NHS trust uses offensive 'terf' slang in official guidance despite supreme court ruling
An NHS trust has been criticised for its use of the offensive term 'terf' in a guide on how to support transgender staff.
A document produced by the North East London Foundation Trust (NELFT) used the term, which stands for 'transgender-exclusionary radical feminist', to describe women who do not want to share single-sex facilities with trans women.
The document claims that excluding trans women from women-only spaces in the hospital is unlawful.
It comes after the Supreme Court ruled that a woman is defined by biological sex under equality laws.
The use of the term was flagged to NHS bosses by The Telegraph, who then warned the trust not to use 'derogatory or dismissive language'.
The NELFT is now reviewing its own guidance surrounding single-sex facilities.
The Government's equality watchdog, issued their guidance to charities and public sector organisations following the Supreme Court 's ruling that trans women – men who identify as female – are not women under the law.
Following the court's decision, there was a debate among charities for women about how to interpret the finding.
Many, including Refuge, the UK's largest domestic abuse organisation, and the Girl Guides said they would not let the ruling change the way they treated trans people and looked to the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) for support.
But the EHRC's guidance reiterated the Supreme Court ruling, saying: 'Trans women (biological men) should not be permitted to use the women's facilities.'
The Trust provides services to parts of north and east London as well as Essex and Kent and specialises in community and mental health.
In its staff policy, the trust says it supports colleagues who identify as transgender, as well as non-binary and other gender identities.
The document also references 'trans-exclusionary radical feminists', warning that this group may feel that the inclusion of trans colleagues is an 'infringement on their beliefs and values.
The term 'terf' has appeared on placards at rallies in London since the supreme court ruling.
While most held up signs fighting for trans rights, some activists were seen threatening violence with disturbing images of stabbed and hanged TERFs.
One sign at the protest in London's Parliament Square showed an illustration of hangman alongside the slogan 'The only good TERF is a [hanged] TERF.'
Another read: 'Trans women are women. Trans men are men. If you don't like that, go s*** somewhere else.' Examples on the sign of where to do that included 'on a pile of Harry Potter books' or 'on the head of another TERF'.
One sign at the protest in London's Parliament Square showed an illustration of hangman alongside the slogan 'The only good TERF is a [hanged] TERF'
A women's rights campaigner said the slur was used to incite violence against women.
They told the Telegraph: ''Given that the term terf has been used to dehumanise and silence women it is particularly egregious that this slur is used in the Equality Impact Assessment which is supposed to be the fair and balanced legal section required under the Public Services Duty in the Equality Act'.
The guidance for staff at the NELFT was written by DEI managers alongside LGBTQ staff network leaders. It was also signed off by two of the trust's executives.
The document came after Maya Forstater, co-founder of charity Sex Matters, won an employment tribunal which declared gender critical beliefs were protected in a democracy.
Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at the charity, said the NELFT's attitude towards women 'reflects the abysmal response from many NHS trusts to the Supreme Court judgement'.
'Terf is a term used by trans activists to demonise women who are working to restore and protect hard-fought rights to single-sex services and spaces,' she said.
'By the time this guidance was published, Forstater v CGD had already established that gender-critical views are legally protected, further illustrating the long-standing contempt for the law within the NHS.'
The Trust, like others in London, currently allows trans women to share wards and lavatories with other women. It has also received a gold award for its commitment to LGBTQ policies by the controversial charity Stonewall.
Some members of the leading doctors' union, the British Medical Association (BMA) condemned the Supreme Court ruling.
Biology in medicine, a group of doctors campaigning for patients to be treated according to biological sex said it was 'destroying trust in medicine', accusing the BMA of 'medical misogyny'.
An NHS spokesperson said: 'Organisations across the NHS are reviewing their policies and guidance to bring them in line with the Supreme Court judgment, and this will take some time. Guidance for staff should clearly not include derogatory or dismissive language, and trusts must take this into account as part of their reviews.'
A Department for Health and Social Care spokesman said: 'Single-sex spaces are protected in law and will always be protected by this Government, and we expect Trusts to follow the clarity that the Supreme Court ruling provides.'
