
UPSC Mains Exam 2025: How to choose a right Optional Subject — 5 key factors to consider
A student, an MBBS doctor from a reputed medical college in the country, inquired about the best optional subject for an upcoming UPSC CSE attempt. During the discussion, a suggestion was made – 'With a background in medical sciences, why not choose the same subject as the optional?' The student responded that medical science is a lengthy optional subject and requires more time to cover than average humanities subjects like sociology or anthropology.
This exchange raises questions about the continued relevance of the optional subject in the UPSC Examination Scheme. It is for this reason that many states have eliminated the optional subject component from their respective state examinations.
Nonetheless, since the optional subject is still a part of the UPSC exam cycle, it is important to understand the factors an aspirant should consider while selecting one. It is worth noting that the optional subject carries a weightage of 500 marks out of the total 1750 marks in the Mains stage—amounting to 28.5% of the total. Any decision regarding the optional subject is critical and can either secure a top 10 rank or significantly impact one's chances of selection.
There are a total of 48 optional subjects available, from which a candidate must select one. Of these, 25 are core academic subjects, and 23 are literature-based.
Some of the factors that should be kept in mind while selecting the optional subject are:
If your bachelor's/master's subject is there in the list of the 48 optional subjects of UPSC, the first preference should be given to that subject. The very fact that you've invested 3-5 years in that subject makes that subject a natural choice. Your mind has adapted to the needs of the subject, and you can save a lot of time because you need not read the entire subject from scratch. Also, while choosing an optional subject, a degree of risk management should be involved. An optional subject is a subject that you would be required to read for 1-4 years, if need be, if you appear for multiple attempts. Hence, choosing a subject that's more convenient and comfortable to you would help to tackle it more efficiently and for longer durations. This criterion should command the heaviest weight while selecting the optional subject for UPSC.
There is a lot of debate on social media regarding the 'trending optional subject'. During the era of 1990s, Public Administration used to be the favourite subject, then came History, and currently PSIR, Sociology, and Anthropology are the most sought-after subjects.
As per the UPSC Annual Report 2022-2023:
In optional subjects, the marks awarded by the examiner are not final. If the chief examiner believes that the marking has been too liberal compared to other optional subjects, they have the authority to reduce the scores. This process of moderation is followed by the UPSC, unlike the scaling method adopted by State Public Service Commissions (PSCs).
There is no fixed scheme for moderation, and it varies from year to year. Many myths surrounding this moderation circulate on social media, often pressuring students into choosing specific optional subjects. However, due to a lack of information and transparency, no official moderation criteria are available online. Therefore, this factor should not influence an aspirant's decision when selecting an optional subject.
Several subjects—such as PSIR, Geography, History, and Sociology—have considerable overlap with the General Studies (GS) papers. While this overlap can be a helpful consideration, it should only carry limited weight. It should not be the sole criterion for selecting an optional subject.
To illustrate this point, consider a hypothetical scenario:
Suppose a candidate chooses Geography as the optional subject solely due to its overlap with the GS syllabus, despite not having a strong interest in it. Geography contributes, on average, 90–120 marks to GS Paper I. In attempting to gain these 90–120 marks, the candidate risks the entire 500 marks allocated to the optional papers—merely on the basis of this overlap.
Hence, it is never advisable to compromise the 500 marks of the optional papers just to gain a few additional marks in the GS papers. Overlap should be considered the least important criterion when selecting an optional subject. Think of the optional as a multi-year commitment that can become mentally exhausting if not chosen wisely.
The length of the syllabus varies across optional subjects. Subjects like Mathematics and History have more extensive syllabi, while others like Sociology and Anthropology are comparatively shorter and can typically be completed within 4 to 4.5 months. For working aspirants, the syllabus length can be a significant factor in decision-making.
An interesting data point from the UPSC Annual Report 2022–2023 reveals that while 60.4% of selected candidates in UPSC 2022 were from engineering backgrounds, 80.8% chose humanities-based optional subjects. This implies that a majority of engineering students do not opt for subjects like Physics, Chemistry, or Mathematics as their optional, instead preferring humanities subjects for their more concise syllabi.
