in South Africa," said Isaack. She said the treaty should be broadly applicable to crimes worldwide. "These matters because when we think of apartheid as a domineering system, as a regime that oppressed black people in SA we also bear in mind that when international law is being developed, this law must also be applicable to other contexts, and at the top of our list are the Israeli apartheid policies and practices in occupied Palestinian territory. And the South African government made this very submission in the international court of justice in the 2014 advisory opinion proceedings," said Isaack. South Africa has previously made similar submissions at the International Court of Justice.

IOL News

5 hours ago

• IOL News

Famous Brand shows financial resilience despite tough year marked by deteriorating infrastructure

Famous Brands, owns Wimpy, Steers and Debonairs among other brands Image: File Famous Brands, Africa's largest restaurant franchisor, reported a resilient financial performance for the year ended 28 February 2025 in its annual report, despite challenging operating conditions marked by a deteriorating infrastructure environment, and cash-strapped consumers. The group, which owns and franchises major South African food brands such as Steers, Wimpy, Debonairs Pizza, Mugg & Bean, and Fishaways, posted a 3.2% rise in revenue to R8.28 billion, up from R8.02 billion the previous year. Operating profit grew by 12.6% to R914 million, while headline earnings per share climbed to 520 cents, from 465 cents in 2024. CEO Darren Hele credited the group's performance to disciplined cost containment, brand resilience, and a robust business model. 'Our financial results are thanks to strong cost control, the enduring appeal of our brands, and the resilience built into our business,' Hele said in the annual report. However, Hele did not shy away from describing the difficulties the company faced. 'South Africa is an increasingly tough market to operate in, with rising costs and failing infrastructure,' he noted. Citing power supply issues, he added that Eskom's electricity tariffs increased by 12.7% in July 2024 and are expected to rise by another 11.3% in July 2025, with future hikes likely. Hele pointed to logistics disruptions at South African ports and poor road conditions as additional threats to operations. 'Delays at ports mean we must hold more stock or source from costlier suppliers to avoid shortages,' he said. 'Infrastructure failures - including potholes and malfunctioning traffic lights - have a knock-on effect on consumer behaviour, leading to reduced late-night foot traffic and earlier dining patterns.' Access to clean, reliable water also emerged as a growing concern. 'Water supply has become increasingly unreliable. We are investing in filtration, recycling, and storage at our plants, particularly where water use is highest,' Hele said. As of year-end, 56% of the group's South African restaurants had secured alternative water solutions. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Despite these obstacles, Famous Brands maintained its expansion momentum. Chairperson Chris Boulle praised the resilience of franchise partners who, he said, continued to open and refurbish outlets despite rising electricity, labour, and input costs. Famous Brands has a healthy pipeline of new restaurant openings planned for 2026. He noted the 2025 financial year was characterised by low consumer spending, especially in the first half. To remain competitive, the group made strategic trade-offs, balancing support to franchisees and affordability for customers. This included carefully deciding which supply chain costs to absorb and which to pass on, all while maintaining viable margins across the system. Famous Brands continues to invest in operational efficiency and scalability. A major milestone was the June 2025 opening of a new cold storage facility at the Midrand Campus, a project completed on time and within budget as part of a broader logistics optimisation plan. The group is also focused on modernising its manufacturing plants over the next three years and enhancing its back-end technology to support cost-effective delivery and front-end customer service.