A spokesman for NELFT said: 'We are reviewing the content of the guidance in light of the recent ruling, as well as the language used to ensure it is respectful and promotes inclusivity, and we will reissue once complete.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Diane Abbott is both an old Leftie and a true Tory
Whenever MPs legislate some monstrosity, we are often assured that the debate reflected 'the House of Commons at its best', as though an odious bill is rendered less odious by everyone having observed parliamentary niceties. Anyone seeking such solace after the approval of Kim Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will have a search on their hands. Friday's debate only confirmed what a wretched, incurious and insubstantial Parliament we have, with few exceptions. One of them is Diane Abbott, the Mother of the House. She used her allotted time to make one final plea to her colleagues not to take the NHS into the killing business. It was a speech both practical and humanist but marked above all by scepticism. Abbott lodged no religious objection. She is not, she pointed out, implacably opposed to assisted suicide; she simply could not vote for such a dangerously flawed piece of legislation. Abbott spoke a language Leadbeater displays no fluency in: doubt. She told MPs she 'would not put my life, or the life of anyone dear to me, in the hands of a panel of officials'. As for those who asserted that assisted suicide would always be voluntary, she accused the Bill's supporters of failing to consider people primed to defer to authority, who would 'think that, because their doctor raises it with them at all, they are being guided in that direction'. Pro-suicide MPs might not 'take seriously' such concerns but 'anyone who knows how institutions work should be watchful of it'. Here was a socialist warning against excessive deference to public sector bureaucrats and sainted NHS doctors. She showed an up-close understanding of the state's flaws that could only come from someone who has spent a career advocating state intervention. There is no conservative like an old Leftie. The MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington says she came into politics with hopes of being 'a voice for the voiceless'. Who, she asked her colleagues to imagine, 'could be more voiceless than somebody who is in their sick bed and believes that they are dying?' We all probably know someone who doesn't want to make a fuss or be a burden on their loved ones. 'Within the family,' Abbott said, 'the most powerful coercion is silence: it is the failure to answer when a question is put'. How many people will fall silent and go along with what they imagine to be in the best interests of the people around them? We are about to find out. What we can take a guess at is the demographic profile of those who will respond in this way. It will be older women, socialised to put their husband and children first. Women from minority religious and ethnic backgrounds, communities where it is traditional for men to do the talking and the decision-making and for women to be talked to and have final decisions presented to them. Such people exist beyond the ken of a House of Commons populated by privileged graduate professionals, those who, in Abbott's words, 'have for the entirety of their adult life been confident in dealing with authority and institutions'. What about those who don't share that confidence? When you legislate with only Esther Rantzen in mind, you're going to overlook a lot of people. Diane Abbott didn't just give a good speech. MPs give good speeches all the time. She took a stand at an hour of great moral failing and made the case for social conscience at a time of personal vanity. When a future Parliament comes to reckon with what this Parliament has done, it will look back with contempt upon a fit of callousness posing as compassion.
North Wales Live
an hour ago
- North Wales Live
Brit fighting for life in Crete after contracting Legionnaires' disease on holiday
A British woman is critically ill in a Greek hospital after becoming serioulsy ill during an all-inclusive holiday to Crete. Donna Jobling, 57, from west Hull, was rushed to intensive care at Venizeleio Hospital in Heraklion with her life hanging in the balance; her family were told it was "touch and go whether she would survive". The Hull mum had been soaking up the sun with husband Sidney and their friends Paula and Nicolas Mason when she started feeling poorly on June 5. What started as a chest infection quickly escalated into a severe illness, and within two days Donna was admitted to hospital and placed into an induced coma. Her niece Claire told Hull Live that tests confirmed Donna contracted Legionnaires' disease caused by the bacteria Legionella pneumophila, According to the NHS, Legionnaires' disease is a lung infection you can get from inhaling droplets of water from things like contaminated air conditioning systems or hot tubs. Donna's infection triggered acute respiratory failure and pneumonia, her family said, and they are now praying for her recovery. Claire, 42, said: "We are all devastated and beside ourselves." She added: "We were told it was touch and go whether she would survive. We are all praying for her. She is stable but under constant watch. We flew out there but had to come back because of work and family commitments. I'm still waiting for documents but will go back with them as soon as I have them." Husband Sidney, a former police officer, remains by Donna's bedside with Claire describing her auntie as "like a mother to us all". "It is quite strict in the intensive care unit," Claire admitted. "You only get 30 minutes to visit. But she is well looked after." Paula and Nicholas, who also went on the £1,500-per-couple holiday, returned to Hull on June 12 and said the illness came out of nowhere. "It was lovely at the start of the holiday. We all walked everywhere," Paula, 52, said. "Then it came out from nowhere. She has a lot of health problems anyway. But she became seriously ill and the doctor said she had to be taken to hospital and they have put her in an induced coma in the intensive care unit." The source of the Legionnaires' Disease has not yet been identified. Easyjet Holidays, with whom the couples travelled, are aware of the issue and have provided alternative hotel options to current and future guests. A spokesperson said: "We're so sorry to hear that Ms Jobling is unwell, and we're continuing to support her and her family in every way we can. As soon as we were made aware of reports of illness, we immediately took action and contacted customers who were already staying in the hotel, or due to travel in the next four weeks, to provide alternative hotel options. "We've also been in touch with customers who recently returned home from this hotel, to inform them of necessary guidance. Our customers' safety and wellbeing is our top priority, and we'll continue to do all we can to support them."
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Dorset hospital discharges improve, hears wellbeing board
Extended hospital stays for patients medically well enough to be discharged are improving, a county's health and wellbeing board has use of apps and partnership working have seen delayed stays shorten from more than 10 days to seven in some Dorset hospital settings - and from 30 to 20 days for people with more complex needs, it was told.A patient at Blandford Hospital, who had been on the wards for 100 days beyond the point she could medically be discharged, was now back home thanks to the efforts of four different teams, the Dorset Council committee was board was being updated on the progress of a council programme called Future Care. Councillors were told much of the success was down to staff in health, social services and social care who had "embraced change" and made the new methods work to the benefit of patients staying in hospital beds longer than they needed to, freeing the beds for more pressing programmes across the county are costing £9m, mainly paid for by NHS are estimated to deliver £36m in benefits up until 2029/2030, councillors Miller, vice chair of the board, said: "This programme is about making sure that as many as possible who go through our service have a really, really positive experience and it's also an experience that improves their health outcomes."Steve Robinson, the board's chair, said the new way of working was the "way it should be, different agencies coming together for the benefit of the patient".He said it was about "putting aside titles and saying 'what is best for this person?'." You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