Additionally, if a candidate does not select their graduation or post-graduation subject as their optional and chooses a completely new subject, they must consider the availability of teachers and study materials. It is advisable to avoid subjects that lack sufficient academic resources or where qualified guidance is not readily accessible.
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week.
Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
16 hours ago
- The Hindu
Private medical colleges in Telangana credit ₹25,000 stipend, take back ₹20,000 in cash, allege MBBS students
Several MBBS interns in Telangana's private medical colleges have come forward with allegations of non-payment of stipends and systemic intimidation. Despite a 2023 government order mandating a monthly stipend of ₹25,906 for medical interns across both government and private colleges in the State, students say many private institutions are flouting the rule, paying as little as ₹2,000 per month or ₹5,000 in some cases. Speaking to The Hindu, interns from multiple private institutions detailed disturbing practices employed by the administrations to create an illusion of compliance. At Patnam Mahender Reddy Institute of Medical Sciences, for instance, an intern alleged that ₹25,000 is credited to their bank account every month, only to be withdrawn and ₹20,000 returned to the college in cash. 'We are made to open specific bank accounts just for this purpose. It is all a show so they can claim compliance on paper,' said the intern. When students raised these concerns with the college management, they were told that while stipends could not be paid, the institution would waive bus and hostel fees instead. 'But even those promises remain only on paper,' the intern added. 'We work 36-hour to 40‑hour shifts, caring for real patients, often in inadequate facilities and instead of fair pay, we are being extorted and silenced,' said another intern. The issue, long festering under the surface, has recently gained momentum when interns from multiple colleges formed informal groups to protest and submit written representations to their college managements to escalate the matter. Another intern from Chalmeda Anand Rao Medical College in Karimnagar revealed that students receive just ₹2,000 as monthly stipend, and that too as a lumpsum after six months. 'We are sent on compulsory field visits to rural health centres but are not allowed to use our personal vehicles. The college insists we use their bus and then deducts the transport charges from our stipend. So, for two to three months, we end up getting only ₹500 or ₹1,000 as stipend,' the intern said. Fear of administrative backlash is silencing many students. 'If someone raises their voice individually, they are threatened with academic retaliation, blocking logbooks or delaying internship completion. That could make us ineligible for NEET-PG, so most remain silent,' he added. Another intern added that some colleges are allegedly hiding behind a 2003 government order that allowed colleges to collect a one-time 'stipend fee' of ₹5,000 per year. 'They are using a two-decade-old GO to justify this exploitation, even though multiple new GOs and NMC directives have since superseded it,' the intern added. The Hindu contacted both the private medical colleges for their comments on these charges, but there was no response.


Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
Know about Maharashtra's First Medical College — Grant Medical College in Mumbai
The Grant Medical College (GMC) in Mumbai, having been established in 1845, is among the earliest institutions to introduce formal medical education in India. As one of the oldest medical colleges in South Asia, it laid the foundation for western medical practice in the region. At present, the college is affiliated with the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (MUHS) and continues to attract top NEET UG scorers aiming for government MBBS seats in the state. Over time, it developed into a premier institution known for clinical training and medical research, alongside the Sir J J Group of Hospitals, which together form a major healthcare and teaching hub in western India. These institutions are under the administrative control of the Directorate of Medical Education and Research (DMER), Maharashtra. NEET UG 2025 Results: Master the counselling process with these tips The Sir J J Group of Hospitals—named after philanthropist Sir Jamsetjee Jeejeebhoy—have a combined bed strength of 2,844 beds, making them one of the largest public hospital setups in the country. Each year, they cater to over 1.2 million outpatients and more than 80,000 inpatients, with patients coming from across Maharashtra and even central India for specialised and tertiary care. Located in the Byculla area of South Mumbai, the GMC-JJ campus spreads over 44 acres, combining colonial-era architecture with modern facilities. According to its official website, the institute houses 45 clinical and surgical wards, 5 hostels, and 7 canteens, offering residential and support infrastructure for undergraduate and postgraduate students, faculty, and healthcare workers. Its central location in Mumbai makes it easily accessible via local trains and road transport, which is especially vital for emergency and referral cases. Pioneering research and distinguished alumni The college has a long history of contribution to global medicine. It served as the workplace of Sir Waldemar Haffkine, who developed the world's first plague vaccine at the JJ hospital campus in the late 19th century. Nobel laureate Robert Koch also conducted research on cholera here. Among its prominent alumni are Dr Jivraj Mehta, the first Chief Minister of Gujarat and a prominent physician, and Dr V N Shirodkar, a noted gynecologist known for pioneering techniques in obstetrics. Admissions and reputation The Grant Medical College is reputed to be among the known government medical college in the state. The institution admits approximately 250 MBBS students annually through the NEET UG counselling conducted by the Maharashtra CET Cell. Due to its academic standards, clinical exposure, and research opportunities, it remains a top preference among NEET aspirants in Maharashtra.


Hindustan Times
3 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Medical students protest bond policy, fee hike in Punjab
Amid widespread unrest over a recent hike in tuition fees and the introduction of a controversial bond policy, the Medical Student Association (MSA), Punjab, met with medical education minister Dr Balbir Singh at Government Medical College, Amritsar, on Friday to register their protest. Amid widespread unrest over a recent hike in tuition fees and the introduction of a controversial bond policy, the Medical Student Association (MSA), Punjab, met with medical education minister Dr Balbir Singh at Government Medical College, Amritsar, on Friday to register their protest. (Getty Images/iStockphoto/ Representational image) The student delegation submitted a memorandum demanding immediate withdrawal of the corrigendum issued by the Punjab government on June 13, 2025. The corrigendum, which implements a 5% annual fee increase and formalises a compulsory service bond, has triggered protests across the state's medical institutions. 'With fees soaring to ₹ 2.49 lakh annually for government quota students and ₹ 14.94 lakh for private management quota, we are left to survive on a ₹ 15,000 stipend — the lowest in the region,' said Dr Archit Bawa of the MSA. 'If a fee hike is justified annually, why doesn't the stipend increase by the same logic?' Calling the policy 'insensitive and unjust,' students argued it would make medical education inaccessible for students from low-income families. Many pointed out that while the state government takes pride in the success of government school students in NEET-UG, a large number may not be able to afford an MBBS seat even in government colleges due to the revised fee structure. Despite 474 students from government schools clearing NEET-UG this year, financial hurdles now threaten their future. A student from Bathinda's meritorious school who scored 564 marks, and another from Abohar who scored 493, are both eligible for government seats but may not be able to join due to the steep costs. Their fathers work as a tailor and a daily wage labourer, respectively. According to the revised structure, a student would need to spend nearly ₹ 10 lakh over the course of an MBBS degree in a government college. When hostel and mess charges are included, the total climbs to ₹ 13–14 lakh. In contrast, tuition fees in neighboring states remain significantly lower — around ₹ 3.19 lakh in Himachal Pradesh and ₹ 4.5 lakh in Haryana for government colleges. A government school teacher, speaking on condition of anonymity, revealed that several meritorious students have opted for medical colleges outside Punjab under the all-India quota due to the more affordable fee structure. Meanwhile, a senior official from the Punjab medical education department defended the move, calling the 5% hike a 'routine annual revision' initiated during the previous government's tenure in 2020. 'We didn't introduce a new hike this year — it's a continuation of existing policy,' the official claimed. However, student bodies like the MSA and Resident Doctors' Association (RDA) continue to question the logic. 'If quality education is the aim, financial sustainability must also include fair stipends and equitable access,' said Dr. Mehtab Bal of RDA Patiala. Responding to the protests, Dr Balbir Singh assured the students that their concerns would be taken into serious consideration. He reiterated that the government is committed to providing subsidized, quality medical education while acknowledging the need to strike a balance between cost and accessibility.